Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-1135G7 vs Intel Processor N200

Intel Core i5-1135G7

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1135G7

The Intel Core i5-1135G7 is a quad-core, mid-range SoC designed to be used in ultra-light laptops. The Tiger Lake-UP3 processor was introduced in September 2020. It features four Willow Cove CPU cores running at 2.4 GHz (base clock speed @ 28 W TDP) Boosting up to 4.2 GHz (1-core Boost). The all-core Boost clock speed sits at 3.8 GHz. This is a Hyper-Threading-enabled CPU, allowing for up to 8 concurrent processing threads.

Architecture

A sizeable performance-per-MHz boost is one of the multiple strengths of Tiger Lake compared to the older Ice Lake and Comet Lake product families. Core i5-1135G7 is compatible with dual-channel DDR4-3200 or quad-channel LPDDR4x-4267 RAM, supports PCI-Express 4.0 (4 lanes) and is capable of HW-accelerating AI workloads. Thunderbolt 4, USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6 support is partially baked into the chip. Four PCI-Express 4.0 lanes allow for read/write rates of up to 7.9 GB/s, provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

The i5 is manufactured on Intel's third-gen 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin that is supposedly comparable to TSMC's 7 nm process that Ryzen 4000 series laptop-grade processors are manufactured on. Both the CPU cores and the iGPU enjoy access to 8 MB of L3 cache. Higher-end Core i7-11x5 processors are notable for their larger Level 3 cache (12 MB versus 8 MB), faster iGPUs and higher clock speeds. Core i5-1135G7 is supposed to be permanently soldered to the motherboard (BGA1449 socket interface) and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

The average i5-1135G7 in our database delivers multi-thread benchmark scores close to those of the Core i7-10810U, Core i5-1145G7, Core i5-1230U and also the Ryzen 7 3780U. The performance may not be ground-breaking, but it’s still on the sunnier side. This Core i5 will have no difficulty coping with some light gaming and video editing on the go, and the usual web browsing and spreadsheet editing will pose no problem to it, either.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 25 W, the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 is among the fastest laptops built around the 1135G7 that we know of. It can be about 60% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The 80 EU Iris Xe Graphics G7 is based on Intel's Gen 12 architecture. The iGPU is somewhat faster than the older Iris Plus G7 (Ice Lake) and much faster than the UHD 620 (Comet Lake). The 80 EUs are clocked at 400 MHz to 1,300 MHz. This graphics adapter can drive up to 4 monitors in resolutions up to SUHD 4320p@60 and hardware decode the AVC, HEVC, VP9 and last but not the least AV1 video streams. The iGPU's gaming performance is close to what a typical GeForce MX250 has in store; casual gamers will be happy with the Xe as it will easily handle most titles at 720p on low or medium quality settings. An important thing to keep in mind is that the iGPU has no video memory of its own, making fast RAM a necessity.

Power consumption

Just like all other Tiger Lake-UP3 chips, the i5-1135G7 has a default TDP of 12 W to 28 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value to get higher clock speeds and thus better performance. Either way, these values are a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The CPU is built with Intel's 3rd generation 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin for decent, as of mid 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

The Intel Processor N200 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. Compared to older processors, the N200 should be similar to a Core i5-8250U (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.4 GHz, 15W) when the power limit is not restricting performance.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N200 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Core i5-1135G7Intel Processor N200
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Alder Lake-N
CodenameTiger Lake-UP3Alder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Core i7-1195G7 compare2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 compare3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 « 2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 compare2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 compare3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock2400 - 4200 MHz1000 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache320 KB
L2 Cache5 MB
L3 Cache8 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP28 Watt6 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1449
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (400 - 1300 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1135G7
32.4 pt (45%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
21.5 pt (30%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
45 Points (31%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
91 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 2786     avg: 4724     median: 4894 (5%)     max: 6136 Points
1406 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1062     avg: 1322     median: 1345 (57%)     max: 1373 Points
690 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 375     avg: 507     median: 515 (57%)     max: 527 Points
265 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 979     avg: 1827     median: 1859 (5%)     max: 2382 Points
542 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 431     avg: 792     median: 822 (5%)     max: 941 Points
219 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 141.4     avg: 194.4     median: 198 (60%)     max: 205 Points
113 Points (34%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 6.37     avg: 8.5     median: 9.3 (12%)     max: 9.72 Points
2.7 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.31     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (58%)     max: 2.36 Points
1.4 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8116     avg: 8143     median: 8116 (49%)     max: 8198 Points
3937 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 20445     avg: 24311     median: 25271 (18%)     max: 27216 Points
7549 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 24499     avg: 30750     median: 30749.5 (21%)     max: 37000 Points
11030 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 10395     avg: 10455     median: 10455 (13%)     max: 10515 Points
5971 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 231.3     avg: 259.1     median: 259.1 (3%)     max: 286.835 s
875 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.525     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (1%)     max: 6.799 s
26 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4185     avg: 6282     median: 5283 (8%)     max: 9377 Points
2115 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 14745     avg: 21407     median: 21892.5 (13%)     max: 24873 MIPS
7146 MIPS (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3924     avg: 4674     median: 4723.5 (56%)     max: 4921 MIPS
3230 MIPS (39%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 36.7     avg: 41.4     median: 41.4 (14%)     max: 46.1 fps
16.3 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 165.55     avg: 182.5     median: 182.5 (42%)     max: 199.5 fps
80 fps (18%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.57     avg: 5.9     median: 6 (10%)     max: 7.6 fps
1.5 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.384     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.449 GB/s
0.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.593     avg: 0.7     median: 0.8 (13%)     max: 0.774 GB/s
0.6 GB/s (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 4.2     avg: 4.9     median: 5.2 (14%)     max: 5.3 GB/s
3.2 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 1046     avg: 1263     median: 1254 (16%)     max: 1548 Seconds
4297 Seconds (55%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 499     avg: 662     median: 649.5 (5%)     max: 1044 Seconds
2150 Seconds (15%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.619     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.727 sec
1.1 sec (25%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7455     avg: 8274     median: 8274 (18%)     max: 9093 Points
3902 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.015     avg: 8.1     median: 8.1 (2%)     max: 8.093 s
18.8 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.61     avg: 17.7     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 17.81 s
42.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 388     avg: 405.6     median: 412.7 (2%)     max: 416.065 s
1011 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
22734 Points (20%)
9491 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6423     avg: 9300     median: 9456 (26%)     max: 11623 Points
2765 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 38873     avg: 55717     median: 58666 (48%)     max: 63164 Points
27649 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 39405     avg: 55009     median: 59162 (48%)     max: 63612 Points
28655 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 54397     avg: 63114     median: 64419 (54%)     max: 65372 Points
34749 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 4680     avg: 7779     median: 8064 (20%)     max: 9304 Points
2848 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 1015     avg: 11403     median: 11896 (21%)     max: 13480 Points
4135 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2664     avg: 3871     median: 3850 (16%)     max: 5262 Points
1251 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
956 Points (26%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1660 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1147     avg: 1373     median: 1384 (58%)     max: 1428 Points
928 Points (39%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3475     avg: 4663     median: 4688 (8%)     max: 5472 Points
1540 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1156     avg: 1365     median: 1379 (6%)     max: 1407 Points
891 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3937     avg: 4752     median: 4761.5 (15%)     max: 5268 Points
1518 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5194     avg: 5874     median: 5911 (59%)     max: 6081 Points
4552 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16405     avg: 18945     median: 18889 (21%)     max: 20747 Points
9989 Points (11%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 710     avg: 739     median: 721.5 (1%)     max: 1273 ms
1460 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 137.6     avg: 152.5     median: 143.3 (2%)     max: 176.5 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 39503     avg: 57825     median: 58147 (52%)     max: 62664 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 171.3     avg: 179.9     median: 180.4 (52%)     max: 186.4 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 151     avg: 226.1     median: 226.5 (47%)     max: 244 Points
171.3 Points (36%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1058     avg: 1176     median: 1169.5 (45%)     max: 1293 Points
614 Points (24%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 20     avg: 37     median: 37.4 (6%)     max: 56.8 Watt
104%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 22.4     avg: 42.4     median: 42.6 (8%)     max: 61.2 Watt
106%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 2.47     avg: 4.6     median: 3.8 (3%)     max: 7.02 Watt
98%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.56     avg: 6.4     median: 5.6 (6%)     max: 14.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 15     avg: 19.2     median: 18.2 (14%)     max: 32.1 Points per Watt
88%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1135G7 → 100% n=47

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 55% n=47

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 09. 07:38:45

#0 checking url part for id 12238 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 07 Jun 2024 05:41:01 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.042s ... 0.043s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.043s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12238 +0.022s ... 0.065s

#7 got single benchmarks 12238 +0.305s ... 0.37s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.022s ... 0.392s

#9 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.015s ... 0.407s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.407s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.539s ... 0.946s

#12 return log +0.035s ... 0.981s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)