Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 7535U vs Intel Core i7-10750H

AMD Ryzen 5 7535U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 7535U

The AMD Ryzen 5 7535U is a processor for thin and light laptops based of the Rembrandt refresh generation. The Ryzen packs six of the eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 2.9 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.55 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (12 threads). The chip is manufactured in 6 nm FinFET at TSMC. The 7535U is the refresh of the 2022 AMD Ryzen 5 6600U and offers 50 MHz higher boost clock at a 3W higher maximum TDP.

The Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip offers modern features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4 and DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s.

The performance should be quite similar to the old Ryzen 5 6600U due to only a slightly increased boost speed (+50MHz) and TDP (28 versus 15-25W).

The integrated GPU Radeon 660M is still a fast iGPUs based on the RDNA2 architecture and offers 6 of the 12 CUs at up to 1.9 GHz.

The Ryzen 7535U is manufactured in 6nm FinFET at TSMC and specified at a TDP of 28W.

Intel Core i7-10750H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-10750H

The Intel Core i7-10750H is a fast 45 W processor designed for use in larger, beefier laptops. The Comet Lake-H family CPU was launched in mid-2020. It features six cores (twelve threads) running at 2.6 GHz Boosting up to 5 GHz (single-core Boost). The likely all-core Boost frequency is 4.3 GHz. Most of the specs are the same as the 10750H’s direct predecessor, the i7-9750H. The newer model has two advantages over its predecessor in that its Boost frequency is higher and the memory controller can now officially host memory clocked at 2,933 MHz, an upgrade over the 2,666 MHz limitation of the outgoing model.

Architecture

Comet Lake is a yet another revision of the dated Skylake architecture (not unlike the previous Coffee Lake, Whiskey Lake, Kaby Lake families) for similar feature set and performance-per-MHz figures. Core i7-10750H is manufactured on the third-gen 14 nm Intel process that is undeniably inferior to TSMC's 7 nm process, the one AMD’s Ryzen 4000 series laptop-grade processors are manufactured on.

The hexa-core CPU is compatible with up to 128 GB of dual-channel DDR4-2933 RAM and has support for PCI-Express 3.0 and Thunderbolt 3 but not the professional features (vPro, TXT, SIPP) as found in the case of Core i7-10850H.

Both the CPU cores and the iGPU have access to 12 MB of L3 cache. Four PCI-Express 3.0 lanes allow for read/write rates of up to 3.9 GB/s provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

The 10750H gets soldered permanently on to the motherboard (BGA1440 socket interface) and is thus pretty much impossible to replace.

Performance

Multi-thread performance is most similar to the Core i5-10500H, the Core i5-11400H and also the Ryzen 7 4700U. While perhaps not the best bang for the buck, the i7 is fast enough for any task, gaming included, as of late 2021.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 75 W, the ThinkPad P15 Gen 1-20ST000DGE is among the fastest laptops built around the 10750H that we know of. It can be about 80% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

We've known the Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU for a while. This is the same iGPU the Core i7-9750H and Core i7-8750H processors had. In this i7, the 24 EU iGPU is clocked at 350 MHz to 1,150 MHz.

Intel UHD Graphics 630 will let you connect up to 3 monitors with resolutions of up to 4096x2304@60. The built-in video decoder will happily handle AVC, HEVC, VP9 and other popular video codecs (AV1 is not supported though). This is not a gaming GPU as it is not fast enough to handle most AAA titles released in 2020. At 720p, Escape from Tarkov runs at just 17 fps (low quality preset), to give you an example. As the iGPU has no VRAM of its own, it is paramount that it is mated to fast system RAM.

Power consumption

This Core i7 series chip is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes leading to subpar, as of early 2022, energy efficiency.

The Core i7-10750H has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 45 W; laptop makers are free to reduce the value somewhat, 35 W being the lower limit, allowing for leaner designs at the cost of performance. Either way, a quality cooling solution is a must.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 7535UIntel Core i7-10750H
CodenameRembrandt RComet Lake-H
SeriesAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)Intel Comet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 7 7736U compare2.7 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS compare3.3 - 4.55 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7535U « 2.9 - 4.55 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go compare3 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 7335U compare3 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H « 2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2900 - 4550 MHz2600 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache3 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 126 / 12
TDP28 Watt45 Watt
Technology6 nm14 nm
max. Temp.95 °C100 °C
SocketFP7BGA1440
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR4-2933, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX
iGPUAMD Radeon 660M ( - 1900 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
$435 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 7535U
33.3 pt (55%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10750H
31.2 pt (52%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 85.3     avg: 85.7     median: 85.7 (48%)     max: 86 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 385     avg: 400     median: 400 (7%)     max: 415 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7769     avg: 8591     median: 8591 (8%)     max: 9413 Points
min: 4807     avg: 7129     median: 7463.5 (7%)     max: 8585 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1372     avg: 1414     median: 1414 (59%)     max: 1456 Points
min: 1136     avg: 1218     median: 1217 (51%)     max: 1271 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 535     avg: 551     median: 551 (60%)     max: 567 Points
min: 431     avg: 472.7     median: 472 (51%)     max: 504 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3012     avg: 3120     median: 3119.5 (8%)     max: 3227 Points
min: 1749     avg: 2848     median: 2941 (7%)     max: 3325 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1263     avg: 1330     median: 1330 (8%)     max: 1397 Points
min: 804     avg: 1263     median: 1303.5 (8%)     max: 1418 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 217     avg: 225     median: 225 (62%)     max: 233 Points
min: 184     avg: 196.7     median: 197 (55%)     max: 213 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 15.09     avg: 15.8     median: 15.8 (20%)     max: 16.43 Points
min: 13.71     avg: 13.9     median: 13.9 (18%)     max: 14.13 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.54     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (63%)     max: 2.74 Points
min: 2.17     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (52%)     max: 2.22 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5785     avg: 5881     median: 5881 (36%)     max: 5977 Points
min: 7275     avg: 7377     median: 7376.5 (45%)     max: 7478 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 27244     avg: 28968     median: 28968 (21%)     max: 30692 Points
min: 37009     avg: 37154     median: 37154 (27%)     max: 37299 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 48700     avg: 50966     median: 50966 (33%)     max: 53232 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 10854     avg: 11256     median: 11255.5 (14%)     max: 11657 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
488.5 s (6%)
142.7 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
13.2 s (3%)
5.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5631 Points (9%)
min: 6265     avg: 6287     median: 6287 (10%)     max: 6309 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 35116     avg: 36760     median: 36760 (21%)     max: 38404 MIPS
min: 26040     avg: 33946     median: 35346 (20%)     max: 37345 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5104     avg: 5263     median: 5262.5 (62%)     max: 5421 MIPS
min: 4504     avg: 5114     median: 5120 (60%)     max: 5470 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
77.7 fps (2%)
min: 77.4     avg: 78.3     median: 78.3 (2%)     max: 79.2 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
208.4 fps (5%)
min: 220.9     avg: 221.2     median: 221.2 (6%)     max: 221.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.79     avg: 9.9     median: 9.9 (17%)     max: 10 fps
min: 5.54     avg: 9.6     median: 9.9 (17%)     max: 11.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.7 GB/s (21%)
min: 0.767     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (23%)     max: 0.78 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (15%)
1.3 GB/s (22%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
6.9 GB/s (18%)
7.6 GB/s (20%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 728     avg: 732     median: 731.5 (9%)     max: 735 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 366     avg: 388.5     median: 388.5 (3%)     max: 411 Seconds
min: 322     avg: 389.1     median: 371 (3%)     max: 587 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.532     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (12%)     max: 0.562 sec
min: 0.578     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.708 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 10006     avg: 10414     median: 10414 (22%)     max: 10822 Points
min: 10847     avg: 11405     median: 11307 (24%)     max: 12061 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
10.4 s (2%)
8.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.9 s (1%)
17.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
817 s (4%)
466.6 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
40448 Points (31%)
43210 Points (33%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10708     avg: 11671     median: 11671 (29%)     max: 12634 Points
min: 8587     avg: 12991     median: 13325 (33%)     max: 14993 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63356 Points (51%)
61445 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
63108 Points (51%)
60119 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
71470 Points (57%)
min: 63803     avg: 65556     median: 65498 (53%)     max: 67904 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
9942 Points (25%)
min: 6797     avg: 10850     median: 11135 (28%)     max: 12015 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 14733     avg: 14873     median: 14873 (27%)     max: 15013 Points
min: 11653     avg: 17163     median: 17628.5 (31%)     max: 18769 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4808     avg: 4855     median: 4854.5 (20%)     max: 4901 Points
min: 4911     avg: 6649     median: 6852 (29%)     max: 7543 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 1861     avg: 1943     median: 1942.5 (49%)     max: 2024 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 6919     avg: 7463     median: 7462.5 (29%)     max: 8006 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1416     avg: 1457     median: 1456.5 (57%)     max: 1497 Points
min: 1114     avg: 1263     median: 1270 (50%)     max: 1333 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6021     avg: 6496     median: 6496 (12%)     max: 6971 Points
min: 4443     avg: 6135     median: 6308 (11%)     max: 6674 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1345     avg: 1388     median: 1387.5 (6%)     max: 1430 Points
min: 1215     avg: 1258     median: 1253 (5%)     max: 1325 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6026     avg: 6449     median: 6448.5 (20%)     max: 6871 Points
min: 5710     avg: 6283     median: 6338.5 (20%)     max: 6632 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5593     avg: 5914     median: 5913.5 (59%)     max: 6234 Points
min: 5321     avg: 5572     median: 5600.5 (56%)     max: 5832 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 24512     avg: 26383     median: 26382.5 (26%)     max: 28253 Points
min: 22859     avg: 24682     median: 24897 (25%)     max: 25637 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5640 Points (62%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
24958 Points (33%)
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 CPU Mark
min: 13808     avg: 15156     median: 15155.5 (79%)     max: 16503 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 637     avg: 659     median: 659 (1%)     max: 681 ms
min: 764     avg: 783     median: 779 (1%)     max: 840 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 5561     avg: 46043     median: 53724.5 (39%)     max: 55732 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 193.5     avg: 194.5     median: 194.5 (53%)     max: 195.4 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 241     avg: 242     median: 242 (43%)     max: 243 Points
min: 202     avg: 225.2     median: 225 (40%)     max: 239 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1217     avg: 1272     median: 1271.5 (48%)     max: 1326 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 31.2     avg: 35.8     median: 35.8 (6%)     max: 40.3 Watt
min: 70.9     avg: 93.4     median: 95 (16%)     max: 123 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
32.7 Watt (6%)
min: 78.5     avg: 103.7     median: 97.1 (18%)     max: 128 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.23     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (4%)     max: 7.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.03     avg: 5.6     median: 5.6 (6%)     max: 6.22 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
38.6 Points per Watt (29%)
min: 9.96     avg: 12.8     median: 13.7 (10%)     max: 15.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 7535U → 100% n=43

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10750H → 113% n=43

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 06. 22:20:36

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14964 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11708 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1757190036s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Sep 2025 05:17:50 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14964 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#8 got single benchmarks 14964 +0.006s ... 0.017s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11708 +0.004s ... 0.022s

#10 got single benchmarks 11708 +0.069s ... 0.09s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.09s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.06s ... 0.151s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.152s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)