Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-12450H vs AMD Ryzen 9 5900X vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Intel Core i5-12450H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-12450H

The Intel Core i5-12450H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 4 of the 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture) leading to 8 cores in total (octa core CPU). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 12 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2 to 4.4 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.5 to 3.3 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 12 MB L3 cache. Compared to the 12500H, the 12450H offers less E-cores, lower clock rates, a slower iGPU and no vPro support.

Performance

The average 12450H in our extensive database is a bit of a disappointment, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Ryzen 7 5700U and the Core i7-10750H, both fairly old chips as of Q2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 48 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.2 GHz.

The CPU is rated at 45 W base power (95 W PL2) but most laptops will use a PL1 of around 60 Watt. The SoC is manufactured in a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7.

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

► remove from comparison AMD R9 5900X

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is a high-end 12-core, hyperthreaded (SMT) Vermeer series desktop processor that can process 24 threads simultaneously. Introduced on October 8, 2020, the Ryzen 9 5900X is the fastest 12-core processor and is specified at 105 watts TDP. The top model, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, offers even more power and at the same time offers another 4 cores and 8 threads. 

The Ryzen 9 5900X clocks with 3.7 GHz base clock and reaches up to 4.8 GHz on one core in turbo mode. However, when all 12 cores are loaded, up to 4.5 GHz is still possible.

The performance of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is consistently excellent in all applications and significantly better than the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X. AMD has been able to significantly improve its single thread performance in particular and even beats the Intel Core i9-10900K in this discipline. The multi-thread performance could also be improved. In an in-house duel, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X can even take on an AMD Threadripper 2950X.

The internal structure of the processor has not changed fundamentally at first glance. The CCX structure has changed a bit compared to Zen2, because now a CCX consists of up to 8 CPU cores. So each individual core can access the complete L3 cache (32 MByte). Furthermore the CCX modules are connected to each other via the same I/O die, which we already know from Zen2. According to AMD, the Infinity-Fabric should now reach clock rates of up to 2 GHz, which in turn allows a RAM clock of 4.000 MHz without performance loss.

For the manufacturing processes, AMD also relies on TSCM for the Vermeer processors for the 7nm production of the CPU cores, although the I/O die is still supplied in 12nm by Globalfoundries. 

In games, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is convincing thanks to the significantly improved IPC. With the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, streaming can be done simultaneously with gaming. But if you only want to play games, you are well advised to take a closer look at the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X or the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X.

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

► remove from comparison AMD R7 5800X

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is an 8-core desktop processor with Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT), which allows it to process 16 threads simultaneously. With its launch on 08.10.2020, it is the fastest 8-core processor from AMD. The second fastest 8-core processor will be the AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT, followed by the more economical AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, also with 8 cores and 16 threads.

The Ryzen 7 5800X clocks with a base clock of 3.8 GHz and reaches up to 4.7 GHz on one core in turbo mode. When all 8 cores are utilized, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, like the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, achieves up to 4.5 GHz.

At first glance, the internal structure of the processor has not changed fundamentally. The CCX structure has changed somewhat compared to Zen2, because now a CCX consists of up to 8-CPU cores. So each individual core can access the complete L3 cache (32 MByte). Furthermore the CCX modules are connected to each other via the same I/O die, which we already know from Zen2. According to AMD, the Infinity-Fabric should now reach clock rates of up to 2Ghz, which in turn allows a RAM clock of 4.000 MHz without performance loss.

Performance

The average 5800X in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-10900K and also the Core i7-12700F, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

In games, AMD's Ryzen 7 5800X can convince with its significantly improved IPC and even put Intel in its place. With the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, gamers are well prepared for the future as simultaneous streaming is no problem with the new Ryzen 7 5800X. Semi-professional content creators, who need even more power, can choose a Ryzen 9 5900X or the Ryzen 9 5950X on the shelf.

Power consumption

The Ryzen 7 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 105 W. This applies as long as the CPU runs at stock clock speeds.

Ryzen 7 5800X is built with TSMC's 7 nm process; as rumors have it, the I/O die is manufactured separately on the 12 nm Global Foundries process.

ModelIntel Core i5-12450HAMD Ryzen 9 5900XAMD Ryzen 7 5800X
CodenameAlder Lake-HVermeer (Zen3)Vermeer (Zen 3)
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-PAMD Vermeer (Ryzen 5000)AMD Vermeer (Ryzen 5000)
Series: Vermeer (Ryzen 5000) Vermeer (Zen 3)
Intel Core i9-12900HK1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H « 1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X « 3.7 - 4.8 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D3.4 - 4.5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X3.4 - 4.9 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X « 3.8 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3.4 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock1500 - 4400 MHz3700 - 4800 MHz3800 - 4700 MHz
L1 Cache704 KB768 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB6 MB4 MB
L3 Cache12 MB64 MB32 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1212 / 248 / 16
TDP45 Watt105 Watt105 Watt
Technology10 nm7 nm7 nm
max. Temp.100 °C90 °C
SocketBGA1744AM4 (1331)AM4 (LGA1331)
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHAMMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2DDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
Die Size2x 80.7 + 125 (I/O) mm22 x 80.7 sq. mm; I/O = 125 mm2
$549 U.S.$449 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-12450H
34.5 pt (57%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 5900X
38.4 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 5800X
39.5 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 96.5     avg: 98.4     median: 98.5 (55%)     max: 100 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 422     avg: 503     median: 509.5 (9%)     max: 570 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7662     avg: 9113     median: 8822.5 (8%)     max: 10633 Points
min: 10531     avg: 15441     median: 16262 (15%)     max: 20634 Points
min: 15241     avg: 15476     median: 15476 (14%)     max: 15711 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1601     avg: 1655     median: 1661 (70%)     max: 1688 Points
min: 1487     avg: 1526     median: 1527 (64%)     max: 1568 Points
min: 1554     avg: 1575     median: 1574.5 (66%)     max: 1595 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 622     avg: 638     median: 641 (70%)     max: 646 Points
min: 579     avg: 603     median: 598 (65%)     max: 639 Points
min: 624     avg: 625     median: 624.5 (68%)     max: 625 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2952     avg: 3517     median: 3390 (8%)     max: 4105 Points
min: 4077     avg: 6104     median: 6233 (15%)     max: 8629 Points
min: 6068     avg: 6075     median: 6074.5 (15%)     max: 6081 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1150     avg: 1372     median: 1350 (9%)     max: 1591 Points
min: 1744     avg: 2631     median: 2695 (17%)     max: 3717 Points
min: 2601     avg: 2609     median: 2608.5 (16%)     max: 2616 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 225     avg: 234.2     median: 238 (66%)     max: 239 Points
min: 242     avg: 252.6     median: 250 (69%)     max: 271 Points
min: 265     avg: 265.5     median: 265.5 (74%)     max: 266 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 14.61     avg: 15.7     median: 16.1 (21%)     max: 16.55 Points
41.8 Points (54%)
29.3 Points (38%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.83     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (68%)     max: 2.91 Points
3.1 Points (75%)
3.1 Points (73%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8166     avg: 8188     median: 8178 (49%)     max: 8221 Points
6828 Points (41%)
6835 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 32260     avg: 34923     median: 35790 (26%)     max: 36720 Points
52076 Points (38%)
45548 Points (33%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 50207     avg: 55957     median: 55999 (36%)     max: 61665 Points
99651 Points (64%)
83426 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 13344     avg: 13357     median: 13352 (16%)     max: 13375 Points
12739 Points (16%)
13039 Points (16%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 431.842     avg: 440.2     median: 436 (5%)     max: 452.626 s
86.1 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.893     avg: 7.5     median: 7.2 (1%)     max: 8.23 s
3 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
59.5 s (0%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
2.5 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 5658     avg: 5956     median: 6015 (10%)     max: 6195 Points
13361 Points (21%)
15604 Points (25%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 31119     avg: 33971     median: 33549 (19%)     max: 38415 MIPS
min: 63583     avg: 88397     median: 90443 (52%)     max: 103095 MIPS
min: 69921     avg: 72114     median: 72113.5 (41%)     max: 74306 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4824     avg: 5109     median: 5011 (59%)     max: 5386 MIPS
min: 5613     avg: 6469     median: 6582 (78%)     max: 6930 MIPS
min: 6843     avg: 6907     median: 6906.5 (81%)     max: 6970 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 75.9     avg: 79.1     median: 76 (25%)     max: 85.35 fps
191 fps (64%)
152 fps (51%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 257.5     avg: 269     median: 272.5 (63%)     max: 277 fps
335 fps (77%)
339 fps (78%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 8.78     avg: 10.5     median: 10.6 (19%)     max: 12.3 fps
min: 12.4     avg: 23     median: 24.9 (44%)     max: 27.4 fps
min: 19.8     avg: 20.3     median: 20.3 (36%)     max: 20.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.703     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (23%)     max: 0.797 GB/s
1.8 GB/s (53%)
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (22%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
2.9 GB/s (50%)
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 7     avg: 7.9     median: 8 (21%)     max: 8.6 GB/s
21.2 GB/s (55%)
15 GB/s (39%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 565     avg: 658     median: 663 (8%)     max: 767 Seconds
min: 331     avg: 336     median: 336 (4%)     max: 341 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 330     avg: 379     median: 385 (3%)     max: 429 Seconds
min: 138     avg: 161.5     median: 154.2 (1%)     max: 275 Seconds
min: 196.8     avg: 196.9     median: 196.9 (1%)     max: 197 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4949     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.54 sec
min: 0.4457     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.992 sec
min: 0.4509     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4545 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9897     avg: 11192     median: 11439 (24%)     max: 11991 Points
min: 14624     avg: 17983     median: 16438 (35%)     max: 46989 Points
15873 Points (34%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.389     avg: 8.4     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.452 s
7.2 s (2%)
7.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.721     avg: 18.8     median: 18.7 (1%)     max: 18.876 s
15.5 s (1%)
15.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 449.018     avg: 452.7     median: 451.4 (2%)     max: 457.561 s
360.5 s (2%)
365.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 42422     avg: 46421     median: 46182 (35%)     max: 50898 Points
min: 75591     avg: 79648     median: 80003 (61%)     max: 84938 Points
86050 Points (66%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12896     avg: 14943     median: 15082 (37%)     max: 17594 Points
min: 14512     avg: 20484     median: 21043.5 (52%)     max: 24451 Points
min: 23381     avg: 23704     median: 23703.5 (58%)     max: 24026 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 79585     avg: 89333     median: 90156 (73%)     max: 97433 Points
min: 78128     avg: 83169     median: 82567 (67%)     max: 89517 Points
94127 Points (76%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 79896     avg: 89470     median: 90458.5 (73%)     max: 97065 Points
min: 76234     avg: 83137     median: 82433.5 (67%)     max: 90527 Points
94179 Points (76%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 87275     avg: 92212     median: 90815 (75%)     max: 99941 Points
min: 76690     avg: 84751     median: 85392 (71%)     max: 91451 Points
96702 Points (80%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 10809     avg: 12625     median: 13289 (34%)     max: 13617 Points
min: 16889     avg: 21197     median: 21362 (54%)     max: 23560 Points
22992 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 17079     avg: 20000     median: 20088 (36%)     max: 22477 Points
min: 24944     avg: 32689     median: 32575 (58%)     max: 35932 Points
min: 29163     avg: 30051     median: 30050.5 (54%)     max: 30938 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5938     avg: 6976     median: 6901 (29%)     max: 8287 Points
min: 8552     avg: 11730     median: 11913 (50%)     max: 13232 Points
min: 11599     avg: 11652     median: 11652 (49%)     max: 11705 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2155     avg: 2226     median: 2237 (56%)     max: 2293 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 7081     avg: 8200     median: 8123 (32%)     max: 9109 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2069     avg: 2132     median: 2157 (68%)     max: 2174 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 7595     avg: 8075     median: 7881 (32%)     max: 8789 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1527     avg: 1614     median: 1636 (64%)     max: 1665 Points
min: 1137     avg: 1574     median: 1604 (63%)     max: 1737 Points
min: 1665     avg: 1683     median: 1683 (66%)     max: 1701 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6777     avg: 7342     median: 7200 (13%)     max: 8330 Points
min: 6512     avg: 11914     median: 11765 (21%)     max: 15119 Points
min: 10093     avg: 10724     median: 10723.5 (19%)     max: 11354 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1509     avg: 1563     median: 1575 (7%)     max: 1594 Points
min: 1162     avg: 1534     median: 1588 (7%)     max: 1670 Points
1673 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6675     avg: 7214     median: 7120.5 (22%)     max: 7938 Points
min: 6534     avg: 12041     median: 12813 (40%)     max: 14983 Points
11246 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6930     avg: 7118     median: 7169.5 (72%)     max: 7203 Points
min: 5479     avg: 6880     median: 7034 (70%)     max: 7392 Points
7333 Points (73%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 26009     avg: 28043     median: 28052 (28%)     max: 30058 Points
min: 29337     avg: 48522     median: 52798.5 (53%)     max: 57137 Points
44131 Points (44%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 556     avg: 569     median: 564.5 (1%)     max: 590 ms
min: 564     avg: 620     median: 582.5 (1%)     max: 905 ms
min: 558     avg: 576     median: 575.5 (1%)     max: 593 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 228     avg: 233.5     median: 233.5 (64%)     max: 239 Points
245 Points (67%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 253     avg: 278.4     median: 285 (51%)     max: 292 Points
min: 178     avg: 266.4     median: 279 (50%)     max: 307 Points
min: 296     avg: 301.5     median: 301.5 (54%)     max: 307 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1463     avg: 1537     median: 1540 (58%)     max: 1637 Points
min: 1514     avg: 1579     median: 1580 (59%)     max: 1619 Points
1541 Points (58%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 52.5     avg: 67.2     median: 61.5 (11%)     max: 90.4 Watt
min: 105.1     avg: 154.2     median: 122 (21%)     max: 235.6 Watt
242.3 Watt (42%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 57.3     avg: 72.5     median: 65.9 (12%)     max: 102.2 Watt
min: 106.6     avg: 152.1     median: 114 (21%)     max: 235.8 Watt
220.7 Watt (40%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.6     avg: 9.3     median: 10.7 (7%)     max: 11.3 Watt
min: 63.1     avg: 75     median: 73.6 (49%)     max: 88.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
7.2 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 15.4     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (13%)     max: 20.1 Points per Watt
min: 15.8     avg: 17.3     median: 16.4 (12%)     max: 19.8 Points per Watt
11.9 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-12450H → 100% n=44

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 5900X → 153% n=44

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 5800X → 142% n=44

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 07. 01:40:25

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14057 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12782 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 12783 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754523625s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 06 Aug 2025 11:23:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14057 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 14057 +0.02s ... 0.033s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12782 +0.005s ... 0.038s

#11 got single benchmarks 12782 +0.049s ... 0.087s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12783 +0.005s ... 0.092s

#13 got single benchmarks 12783 +0.006s ... 0.098s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.098s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.091s ... 0.189s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.189s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)