Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-10510U vs Intel Celeron N4500 vs Intel Core i7-10810U

Intel Core i7-10510U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-10510U

The Intel Core i7-10510U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks based on the Comet Lake (CML-U) generation and was announced in August 2019. Compared to the similar Whiskey Lake processors (e.g.& Core i7-8665U), the only difference is support for higher memory speeds (DDR4-2666, LPDDR4-2933) and two additional cores in the top model (not in this i7-10510U). The processor cores are clocked between 1.8 and 4.9 GHz (all 4 cores 4.3 GHz max). Thanks to HyperThreading 8 threads can be used. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The integrated graphics adapter however is still the same as in the previous generations. It should be still called Intel HD Graphics 620 and clock from 300 - 1150 MHz in the i7. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a VP9 and H.265 de- and encoder and an integrated dual channel DDR4-2666 / LPDDR4-2933 memory controller.

Performance

The average 10510U in our database proves to be an OK mid-range option, its multi-thread benchmark scores hovering near those of the Ryzen 7 2700U and the Core i5-8259U. While not as impressive as the hexa-core Core i7-10710U, the 10510U will make most customers happy, making for short load times and generally pain-free experience.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 45 W, the Modern 15 A10RB is among the fastest laptops powered by the 10510U that we know of. It can be more than twice as fast in CPU-bound workloads as the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i7 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W resulting in corresponding performance and clock speed changes. By going for the lowest value, it is possible to build passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs around the i7. Please note that Comet Lake-U chips can briefly consume up to 90 W when under extreme loads.

Last but not the least, the i7-10510U is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for lower-than-average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Celeron N4500

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4500

The Intel Celeron N4500 is a dual-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The two Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 2.8 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading. The N4500 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could is up two 30% better on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the dual-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 16 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 750 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4(x) memory controller (up to 16 GB, up to 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N4500 in our database shapes up to be a fairly slow processor, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core i3-4010U. (The latter saw the light of day in 2013 as a lower mid-range, dual-core CPU designed for use in ultraportable laptops.) In other words, expect the Celeron to be painfully slow in all but the most basic activities.

You mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

Like most N-class Intel chips, the Celeron has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 6 W. This is not much at all and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

The Celeron N4500 is built with Intel's 2nd generation 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-10810U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-10810U

The Intel Core i7-10810U is a power efficient hexa-core SoC for notebooks based on the Comet Lake (CML-U) generation and appeared in March 2020. Compared to the similar Whiskey Lake processors (e.g. Core i5-8665U), the only difference is support for higher memory speeds (DDR4-2666 vs 2400) and two additional cores in the top model. The processor cores are clocked between 1.1 and 4.9 GHz. Thanks to HyperThreading 12 threads can be used. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The CPU supports professional management features vPro (as a difference to the i7-10710U).

Thanks to the two additional cores and the high clock rates, the processor performance of the i7-10710U is very good for its class. It should outperform the top Whiskey Lake and also Ice Lake processors if the cooling and TDP settings are not limiting.

The integrated graphics card however is still the same as in the previous generations. It should be still called Intel HD Graphics 620 and clock from 300 - 1150 MHz in the i7. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a VP9 and H.265 de- and encoder and an integrated dual channel DDR4-2666 / LPDDR4x 2933 / LPDDR3-2133 memory controller.

The chip is still produced on the 14nm++ process as Whiskey Lake. The TDP (PL1) is specified at 15 Watts but can be varied from 12.5 to 25 Watt from the manufacturer (cTDP up/down) resulting in different performance (especially Turbo durations). To provide the full performance, Intel proposes a short power peak of 90 W (PL4) for the i7 and therefore 8 W more than the quad-core CML-U CPUs and a whopping 19 W more than Whiskey Lake. Therefore, some slim laptops with 15W CML-U CPUs wont offer the i7 as they cant provide enough power and cooling to get full performance out of the 6 cores.

ModelIntel Core i7-10510UIntel Celeron N4500Intel Core i7-10810U
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Jasper LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-UJasper LakeComet Lake-U
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-U
Intel Core i7-10810U1.1 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10710U1.1 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10610U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10510U « 1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310U1.7 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210U1.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110U2.1 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 5205U1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10810U « 1.1 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10710U1.1 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10610U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10510U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310U1.7 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210U1.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110U2.1 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 5205U1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1800 - 4900 MHz1100 - 2800 MHz1100 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1.5 MB1 MB
L3 Cache8 MB4 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 82 / 26 / 12
TDP15 Watt6 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1528BGA1338BGA1528
FeaturesLPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2666/LPDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHALPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2666/LPDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (350 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10510U
30.2 pt (42%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4500
17.2 pt (24%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10810U
30.3 pt (42%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 3626     avg: 3866     median: 3734 (3%)     max: 4239 Points
709 Points (1%)
min: 3867     avg: 4311     median: 4310.5 (4%)     max: 4754 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1066     avg: 1142     median: 1152 (49%)     max: 1207 Points
452 Points (19%)
min: 1082     avg: 1119     median: 1118.5 (48%)     max: 1155 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 362     avg: 436.7     median: 441 (49%)     max: 497 Points
188 Points (21%)
min: 396     avg: 425.2     median: 424 (47%)     max: 447 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1015     avg: 1412     median: 1422 (3%)     max: 1897 Points
332 Points (1%)
min: 1498     avg: 1778     median: 1713 (4%)     max: 2344 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 482     avg: 666     median: 678 (4%)     max: 856 Points
171 Points (1%)
min: 623     avg: 799     median: 754 (5%)     max: 1064 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 113     avg: 178.4     median: 182 (55%)     max: 202 Points
82 Points (25%)
min: 161     avg: 175.6     median: 182 (55%)     max: 183 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
6.7 Points (9%)
2.1 Points (3%)
7 Points (9%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (49%)
1 Points (26%)
2 Points (49%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5740     avg: 6919     median: 7268 (44%)     max: 7748 Points
min: 6656     avg: 6927     median: 6926.5 (42%)     max: 7197 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 6763     avg: 19637     median: 25882 (19%)     max: 26265 Points
min: 18912     avg: 19287     median: 19286.5 (14%)     max: 19661 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
9009 Points (6%)
6954 Points (5%)
23491 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
5856 Points (7%)
5266 Points (6%)
8591 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1270 s (15%)
min: 205.3     avg: 236.3     median: 236.3 (3%)     max: 267.369 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
50.2 s (10%)
min: 4.856     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (1%)     max: 6.952 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1076 Points (2%)
min: 4747     avg: 4837     median: 4837 (8%)     max: 4927 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 12196     avg: 17704     median: 17318 (10%)     max: 21298 MIPS
5394 MIPS (3%)
min: 16072     avg: 21290     median: 21925 (13%)     max: 25244 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3747     avg: 4591     median: 4678 (56%)     max: 4981 MIPS
2853 MIPS (34%)
min: 4398     avg: 4561     median: 4498 (54%)     max: 4794 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12 fps (4%)
min: 39.15     avg: 39.4     median: 39.4 (14%)     max: 39.7 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
60.6 fps (14%)
min: 141.6     avg: 147.7     median: 147.7 (34%)     max: 153.7 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.41     avg: 4.6     median: 4.6 (8%)     max: 6.04 fps
0.7 fps (1%)
min: 3.81     avg: 5.3     median: 5.2 (9%)     max: 6.45 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.566     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (0%)     max: 0.64 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
min: 0.956     avg: 1     median: 1 (17%)     max: 1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.1 GB/s (3%)
min: 5.5     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (15%)     max: 5.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1346 Seconds (17%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 628     avg: 796     median: 797 (6%)     max: 1051 Seconds
4249 Seconds (30%)
min: 571     avg: 689     median: 694 (5%)     max: 875 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.637     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.81 sec
2.1 sec (46%)
min: 0.651     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.717 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 5989     avg: 8472     median: 6125 (13%)     max: 13303 Points
2053 Points (4%)
min: 6496     avg: 6843     median: 6842.5 (15%)     max: 7189 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22.8 s (5%)
min: 7.795     avg: 8     median: 8 (2%)     max: 8.155 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
51.4 s (2%)
min: 16.9     avg: 17.5     median: 17.5 (1%)     max: 18.167 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1132 s (5%)
min: 476.3     avg: 511     median: 510.9 (2%)     max: 545.435 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
29737 Points (26%)
25128 Points (22%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 5226     avg: 8090     median: 8048.5 (22%)     max: 11006 Points
1507 Points (4%)
min: 6537     avg: 8591     median: 8534 (23%)     max: 10599 Points
43938 Points (36%)
44043 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 41700     avg: 56447     median: 58554 (49%)     max: 67021 Points
51608 Points (43%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 4131     avg: 6524     median: 6215 (16%)     max: 9653 Points
1521 Points (4%)
min: 6231     avg: 7704     median: 7279 (18%)     max: 10034 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 5667     avg: 9849     median: 10085 (18%)     max: 13225 Points
2017 Points (4%)
min: 9003     avg: 10590     median: 10730 (19%)     max: 11864 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2142     avg: 3135     median: 3088 (13%)     max: 4801 Points
504 Points (2%)
min: 2331     avg: 3331     median: 3587 (15%)     max: 4127 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
457 Points (12%)
1563 Points (42%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
662 Points (3%)
4090 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 977     avg: 1197     median: 1212 (51%)     max: 1287 Points
min: 401     avg: 531     median: 594 (25%)     max: 598 Points
min: 1219     avg: 1240     median: 1226 (52%)     max: 1274 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2474     avg: 3687     median: 3663 (7%)     max: 4484 Points
min: 707     avg: 929     median: 1018 (2%)     max: 1063 Points
min: 3351     avg: 4350     median: 3934 (7%)     max: 5553 Points
min: 1220     avg: 1229     median: 1233 (5%)     max: 1235 Points
min: 3924     avg: 4908     median: 5168 (16%)     max: 5631 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4976     avg: 5400     median: 5368 (54%)     max: 5832 Points
min: 4762     avg: 5082     median: 5203 (52%)     max: 5281 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13116     avg: 16270     median: 17109 (19%)     max: 18364 Points
min: 19324     avg: 21447     median: 22485 (25%)     max: 22533 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16742     avg: 16790     median: 16790 (30%)     max: 16838 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 4369     avg: 4427     median: 4427 (86%)     max: 4485 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 742     avg: 885     median: 859 (1%)     max: 1184 ms
min: 1665.2     avg: 2413     median: 2412.6 (3%)     max: 3160 ms
min: 853     avg: 901     median: 914 (1%)     max: 968 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
197.1 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 31505     avg: 41519     median: 38295 (34%)     max: 51741 Points
24838 Points (22%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
91.2 Points (26%)
161.3 Points (46%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 192     avg: 209.1     median: 210 (44%)     max: 226 Points
min: 48.2     avg: 94.8     median: 94.8 (20%)     max: 141.3 Points
min: 202     avg: 205.2     median: 206 (43%)     max: 207 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
6833 Points (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
7404 Points (34%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1101 Points (42%)
1018 Points (39%)
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
81 Points (45%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 23     avg: 37.8     median: 38 (7%)     max: 50 Watt
10.7 Watt (2%)
min: 29.1     avg: 46.9     median: 46.9 (8%)     max: 64.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 25.5     avg: 41.2     median: 38.4 (7%)     max: 61 Watt
9.1 Watt (2%)
min: 32.6     avg: 53.9     median: 53.9 (10%)     max: 75.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
10.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
5.5 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.5 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 8.95     avg: 16.7     median: 17 (13%)     max: 22.4 Points per Watt
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)
14.2 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10510U → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4500 → 43% n=24

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10810U → 115% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 23. 03:49:53

#0 checking url part for id 11457 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13079 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11935 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 May 2024 05:37:27 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.051s ... 0.052s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.052s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11457 +0.031s ... 0.083s

#8 got single benchmarks 11457 +0.293s ... 0.376s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13079 +0.027s ... 0.403s

#10 got single benchmarks 13079 +0.04s ... 0.442s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11935 +0.032s ... 0.475s

#12 got single benchmarks 11935 +0.042s ... 0.516s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.516s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.69s ... 1.206s

#15 return log +0s ... 1.206s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)