Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-10750H vs Intel Core i5-8400

Intel Core i7-10750H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-10750H

The Intel Core i7-10750H is a fast 45 W processor designed for use in larger, beefier laptops. The Comet Lake-H family CPU was launched in mid-2020. It features six cores (twelve threads) running at 2.6 GHz Boosting up to 5 GHz (single-core Boost). The likely all-core Boost frequency is 4.3 GHz. Most of the specs are the same as the 10750H’s direct predecessor, the i7-9750H. The newer model has two advantages over its predecessor in that its Boost frequency is higher and the memory controller can now officially host memory clocked at 2,933 MHz, an upgrade over the 2,666 MHz limitation of the outgoing model.

Architecture

Comet Lake is a yet another revision of the dated Skylake architecture (not unlike the previous Coffee Lake, Whiskey Lake, Kaby Lake families) for similar feature set and performance-per-MHz figures. Core i7-10750H is manufactured on the third-gen 14 nm Intel process that is undeniably inferior to TSMC's 7 nm process, the one AMD’s Ryzen 4000 series laptop-grade processors are manufactured on.

The hexa-core CPU is compatible with up to 128 GB of dual-channel DDR4-2933 RAM and has support for PCI-Express 3.0 and Thunderbolt 3 but not the professional features (vPro, TXT, SIPP) as found in the case of Core i7-10850H.

Both the CPU cores and the iGPU have access to 12 MB of L3 cache. Four PCI-Express 3.0 lanes allow for read/write rates of up to 3.9 GB/s provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

The 10750H gets soldered permanently on to the motherboard (BGA1440 socket interface) and is thus pretty much impossible to replace.

Performance

Multi-thread performance is most similar to the Core i5-10500H, the Core i5-11400H and also the Ryzen 7 4700U. While perhaps not the best bang for the buck, the i7 is fast enough for any task, gaming included, as of late 2021.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 75 W, the ThinkPad P15 Gen 1-20ST000DGE is among the fastest laptops built around the 10750H that we know of. It can be about 80% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

We've known the Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU for a while. This is the same iGPU the Core i7-9750H and Core i7-8750H processors had. In this i7, the 24 EU iGPU is clocked at 350 MHz to 1,150 MHz.

Intel UHD Graphics 630 will let you connect up to 3 monitors with resolutions of up to 4096x2304@60. The built-in video decoder will happily handle AVC, HEVC, VP9 and other popular video codecs (AV1 is not supported though). This is not a gaming GPU as it is not fast enough to handle most AAA titles released in 2020. At 720p, Escape from Tarkov runs at just 17 fps (low quality preset), to give you an example. As the iGPU has no VRAM of its own, it is paramount that it is mated to fast system RAM.

Power consumption

This Core i7 series chip is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes leading to subpar, as of early 2022, energy efficiency.

The Core i7-10750H has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 45 W; laptop makers are free to reduce the value somewhat, 35 W being the lower limit, allowing for leaner designs at the cost of performance. Either way, a quality cooling solution is a must.

Intel Core i5-8400

► remove from comparison Intel i5-8400

The Intel Core i5-8400 is a mid-range 6-core CPU. The processor belongs to the Coffee Lake generation and was presented in September 2017. It does not support Hyper-Threading, which means it can run six threads simultaneously. The base clock rate is 2.8 GHz and the CPU can speed up to 4.0 GHz under high load. Despite belonging to the new generation of CPUs, the Core i5-8400 is manufactured in an improved 14nm process.

Performance

The processor offers a strong performance increase compared to the Core i5-7400 due to its two additional cores. Single-core performance has not improved significantly compared to its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a mid-range model, the Core i5-8400 should be suitable for demanding games and programs.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The build is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 65 watts. Therefore, well-dimensioned cooling systems should easily manage to deal with the created heat. We expect increased efficiency due to the higher performance.

ModelIntel Core i7-10750HIntel Core i5-8400
CodenameComet Lake-HCoffee Lake-S
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Coffee Lake
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-S
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H « 2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8086K compare3.7 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700K compare3.7 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700 compare3.2 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8600K compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500 compare3 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400 « 2.8 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500T compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Clock2600 - 5000 MHz2800 - 4000 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache12 MB9 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 126 / 6
TDP45 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1440FCLGA1151
FeaturesDDR4-2933, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDual-Channel DDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$435 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10750H
31.2 pt (52%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 4807     avg: 7129     median: 7463.5 (7%)     max: 8585 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1136     avg: 1218     median: 1217 (51%)     max: 1271 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 431     avg: 472.7     median: 472 (51%)     max: 504 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1749     avg: 2848     median: 2941 (7%)     max: 3325 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 804     avg: 1263     median: 1303.5 (8%)     max: 1418 Points
min: 939     avg: 943     median: 941 (6%)     max: 949 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 184     avg: 196.7     median: 197 (55%)     max: 213 Points
min: 167     avg: 169.5     median: 169.5 (47%)     max: 172 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 13.71     avg: 13.9     median: 13.9 (18%)     max: 14.13 Points
11 Points (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.17     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (52%)     max: 2.22 Points
1.9 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7275     avg: 7377     median: 7376.5 (45%)     max: 7478 Points
min: 6356     avg: 6364     median: 6363.5 (38%)     max: 6371 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 37009     avg: 37154     median: 37154 (27%)     max: 37299 Points
min: 30658     avg: 30790     median: 30789.5 (22%)     max: 30921 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
142.7 s (2%)
191.8 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
5.6 s (1%)
6.2 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6265     avg: 6287     median: 6287 (10%)     max: 6309 Points
5173 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 26040     avg: 33946     median: 35346 (20%)     max: 37345 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4504     avg: 5114     median: 5120 (60%)     max: 5470 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 77.4     avg: 78.3     median: 78.3 (2%)     max: 79.2 fps
61.4 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 220.9     avg: 221.2     median: 221.2 (6%)     max: 221.5 fps
223.8 fps (6%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 5.54     avg: 9.6     median: 9.9 (17%)     max: 11.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.767     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (23%)     max: 0.78 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.3 GB/s (22%)
0.8 GB/s (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.6 GB/s (20%)
5 GB/s (13%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 322     avg: 389.1     median: 371 (3%)     max: 587 Seconds
488 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.578     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.708 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 10847     avg: 11405     median: 11307 (24%)     max: 12061 Points
9474 Points (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.3 s (2%)
9.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.9 s (1%)
21.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
466.6 s (2%)
526 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
43210 Points (33%)
35310 Points (27%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 8587     avg: 12991     median: 13325 (33%)     max: 14993 Points
min: 9057     avg: 9453     median: 9453 (23%)     max: 9849 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
61445 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
60119 Points (49%)
65891 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 63803     avg: 65556     median: 65498 (53%)     max: 67904 Points
69971 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 6797     avg: 10850     median: 11135 (28%)     max: 12015 Points
7891 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 11653     avg: 17163     median: 17628.5 (31%)     max: 18769 Points
min: 10911     avg: 11774     median: 12066 (22%)     max: 12346 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4911     avg: 6649     median: 6852 (29%)     max: 7543 Points
min: 4372     avg: 4941     median: 4940.5 (21%)     max: 5509 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1517 Points (37%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
6704 Points (26%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1114     avg: 1263     median: 1270 (48%)     max: 1333 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4443     avg: 6135     median: 6308 (11%)     max: 6674 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1215     avg: 1258     median: 1253 (5%)     max: 1325 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5710     avg: 6283     median: 6338.5 (20%)     max: 6632 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5321     avg: 5572     median: 5600.5 (56%)     max: 5832 Points
5104 Points (51%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 22859     avg: 24682     median: 24897 (24%)     max: 25637 Points
20500 Points (20%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5640 Points (62%)
4996 Points (55%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
24958 Points (33%)
19500 Points (26%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i5-8400 +
19334 Points (30%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i5-8400 +
4283 Points (64%)
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 CPU Mark
min: 13808     avg: 15156     median: 15155.5 (79%)     max: 16503 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 764     avg: 783     median: 779 (1%)     max: 840 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 5561     avg: 46043     median: 53724.5 (39%)     max: 55732 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 202     avg: 225.2     median: 225 (40%)     max: 239 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 70.9     avg: 93.4     median: 95 (16%)     max: 123 Watt
115 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 78.5     avg: 103.7     median: 97.1 (18%)     max: 128 Watt
100%
1 i5-8400 +
97 Watt (18%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 9.96     avg: 12.8     median: 13.7 (10%)     max: 15.1 Points per Watt
9.7 Points per Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10750H → 100% n=30

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8400 → 82% n=30

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 03. 19:11:08

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11708 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9298 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759511467s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 02 Oct 2025 12:30:24 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11708 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#8 got single benchmarks 11708 +0.075s ... 0.087s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9298 +0.001s ... 0.088s

#10 got single benchmarks 9298 +0.004s ... 0.092s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.092s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.049s ... 0.142s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.145s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)