Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-14700HX vs Intel Core Ultra 7 165H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

Intel Core i7-14700HX

► remove from comparison Intel i7-14700HX

The Intel Core i7-14700HX is a high-end CPU based on the new Raptor Lake architecture for large and heavy notebooks. The CPU was introduced at the beginning of 2024 as part of the Raptor Lake HX refresh. The i7-14700HX is similar to the Core i7-13850HX with slightly higher clocked CPU cores.

The total of 28 threads are divided into P-cores and E-cores, which we already know from Alder Lake. The 14700HX offers 8 performance cores (P-cores) with hyperthreading and 12 efficiency cores (E-cores) without hyperthreading. A total of 28 threads are therefore supported. The P-cores clock at up to 5.5 GHz (single core) and the E-cores up to 3.9 GHz. The integrated memory controller supports a maximum of DDR5 with 5600 MHz.

Compared to Alder Lake, the new Raptor Lake architecture offers improved P-cores (Raptor Cove architecture with more cache), more E-cores (same Gracemont architecture) and higher clock rates thanks to the improved Intel 7 process. Furthermore, Intel now supports faster DDR5 main memory (up to 5600 MHz) in the top models.

The 14700HX is manufactured on the older 10nm FinFET process at Intel (Intel 7 process) and is specified with 55 watts base power and 157 watts turbo power.

Intel Core Ultra 7 165H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 165H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H is a high-end laptop processor of the Meteor Lake series. This 1st Gen Core Ultra chip has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. The 16 cores are comprised of 6 HT-enabled Performance cores running at up to 5.0 GHz and 10 Efficient cores (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) running at up to 3.8 GHz. Two of the 10 E-cores are located in the Low Power Island.

The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.30 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 7 165H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 165H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official Intel performance data, then the 165H is about as fast as the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.30 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is almost as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 7 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. A powerful cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 165H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 155H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a high-end laptop processor of the Meteor Lake series that has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. This 1st Gen Core Ultra chip has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; its 16 cores are comprised of 6 HT-enabled Performance cores running at up to 4.8 GHz and 10 Efficient cores (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) running at up to 3.8 GHz.

The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.30 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 7 155H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 155H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official performance data published by Intel, then the 155H is about as fast as the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.30 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is almost as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 7 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. Its Base power consumption is supposed to be around 64 W, however, most laptop makers will probably go for a higher value to get higher clock speeds and thus better performance. Either way, a powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 155H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

ModelIntel Core i7-14700HXIntel Core Ultra 7 165HIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
CodenameRaptor Lake-HX RefreshMeteor Lake-HMeteor Lake-H
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HXIntel Meteor Lake-HIntel Meteor Lake-H
Series: Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H
Intel Core i9-14900HX1.6 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700HX « 3.9 - 5.5 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14650HX1.6 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500HX1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14450HX1.8 - 4.8 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H « 3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H « 3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Clock3900 - 5500 MHz3800 - 5000 MHz3800 - 4800 MHz
L2 Cache24 MB
L3 Cache30 MB24 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads20 / 28
8 x 5.5 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
12 x 3.9 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
16 / 22
6 x 5.0 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
16 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP55 Watt28 Watt28 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2157 Watt
Technology10 nm7 nm7 nm
Die Size257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C110 °C110 °C
SocketBGA1964BGA2049BGA2049
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enter., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1600 MHz)Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2300 MHz)Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-14700HX
44.3 pt (74%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 165H
37.6 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 155H
37.5 pt (62%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 100.6     avg: 118.2     median: 121 (68%)     max: 125.5 Points
103.3 Points (58%)
min: 96     avg: 102.7     median: 102.3 (57%)     max: 108 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1003     avg: 1282     median: 1345 (25%)     max: 1408 Points
min: 616     avg: 690     median: 690 (13%)     max: 764 Points
min: 323     avg: 776     median: 789 (15%)     max: 1024 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 22313     avg: 24631     median: 24595 (23%)     max: 28122 Points
min: 14055     avg: 14783     median: 14551 (14%)     max: 15743 Points
min: 9769     avg: 14965     median: 15028 (14%)     max: 19007 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1702     avg: 2000     median: 2103 (88%)     max: 2144 Points
min: 1668     avg: 1731     median: 1759 (74%)     max: 1766 Points
min: 1496     avg: 1726     median: 1743 (73%)     max: 1815 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 651     avg: 765     median: 803 (87%)     max: 821 Points
min: 674     avg: 681     median: 683 (74%)     max: 687 Points
min: 601     avg: 665     median: 670.5 (73%)     max: 696 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 8361     avg: 9231     median: 9244 (23%)     max: 10498 Points
min: 5471     avg: 5640     median: 5545 (14%)     max: 5904 Points
min: 3798     avg: 5795     median: 5762.5 (14%)     max: 7409 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3328     avg: 3752     median: 3812 (24%)     max: 4137 Points
min: 2467     avg: 2583     median: 2641 (17%)     max: 2642 Points
min: 1932     avg: 2449     median: 2450 (15%)     max: 2880 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 238     avg: 281.1     median: 294 (81%)     max: 304 Points
min: 257     avg: 258     median: 257 (71%)     max: 260 Points
min: 99.6     avg: 249.5     median: 255 (71%)     max: 268 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
10.4 Points (14%)
min: 27.11     avg: 30.5     median: 30.7 (40%)     max: 33.49 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.6 Points (86%)
min: 2.77     avg: 3     median: 3 (72%)     max: 3.13 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
11767 Points (71%)
min: 8808     avg: 9492     median: 9619.5 (58%)     max: 9919 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
68172 Points (49%)
min: 50589     avg: 56540     median: 57550 (42%)     max: 60472 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 13726     avg: 67393     median: 80420 (51%)     max: 95005 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12270     avg: 30347     median: 13508.5 (16%)     max: 82102 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
409.9 s (5%)
min: 92.544     avg: 146.2     median: 139.6 (2%)     max: 206.526 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.7 s (1%)
min: 3.523     avg: 3.8     median: 3.7 (1%)     max: 4.041 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
482 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
3.4 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
10202 Points (16%)
min: 6137     avg: 6921     median: 6911.5 (11%)     max: 7723 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 84799     avg: 95840     median: 98097 (56%)     max: 104730 MIPS
min: 54741     avg: 58029     median: 56997 (33%)     max: 62349 MIPS
min: 41739     avg: 59108     median: 60595 (35%)     max: 70254 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5641     avg: 6595     median: 6895 (81%)     max: 7041 MIPS
min: 4939     avg: 5200     median: 5273 (62%)     max: 5387 MIPS
min: 4594     avg: 5330     median: 5398 (64%)     max: 5621 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
177.1 fps (59%)
min: 120.65     avg: 136.4     median: 135.4 (45%)     max: 154.15 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
365.2 fps (84%)
min: 282.57     avg: 302.1     median: 300.5 (69%)     max: 325 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 22     avg: 25.1     median: 25.2 (44%)     max: 27.4 fps
min: 14.4     avg: 15.2     median: 15.2 (27%)     max: 16 fps
min: 9.93     avg: 16.5     median: 16.7 (29%)     max: 21.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
2.2 GB/s (65%)
min: 0.944     avg: 1     median: 1 (29%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
4.1 GB/s (71%)
min: 1.6     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (29%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
19.3 GB/s (50%)
min: 9.3     avg: 10.3     median: 10.4 (27%)     max: 10.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 228     avg: 250.3     median: 243 (3%)     max: 312 Seconds
min: 406     avg: 435     median: 435 (6%)     max: 464 Seconds
min: 296     avg: 413.3     median: 380 (5%)     max: 692 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 126     avg: 148.7     median: 140 (1%)     max: 184 Seconds
min: 231     avg: 246     median: 246 (2%)     max: 261 Seconds
min: 175     avg: 232.5     median: 220 (2%)     max: 381 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3821     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4896 sec
min: 0.4565     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4686 sec
min: 0.4457     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.53 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
18104 Points (39%)
min: 12066     avg: 12936     median: 12712.5 (27%)     max: 14729 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6 s (1%)
min: 7.046     avg: 7.4     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 8.087 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
13.1 s (1%)
min: 15.701     avg: 16.2     median: 15.9 (1%)     max: 17.277 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
310.6 s (1%)
min: 394.754     avg: 413.2     median: 400.3 (2%)     max: 444.482 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 61131     avg: 65940     median: 63514 (49%)     max: 74620 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 20470     avg: 23414     median: 23101.5 (57%)     max: 27236 Points
min: 18101     avg: 20276     median: 20275.5 (50%)     max: 22450 Points
min: 6531     avg: 18376     median: 19092.5 (47%)     max: 23779 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 53255     avg: 77249     median: 77292.5 (63%)     max: 93608 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 66925     avg: 75901     median: 72861.5 (59%)     max: 90957 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
97608 Points (81%)
min: 84880     avg: 88438     median: 88437.5 (73%)     max: 91995 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 19898     avg: 21355     median: 21196 (54%)     max: 22970 Points
min: 13733     avg: 14430     median: 14429.5 (37%)     max: 15126 Points
min: 7073     avg: 15332     median: 15194 (38%)     max: 19549 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 30534     avg: 34695     median: 33378 (60%)     max: 40672 Points
min: 23240     avg: 23582     median: 23582 (42%)     max: 23924 Points
min: 5249     avg: 22618     median: 23177 (41%)     max: 28337 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 14526     avg: 16237     median: 16225 (68%)     max: 18028 Points
min: 7617     avg: 8260     median: 8259.5 (35%)     max: 8902 Points
min: 3922     avg: 9000     median: 9454.5 (40%)     max: 12145 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2378     avg: 2764     median: 2884 (72%)     max: 2975 Points
min: 2358     avg: 2429     median: 2421.5 (60%)     max: 2513 Points
min: 1901     avg: 2377     median: 2409 (60%)     max: 2473 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 14807     avg: 16228     median: 16326 (63%)     max: 17562 Points
min: 11616     avg: 12341     median: 12230.5 (47%)     max: 13288 Points
min: 7732     avg: 12275     median: 12385 (48%)     max: 13656 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2712 Points (86%)
min: 2167     avg: 2588     median: 2313 (73%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
14337 Points (59%)
min: 10787     avg: 15361     median: 12061 (50%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1700     avg: 1982     median: 2080 (81%)     max: 2133 Points
min: 1688     avg: 1782     median: 1793.5 (70%)     max: 1853 Points
min: 1462     avg: 1751     median: 1761.5 (69%)     max: 1824 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15705     avg: 17679     median: 17691 (32%)     max: 19597 Points
min: 11733     avg: 12010     median: 12051.5 (22%)     max: 12204 Points
min: 10017     avg: 12016     median: 12183.5 (22%)     max: 13556 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1937     avg: 1962     median: 1962 (9%)     max: 1987 Points
min: 1556     avg: 1678     median: 1696 (7%)     max: 1745 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15251     avg: 16605     median: 16604.5 (52%)     max: 17958 Points
min: 11112     avg: 11906     median: 12025 (38%)     max: 12530 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8945 Points (89%)
min: 6559     avg: 6879     median: 6927 (69%)     max: 7141 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
67087 Points (67%)
min: 39509     avg: 43123     median: 43897 (44%)     max: 46412 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 447     avg: 468     median: 451.5 (1%)     max: 542 ms
min: 514     avg: 518     median: 517.5 (1%)     max: 521 ms
min: 416.4     avg: 541     median: 535 (1%)     max: 642 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 89858     avg: 98657     median: 98656.5 (75%)     max: 107455 Points
min: 77142     avg: 88549     median: 89268 (67%)     max: 97162 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 251     avg: 281.4     median: 274 (75%)     max: 307 Points
min: 259     avg: 263     median: 263 (72%)     max: 267 Points
min: 166.4     avg: 251.8     median: 255 (70%)     max: 309 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 276     avg: 308     median: 302 (54%)     max: 338 Points
min: 291     avg: 293     median: 293 (53%)     max: 295 Points
min: 213     avg: 276.5     median: 278.5 (50%)     max: 299 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1923     avg: 2088     median: 2132 (80%)     max: 2235 Points
min: 1690     avg: 1751     median: 1692 (63%)     max: 1872 Points
min: 1366     avg: 1663     median: 1685.5 (63%)     max: 1903 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 101.3     avg: 140.5     median: 142.3 (25%)     max: 175 Watt
min: 55.7     avg: 58.2     median: 58.2 (10%)     max: 60.6 Watt
min: 37.1     avg: 74.8     median: 72.8 (13%)     max: 168 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 128     avg: 185.3     median: 184.8 (34%)     max: 243 Watt
min: 64.8     avg: 79.7     median: 79.7 (15%)     max: 94.6 Watt
min: 46.9     avg: 89.4     median: 87.9 (16%)     max: 160.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 7.9     avg: 20.4     median: 22.6 (15%)     max: 26.6 Watt
min: 2.51     avg: 4.6     median: 4.6 (3%)     max: 6.73 Watt
min: 2.42     avg: 7.2     median: 6.1 (4%)     max: 24.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 9.28     avg: 17     median: 15.9 (18%)     max: 26.8 Watt
min: 3.01     avg: 5.3     median: 5.3 (6%)     max: 7.51 Watt
min: 2.83     avg: 10.1     median: 7.8 (9%)     max: 90.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 17     avg: 19.2     median: 19.2 (14%)     max: 21.3 Points per Watt
min: 27.9     avg: 33     median: 33 (25%)     max: 38.1 Points per Watt
min: 17.7     avg: 30.9     median: 28.6 (21%)     max: 64.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-14700HX → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 165H → 74% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 155H → 75% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 29. 10:54:44

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17168 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16905 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 16906 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753779284s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:17:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17168 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 17168 +0.012s ... 0.023s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 16905 +0.004s ... 0.026s

#11 got single benchmarks 16905 +0.007s ... 0.033s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 16906 +0.004s ... 0.037s

#13 got single benchmarks 16906 +0.058s ... 0.095s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.095s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.08s ... 0.175s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.175s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)