Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 5 125H

The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H is a mid-range Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 14 cores (4 + 8 + 2) and 18 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 4, are HT-enabled and run at up to 4.5 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island), run at up to 3.6 GHz. The 7-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.20 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture & Features

Meteor Lake is a case of throwing everything at AMD (including the kitchen sink, yes) and seeing what sticks. With this product family, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance, higher hardware AI workload acceleration rates and longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. For those counting, that's four birds to kill with a single stone.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestwood architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 5 125H comes with 18 MB of L3 cache which is a significant reduction compared to the 24 MB that the 155H, the 165H and the 185H have. The processor has a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s; it supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the 125H features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support. It is also worth mentioning that Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 125H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

While we have no way of knowing what the 125H will be like, as of December 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be slightly slower than the Ryzen 7 7735HS (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.75 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 7-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.20 GHz is set to overshadow the Radeon 760M; just like the 8-core Arc GPU, this graphics adapter is set to be miles ahead of the aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. As long as one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

The Base power consumption, in the case of the 125H, is 28 W while its maximum Turbo power consumption is supposed to be within 115 W. A powerful cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

This Core Ultra 5 series processor is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 155H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a high-end laptop processor of the Meteor Lake series that has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. This 1st Gen Core Ultra chip has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; its 16 cores are comprised of 6 HT-enabled Performance cores running at up to 4.8 GHz and 10 Efficient cores (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) running at up to 3.8 GHz.

The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.30 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture & Features

Meteor Lake is a case of throwing everything at AMD (including the kitchen sink, yes) and seeing what sticks. With this product family, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance, higher hardware AI workload acceleration rates and longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. For those counting, that's four birds to kill with a single stone.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestwood architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 7 155H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 155H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official performance data published by Intel, then the 155H is about as fast as the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.30 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is almost as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 7 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. Its Base power consumption is supposed to be around 64 W, however, most laptop makers will probably go for a higher value to get higher clock speeds and thus better performance. Either way, a powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 155H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 5 125HIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
SeriesIntel Intel Meteor Lake-HIntel Intel Meteor Lake-H
CodenameMeteor Lake-HMeteor Lake-H
Series: Intel Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H compare3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H compare3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H « 3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H compare3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H « 3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H compare3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Clock3600 - 4500 MHz3800 - 4800 MHz
L3 Cache18 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 18
4 x 4.5 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.6 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
16 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
Technology7 nm7 nm
max. Temp.110 °C110 °C
SocketBGA2049BGA2049
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Essen., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel Arc 7-Cores iGPU ( - 2200 MHz)Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 155H
42.1 pt (58%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
100 Points (69%)
min: 2.2     avg: 86.3     median: 103 (72%)     max: 107.2 Points
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
564 Points (10%)
min: 6.94     avg: 728     median: 799 (15%)     max: 1024 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9965     avg: 11293     median: 11292.5 (10%)     max: 12620 Points
min: 9769     avg: 14883     median: 14895 (14%)     max: 19007 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1655     avg: 1683     median: 1682.5 (72%)     max: 1710 Points
min: 1496     avg: 1727     median: 1752 (75%)     max: 1801 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 633     avg: 644     median: 644 (72%)     max: 655 Points
min: 620     avg: 668     median: 671.5 (75%)     max: 693 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3870     avg: 4370     median: 4369.5 (11%)     max: 4869 Points
min: 3798     avg: 5803     median: 5706 (14%)     max: 7409 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1700     avg: 1922     median: 1921.5 (12%)     max: 2143 Points
min: 1988.07     avg: 2469     median: 2496 (16%)     max: 2857.55 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 236     avg: 241     median: 241 (73%)     max: 246 Points
min: 230     avg: 254.9     median: 255 (77%)     max: 268 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 21.9     avg: 24.2     median: 24.2 (31%)     max: 26.4 Points
min: 29.98     avg: 31.7     median: 31.7 (41%)     max: 33.49 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.9     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (73%)     max: 2.98 Points
min: 3.07     avg: 3.1     median: 3.1 (77%)     max: 3.13 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 9266     avg: 9335     median: 9334.5 (56%)     max: 9403 Points
min: 9828     avg: 9874     median: 9873.5 (60%)     max: 9919 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 45559     avg: 48467     median: 48466.5 (35%)     max: 51374 Points
min: 56242     avg: 58357     median: 58357 (42%)     max: 60472 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 13726     avg: 54366     median: 54365.5 (38%)     max: 95005 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 13938     avg: 48020     median: 48020 (58%)     max: 82102 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
296.9 s (4%)
139.6 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
9.5 s (2%)
3.5 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
482 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
3.4 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6103     avg: 9592     median: 9591.5 (15%)     max: 13080 Points
min: 7084     avg: 7404     median: 7403.5 (12%)     max: 7723 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4663     avg: 4885     median: 4884.5 (58%)     max: 5106 MIPS
min: 5037     avg: 5352     median: 5405.5 (65%)     max: 5540 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 42601     avg: 59067     median: 60595 (35%)     max: 70074 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
129.6 fps (45%)
min: 128.04     avg: 141.1     median: 141.1 (49%)     max: 154.15 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
305.3 fps (70%)
min: 282.57     avg: 303.8     median: 303.8 (70%)     max: 325 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 10.6     avg: 12.2     median: 12.2 (21%)     max: 13.7 fps
min: 9.93     avg: 16.5     median: 16.6 (29%)     max: 21.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.83     avg: 418.9     median: 418.9 (50%)     max: 837 GB/s
min: 0.944     avg: 1     median: 1 (0%)     max: 1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (22%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
1.7 GB/s (29%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 8.9     avg: 9     median: 9 (23%)     max: 9 GB/s
min: 10.2     avg: 10.4     median: 10.4 (27%)     max: 10.6 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 523     avg: 597     median: 597 (8%)     max: 671 Seconds
min: 296     avg: 416     median: 397 (5%)     max: 637 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 285     avg: 324.5     median: 324.5 (2%)     max: 364 Seconds
min: 178     avg: 234.2     median: 224.5 (2%)     max: 349 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.503     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.53 sec
min: 0.4609     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.516 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12498     avg: 13225     median: 13225 (28%)     max: 13952 Points
13097 Points (28%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.4     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 7.5 s
min: 7.046     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.168 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.5 s (1%)
min: 15.767     avg: 16     median: 15.9 (1%)     max: 16.125 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 400.5     avg: 403.6     median: 403.6 (2%)     max: 406.6 s
min: 394.754     avg: 397.5     median: 397.5 (2%)     max: 400.292 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 43778     avg: 54877     median: 54876.5 (48%)     max: 65975 Points
min: 62245     avg: 68433     median: 68432.5 (60%)     max: 74620 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12766     avg: 14853     median: 14853 (40%)     max: 16940 Points
min: 6531     avg: 18559     median: 20315 (55%)     max: 23598 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
72226 Points (59%)
min: 68032     avg: 75732     median: 74730 (61%)     max: 85435 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
66925 Points (54%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
14164 Points (36%)
min: 7073     avg: 14929     median: 15201.5 (38%)     max: 19549 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 16291     avg: 18796     median: 18796 (34%)     max: 21301 Points
min: 5249     avg: 22120     median: 23400 (42%)     max: 28337 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6391     avg: 7556     median: 7556 (32%)     max: 8721 Points
min: 3922     avg: 8708     median: 9873 (42%)     max: 12145 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2258     avg: 2284     median: 2284 (69%)     max: 2310 Points
min: 2287     avg: 2404     median: 2416.5 (73%)     max: 2459 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 11555     avg: 11563     median: 11563 (46%)     max: 11571 Points
min: 10696     avg: 12575     median: 12593.5 (50%)     max: 13656 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1630     avg: 1665     median: 1664.5 (70%)     max: 1699 Points
min: 1689     avg: 1764     median: 1766 (75%)     max: 1824 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9696     avg: 10236     median: 10235.5 (18%)     max: 10775 Points
min: 10017     avg: 12207     median: 12363 (22%)     max: 13556 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1684     avg: 1696     median: 1696 (7%)     max: 1708 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11684     avg: 12061     median: 12061 (38%)     max: 12438 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6750 Points (67%)
min: 6838     avg: 6883     median: 6882.5 (69%)     max: 6927 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
38736 Points (43%)
min: 43897     avg: 44574     median: 44573.5 (50%)     max: 45250 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 575     avg: 582     median: 581.5 (1%)     max: 588 ms
min: 416.4     avg: 532     median: 535 (1%)     max: 585 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
85765 Points (77%)
min: 77142     avg: 87834     median: 89545 (80%)     max: 93476 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
237 Points (68%)
min: 236     avg: 253.9     median: 256 (74%)     max: 263 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 245     avg: 254     median: 254 (53%)     max: 263 Points
min: 255     avg: 279.5     median: 280 (58%)     max: 299 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1633 Points (63%)
min: 1366     avg: 1665     median: 1684 (64%)     max: 1903 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.9     avg: 50.4     median: 50.4 (9%)     max: 53.9 Watt
min: 37.1     avg: 73.9     median: 70.2 (12%)     max: 168 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
56.7 Watt (10%)
min: 46.9     avg: 93.3     median: 93.3 (17%)     max: 160.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.31     avg: 4.8     median: 4.8 (3%)     max: 5.29 Watt
min: 3.12     avg: 6.5     median: 5.5 (4%)     max: 19.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.71     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (7%)     max: 7.68 Watt
min: 4.35     avg: 11.9     median: 7.4 (8%)     max: 90.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
30 Points per Watt (22%)
min: 17.7     avg: 31.8     median: 29.1 (22%)     max: 64.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 125H → 100% n=46

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 155H → 109% n=46

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 08. 14:40:52

#0 checking url part for id 16911 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16906 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 May 2024 05:39:01 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.038s ... 0.039s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.039s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 16911 +0.003s ... 0.042s

#7 got single benchmarks 16911 +0.019s ... 0.061s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 16906 +0.023s ... 0.084s

#9 got single benchmarks 16906 +0.108s ... 0.192s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.192s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.457s ... 0.649s

#12 return log +0.032s ... 0.681s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)