Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 275HX

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is a mobile high-end CPU for gaming notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 24 cores consisting of 8 fast performance cores with up to 5.4 GHz and 16 smaller efficiency cores with up to 4.6 GHz clock speed. The CPU has access to 40 MB L2 cache and 36 MB L3 cache and is specified with a TDP of 55 watts.

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Essentials. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB DDR5-6400 (dual channel, ECC optional). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is a small Intel Graphics graphics card with four Xe cores running at 300 - 1900 MHz.

Performance - High End

The performance of the Ultra 9 275HX is only slightly behind the top model, the Core Ultra 9 285HX, due to the 100 MHz lower boost clock of the P-cores Core Ultra 9 285HX and therefore also remains below the similar Desktop Core Ultra 9 285K (higher clocked with up to 5.7 GHz and more TDP with 125 watts). Due to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should perform just behind or at the level of the Raptor Lake Core i9-14900HX (8 + 16 cores, max 5.8 / 4.1 GHz). This makes the CPU ideal for very demanding tasks such as high-end gaming and content creation.

Production - TSMC and Foveros

The Arrow Lake-HX chips are based on the desktop Arrow Lake-S chips and are composed of several chiplets. The CPU part is manufactured at TSMC in the modern N3B (3nm) process, the GPU also comes from TSMC in the N5P process. The SoC and I/O tile are manufactured in the TSMC N6 process. The base tile is manufactured by Intel in the 22nm process and carries the individual chiplets thanks to Fovero's 3D packaging.

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is a powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in June 2024. The APU comes with 12 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.1 GHz, the 16 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 890M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support.

Of the 12 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores and 8 are smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter run at significantly lower clock speeds than the former.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the HX 370 supports LPDDR5x-8000 and DDR5-5600 RAM, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

Given the IPC improvement, we expect 4 Zen 5 cores combined with 8 Zen 5c cores to perform about as well as 16 Zen 4 cores meaning there is a real chance of the HX 370 dethroning the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. We'll make sure to update this section once we get our hands on a laptop powered by the HX 370.

Graphics

The Radeon 890M is the most powerful iGPU that AMD has on offer right now. It features 16 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (1024 unified shaders) running at up to 2,900 MHz. We expect the graphics adapter to deliver gaming performance good enough for playing 2023 and 2024 games in 1080p (Low detail settings).

Naturally, the 890M is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The HX 370 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of mid 2024, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 9 275HXAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
CodenameArrow Lake-HXStrix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)
SeriesIntel Arrow LakeAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Series: Arrow Lake Arrow Lake-HX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX compare2.1 - 5.5 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX « 2.1 - 5.4 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX compare2.3 - 5.3 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX compare2.3 - 5.2 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX compare2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX compare2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Clock2100 - 5400 MHz2000 - 5100 MHz
L2 Cache40 MB12 MB
L3 Cache36 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads24 / 24
8 x 5.4 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-Core
16 x 4.6 GHz Intel Skymont E-Core
12 / 24
4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
TDP55 Watt28 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2160 Watt54 Watt
Technology3 nm4 nm
iGPUIntel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (300 - 1900 MHz)AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)
NPU / AI13 TOPS INT850 TOPS INT8
Chip AI36 TOPS INT880 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comwww.amd.com
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 275HX
48.5 pt (81%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.2 pt (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 123.1     avg: 134     median: 134.7 (67%)     max: 138.2 Points
min: 113.6     avg: 117     median: 117 (58%)     max: 121 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1547     avg: 2023     median: 2049 (38%)     max: 2288 Points
min: 621     avg: 1083     median: 1152 (21%)     max: 1299 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 30712     avg: 35882     median: 35959 (33%)     max: 40970 Points
min: 10435     avg: 20668     median: 21897 (20%)     max: 23902 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2009     avg: 2190     median: 2194.5 (89%)     max: 2267 Points
min: 1921     avg: 2012     median: 2018.5 (82%)     max: 2049 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 774     avg: 845     median: 853 (93%)     max: 870 Points
min: 753     avg: 789     median: 791 (86%)     max: 804 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 12026     avg: 14054     median: 14183 (35%)     max: 16108 Points
min: 6449     avg: 8395     median: 8817 (21%)     max: 9280 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4756     avg: 5589     median: 5668 (36%)     max: 6271 Points
min: 2498.13     avg: 3242     median: 3448 (22%)     max: 3551 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 306     avg: 331.3     median: 334 (93%)     max: 343 Points
min: 188.8     avg: 291.6     median: 307 (85%)     max: 315 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
67.9 Points (88%)
min: 34.85     avg: 39     median: 39.5 (51%)     max: 41.17 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
4 Points (95%)
min: 3.59     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (88%)     max: 3.7 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
12237 Points (74%)
min: 8437     avg: 8639     median: 8655 (52%)     max: 8797 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
94497 Points (68%)
min: 48553     avg: 53517     median: 53766 (39%)     max: 56689 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
88529 Points (57%)
min: 89081     avg: 97658     median: 98125 (63%)     max: 103657 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14731 Points (18%)
min: 15381     avg: 15748     median: 15797 (19%)     max: 15935 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
45.1 s (1%)
min: 50.536     avg: 75.7     median: 79.4 (1%)     max: 84.742 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.4 s (0%)
min: 2.701     avg: 2.9     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 3.743 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
10119 Points (16%)
min: 4008     avg: 4504     median: 4759 (8%)     max: 4859 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 98236     avg: 113381     median: 112452 (65%)     max: 124155 MIPS
min: 66154     avg: 78634     median: 80868 (46%)     max: 84735 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6026     avg: 6695     median: 6687 (79%)     max: 7149 MIPS
min: 5859     avg: 6178     median: 6179 (73%)     max: 6497 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
259 fps (7%)
min: 144.9     avg: 167.2     median: 169.8 (4%)     max: 185.1 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
395.5 fps (10%)
min: 300     avg: 309.4     median: 306 (8%)     max: 330 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 30.7     avg: 38     median: 38.6 (68%)     max: 43.8 fps
min: 20.3     avg: 25.5     median: 26.3 (46%)     max: 28.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.6     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (47%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.5     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (47%)     max: 2.8 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 15.1     avg: 15.5     median: 15.3 (40%)     max: 16.6 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 134     avg: 153.7     median: 151 (2%)     max: 190 Seconds
min: 208     avg: 237     median: 221 (3%)     max: 306 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 82     avg: 95.1     median: 94 (1%)     max: 116 Seconds
min: 139     avg: 155.2     median: 147.5 (1%)     max: 192 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3943     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4568 sec
min: 0.3892     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.529 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 20771     avg: 21014     median: 20860 (44%)     max: 21412 Points
min: 13761     avg: 16239     median: 16471.5 (35%)     max: 17466 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.1 s (2%)
min: 8.224     avg: 8.4     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.482 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.4 s (1%)
min: 17.504     avg: 18.6     median: 17.8 (1%)     max: 22.248 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 118679     avg: 122525     median: 122974 (94%)     max: 125471 Points
min: 66119     avg: 73048     median: 75346 (58%)     max: 77565 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 21109     avg: 26467     median: 26595.5 (65%)     max: 29050 Points
min: 17129     avg: 20590     median: 20813 (51%)     max: 24599 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 104288     avg: 109602     median: 109523 (89%)     max: 115412 Points
min: 50952     avg: 62767     median: 63723.5 (52%)     max: 76578 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 107788     avg: 110909     median: 109856 (89%)     max: 116134 Points
min: 50955     avg: 64270     median: 66513.5 (54%)     max: 77375 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 111394     avg: 114497     median: 113780 (91%)     max: 119034 Points
min: 48351     avg: 63261     median: 64870 (52%)     max: 76518 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 22080     avg: 26083     median: 25886 (65%)     max: 29274 Points
min: 16960     avg: 19505     median: 19578 (50%)     max: 21349 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 37357     avg: 46945     median: 47850 (85%)     max: 53870 Points
min: 24918     avg: 30155     median: 30474.5 (54%)     max: 33844 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 13789     avg: 16117     median: 16277 (69%)     max: 17607 Points
min: 8866     avg: 10471     median: 10581.5 (45%)     max: 12293 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2843     avg: 3033     median: 3057 (71%)     max: 3160 Points
min: 2780     avg: 2888     median: 2884 (67%)     max: 2965 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 16033     avg: 19376     median: 19464 (76%)     max: 21668 Points
min: 11973     avg: 14661     median: 15043 (58%)     max: 16311 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2691     avg: 2796     median: 2796 (89%)     max: 2901 Points
min: 2645     avg: 2751     median: 2764 (88%)     max: 2844 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 17227     avg: 18101     median: 18101 (74%)     max: 18975 Points
min: 12289     avg: 13856     median: 14161 (58%)     max: 15017 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2033     avg: 2200     median: 2224 (75%)     max: 2292 Points
min: 1957     avg: 2089     median: 2097 (71%)     max: 2175 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 19105     avg: 22869     median: 22642 (41%)     max: 25855 Points
min: 11394     avg: 14325     median: 14477.5 (26%)     max: 16322 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2058     avg: 2118     median: 2117.5 (9%)     max: 2177 Points
min: 1827     avg: 1935     median: 1934.5 (8%)     max: 2041 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 21162     avg: 22375     median: 22374.5 (71%)     max: 23587 Points
min: 12962     avg: 14250     median: 14282 (45%)     max: 15009 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8615     avg: 8894     median: 8894 (89%)     max: 9173 Points
min: 7480     avg: 7969     median: 7818 (78%)     max: 8628 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 80186     avg: 84364     median: 84363.5 (83%)     max: 88541 Points
min: 42842     avg: 52918     median: 54586.5 (54%)     max: 57060 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 402     avg: 414.5     median: 411.5 (0%)     max: 432 ms
min: 307.8     avg: 436     median: 433.5 (1%)     max: 503 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 123370     avg: 127054     median: 127124 (84%)     max: 130140 Points
min: 64079     avg: 112489     median: 122618 (81%)     max: 125813 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 285     avg: 325.4     median: 330 (86%)     max: 341 Points
min: 210     avg: 256.8     median: 259 (67%)     max: 345 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 306     avg: 351.5     median: 346.5 (62%)     max: 532 Points
min: 252     avg: 308.4     median: 317 (57%)     max: 363 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1857     avg: 2161     median: 2175 (81%)     max: 2339 Points
min: 1344     avg: 1779     median: 1785 (67%)     max: 2040 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 93.9     avg: 195.7     median: 195.7 (34%)     max: 270 Watt
min: 45.6     avg: 90.6     median: 93 (16%)     max: 133.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 153.1     avg: 219.5     median: 228 (42%)     max: 259 Watt
min: 46.3     avg: 94.6     median: 101.8 (19%)     max: 130.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 10.3     avg: 31     median: 27.2 (18%)     max: 79.9 Watt
min: 3.66     avg: 8.7     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 19.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 10.1     avg: 22.8     median: 22.2 (16%)     max: 38.4 Watt
min: 6.31     avg: 9.5     median: 9.2 (7%)     max: 12.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20.4     avg: 26.1     median: 24.3 (18%)     max: 33.8 Points per Watt
min: 26.9     avg: 36.1     median: 32.4 (24%)     max: 54.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX → 100% n=51

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 → 77% n=51

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 26. 07:49:40

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18886 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17543 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1766731780s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Dec 2025 05:19:44 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18886 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 18886 +0.045s ... 0.055s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17543 +0.006s ... 0.06s

#10 got single benchmarks 17543 +0.04s ... 0.1s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.1s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.083s ... 0.183s

#13 return log +0.007s ... 0.191s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)