Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N4500 vs Intel Core i7-10810U

Intel Celeron N4500

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4500

The Intel Celeron N4500 is a dual-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The two Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 2.8 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading. The N4500 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could is up two 30% better on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the dual-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 16 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 750 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4(x) memory controller (up to 16 GB, up to 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N4500 in our database shapes up to be a fairly slow processor, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core i3-4010U. (The latter saw the light of day in 2013 as a lower mid-range, dual-core CPU designed for use in ultraportable laptops.) In other words, expect the Celeron to be painfully slow in all but the most basic activities.

You mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

Like most N-class Intel chips, the Celeron has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 6 W. This is not much at all and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

The Celeron N4500 is built with Intel's 2nd generation 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-10810U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-10810U

The Intel Core i7-10810U is a power efficient hexa-core SoC for notebooks based on the Comet Lake (CML-U) generation and appeared in March 2020. Compared to the similar Whiskey Lake processors (e.g. Core i5-8665U), the only difference is support for higher memory speeds (DDR4-2666 vs 2400) and two additional cores in the top model. The processor cores are clocked between 1.1 and 4.9 GHz. Thanks to HyperThreading 12 threads can be used. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The CPU supports professional management features vPro (as a difference to the i7-10710U).

Thanks to the two additional cores and the high clock rates, the processor performance of the i7-10710U is very good for its class. It should outperform the top Whiskey Lake and also Ice Lake processors if the cooling and TDP settings are not limiting.

The integrated graphics card however is still the same as in the previous generations. It should be still called Intel HD Graphics 620 and clock from 300 - 1150 MHz in the i7. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a VP9 and H.265 de- and encoder and an integrated dual channel DDR4-2666 / LPDDR4x 2933 / LPDDR3-2133 memory controller.

The chip is still produced on the 14nm++ process as Whiskey Lake. The TDP (PL1) is specified at 15 Watts but can be varied from 12.5 to 25 Watt from the manufacturer (cTDP up/down) resulting in different performance (especially Turbo durations). To provide the full performance, Intel proposes a short power peak of 90 W (PL4) for the i7 and therefore 8 W more than the quad-core CML-U CPUs and a whopping 19 W more than Whiskey Lake. Therefore, some slim laptops with 15W CML-U CPUs wont offer the i7 as they cant provide enough power and cooling to get full performance out of the 6 cores.

ModelIntel Celeron N4500Intel Core i7-10810U
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameJasper LakeComet Lake-U
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-U
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10810U « 1.1 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10710U compare1.1 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10610U compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10510U compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310U compare1.7 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210U compare1.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110U compare2.1 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 5205U compare1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1100 - 2800 MHz1100 - 4900 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 26 / 12
TDP6 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1338BGA1528
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHALPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2666/LPDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (350 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache256 KB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4500
17.2 pt (24%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10810U
30.3 pt (42%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
709 Points (1%)
min: 3867     avg: 4311     median: 4310.5 (4%)     max: 4754 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
452 Points (19%)
min: 1082     avg: 1119     median: 1118.5 (48%)     max: 1155 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
188 Points (21%)
min: 396     avg: 425.2     median: 424 (47%)     max: 447 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
332 Points (1%)
min: 1498     avg: 1778     median: 1713 (4%)     max: 2344 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
171 Points (1%)
min: 623     avg: 799     median: 754 (5%)     max: 1064 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
82 Points (25%)
min: 161     avg: 175.6     median: 182 (55%)     max: 183 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.1 Points (3%)
7 Points (9%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (26%)
2 Points (49%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6656     avg: 6927     median: 6926.5 (42%)     max: 7197 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 18912     avg: 19287     median: 19286.5 (14%)     max: 19661 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
6954 Points (5%)
23491 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
5266 Points (6%)
8591 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1270 s (15%)
min: 205.3     avg: 236.3     median: 236.3 (3%)     max: 267.369 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
50.2 s (10%)
min: 4.856     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (1%)     max: 6.952 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1076 Points (2%)
min: 4747     avg: 4837     median: 4837 (8%)     max: 4927 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
5394 MIPS (3%)
min: 16072     avg: 21290     median: 21925 (13%)     max: 25244 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2853 MIPS (34%)
min: 4398     avg: 4561     median: 4498 (54%)     max: 4794 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12 fps (4%)
min: 39.15     avg: 39.4     median: 39.4 (14%)     max: 39.7 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
60.6 fps (14%)
min: 141.6     avg: 147.7     median: 147.7 (34%)     max: 153.7 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.7 fps (1%)
min: 3.81     avg: 5.3     median: 5.2 (9%)     max: 6.45 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.566     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (0%)     max: 0.64 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
min: 0.956     avg: 1     median: 1 (17%)     max: 1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.1 GB/s (3%)
min: 5.5     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (15%)     max: 5.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1346 Seconds (17%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4249 Seconds (30%)
min: 571     avg: 689     median: 694 (5%)     max: 875 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
2.1 sec (46%)
min: 0.651     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.717 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2053 Points (4%)
min: 6496     avg: 6843     median: 6842.5 (15%)     max: 7189 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22.8 s (5%)
min: 7.795     avg: 8     median: 8 (2%)     max: 8.155 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
51.4 s (2%)
min: 16.9     avg: 17.5     median: 17.5 (1%)     max: 18.167 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1132 s (5%)
min: 476.3     avg: 511     median: 510.9 (2%)     max: 545.435 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
25128 Points (22%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1507 Points (4%)
min: 6537     avg: 8591     median: 8534 (23%)     max: 10599 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
43938 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
44043 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
51608 Points (43%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1521 Points (4%)
min: 6231     avg: 7704     median: 7279 (18%)     max: 10034 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2017 Points (4%)
min: 9003     avg: 10590     median: 10730 (19%)     max: 11864 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
504 Points (2%)
min: 2331     avg: 3331     median: 3587 (15%)     max: 4127 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
457 Points (12%)
1563 Points (42%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
662 Points (3%)
4090 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 401     avg: 531     median: 594 (25%)     max: 598 Points
min: 1219     avg: 1240     median: 1226 (52%)     max: 1274 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 707     avg: 929     median: 1018 (2%)     max: 1063 Points
min: 3351     avg: 4350     median: 3934 (7%)     max: 5553 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1220     avg: 1229     median: 1233 (5%)     max: 1235 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3924     avg: 4908     median: 5168 (16%)     max: 5631 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4762     avg: 5082     median: 5203 (52%)     max: 5281 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 19324     avg: 21447     median: 22485 (25%)     max: 22533 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1665.2     avg: 2413     median: 2412.6 (3%)     max: 3160 ms
min: 853     avg: 901     median: 914 (1%)     max: 968 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
197.1 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
24838 Points (22%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
91.2 Points (26%)
161.3 Points (46%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 48.2     avg: 94.8     median: 94.8 (20%)     max: 141.3 Points
min: 202     avg: 205.2     median: 206 (43%)     max: 207 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
6833 Points (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
7404 Points (34%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1018 Points (39%)
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
81 Points (45%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.7 Watt (2%)
min: 29.1     avg: 46.9     median: 46.9 (8%)     max: 64.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
9.1 Watt (2%)
min: 32.6     avg: 53.9     median: 53.9 (10%)     max: 75.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
10.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
5.5 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.5 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)
14.2 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4500 → 100% n=38

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10810U → 336% n=38

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 15. 23:02:15

#0 checking url part for id 13079 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11935 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:33:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.033s ... 0.034s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.034s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13079 +0.021s ... 0.055s

#7 got single benchmarks 13079 +0.022s ... 0.077s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11935 +0.019s ... 0.096s

#9 got single benchmarks 11935 +0.019s ... 0.115s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.115s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.366s ... 0.481s

#12 return log +0.061s ... 0.542s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)