Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N3450 vs Intel Core i7-8550U

Intel Celeron N3450

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron N3450 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced mid 2016. It runs at 1.1 - 2.2 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi-Core Burst max 2.1 GHz) and is based on the Apollo Lake platform. Similar to the Braswell predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process (P1273) with FinFETs. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 1866/2400 MHz).

Architecture

For the first time in a couple of years, Intel completely reworked the CPU architecture of the Atom series. The manufacturer advertises performance gains of roughly 30 percent, but does not reveal any specifics about the individual changes. The new Goldmont architecture should therefore be roughly on par with AMD's Beema/Carrizo-L APUs in terms of per-MHz performance, but it still far behind the more expensive Core CPUs (like Skylake / Kaby Lake).

Performance

The CPU performance of the Celeron N3450 with 4 CPU cores and a clock between 1.1-2.2 GHz should depend a lot on the cooling solution. If the chip can maintain its Boost clock, the N3450 should be about 15-20 percent faster than the old N3710 (Braswell) and compete with an AMD A4-7210. This means the processor is perfectly suited for daily tasks (office, browsing) as well as moderate multi-tasking.

GPU Performance

The HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 700 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics (Braswell). This means only older and simpler titles like Counter-Strike: GO or Diablo 3 will run smoothly.

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 6 Watts (SDP 4 Watts – Scenario Design Power). The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well.

Intel Core i7-8550U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-8550U

The Intel Core i7-8550U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation and was announced in August 2017. Contrary to its direct predecessors Core i7-7500U and i5-7260U, respectively, which were still dual-cores, the i7-8550U is equipped with four cores but at a lower base frequency of 1.8 GHz. The Turbo Boost is not specified yet, but should be at least 3.7 - 4 GHz and therefore also offer good short term single core speeds. The GPU is now named Intel UHD Graphics 620 but otherwise identical to the Intel HD Graphics 620. The integrated memory controller supports DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

The performance of the i7-8550U depends on the cooling solution of the laptop and the defined TDP limits for short and long term performance. This leads to big differences in our benchmark scores ranging from the 15 Watt reference by Intel up to the 23% higher score of the Inspiron 17-7773 in the Cinebench R15 Multi benchmark. Especially when taxing the CPU for longer periods, these differences can be even higher.

In our usual benchmarks, the average i7-8550U is as fast as the 35 Watt rated Core i5-7440HQ. For single thread performance, the high Turbo Boost frequency helps achieving one of the highest scores for mobile CPUs.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

ModelIntel Celeron N3450Intel Core i7-8550U
CodenameApollo LakeKaby Lake Refresh
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Kaby Lake Refresh
Series: Kaby Lake Refresh Kaby Lake Refresh
Intel Celeron J3455 compare1.5 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3450 « 1.1 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J3355 compare2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3350 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i7-8650U compare1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U « 1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U compare1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U compare1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Clock1100 - 2200 MHz1800 - 4000 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 8
TDP6 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketFCBGA1296BGA1356
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics 500 (12 EUs, 200 - 700 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 , 8x USB 3.0, 6x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/sDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 500 (200 - 700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.$409 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
L1 Cache256 KB
L3 Cache8 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8550U
26.6 pt (44%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
2914 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1021 Points (43%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 383     avg: 388.5     median: 388.5 (42%)     max: 394 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1118     avg: 1128     median: 1128 (3%)     max: 1138 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 128     avg: 146.8     median: 143 (1%)     max: 167 Points
min: 301     avg: 576     median: 553 (3%)     max: 761 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 36     avg: 44     median: 44.5 (12%)     max: 48 Points
min: 108     avg: 159.5     median: 163 (45%)     max: 172 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.63     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 2.1 Points
min: 4.38     avg: 6.3     median: 6.1 (8%)     max: 8.56 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.47     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (13%)     max: 0.59 Points
min: 1.43     avg: 1.8     median: 1.9 (45%)     max: 1.95 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1219     avg: 1362     median: 1415 (9%)     max: 1451 Points
min: 4202     avg: 6333     median: 6423 (39%)     max: 8211 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3956     avg: 4318     median: 3959 (3%)     max: 5039 Points
min: 11694     avg: 17867     median: 17321.5 (13%)     max: 24180 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 12279     avg: 23153     median: 22717 (15%)     max: 31667 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 6737     avg: 8065     median: 8370.5 (10%)     max: 8436 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
867 s (10%)
min: 257.5     avg: 352     median: 366.7 (4%)     max: 435 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 21.14     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (4%)     max: 23.47 s
min: 7.047     avg: 9.8     median: 9.9 (2%)     max: 12.7 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
847 s (3%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
26.3 s (14%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1020 Points (2%)
min: 3847     avg: 4487     median: 4374 (7%)     max: 5287 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
15613 MIPS (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4337 MIPS (51%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12 fps (0%)
min: 32     avg: 35.3     median: 33.1 (1%)     max: 41 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
58.2 fps (1%)
min: 143.6     avg: 153.9     median: 147.9 (4%)     max: 178 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.77     avg: 4     median: 3.9 (7%)     max: 4.43 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.146     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (4%)     max: 0.147 GB/s
min: 0.357     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (13%)     max: 0.469 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (4%)
min: 0.583     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (13%)     max: 0.793 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.2 GB/s (3%)
min: 3.3     avg: 4.2     median: 4.3 (11%)     max: 4.6 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 841     avg: 897     median: 913 (6%)     max: 937 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2576 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 27.45     avg: 30.8     median: 30.8 (7%)     max: 34.2 s
min: 9     avg: 10.5     median: 9.3 (2%)     max: 17.45 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 61.2     avg: 67.6     median: 67.6 (3%)     max: 74 s
min: 20     avg: 23     median: 21.2 (1%)     max: 32.72 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1566 s (7%)
min: 510     avg: 575     median: 536 (2%)     max: 740 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
21623 Points (17%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1780     avg: 1980     median: 1925 (5%)     max: 2291 Points
min: 3961     avg: 6653     median: 6649 (16%)     max: 9527 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
14788 Points (12%)
min: 16314     avg: 42803     median: 44682 (36%)     max: 55226 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
14287 Points (12%)
min: 16312     avg: 37536     median: 36876 (30%)     max: 51937 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 15289     avg: 16256     median: 16256 (13%)     max: 17223 Points
min: 27917     avg: 50269     median: 52842 (42%)     max: 58213 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1364     avg: 1433     median: 1433 (4%)     max: 1502 Points
min: 3437     avg: 5739     median: 5695 (14%)     max: 7725 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 1952     avg: 2029     median: 2028.5 (4%)     max: 2105 Points
min: 3961     avg: 8228     median: 8306 (15%)     max: 11110 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2463     avg: 2898     median: 2875 (12%)     max: 3865 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1081 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3141 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1399 Points (14%)
min: 4555     avg: 4858     median: 4900 (49%)     max: 4997 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4001 Points (4%)
min: 10869     avg: 14247     median: 15117 (15%)     max: 16294 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1385     avg: 1422     median: 1422 (16%)     max: 1459 Points
min: 4439     avg: 4686     median: 4699 (52%)     max: 4858 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3821     avg: 3953     median: 3953 (5%)     max: 4085 Points
min: 10747     avg: 13316     median: 13251 (17%)     max: 15294 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
3958 Points (7%)
min: 8918     avg: 12315     median: 12327.5 (22%)     max: 14144 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1202 Points (16%)
min: 2471     avg: 3671     median: 3770 (49%)     max: 4020 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11637     avg: 12834     median: 12833.5 (20%)     max: 14030 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3784     avg: 3949     median: 3948.5 (59%)     max: 4113 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3476 ms (4%)
min: 877     avg: 1087     median: 1107 (1%)     max: 2114 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
258.2 ms (3%)
min: 63.2     avg: 80.3     median: 71.3 (1%)     max: 122.7 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
11297 Points (8%)
min: 17296     avg: 33448     median: 33496 (25%)     max: 42043 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
182 Points (33%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 25.3     avg: 40.1     median: 33.7 (6%)     max: 61.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 28.2     avg: 38.1     median: 30.4 (6%)     max: 63.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 10.4     avg: 15.6     median: 17.3 (13%)     max: 17.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3450 → 100% n=33

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8550U → 332% n=33

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 07. 17:45:56

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8184 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9208 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759851956s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8184 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 8184 +0.006s ... 0.011s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9208 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#10 got single benchmarks 9208 +0.01s ... 0.022s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.034s ... 0.056s

#13 return log +0.008s ... 0.064s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)