Intel HD Graphics 500 vs Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580

Intel HD Graphics 500

► remove Intel HD Graphics 500

The Intel HD Graphics 500 is an integrated processor graphics unit from the Apollo Lake generation (e. g. Celeron N3450 and Celeron N3350), which was announced mid 2016. The GPU can convince with low consumption figures, but the performance is only in the low-end segment and is rarely sufficient for modern games. Being a partial configuration of the Apollo Lake GPU, the HD Graphics 505 is equipped with just 12 Execution Units (EUs) (HD Graphics 505: 18 EUs) running at up to 650-700 MHz depending on the model. The technical specifications of the GPU are based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which is also used for the more expensive Skylake series.

Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the HD 505 has to access the main memory via processor (2x 64bit DDR3L-/LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400).

Performance

The HD Graphics 505 should be slightly slower than the older Broadwell GPU HD Graphics (Broadwell), so modern games (as of 2016) will rarely run smoothly even at the lowest settings.

Features

The revised video engine now decodes H.265/HEVC completely in hardware and thereby much more efficiently than before. Up to three displays can be connected via DP/eDP or HDMI (4K probably only at 30 Hz via HDMI 1.4).

Power Consumption

The TDP of the whole Pentium N4200 chip is 6 Watts by default, so the GPU is primarily used for (often passively cooled) netbooks or thin notebooks. The TDP can also be reduced to 4 Watts, but this will obviously affect the performance.

Intel UHD Graphics 605

► remove Intel UHD Graphics 605

The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is an integrated processor graphics unit from the Gemini Lake generation (e. g. Pentium Silver N5000), which was announced late 2017. The GPU can convince with low consumption figures, but the performance is only in the low-end segment and is rarely sufficient for modern games. Being the maximum configuration of the Gemini Lake GPU, the UHD Graphics 605 is equipped with 18 Execution Units (EUs) running at up to 750 MHz. The technical specifications of the GPU are based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which is also used for the more expensive Skylake series and also in the predecessor HD Graphics 505.

Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the UHD 605 has to access the main memory via processor (2x 64bit DDR4/LPDDR4-2400).

Performance

The UHD Graphics 605 offers a similar performance as the Intel HD Graphics 505 in the Apollo Lake SoCs (same Gen 9 architecture). Therefore, the GPU is only suited for some very low demanding games like Dirt Rally or Sims 4.

Features

The video engine decodes H.265/HEVC (8b and 10b) and VP9 completely in hardware. Up to three displays can be connected via DP 1.2a/eDP 1.3 or HDMI 2.0a (including HDCP 2.2).

Power Consumption

The TDP of the whole Pentium Silver N5000 chip is 6 Watts by default, so the GPU is primarily used for (often passively cooled) netbooks or thin notebooks. The TDP can also be reduced to 4.9 Watts, but this will obviously affect the performance.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580

► remove

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 (GT4e) is an integrated professional graphics unit of the Skylake generation (top version). As successors of the Iris Graphics 6200 (Broadwell), the Iris P580 can be found in some high-end Xeon quad core CPUs and offers 128 MB of dedicated eDRAM memory. Furthermore, the so-called GT4e-version features 72 Execution Units (EUs). Besides the eDRAM cache, the Iris 580 is able to access the main memory (2x 64bit DDR3L-1600 / DDR4-2133).

Compared to the consumer Iris Pro Graphics 580, the P580 is only included in the Xeon processors and intended for professional applications (certified drivers?) similar to the Quadro and Fire Pro lines. 

Compared to the Iris Graphics 550 (28 W GT3e), the Iris Pro Graphics P580 offers more EUs (72 vs. 48) and a larger eDRAM Cache (128 vs. 64 MB).

Performance

The exact performance of the Iris Graphics P580 depends on memory configuration and CPU model (different clock speeds). However, it should be clearly faster than the old Broadwell Iris Pro 6200 and may compete with a dedicated GeForce 945M. Modern games of 2015/2016 should be playable in medium settings.

Features

The revised video engine now decodes H.265/HEVC completely in hardware and thereby much more efficiently than before. Displays can be connected via DP 1.2 / eDP 1.3 (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 60 Hz), whereas HDMI is limited to the older version 1.4 (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 30 Hz). However, HDMI 2.0 can be added using a DisplayPort converter. Up to three displays can be controlled simultaneously.

Power Consumption

The Iris Graphics P580 can be found in some mobile high-end quad core processors (45 W). Therefore, they are most likely not used in thin and light laptops.

Intel HD Graphics 500Intel UHD Graphics 605Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
ManufacturerIntelIntelIntel
Gen. 9 Series
Iris Pro Graphics P580 72 @ 350 - 1100 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 580 72 @ 350 - 1050 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 550 48 @ 300 - 1100 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 540 48 @ 300 - 1050 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 530 24 @ 350 - 1150 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 520 24 @ 300 - 1050 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 515 24 @ 300 - 1000 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 610 12 @ 300 - 950 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 510 12 @ 300 - 950 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 605 18 @ 300 - 750 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 505 18 @ 300 - 750 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 600 12 @ 300 - 700 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 500 12 @ 300 - 700 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics P580 72 @ 350 - 1100 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 580 72 @ 350 - 1050 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 550 48 @ 300 - 1100 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 540 48 @ 300 - 1050 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 530 24 @ 350 - 1150 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 520 24 @ 300 - 1050 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 515 24 @ 300 - 1000 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 610 12 @ 300 - 950 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 510 12 @ 300 - 950 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 605 18 @ 300 - 750 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 505 18 @ 300 - 750 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 600 12 @ 300 - 700 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 500 12 @ 300 - 700 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics P580 72 @ 350 - 1100 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 580 72 @ 350 - 1050 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 550 48 @ 300 - 1100 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 540 48 @ 300 - 1050 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 530 24 @ 350 - 1150 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 520 24 @ 300 - 1050 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 515 24 @ 300 - 1000 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 610 12 @ 300 - 950 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 510 12 @ 300 - 950 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 605 18 @ 300 - 750 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 505 18 @ 300 - 750 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 600 12 @ 300 - 700 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 500 12 @ 300 - 700 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
CodenameApollo LakeGemini LakeSkylake GT4e
ArchitectureIntel Gen. 9 (Apollo Lake)Intel Gen. 9 (Apollo Lake)Intel Gen. 9 (Skylake)
12 - 18 - 72 -
Core300 - 700 (Boost) MHz300 - 750 (Boost) MHz350 - 1100 (Boost) MHz
Bus64/128 Bit64/128 BiteDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Memory(LP)DDR3(L) / LPDDR4DDR4 / LPDDR4eDRAM
yesyesyes
DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 12_1)DirectX 12 (FL 12_1)DirectX 12 (FL 12_1)
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
FeaturesQuickSyncQuickSyncQuickSync
Introduced01.09.2016 11.12.2017 24.01.2016
Manufacturerhttps://ark.intel.com/de/products/128990...
Max. Memory128 MB
CPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Celeron N34504 x 1100 MHz, 6 W200 MHz700 MHz
Intel Celeron J33552 x 2000 MHz, 10 W250 MHz700 MHz
Intel Celeron N33502 x 1100 MHz, 6 W200 MHz650 MHz
min. - max.200 - 250 MHz650 - 700 MHz

3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 19294     avg: 24491     median: 24609 (5%)     max: 29579 Points
min: 32770     avg: 46301.7     median: 45868 (9%)     max: 55453 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 12299     avg: 15194.7     median: 15085 (2%)     max: 18200 Points
min: 16152     avg: 17041     median: 16955 (2%)     max: 18016 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 1932     avg: 2139.6     median: 2116 (3%)     max: 2306 Points
min: 2670     avg: 3224.1     median: 3230 (5%)     max: 3723 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 2578     avg: 3029.8     median: 3007 (2%)     max: 3693 Points
min: 2874     avg: 3623.9     median: 3497 (2%)     max: 4485 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 271     avg: 317.6     median: 301 (1%)     max: 401 Points
min: 393     avg: 443.7     median: 417 (2%)     max: 524 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 293     avg: 354.7     median: 361 (1%)     max: 444 Points
min: 425     avg: 485.2     median: 457 (1%)     max: 576 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 20140     avg: 26073.7     median: 23761 (3%)     max: 34320 Points
min: 24854     avg: 27619.7     median: 27208 (4%)     max: 30797 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 414     avg: 532.6     median: 530 (2%)     max: 655 points
min: 664     avg: 806.3     median: 799 (2%)     max: 1007 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 368     avg: 478.6     median: 482 (1%)     max: 584 points
min: 592     avg: 725.4     median: 722 (1%)     max: 902 points
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 + Intel UHD Graphics 605
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + Intel UHD Graphics 605
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
8388 Points (4%)
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
5802 Points (11%)
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics 500
Standard 1280x1024 + Intel UHD Graphics 605
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Extreme HD DirectX 1920x1080
1.7 fps (1%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - DX 11, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
6.5 fps (2%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - OpenGL, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
7.2 fps (4%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
9 fps (4%)
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500
Shading 32Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 605
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500
OpenGL 64Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 605
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500
OpenGL 64Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 605
Ref. Match 64Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500
Ref. Match 64Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 605
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Intel HD Graphics 500
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Intel UHD Graphics 605
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Intel HD Graphics 500
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Intel UHD Graphics 605
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
20 fps (4%)
min: 22     avg: 27.8     median: 27 (5%)     max: 33 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
20 fps (5%)
min: 19     avg: 31.1     median: 31 (8%)     max: 42 fps
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
6.3 fps (4%)
18.5 fps (12%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 2560x1440
3.6 fps (3%)
5.9 fps (5%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
10 fps (5%)
27.3 fps (14%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen 1920x1080
9.7 fps (4%)
15.7 fps (6%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
8.4 fps (2%)
min: 11     avg: 13     median: 12 (3%)     max: 14 fps
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
8.8 fps (5%)
min: 11     avg: 18.2     median: 18 (11%)     max: 25 fps
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
49 Samples/s (1%)
67 Samples/s (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
79 Samples/s (1%)
96 Samples/s (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
min: 296     avg: 320     median: 324 (1%)     max: 336 Points
432 Points (2%)
Power Consumption - FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test - Power Consumption (external Monitor) 1280x720 *
8.9 Watt (0%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark 1.19 GPU Stress Test 1280x720
450 MHz (26%)

Average Benchmarks Intel HD Graphics 500 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel UHD Graphics 605 → 141%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
7 8.2 ~ 8 fps
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
28.2  fps
177%
UHD Graphics 605:
49.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
20.2  fps
193%
UHD Graphics 605:
39  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
13.9  fps
191%
UHD Graphics 605:
26.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12.6  fps
198%
UHD Graphics 605:
24.9  fps
QHD 2560x1440
UHD Graphics 605:
23.6  fps
4K 3840x2160
UHD Graphics 605:
15  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
6.5 10.9 ~ 9 fps
UHD Graphics 605:
»
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
5.8  fps
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
1  fps
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
11.7 (!) 17.6 ~ 15 fps
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
1  fps
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
7.2  fps
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
2  fps
200%
UHD Graphics 605:
4  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
4  fps
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
3  fps
133%
UHD Graphics 605:
4  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12  fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
12  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
4.6  fps
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
5.5  fps
160%
UHD Graphics 605:
8.8  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
1  fps
300%
UHD Graphics 605:
3  fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
HD Graphics 500:
1  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
34.4 (!)  fps
154%
UHD Graphics 605:
53  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
4.6 (!)  fps
193%
UHD Graphics 605:
8.9  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
5.3 7.6 ~ 6 fps
133%
UHD Graphics 605:
6.4 9.1 ~ 8 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
4.7  fps
128%
UHD Graphics 605:
6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
4.3  fps
128%
UHD Graphics 605:
5.5  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
5.5  fps
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
3.4 4.4 ~ 4 fps
UHD Graphics 605:
»
ELEX

ELEX

2017
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
5.2  fps
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
10  fps
70%
UHD Graphics 605:
7  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
13  fps
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
18.2 21.2 ~ 20 fps
200%
UHD Graphics 605:
38 41.4 ~ 40 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
17.2  fps
209%
UHD Graphics 605:
34.5 36.5 ~ 36 fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
17 18.4 ~ 18 fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
10  fps
188%
UHD Graphics 605:
18.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
5.6  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
18.1  fps
144%
UHD Graphics 605:
22.6 26.8 27.8 ~ 26 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
6.2  fps
161%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.9 10 ~ 10 fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
4.9  fps
112%
UHD Graphics 605:
5.5  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
3.2  fps
UHD Graphics 605:
»
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
8.7  fps
103%
UHD Graphics 605:
9  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
7.9  fps
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1024x768
UHD Graphics 605:
12.7  fps
med. 1366x768
UHD Graphics 605:
5.5  fps
UHD Graphics 605:
»
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
15.9  fps
72%
UHD Graphics 605:
11.4  fps
med. 1366x768
UHD Graphics 605:
8.3  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
4.3  fps
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1024x768
UHD Graphics 605:
6.9  fps
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
15.5  fps
79%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.3  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
19.1  fps
126%
UHD Graphics 605:
22.7 24.7 ~ 24 fps
med. 1366x768
UHD Graphics 605:
14.3  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
16.4  fps
132%
UHD Graphics 605:
21.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
9.7  fps
163%
UHD Graphics 605:
15.8  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
15.9 22.1 27.6 fps ~ 22 fps
155%
UHD Graphics 605:
32.5 33.7 35.9 ~ 34 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
15.3 15.3 fps ~ 15 fps
93%
UHD Graphics 605:
14 14.3 14.3 ~ 14 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
5.6 fps  fps
125%
UHD Graphics 605:
6.7 7.8 ~ 7 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
5.1 fps  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
28.5  fps
147%
UHD Graphics 605:
42  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12.5  fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
UHD Graphics 605:
9.5  fps
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1024x768
UHD Graphics 605:
10.9  fps
med. 1366x768
UHD Graphics 605:
9.5  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
4  fps
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1024x768
UHD Graphics 605:
7.8  fps
med. 1366x768
UHD Graphics 605:
6.2  fps
UHD Graphics 605:
»
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
22  fps
141%
UHD Graphics 605:
31  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
16  fps
125%
UHD Graphics 605:
20  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
13  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1024x768
UHD Graphics 605:
17.5  fps
med. 1366x768
UHD Graphics 605:
13.1  fps
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
17.7  fps
81%
UHD Graphics 605:
14.4  fps
med. 1344x756
UHD Graphics 605:
9.3  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
71.6  fps
135%
UHD Graphics 605:
96.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
13.7  fps
159%
UHD Graphics 605:
21.8  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
10.5  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
10  fps
143%
UHD Graphics 605:
14.3  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
6.3  fps
151%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.5  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
43.8  fps
134%
UHD Graphics 605:
58.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
19.1  fps
86%
UHD Graphics 605:
16.5  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
29.3  fps
118%
UHD Graphics 605:
34.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
14.4  fps
119%
UHD Graphics 605:
17.1  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
16.2 18 18.7 21 21.2 22.5 24.3 ~ 20 fps
120%
UHD Graphics 605:
14.8 20.1 23.5 24.4 25.3 27.4 33.2 ~ 24 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
8.8 9.6 9.8 11 13 ~ 10 fps
140%
UHD Graphics 605:
10.8 11.1 13.2 13.5 13.7 16.6 17.2 ~ 14 fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
7.9 8.9 9.7 ~ 9 fps
133%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.4 9.5 10.4 11.6 11.6 12.9 15.2 ~ 12 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 500:
2.7  fps
148%
UHD Graphics 605:
2.8 3.3 4.2 4.3 ~ 4 fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
21.5  fps
147%
UHD Graphics 605:
31.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
9.3  fps
199%
UHD Graphics 605:
18.5  fps
high 1366x768
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
19.3  fps
167%
UHD Graphics 605:
32.3  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
9.1  fps
188%
UHD Graphics 605:
17.1  fps
high 1366x768
UHD Graphics 605:
14.1  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
14 16.6 ~ 15 fps
307%
UHD Graphics 605:
44.4 48.4 ~ 46 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
14  fps
193%
UHD Graphics 605:
26.4 27.5 ~ 27 fps
high 1366x768
UHD Graphics 605:
16.4 17.1 ~ 17 fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12.7 22 ~ 17 fps
169%
UHD Graphics 605:
28.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
13.6  fps
155%
UHD Graphics 605:
21.1  fps
high 1366x768
UHD Graphics 605:
18.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
27.8  fps
126%
UHD Graphics 605:
35  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12.2  fps
148%
UHD Graphics 605:
18  fps
high 1366x768
UHD Graphics 605:
11.4  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 500:
11.2  fps
178%
UHD Graphics 605:
19.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
7.6  fps
162%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.3  fps
high 1366x768
UHD Graphics 605:
7.5  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
22.9  fps
120%
UHD Graphics 605:
27.4  fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
11.1  fps
191%
UHD Graphics 605:
21.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
6.7  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
100%
HD Graphics 500:
40.1  fps
139%
UHD Graphics 605:
55.6  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
14.7  fps
154%
UHD Graphics 605:
22.7  fps
high 1360x768
UHD Graphics 605:
15.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
54.5  fps
144%
UHD Graphics 605:
78.7  fps
med. 1360x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
14.1  fps
123%
UHD Graphics 605:
17.4  fps
high 1360x768
UHD Graphics 605:
10  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
3.9  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
UHD Graphics 605:
»
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
100%
HD Graphics 500:
119  fps
high 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 500:
27.2  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
100%
HD Graphics 500:
46  fps
HD Graphics 500:
»

Average Gaming Intel HD Graphics 500 → 100%

Average Gaming Intel UHD Graphics 605 → 149%

v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)