Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

► remove from comparison AMD Z1 Extreme

The AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series and fastest model of the U-series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports SMT (hyperthreading , 16 threads). The cores clock from 3.3 (base) up to 5.1 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

The performance of the R7 7840U is, depending on the workload, only slightly below the Ryzen 7 7840HS (higher base clock speed and TDP). Compared to the previous generation Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, the 7840U is clearly faster thanks to the Zen 4 architecture and higher clock speeds. Compared to the similar Ryzen 7 7840U, the Z1 Extreme offers no AI engine.

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.7 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 15 and 30 Watt.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 7840U

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series and fastest model of the U-series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (16 threads). The cores clock from 3.3 (base) up to 5.1 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

Compared to the consumer Ryzen 7 7840U, the PRO models offer additional security, manageability, and reliability features designed for professional users and workstation environments.

The performance of the R7 PRO 7840U is, depending on the workload, only slightly below the Ryzen 7 7840HS (higher base clock speed and TDP). Compared to the previous generation Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, the 7840U is clearly faster thanks to the Zen 4 architecture and higher clock speeds.

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.7 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 15 and 30 Watt.

ModelAMD Ryzen Z1 ExtremeAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
CodenamePhoenix (Zen 4)Phoenix (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4)
Series: Phoenix (Zen 4) Phoenix (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Clock3300 - 5100 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 168 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP30 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
max. Temp.100 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Z1 Extreme
38.9 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 PRO 7840U
38.2 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 13004     avg: 14361     median: 14960 (14%)     max: 15120 Points
min: 10576     avg: 13277     median: 13767 (13%)     max: 15142 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1733     avg: 1748     median: 1733 (73%)     max: 1779 Points
min: 1703     avg: 1719     median: 1716 (72%)     max: 1747 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 672     avg: 679     median: 672 (73%)     max: 692 Points
min: 652     avg: 666     median: 669 (73%)     max: 684 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5109     avg: 5576     median: 5794 (14%)     max: 5825 Points
min: 4210     avg: 5202     median: 5377 (13%)     max: 5981 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2050     avg: 2261     median: 2336 (15%)     max: 2397 Points
min: 1590     avg: 2096     median: 2218 (14%)     max: 2418 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 262     avg: 270     median: 268 (74%)     max: 280 Points
min: 247     avg: 263     median: 265 (73%)     max: 273 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 56966     avg: 61359     median: 62657 (36%)     max: 64454 MIPS
min: 34490     avg: 54214     median: 58386 (34%)     max: 62320 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6077     avg: 6197     median: 6196.5 (73%)     max: 6316 MIPS
min: 5633     avg: 5871     median: 5900 (70%)     max: 5988 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 16.3     avg: 17.8     median: 18.4 (32%)     max: 18.7 fps
min: 13.6     avg: 16.1     median: 16.5 (29%)     max: 17.8 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 365     avg: 392.3     median: 366 (5%)     max: 446 Seconds
min: 354     avg: 440.6     median: 390 (5%)     max: 664 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 213     avg: 213.5     median: 213.5 (2%)     max: 214 Seconds
min: 217     avg: 263.4     median: 237 (2%)     max: 380 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4447     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4662 sec
min: 0.4658     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4807 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 15202     avg: 18467     median: 18941.5 (47%)     max: 20784 Points
min: 16111     avg: 17318     median: 17331.5 (43%)     max: 18499 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
15761 Points (40%)
min: 16274     avg: 17360     median: 17641 (45%)     max: 18165 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 19305     avg: 23844     median: 24785 (44%)     max: 26499 Points
min: 19497     avg: 22472     median: 23519 (42%)     max: 24045 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6281     avg: 8599     median: 8764.5 (37%)     max: 10587 Points
min: 7179     avg: 8178     median: 8317 (35%)     max: 8657 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2530     avg: 2537     median: 2534 (63%)     max: 2550 Points
min: 1896     avg: 2366     median: 2479 (62%)     max: 2508 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 10872     avg: 11404     median: 11358.5 (44%)     max: 12026 Points
min: 7596     avg: 10709     median: 11130 (43%)     max: 12069 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2518 Points (80%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
11285 Points (46%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1896     avg: 1917     median: 1907.5 (75%)     max: 1956 Points
min: 1740     avg: 1824     median: 1853 (72%)     max: 1895 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9589     avg: 10256     median: 10258 (18%)     max: 10917 Points
min: 9663     avg: 10246     median: 9968 (18%)     max: 10920 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 536     avg: 546     median: 546 (1%)     max: 556 ms
min: 523     avg: 550     median: 562 (1%)     max: 571 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 86617     avg: 89260     median: 89260 (65%)     max: 91903 Points
min: 85772     avg: 87443     median: 87442.5 (64%)     max: 89113 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 248     avg: 262.5     median: 262.5 (72%)     max: 277 Points
min: 234     avg: 239.5     median: 239.5 (66%)     max: 245 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 300     avg: 345.3     median: 304 (55%)     max: 432 Points
min: 259     avg: 283.4     median: 283 (51%)     max: 317 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1693     avg: 1706     median: 1705.5 (64%)     max: 1718 Points
min: 1533     avg: 1606     median: 1595 (60%)     max: 1669 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 42.2     avg: 50.9     median: 50.9 (9%)     max: 59.6 Watt
min: 39.7     avg: 49.9     median: 53.1 (9%)     max: 57.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
64.7 Watt (12%)
55.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 8.09     avg: 10.5     median: 10.4 (7%)     max: 12.8 Watt
min: 5.18     avg: 7     median: 6.9 (5%)     max: 8.88 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.95     avg: 7.7     median: 5.9 (7%)     max: 12.3 Watt
min: 4.4     avg: 5.4     median: 5.2 (6%)     max: 7.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
36.1 Points per Watt (27%)
40 Points per Watt (30%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U → 96% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 14. 08:52:48

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15017 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15058 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755154367s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Aug 2025 05:18:40 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15017 +0.003s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 15017 +0.007s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15058 +0.003s ... 0.017s

#10 got single benchmarks 15058 +0.007s ... 0.024s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.026s ... 0.05s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.051s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)