Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-10510U vs Intel Celeron N4500 vs Intel Pentium Silver N6000

Intel Core i7-10510U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-10510U

The Intel Core i7-10510U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks based on the Comet Lake (CML-U) generation and was announced in August 2019. Compared to the similar Whiskey Lake processors (e.g.& Core i7-8665U), the only difference is support for higher memory speeds (DDR4-2666, LPDDR4-2933) and two additional cores in the top model (not in this i7-10510U). The processor cores are clocked between 1.8 and 4.9 GHz (all 4 cores 4.3 GHz max). Thanks to HyperThreading 8 threads can be used. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The integrated graphics adapter however is still the same as in the previous generations. It should be still called Intel HD Graphics 620 and clock from 300 - 1150 MHz in the i7. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a VP9 and H.265 de- and encoder and an integrated dual channel DDR4-2666 / LPDDR4-2933 memory controller.

Performance

The average 10510U in our database proves to be an OK mid-range option, its multi-thread benchmark scores hovering near those of the Ryzen 7 2700U and the Core i5-8259U. While not as impressive as the hexa-core Core i7-10710U, the 10510U will make most customers happy, making for short load times and generally pain-free experience.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 45 W, the Modern 15 A10RB is among the fastest laptops powered by the 10510U that we know of. It can be more than twice as fast in CPU-bound workloads as the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i7 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W resulting in corresponding performance and clock speed changes. By going for the lowest value, it is possible to build passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs around the i7. Please note that Comet Lake-U chips can briefly consume up to 90 W when under extreme loads.

Last but not the least, the i7-10510U is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for lower-than-average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Celeron N4500

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4500

The Intel Celeron N4500 is a dual-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The two Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 2.8 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading. The N4500 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could is up two 30% better on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the dual-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 16 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 750 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4(x) memory controller (up to 16 GB, up to 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N4500 in our database shapes up to be a fairly slow processor, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core i3-4010U. (The latter saw the light of day in 2013 as a lower mid-range, dual-core CPU designed for use in ultraportable laptops.) In other words, expect the Celeron to be painfully slow in all but the most basic activities.

You mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

Like most N-class Intel chips, the Celeron has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 6 W. This is not much at all and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

The Celeron N4500 is built with Intel's 2nd generation 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Pentium Silver N6000

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium N6000

The Intel Pentium Silver N6000 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 3.3 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N6000 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process, the same process as Ice Lake.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the four CPU cores, the SoC integrates a 32 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 850 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4x memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N6000 in our database proves to be an OK entry-level processor, as of late 2022, its multi-thread benchmark scores nearly matching those of the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U. Yes, the chip is a whole lot slower than the latest Ryzen 3 and Core i3 processors, but it will at least let you run your day-to-day apps without annoying slowdowns.

The Asus Vivobook 13 Slate is among the fastest systems built around the N6000 that we know of, thanks to the long-term CPU power limit of 10 W. It can be more than 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

Like nearly all other N-class Intel processors, the Pentium N6000 has a default TDP of 6 W (also known as the long-term power limit). This is low and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

The SoC is built with Intel's 2nd generation 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-10510UIntel Celeron N4500Intel Pentium Silver N6000
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Jasper LakeIntel Jasper Lake
CodenameComet Lake-UJasper LakeJasper Lake
Series: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Core i7-10810U1.1 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10710U1.1 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10610U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10510U « 1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310U1.7 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210U1.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110U2.1 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 5205U1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 « 1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock1800 - 4900 MHz1100 - 2800 MHz1100 - 3300 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache8 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 82 / 24 / 4
TDP15 Watt6 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1528BGA1338BGA1338
FeaturesLPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2666/LPDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3 x 8, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (350 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) (350 - 850 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10510U
30.2 pt (42%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4500
17.2 pt (24%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Pentium N6000
21.9 pt (30%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 3626     avg: 3866     median: 3734 (3%)     max: 4239 Points
709 Points (1%)
min: 1610     avg: 1730     median: 1699 (2%)     max: 1911 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1066     avg: 1142     median: 1152 (49%)     max: 1207 Points
452 Points (19%)
min: 653     avg: 669     median: 672.5 (29%)     max: 679 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 362     avg: 436.7     median: 441 (49%)     max: 497 Points
188 Points (21%)
min: 237     avg: 253.8     median: 255 (28%)     max: 268 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1015     avg: 1412     median: 1422 (3%)     max: 1897 Points
332 Points (1%)
min: 595     avg: 657     median: 650.5 (2%)     max: 730 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 482     avg: 666     median: 678 (4%)     max: 856 Points
171 Points (1%)
min: 266     avg: 292.5     median: 291 (2%)     max: 322 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 113     avg: 178.4     median: 182 (55%)     max: 202 Points
82 Points (25%)
min: 109     avg: 114.3     median: 113.7 (34%)     max: 121 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
6.7 Points (9%)
2.1 Points (3%)
min: 3.47     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (5%)     max: 3.71 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (49%)
1 Points (26%)
min: 1.36     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (35%)     max: 1.46 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5740     avg: 6919     median: 7268 (44%)     max: 7748 Points
min: 4057     avg: 4132     median: 4131.5 (25%)     max: 4206 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 6763     avg: 19637     median: 25882 (19%)     max: 26265 Points
min: 9343     avg: 9643     median: 9642.5 (7%)     max: 9942 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
9009 Points (6%)
6954 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
5856 Points (7%)
5266 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1270 s (15%)
727 s (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
50.2 s (10%)
16.9 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1076 Points (2%)
1330 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 12196     avg: 17704     median: 17318 (10%)     max: 21298 MIPS
5394 MIPS (3%)
min: 8096     avg: 8953     median: 9212 (5%)     max: 9668 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3747     avg: 4591     median: 4678 (56%)     max: 4981 MIPS
2853 MIPS (34%)
min: 2320     avg: 2934     median: 3305 (40%)     max: 3387 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12 fps (4%)
18.4 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
60.6 fps (14%)
93.4 fps (22%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.41     avg: 4.6     median: 4.6 (8%)     max: 6.04 fps
0.7 fps (1%)
min: 1.55     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (3%)     max: 1.76 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
0.4 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.1 GB/s (3%)
2.8 GB/s (7%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
3786 Seconds (48%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 628     avg: 796     median: 797 (6%)     max: 1051 Seconds
4249 Seconds (30%)
min: 1738     avg: 2163     median: 1935 (14%)     max: 3157 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.637     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.81 sec
2.1 sec (46%)
min: 1.084     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (26%)     max: 1.278 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 5989     avg: 8472     median: 6125 (13%)     max: 13303 Points
2053 Points (4%)
3985 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22.8 s (5%)
17.5 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
51.4 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1132 s (5%)
895 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
29737 Points (26%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 5226     avg: 8090     median: 8048.5 (22%)     max: 11006 Points
1507 Points (4%)
min: 3134     avg: 3617     median: 3563 (10%)     max: 4155 Points
min: 30345     avg: 32921     median: 32921 (27%)     max: 35497 Points
min: 30120     avg: 32790     median: 32790 (27%)     max: 35460 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 41700     avg: 56447     median: 58554 (49%)     max: 67021 Points
min: 38897     avg: 43994     median: 43993.5 (37%)     max: 49090 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 4131     avg: 6524     median: 6215 (16%)     max: 9653 Points
1521 Points (4%)
min: 2524     avg: 2897     median: 2947 (7%)     max: 3220 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 5667     avg: 9849     median: 10085 (18%)     max: 13225 Points
2017 Points (4%)
min: 3838     avg: 4315     median: 4063 (7%)     max: 5296 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2142     avg: 3135     median: 3088 (13%)     max: 4801 Points
504 Points (2%)
min: 1161     avg: 1301     median: 1259.5 (5%)     max: 1523 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
457 Points (12%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
662 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 977     avg: 1197     median: 1212 (51%)     max: 1287 Points
min: 401     avg: 531     median: 594 (25%)     max: 598 Points
min: 720     avg: 728     median: 727 (31%)     max: 736 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2474     avg: 3687     median: 3663 (7%)     max: 4484 Points
min: 707     avg: 929     median: 1018 (2%)     max: 1063 Points
min: 1784     avg: 1912     median: 1915 (3%)     max: 2004 Points
min: 723     avg: 725     median: 724.5 (3%)     max: 726 Points
min: 1881     avg: 1912     median: 1911.5 (6%)     max: 1942 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4976     avg: 5400     median: 5368 (54%)     max: 5832 Points
3188 Points (32%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13116     avg: 16270     median: 17109 (19%)     max: 18364 Points
8341 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16742     avg: 16790     median: 16790 (30%)     max: 16838 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 4369     avg: 4427     median: 4427 (86%)     max: 4485 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 742     avg: 885     median: 859 (1%)     max: 1184 ms
min: 1665.2     avg: 2413     median: 2412.6 (3%)     max: 3160 ms
min: 1388     avg: 1412     median: 1405 (2%)     max: 1451 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
197.1 ms (2%)
293.2 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 31505     avg: 41519     median: 38295 (34%)     max: 51741 Points
24838 Points (22%)
min: 25840     avg: 32251     median: 34145.5 (31%)     max: 34874 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
91.2 Points (26%)
104.2 Points (30%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 192     avg: 209.1     median: 210 (44%)     max: 226 Points
min: 48.2     avg: 94.8     median: 94.8 (20%)     max: 141.3 Points
min: 138.4     avg: 143.8     median: 146 (30%)     max: 147 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
6833 Points (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
7404 Points (34%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1101 Points (42%)
min: 440     avg: 469     median: 469 (18%)     max: 498 Points
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
81 Points (45%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 23     avg: 37.8     median: 38 (7%)     max: 50 Watt
10.7 Watt (2%)
min: 11.3     avg: 12     median: 12 (2%)     max: 12.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 25.5     avg: 41.2     median: 38.4 (7%)     max: 61 Watt
9.1 Watt (2%)
min: 10.5     avg: 13.3     median: 12.9 (2%)     max: 16.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
10.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.5 Watt (6%)
min: 3.37     avg: 5.4     median: 4.8 (5%)     max: 8.08 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 8.95     avg: 16.7     median: 17 (13%)     max: 22.4 Points per Watt
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)
min: 19.6     avg: 22.3     median: 20.6 (15%)     max: 26.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10510U → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4500 → 40% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver N6000 → 60% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 23. 07:49:17

#0 checking url part for id 11457 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13079 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13075 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 May 2024 05:37:27 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.044s ... 0.046s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.046s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11457 +0.019s ... 0.065s

#8 got single benchmarks 11457 +0.169s ... 0.234s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13079 +0.018s ... 0.252s

#10 got single benchmarks 13079 +0.024s ... 0.276s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 13075 +0.018s ... 0.294s

#12 got single benchmarks 13075 +0.028s ... 0.322s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.322s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.568s ... 0.89s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.89s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)