NVIDIA Quadro M1200 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
NVIDIA Quadro M1200
► remove from comparison
The 28 nm Nvidia Quadro M1200 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a (first generation) Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM107 chip with 640 shader cores. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M. The Quadro M1200M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is the successor to the Quadro M1000M (950M based).
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
Performance
The performance of the Quadro M1200 is on a level to the previous generation M2000M which is also based on the 960M. In games it is comparable to the GTX 960M although the driver support is not optimized for gaming.
Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M2000M can be used for general calculations.
Power Consumption
The power consumption of the Quadro M1200 is rated for the same TGP of 45 Watt (32.5 Watt TDP) and therefore a bit lower than the M2000M with 55 Watt TGP.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
► remove from comparisonThe Nvidia Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design is a professional high-end graphics card for powerful laptops and mobile workstations. It is based on the same TU106 chip as the consumer GeForce RTX 2070 (mobile) but with reduced clock speeds, shader count and memory bandwidth. Compared to the normal mobile RTX3000, the Max-Q variants are clocked lower and work in a more efficient state. Currently, we know of three variants with different clock speeds and power consumptions (60, 65 and 70 W).
Model | Shader | TGP (W) | Base (MHz) | Boost (MHz) |
Quadro RTX 4000 Desktop | 2304 | 160 | 1005 | 1545 |
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile | 1920 | 80 | 945 | 1380 |
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | 1920 | 70 | 870 | 1380 |
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | 2304 | 65 | 765 | 1305 |
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | 2304 | 60 | 600 | 1215 |
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 2304 | 80 | 885 | 1185 |
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 2304 | 90 | 1080 | 1305 |
The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers, which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.
Features
NVIDIA manufacturers the TU106 chip on a 12 nm FinFET process and includes features like Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) and Real-Time Ray Tracing (RTRT), which should combine to create more realistic lighting effects than older GPUs based on the company's Pascal architecture (if the games support it). The Quadro RTX 3000 is also DisplayPort 1.4 ready, while there is also support for HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) and H.265 video en/decoding (PlayReady 3.0).
Performance
In professional applications, the Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q can be faster GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q due to the optimized drivers and bigger VRAM. When gaming with the RTX 3000, the slower clock speeds and less frequently updated drivers should hinder the performance compared to the GeForce variant.
The still relatively high power consumption of the RTX3000 Max-Q makes the card most suited for big laptops. However, we should see thinner designs with the Max-Q variants than the regular RTX 3000.
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
► remove from comparisonThe Nvidia Quadro T2000 with Max-Q Design is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is based on the consumer desktop GTX 1650 Ti therefore currently between a mobile GTX 1650 and GTX 1660 Ti. The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC. Compared to the normal Quadro T2000, the Max-Q variants are clocked lower and work in a more efficient state. Currently, we know of two variants with different clock speeds and power consumptions (35 and 40 W).
Model | Shader | TGP (W) | Base (MHz) | Boost (MHz) |
Quadro T2000 Mobile | 1024 | 60 | 1575 | 1785 |
Quadro T2000 Max-Q | 1024 | 40 | 1200 | 1620 |
Quadro T2000 Max-Q | 1024 | 35 | 930 | 1500 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Desktop) | 1024 | 75? | 1530 | 1725 |
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 1536 | 80 | 1455 | 1590 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 896 | 50 | 1395 | 1560 |
The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal.
The performance in professional apps should be clearly lower than a normal (Max-P) Quadro T2000 due to the lower clock speeds, but still ahead the slower Quadro T1000 due to the higher shader count. Compared to consumer cards, the mobile GTX 1650 should be still slower.
Thanks to the relative low power consumption of the Quadro T2000 Max-Q, the GPU is suited for thin and light laptops. The used TU116 chip is manufactured in 12nm FFN at TSMC.
NVIDIA Quadro M1200 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quadro Turing Series |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Codename | N17P-Q1 | N19E-Q1 MAX-Q | N19P-Q3 MAX-Q | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Architecture | Maxwell | Turing | Turing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pipelines | 640 - unified | 1920 - unified | 1024 - unified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Core Speed | 991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz | 600 - 870 - 1215 - 1380 (Boost) MHz | 930 / 1200 - 1500 / 1620 (Boost) MHz | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Memory Speed | 5000 MHz | 14000 MHz | 8000 MHz | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Memory Bus Width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit | 128 Bit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 | GDDR5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Max. Amount of Memory | 4 GB | 6 GB | 4 GB | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shared Memory | no | no | no | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
API | DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 | DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 | DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Consumption | 45 Watt | 60 - 70 Watt | 35 - 40 Watt | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transistors | 1.9 Billion | 10.8 Billion | 4.7 Billion | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
technology | 28 nm | 12 nm | 12 nm | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features | Optimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus | DLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notebook Size | large | large | medium sized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date of Announcement | 13.01.2017 | 27.05.2019 | 27.05.2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to Manufacturer Page | www.nvidia.de |
Benchmarks
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M1200 → 100% n=21
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q → 366% n=21
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q → 255% n=21

* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks
The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Hitman 3
2021
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0
2020
Yakuza Like a Dragon
2020
Dirt 5
2020
Watch Dogs Legion
2020
Horizon Zero Dawn
2020
Death Stranding
2020
F1 2020
2020
Gears Tactics
2020
Doom Eternal
2020
Hunt Showdown
2020
Need for Speed Heat
2019
GRID 2019
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Control
2019
Anno 1800
2019
The Division 2
2019
Dirt Rally 2.0
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
Apex Legends
2019
Hitman 2
2018
Far Cry 5
2018
X-Plane 11.11
2018
Doom
2016
Dota 2 Reborn
2015
The Witcher 3
2015
GTA V
2015
Thief
2014
BioShock Infinite
2013Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M1200 → 100%
Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q → 339%
Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 376%
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q → 227%
Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 239%
NVIDIA Quadro M1200 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | ||||
Hitman 3 | 178 | 100 | 86 | 78 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 | 93 | 52 | 43 | 36 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||
Immortals Fenyx Rising | 105 | 71 | 63 | 58 | 24 | ||||||||||||||||
Yakuza Like a Dragon | 131 | 88 | 66 | 59 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla | 90 | 60 | 50 | 44 | 19 | ||||||||||||||||
Dirt 5 | 133 | 71 | 58 | 47 | 37 | 23 | |||||||||||||||
Watch Dogs Legion | 110 | 70 | 61 | 33 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||
Horizon Zero Dawn | 118 | 76 | 65 | 56 | 41 | 23 | |||||||||||||||
Death Stranding | 98 | 85 | 79 | 76 | 54 | 29 | |||||||||||||||
Doom Eternal | 178.3 | 119.2 | 104.4 | 102.6 | 67.5 | 31.6 | 147.4 | 85.5 | 58.1 | ||||||||||||
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order | 76.8 | 71.8 | 66.3 | 46.8 | 24.1 | 64.2 | 53.1 | 47 | |||||||||||||
Need for Speed Heat | 82 | 74.7 | 66.7 | 61.9 | 47.5 | 25.9 | |||||||||||||||
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 | 142.5 | 93.8 | 81 | 54.3 | 34 | 17.5 | |||||||||||||||
GRID 2019 | 93 | 72.4 | 66.3 | 51.4 | 46.6 | 21.2 | 179 | 94.7 | 77.7 | 51 | |||||||||||
Ghost Recon Breakpoint | 75 | 65 | 59 | 45 | 32 | 16 | |||||||||||||||
The Division 2 | 114 | 86 | 68 | 50 | 34 | 17 | |||||||||||||||
Dirt Rally 2.0 | 203 | 128 | 101 | 64 | 47.2 | 271 | 86.1 | 69.9 | 40.3 | ||||||||||||
Hitman 2 | 66.3 | 63.2 | 57.5 | 55.9 | 44.8 | 24.3 | |||||||||||||||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 86 | 76 | 71 | 65 | 43 | 21 | 101 | 56 | 48 | 42 | |||||||||||
Far Cry 5 | 143 | 87 | 79 | 75 | 26 | ||||||||||||||||
X-Plane 11.11 | 110 | 97 | 81 | 65 | 96 | 82 | 69 | 47.2 | |||||||||||||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 149 | 79.1 | 59.5 | 43.8 | 25.9 | 91 | 45 | 33 | 25.7 | 13 | |||||||||||
Rise of the Tomb Raider | 88.1 | 49.15 | 28.36 | 23.92 | 9.88 | 195 | 139 | 96.7 | 80.8 | 34 | |||||||||||
Dota 2 Reborn | 144 | 131 | 126 | 118 | 75 | 149 | 136 | 124 | 113 | 46 | |||||||||||
The Witcher 3 | 73.6 | 45.9 | 28 | 13 | 270 | 179 | 100 | 53 | 35 | 181 | 107.6 | 62.5 | 33 | ||||||||
GTA V | 155 | 150 | 111.8 | 58.5 | 49.4 | 65 | |||||||||||||||
NVIDIA Quadro M1200 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | |||||||||||||||||||
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | | 1 | < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps | 13 12 | 1 20 5 | 6 19 1 | 14 10 | 14 1 | 19 3 3 | < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps | 3 5 | 2 6 1 | 4 4 1 | 5 1 | 1 | 1 2 |
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List