Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155H vs Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 7940HS is a powerful Phoenix family APU that saw the light of day in H1 2023. Its 8 cores are powered by the Zen 4 architecture and are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads. 4.0 GHz is the base clock speed and the highest Boost clock speed achievable is 5.2 GHz.

The 7940HS introduces Ryzen AI which is AMD's answer to Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies. The Radeon 780M serves as the integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has. Ryzen AI is set to give applications such as DaVinci Resolve and Photoshop quite a bit of generative AI magic.

More importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

The 7940HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast RAM (up to LPDDR5x-7500 or DDR5-5600, including ECC-enabled memory). The processor is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt; PCIe support is limited to the 4.0 spec for a throughput of 1.97 GB/s per lane.

OS support is limited to 64-bit editions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 and of course to Linux. Note that the chip isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7940HS in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-12900HK and also, somewhat disappointingly, the Ryzen 7 7840HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 80 W, the ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY is among the fastest laptops built around the 7940HS that we know of. It can be about 15% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) running at up to 2,800 MHz. This is a very fast iGPU, as of late 2023. It will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p, and it is also capable of HW-encoding and HW-decoding most video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1, but more importantly it is fast enough for proper 1080p gaming as long as one is fine with low to medium detail settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 7940HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 155H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a high-end laptop processor of the Meteor Lake series that has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. This 1st Gen Core Ultra chip has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; its 16 cores are comprised of 6 HT-enabled Performance cores running at up to 4.8 GHz and 10 Efficient cores (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) running at up to 3.8 GHz.

The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.30 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestwood architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 7 155H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 155H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official performance data published by Intel, then the 155H is about as fast as the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.30 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is almost as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 7 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. Its Base power consumption is supposed to be around 64 W, however, most laptop makers will probably go for a higher value to get higher clock speeds and thus better performance. Either way, a powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 155H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 185H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is the top-of-the-line Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 6, are SMT-enabled and run at up to 5.1 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) run at up to 3.8 GHz. The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.35 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, such as the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestwood architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while the rest of the chip is turned off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes that this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 9 185H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 185H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official Intel performance data, then the 185H is not a whole lot faster than the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.35 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is about as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 9 series processor has a "base" power consumption of 45 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. A powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 185H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 7940HSIntel Core Ultra 7 155HIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Intel Meteor Lake-HIntel Meteor Lake-H
CodenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Meteor Lake-HMeteor Lake-H
Series: Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H « 3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Clock4000 - 5200 MHz3800 - 4800 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB24 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1616 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
16 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP35 Watt28 Watt45 Watt
Technology4 nm7 nm7 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C110 °C110 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8BGA2049BGA2049
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7940HS
46.2 pt (64%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 155H
42.1 pt (58%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 185H
44.2 pt (61%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
min: 104     avg: 106     median: 106 (74%)     max: 108 Points
min: 2.2     avg: 87.5     median: 102.8 (71%)     max: 107.2 Points
min: 108     avg: 109     median: 109 (76%)     max: 110 Points
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
min: 824     avg: 912     median: 937.5 (17%)     max: 972 Points
min: 6.94     avg: 724     median: 773 (14%)     max: 1024 Points
min: 828     avg: 948     median: 947.5 (18%)     max: 1067 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15556     avg: 16952     median: 16985 (16%)     max: 18131 Points
min: 9769     avg: 14873     median: 14777 (14%)     max: 19007 Points
min: 12688     avg: 17445     median: 18177 (17%)     max: 19851 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1733     avg: 1787     median: 1791 (76%)     max: 1832 Points
min: 1496     avg: 1727     median: 1749 (74%)     max: 1801 Points
min: 1620     avg: 1803     median: 1810.5 (77%)     max: 1906 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 680     avg: 701     median: 702 (78%)     max: 714 Points
min: 620     avg: 667     median: 671 (75%)     max: 693 Points
min: 622     avg: 694     median: 700.5 (78%)     max: 735 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6277     avg: 6635     median: 6640 (16%)     max: 7111 Points
min: 3798     avg: 5762     median: 5671 (14%)     max: 7409 Points
min: 4843     avg: 6712     median: 7138.5 (17%)     max: 7651 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2470     avg: 2687     median: 2663 (17%)     max: 2848 Points
min: 1950     avg: 2452     median: 2476 (16%)     max: 2857.55 Points
min: 1581.9     avg: 2669     median: 2777.5 (18%)     max: 3165 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 277     avg: 283.7     median: 284 (86%)     max: 288 Points
min: 230     avg: 254.2     median: 255 (77%)     max: 268 Points
min: 238     avg: 262.8     median: 264.5 (80%)     max: 280 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.8     avg: 30.3     median: 30.3 (39%)     max: 30.88 Points
min: 29.98     avg: 31.7     median: 31.7 (41%)     max: 33.49 Points
34 Points (44%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.34     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (85%)     max: 3.46 Points
min: 3.07     avg: 3.1     median: 3.1 (77%)     max: 3.13 Points
3.3 Points (81%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7798     avg: 7881     median: 7880.5 (48%)     max: 7963 Points
min: 9828     avg: 9874     median: 9873.5 (60%)     max: 9919 Points
10300 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 47982     avg: 48914     median: 48913.5 (35%)     max: 49845 Points
min: 56242     avg: 58357     median: 58357 (42%)     max: 60472 Points
59935 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 84721     avg: 86625     median: 86625 (60%)     max: 88529 Points
min: 13726     avg: 54366     median: 54365.5 (38%)     max: 95005 Points
88902 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14300     avg: 14516     median: 14515.5 (18%)     max: 14731 Points
min: 13938     avg: 48020     median: 48020 (58%)     max: 82102 Points
14374 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 66.801     avg: 82.5     median: 82.5 (1%)     max: 98.222 s
139.6 s (2%)
min: 292.1     avg: 366.7     median: 366.7 (4%)     max: 441.275 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.648     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 2.698 s
3.5 s (1%)
min: 3.254     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (1%)     max: 8.1 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
482 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
3.4 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7439     avg: 7465     median: 7464.5 (12%)     max: 7490 Points
min: 7084     avg: 7404     median: 7403.5 (12%)     max: 7723 Points
min: 7940     avg: 12898     median: 12898 (20%)     max: 17856 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 66408     avg: 70832     median: 70707 (41%)     max: 73434 MIPS
min: 42601     avg: 58800     median: 60099 (35%)     max: 70074 MIPS
min: 52522     avg: 67897     median: 69924 (40%)     max: 76331 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6417     avg: 6643     median: 6642 (79%)     max: 6776 MIPS
min: 5037     avg: 5349     median: 5401 (65%)     max: 5540 MIPS
min: 4502     avg: 5381     median: 5524.5 (66%)     max: 5781 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 140.8     avg: 145.8     median: 145.8 (51%)     max: 150.8 fps
min: 128.04     avg: 141.1     median: 141.1 (49%)     max: 154.15 fps
158.2 fps (55%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 292.5     avg: 298.5     median: 298.5 (69%)     max: 304.5 fps
min: 282.57     avg: 303.8     median: 303.8 (70%)     max: 325 fps
335.5 fps (77%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.1     avg: 21.1     median: 20.9 (37%)     max: 22.6 fps
min: 9.93     avg: 16.4     median: 16.4 (29%)     max: 21.2 fps
min: 14.1     avg: 19.5     median: 20.8 (37%)     max: 22.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.3     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (0%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
min: 0.944     avg: 1     median: 1 (0%)     max: 1 GB/s
min: 0.96     avg: 1     median: 1 (0%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.1 GB/s (36%)
1.7 GB/s (29%)
min: 1.4     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (28%)     max: 1.8 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 14.8     avg: 15     median: 15 (39%)     max: 15.1 GB/s
min: 10.2     avg: 10.4     median: 10.4 (27%)     max: 10.6 GB/s
min: 7.9     avg: 9.6     median: 9.6 (25%)     max: 11.3 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 287     avg: 306.9     median: 305 (4%)     max: 331 Seconds
min: 296     avg: 420.3     median: 397 (5%)     max: 637 Seconds
min: 285     avg: 357.4     median: 327.5 (4%)     max: 538 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 182     avg: 190.4     median: 188.5 (1%)     max: 202 Seconds
min: 178     avg: 234.3     median: 225 (2%)     max: 349 Seconds
min: 163     avg: 201.3     median: 190 (1%)     max: 285 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4159     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4467 sec
min: 0.4609     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.516 sec
min: 0.4457     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.503 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14891     avg: 15553     median: 15689 (33%)     max: 15851 Points
13097 Points (28%)
min: 9854     avg: 11420     median: 11420 (24%)     max: 12986 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.058     avg: 7.3     median: 7.3 (2%)     max: 7.442 s
min: 7.046     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.168 s
min: 6.6     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (1%)     max: 6.751 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.513     avg: 18     median: 18 (1%)     max: 18.402 s
min: 15.767     avg: 16     median: 15.9 (1%)     max: 16.125 s
14.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 529.929     avg: 531     median: 531.4 (2%)     max: 532.8 s
min: 394.754     avg: 397.5     median: 397.5 (2%)     max: 400.292 s
304.4 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 74246     avg: 80834     median: 80476.5 (70%)     max: 86583 Points
min: 62245     avg: 68433     median: 68432.5 (60%)     max: 74620 Points
80494 Points (70%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 16799     avg: 22601     median: 22587.5 (61%)     max: 25006 Points
min: 6531     avg: 17980     median: 19912 (54%)     max: 23598 Points
min: 12693     avg: 20942     median: 21875 (59%)     max: 24629 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 79935     avg: 88670     median: 89772 (73%)     max: 96559 Points
min: 68032     avg: 76390     median: 79025 (64%)     max: 85435 Points
min: 75240     avg: 75478     median: 75478 (61%)     max: 75716 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 79450     avg: 88483     median: 89602 (73%)     max: 96418 Points
66925 Points (54%)
min: 75340     avg: 75417     median: 75417 (61%)     max: 75494 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 85305     avg: 91108     median: 92030 (78%)     max: 96047 Points
min: 78677     avg: 84868     median: 84868 (71%)     max: 91059 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13400     avg: 19703     median: 21112 (53%)     max: 21353 Points
min: 7073     avg: 15232     median: 16405 (42%)     max: 19549 Points
min: 17876     avg: 18479     median: 18664 (47%)     max: 18896 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24034     avg: 28329     median: 28504 (51%)     max: 30876 Points
min: 5249     avg: 22153     median: 23288.5 (42%)     max: 28337 Points
min: 21106     avg: 27129     median: 27113 (48%)     max: 30623 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 10388     avg: 11211     median: 11210 (47%)     max: 12212 Points
min: 3922     avg: 8634     median: 9368 (39%)     max: 12145 Points
min: 6307     avg: 10831     median: 11696 (49%)     max: 12209 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2426     avg: 2618     median: 2630 (71%)     max: 2746 Points
min: 1901     avg: 2388     median: 2414 (65%)     max: 2459 Points
min: 2199     avg: 2459     median: 2499 (67%)     max: 2570 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 9899     avg: 12185     median: 12249 (48%)     max: 13470 Points
min: 10464     avg: 12459     median: 12539 (49%)     max: 13656 Points
min: 12825     avg: 13697     median: 13864 (55%)     max: 14160 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1823     avg: 1982     median: 1994.5 (84%)     max: 2032 Points
min: 1689     avg: 1765     median: 1768 (75%)     max: 1824 Points
min: 1700     avg: 1825     median: 1847.5 (78%)     max: 1902 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11207     avg: 11870     median: 11837.5 (21%)     max: 12500 Points
min: 10017     avg: 12075     median: 12248 (22%)     max: 13556 Points
min: 10441     avg: 13019     median: 13109 (23%)     max: 14230 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1764     avg: 1874     median: 1906 (8%)     max: 1918 Points
min: 1684     avg: 1712     median: 1708 (7%)     max: 1745 Points
min: 1821     avg: 1826     median: 1825.5 (8%)     max: 1830 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11232     avg: 11567     median: 11454 (36%)     max: 12127 Points
min: 11684     avg: 12163     median: 12366 (39%)     max: 12438 Points
min: 13228     avg: 13600     median: 13600 (43%)     max: 13972 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7410     avg: 7856     median: 7904 (79%)     max: 8253 Points
min: 6838     avg: 6883     median: 6882.5 (69%)     max: 6927 Points
7602 Points (76%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 45905     avg: 46966     median: 46270 (51%)     max: 48723 Points
min: 43897     avg: 44574     median: 44573.5 (49%)     max: 45250 Points
47960 Points (53%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 481     avg: 497.2     median: 499 (1%)     max: 515 ms
min: 416.4     avg: 533     median: 534.5 (1%)     max: 585 ms
min: 494     avg: 524     median: 517 (1%)     max: 594 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
89067 Points (80%)
min: 77142     avg: 87778     median: 89268 (80%)     max: 93476 Points
min: 90543     avg: 94193     median: 93980 (84%)     max: 98055 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 234     avg: 261.2     median: 263 (76%)     max: 271 Points
min: 236     avg: 254     median: 256 (74%)     max: 263 Points
min: 237     avg: 260.6     median: 267.3 (77%)     max: 269 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 302     avg: 319.9     median: 317 (66%)     max: 349 Points
min: 255     avg: 279.2     median: 278 (58%)     max: 299 Points
min: 237     avg: 281.5     median: 292 (61%)     max: 295 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1674     avg: 1784     median: 1792 (69%)     max: 1861 Points
min: 1366     avg: 1669     median: 1685 (65%)     max: 1903 Points
min: 1589     avg: 1757     median: 1736.5 (67%)     max: 1971 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 70     avg: 103.1     median: 105.2 (18%)     max: 130.1 Watt
min: 37.1     avg: 71.3     median: 65.9 (11%)     max: 168 Watt
min: 44.4     avg: 112.9     median: 125.7 (22%)     max: 176.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 73     avg: 107.5     median: 110.4 (20%)     max: 134 Watt
min: 46.9     avg: 91     median: 87.9 (16%)     max: 160.1 Watt
min: 88     avg: 138.3     median: 154.9 (28%)     max: 171.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.81     avg: 13.3     median: 15.5 (10%)     max: 20.1 Watt
min: 3.12     avg: 6.6     median: 5.5 (4%)     max: 19.6 Watt
min: 5.87     avg: 11.2     median: 11.4 (8%)     max: 19.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 9.82     avg: 15.9     median: 15.6 (17%)     max: 21.5 Watt
min: 4.35     avg: 11     median: 7.5 (8%)     max: 90.3 Watt
min: 11.7     avg: 15.4     median: 13.1 (14%)     max: 28.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 21.9     avg: 26.5     median: 25.5 (19%)     max: 33.8 Points per Watt
min: 17.7     avg: 32.1     median: 29.6 (22%)     max: 64.7 Points per Watt
min: 17.8     avg: 30.5     median: 24.3 (18%)     max: 67 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS → 100% n=52

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 155H → 97% n=52

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 185H → 100% n=52

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 17. 21:37:37

#0 checking url part for id 14946 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16906 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16921 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.036s ... 0.037s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.037s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14946 +0.02s ... 0.057s

#8 got single benchmarks 14946 +0.049s ... 0.106s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 16906 +0.019s ... 0.126s

#10 got single benchmarks 16906 +0.084s ... 0.209s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 16921 +0.016s ... 0.225s

#12 got single benchmarks 16921 +0.032s ... 0.257s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.257s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.672s ... 0.929s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.929s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)