Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-14650HX vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

Intel Core i7-14650HX

► remove from comparison Intel i7-14650HX

The Intel Core i7-14650HX is a high-end CPU based on the new Raptor Lake architecture for large and heavy notebooks. The CPU was introduced at the beginning of 2024 and is similar to the older Core i7-13700HX except for slightly higher CPU clock rates (max 200 MHz).

The total of 24 threads are divided into P-cores and E-cores, which we already know from Alder-Lake. The 13700HX offers 8 performance cores (P-cores) with hyperthreading and 8 efficiency cores (E-cores) without hyperthreading. A total of 20 threads are therefore supported. The P-cores clock from 2.2 to 5.2 GHz (single core) or 4.5 GHz (all cores) and the E-cores from 1.6 to 3.7 GHz. The integrated memory controller supports a maximum of DDR5 with 4800 MHz (and not 5600 MHz like the i9 HX models).

Compared to Alder Lake, the new Raptor Lake architecture offers improved P-cores (Raptor Cove architecture with more cache), more E-cores (same Gracemont architecture) and higher clock rates thanks to the improved Intel 7 process. Furthermore, Intel now supports faster DDR5 main memory in the top models (up to 5600 MHz in the i9).

The performance should be slightly above the older Core i7-13700HX (with the same TDP settings and cooling). This makes the CPU ideal for demanding tasks and games.

The 14650HX continues to be manufactured using Intel's improved 10nm FinFET process (Intel 7 process) and is specified with 55 watts of base power and 157 watts of turbo power.

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 155H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a high-end laptop processor of the Meteor Lake series that has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. This 1st Gen Core Ultra chip has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; its 16 cores are comprised of 6 HT-enabled Performance cores running at up to 4.8 GHz and 10 Efficient cores (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) running at up to 3.8 GHz.

The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.30 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 7 155H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 155H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official performance data published by Intel, then the 155H is about as fast as the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.30 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is almost as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 7 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. Its Base power consumption is supposed to be around 64 W, however, most laptop makers will probably go for a higher value to get higher clock speeds and thus better performance. Either way, a powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 155H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

ModelIntel Core i7-14650HXIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
CodenameRaptor Lake-HX RefreshMeteor Lake-H
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HXIntel Meteor Lake-H
Series: Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H
Intel Core i9-14900HX compare1.6 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700HX compare3.9 - 5.5 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14650HX « 1.6 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500HX compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14450HX compare1.8 - 4.8 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H compare3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H « 3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H compare3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H compare3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Clock1600 - 5200 MHz3800 - 4800 MHz
L2 Cache24 MB
L3 Cache30 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 24
8 x 5.2 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.7 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
16 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP55 Watt28 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2157 Watt
Technology10 nm7 nm
Die Size257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C110 °C
SocketBGA1964BGA2049
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1600 MHz)Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-14650HX
42.3 pt (70%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 155H
37.5 pt (62%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 116     avg: 116.5     median: 116.5 (65%)     max: 117 Points
min: 96     avg: 102.7     median: 102.3 (57%)     max: 108 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 835     avg: 1035     median: 1035 (19%)     max: 1235 Points
min: 323     avg: 776     median: 789 (15%)     max: 1024 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16453     avg: 20454     median: 20454 (19%)     max: 24455 Points
min: 9769     avg: 14965     median: 15028 (14%)     max: 19007 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1963     avg: 1969     median: 1969 (83%)     max: 1975 Points
min: 1496     avg: 1726     median: 1743 (73%)     max: 1815 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 754     avg: 758     median: 758 (83%)     max: 762 Points
min: 601     avg: 665     median: 670.5 (73%)     max: 696 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6236     avg: 7793     median: 7792.5 (19%)     max: 9349 Points
min: 3798     avg: 5795     median: 5762.5 (14%)     max: 7409 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3142     avg: 3471     median: 3470.5 (22%)     max: 3799 Points
min: 1932     avg: 2449     median: 2450 (15%)     max: 2880 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 284     avg: 285.5     median: 285.5 (79%)     max: 287 Points
min: 99.6     avg: 249.5     median: 255 (71%)     max: 268 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
43.9 Points (57%)
min: 27.11     avg: 30.5     median: 30.7 (40%)     max: 33.49 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.4 Points (81%)
min: 2.77     avg: 3     median: 3 (72%)     max: 3.13 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
15819 Points (96%)
min: 8808     avg: 9492     median: 9619.5 (58%)     max: 9919 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
112749 Points (82%)
min: 50589     avg: 56540     median: 57550 (42%)     max: 60472 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 13726     avg: 67393     median: 80420 (51%)     max: 95005 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12270     avg: 30347     median: 13508.5 (16%)     max: 82102 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
642 s (8%)
min: 92.544     avg: 146.2     median: 139.6 (2%)     max: 206.526 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
14.8 s (3%)
min: 3.523     avg: 3.8     median: 3.7 (1%)     max: 4.041 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
482 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
3.4 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
38336 Points (61%)
min: 6137     avg: 6921     median: 6911.5 (11%)     max: 7723 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 68711     avg: 81199     median: 81198.5 (47%)     max: 93686 MIPS
min: 41739     avg: 59108     median: 60595 (35%)     max: 70254 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6364     avg: 6530     median: 6529.5 (77%)     max: 6695 MIPS
min: 4594     avg: 5330     median: 5398 (64%)     max: 5621 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 120.65     avg: 136.4     median: 135.4 (3%)     max: 154.15 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 282.57     avg: 302.1     median: 300.5 (8%)     max: 325 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 12.6     avg: 19.1     median: 19.1 (34%)     max: 25.6 fps
min: 9.93     avg: 16.5     median: 16.7 (29%)     max: 21.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.9 GB/s (56%)
min: 0.944     avg: 1     median: 1 (29%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
3.7 GB/s (64%)
min: 1.6     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (29%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
19.8 GB/s (52%)
min: 9.3     avg: 10.3     median: 10.4 (27%)     max: 10.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 247     avg: 307     median: 307 (4%)     max: 367 Seconds
min: 296     avg: 413.3     median: 380 (5%)     max: 692 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 141     avg: 173.5     median: 173.5 (1%)     max: 206 Seconds
min: 175     avg: 232.5     median: 220 (2%)     max: 381 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4195     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4244 sec
min: 0.4457     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.53 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12066     avg: 12936     median: 12712.5 (27%)     max: 14729 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.4 s (1%)
min: 7.046     avg: 7.4     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 8.087 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
14.1 s (1%)
min: 15.701     avg: 16.2     median: 15.9 (1%)     max: 17.277 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
337.3 s (1%)
min: 394.754     avg: 413.2     median: 400.3 (2%)     max: 444.482 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 61131     avg: 65940     median: 63514 (49%)     max: 74620 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 20090     avg: 22127     median: 22126.5 (54%)     max: 24163 Points
min: 6531     avg: 18376     median: 19092.5 (47%)     max: 23779 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 53255     avg: 77249     median: 77292.5 (63%)     max: 93608 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 66925     avg: 75901     median: 72861.5 (59%)     max: 90957 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 84880     avg: 88438     median: 88437.5 (71%)     max: 91995 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
17628 Points (45%)
min: 7073     avg: 15332     median: 15194 (38%)     max: 19549 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 28404     avg: 30196     median: 30196 (54%)     max: 31988 Points
min: 5249     avg: 22618     median: 23177 (41%)     max: 28337 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 12741     avg: 14026     median: 14026 (59%)     max: 15311 Points
min: 3922     avg: 9000     median: 9454.5 (40%)     max: 12145 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2744     avg: 2753     median: 2752.5 (69%)     max: 2761 Points
min: 1901     avg: 2377     median: 2409 (60%)     max: 2473 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 12892     avg: 14451     median: 14451 (56%)     max: 16010 Points
min: 7732     avg: 12275     median: 12385 (48%)     max: 13656 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2167     avg: 2261     median: 2280.5 (72%)     max: 2314 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 10787     avg: 11569     median: 11714 (48%)     max: 12061 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1933     avg: 1937     median: 1936.5 (73%)     max: 1940 Points
min: 1462     avg: 1751     median: 1761.5 (67%)     max: 1824 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12584     avg: 14697     median: 14697 (26%)     max: 16810 Points
min: 10017     avg: 12016     median: 12183.5 (22%)     max: 13556 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1556     avg: 1678     median: 1696 (7%)     max: 1745 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11112     avg: 11906     median: 12025 (38%)     max: 12530 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6559     avg: 6879     median: 6927 (69%)     max: 7141 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 39509     avg: 43123     median: 43897 (43%)     max: 46412 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 483     avg: 484.5     median: 484.5 (1%)     max: 486 ms
min: 416.4     avg: 541     median: 535 (1%)     max: 642 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
98007 Points (72%)
min: 77142     avg: 88549     median: 89268 (65%)     max: 97162 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 271     avg: 277     median: 277 (76%)     max: 283 Points
min: 166.4     avg: 251.8     median: 255 (70%)     max: 309 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 289     avg: 300     median: 300 (54%)     max: 311 Points
min: 213     avg: 276.5     median: 278.5 (50%)     max: 299 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1965     avg: 2029     median: 2028.5 (76%)     max: 2092 Points
min: 1366     avg: 1663     median: 1685.5 (63%)     max: 1903 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 155.8     avg: 157.6     median: 157.6 (27%)     max: 159.3 Watt
min: 37.1     avg: 74.8     median: 72.8 (13%)     max: 168 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
197 Watt (36%)
min: 46.9     avg: 89.4     median: 87.9 (16%)     max: 160.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 22.4     avg: 23.6     median: 23.6 (16%)     max: 24.8 Watt
min: 2.42     avg: 7.2     median: 6.1 (4%)     max: 24.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 15     avg: 16.3     median: 16.3 (20%)     max: 17.6 Watt
min: 2.83     avg: 8     median: 7.8 (9%)     max: 18.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
19.3 Points per Watt (14%)
min: 17.7     avg: 30.9     median: 28.6 (21%)     max: 64.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-14650HX → 100% n=40

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 155H → 95% n=40

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 29. 18:18:49

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17170 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16906 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759162729s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 29 Sep 2025 12:06:34 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17170 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 17170 +0.007s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 16906 +0.005s ... 0.02s

#10 got single benchmarks 16906 +0.057s ... 0.078s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.078s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.072s ... 0.15s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.152s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)