Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-13900K vs Intel Core i9-14900K vs AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

Intel Core i9-13900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13900K

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a fast high-end desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3 - 5.8 GHz and sixteen Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.2 - 4.3 GHz.

Thanks to the faster P-cores and more E-cores, the i9-13900K is significantly faster than the old i9-12900K (especially in multi-threaded workloads). Compared to the Raphael AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (Zen 4), the 13900K offers a slightly higher multi-thread-performance and a slightly lower single core performance. In games, the Intel CPU is currently the clear winner (at the time of announcement of the 7950X).

The 13900K is rated at 125 Watt TDP base power (PL1) and 253 Watt Turbo Power (PL2) and therefore slightly higher than the old i9-12900K.

Intel Core i9-14900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-14900K

The Intel Core i9-14900K is a high-end processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, similar to the Intel Core i9-13900K last year. The base clock is 3.2 GHz and can reach up to 6 GHz under optimal conditions. The total of 32 threads are still divided into 8 P and 16 E cores. The 8 performance cores (P-cores) also offer hyperthreading, which means that a total of 32 threads can be processed simultaneously in conjunction with the 16 energy-efficient E-cores. As before, the K models continue to offer a freely selectable multiplier, which simplifies overclocking. The Intel Core i9-14900K uses the same CPU socket (LGA 1700) as the Intel Core i9-13900K. This means you don't necessarily need a new motherboard, as the 600 series chipsets support the new processors after a BIOS update. There is also still the option of using DDR4 for the RAM.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i9-13900K, the Core i9-14900K still offers 8 P-cores, which are relieved by 16 additional E-cores for demanding applications and thus ensure very high multi-thread performance. In comparison, however, the Intel Core i9-14900K can only gain a slight lead. The e-cores primarily take care of background applications. The hybrid architecture relies on the Intel Thread Director, which is responsible for the correct allocation of tasks. Meanwhile, the IPC could only be increased slightly. As an innovation with the Intel Core i9-14900K, the manufacturer is increasingly relying on AI, which is also used for overclocking. With one click in the Intel Extreme Utility, the tool checks the entire system and makes the necessary settings.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i9-13900K, the Intel Core i9-14900K offers an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, nothing has changed with the Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power consumption

The Intel Core i9-14900K is specified with a TDP of 125 watts, which corresponds to the PL1 value. In Boost mode, the processor's performance can increase to up to 253 watts (PL2). However, this requires very good cooling. Compared to the Intel Core i9-13900K, the specified power consumption does not increase if the limits are adhered to. The situation is different if the limits are deactivated. As this value depends on the overall system, we cannot make an exact statement on this.

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7900X

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a fast high-end desktop processor of the Raphael series. It offers 12 cores based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (24 threads). The cores clock from 4.7 (base) up to 5.7 GHz (single core boost). When all 12 cores are fully loaded, 5.1 GHz is the max. clock speed. The 7900X is the second fastest Ryzen at launch, only bested by the Ryzen 9 7950X with 4 more cores.

The performance of the R9 7900X is clearly better than the old Ryzen 9 5900X thanks to the improved architecture and modern 5nm process. Compared to Intels Raptor Lake Core i9-13700K the single-core performance is slightly lower and the multi-core performance slightly faster. The gaming performance is a bit lower, and is on average only on par with the Core i5-13600K and also lower than the old Ryzen 7 5800X3D.

The Raphael series still uses a chiplet design with two CCD-clusters (each with 8 possible cores) in 5nm and an IO-die (including the memory controller and the Radeon Graphics iGPU) in 6nm.

ModelIntel Core i9-13900KIntel Core i9-14900KAMD Ryzen 9 7900X
CodenameRaptor LakeRaptor LakeRaphael (Zen4)
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Raptor Lake-RAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)
Series: Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000) Raphael (Zen4)
Intel Core i9-13900K « 3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14901E2.8 - 5.6 GHz8 / 16 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i5-135002.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14701E2.6 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14901TE2.3 - 5.5 GHz8 / 16 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14701TE2.1 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501TE2.2 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501E3.3 - 5.2 GHz6 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401E2.5 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401TE2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T1.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900K « 3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-149002 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-147001.5 - 5.4 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14600K3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-145002.6 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500T1.7 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X « 4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 79003.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 77003.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 76003.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock3000 - 5800 MHz3200 - 6000 MHz4700 - 5600 MHz
L2 Cache32 MB32 MB12 MB
L3 Cache36 MB36 MB64 MB
Cores / Threads24 / 32
8 x 5.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.3 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
24 / 32
8 x 6.0 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
12 / 24
TDP125 Watt125 Watt170 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm5 nm (CCD), 6 nm (I/O) nm
Die Size257 mm2257 mm22x 70 (CCD) mm2 + 122 (I/O) mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C95 °C
SocketLGA 1700LGA 1700AM5 (LGA 1718)
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sMMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Architecturex86x86x86
$589 U.S.$589 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache768 KB
TransistorsCCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million
Voltage0.650 - 1.475V V

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900K
49 pt (82%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-14900K
51.1 pt (85%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7900X
48.1 pt (80%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 134     avg: 136.5     median: 137 (77%)     max: 138 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 2112     avg: 2189     median: 2146.5 (40%)     max: 2352 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 32592     avg: 37310     median: 38271.5 (36%)     max: 40103 Points
min: 37606     avg: 39400     median: 39399.5 (37%)     max: 41193 Points
min: 28925     avg: 29289     median: 29300 (27%)     max: 29628 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2203     avg: 2238     median: 2238.5 (94%)     max: 2272 Points
min: 2174     avg: 2263     median: 2262.5 (95%)     max: 2351 Points
min: 2012     avg: 2020     median: 2016.5 (85%)     max: 2039 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 828     avg: 849     median: 849.5 (93%)     max: 870 Points
900 Points (98%)
min: 780     avg: 783     median: 782.5 (85%)     max: 787 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 13415     avg: 14459     median: 14620.5 (36%)     max: 15181 Points
15466 Points (38%)
min: 11353     avg: 11474     median: 11471.5 (28%)     max: 11623 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5321     avg: 5798     median: 5805.5 (37%)     max: 6191 Points
min: 5924     avg: 6103     median: 6103 (39%)     max: 6282 Points
min: 4753     avg: 4818     median: 4820.5 (30%)     max: 4856 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 299     avg: 314.1     median: 318 (88%)     max: 328 Points
min: 317     avg: 324.5     median: 324.5 (90%)     max: 332 Points
min: 319     avg: 322.2     median: 323 (89%)     max: 325 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 62.2     avg: 67     median: 67.5 (87%)     max: 70.78 Points
72.2 Points (93%)
min: 53.91     avg: 54.6     median: 54.7 (71%)     max: 55.26 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.8     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (92%)     max: 3.93 Points
min: 4.02     avg: 4     median: 4 (95%)     max: 4.21 Points
min: 3.78     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (91%)     max: 3.85 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 11661     avg: 11989     median: 12017.5 (73%)     max: 12259 Points
12643 Points (76%)
min: 8465     avg: 8658     median: 8623 (52%)     max: 8858 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 85342     avg: 88253     median: 87738 (64%)     max: 92192 Points
94801 Points (69%)
min: 67036     avg: 68658     median: 68579.5 (50%)     max: 70741 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 132000     avg: 134526     median: 133567 (85%)     max: 138969 Points
144156 Points (92%)
min: 121250     avg: 126872     median: 125768 (80%)     max: 134469 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 17418     avg: 17943     median: 17998.5 (22%)     max: 18355 Points
18511 Points (23%)
min: 16151     avg: 16234     median: 16246 (20%)     max: 16338 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 79.738     avg: 84.6     median: 84.2 (1%)     max: 90.13 s
74.5 s (1%)
min: 39.576     avg: 40.4     median: 40.3 (0%)     max: 41.122 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 1.818     avg: 2.1     median: 2 (0%)     max: 2.305 s
2.1 s (0%)
min: 1.781     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (0%)     max: 1.872 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 13210     avg: 14265     median: 14271 (23%)     max: 15309 Points
16108 Points (26%)
17225 Points (27%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 127201     avg: 142777     median: 146984 (84%)     max: 148053 MIPS
min: 145144     avg: 146282     median: 145207 (83%)     max: 149570 MIPS
min: 124975     avg: 127080     median: 127195 (73%)     max: 129087 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7176     avg: 7343     median: 7272 (86%)     max: 7539 MIPS
min: 7772     avg: 7893     median: 7932 (93%)     max: 7934 MIPS
min: 8252     avg: 8280     median: 8269 (97%)     max: 8345 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 247.5     avg: 261.5     median: 264.8 (7%)     max: 269 fps
min: 75.9     avg: 181.2     median: 181.2 (5%)     max: 286.5 fps
241 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 412     avg: 419     median: 419.3 (11%)     max: 425.5 fps
min: 257.5     avg: 345.5     median: 345.5 (9%)     max: 433.5 fps
376 fps (10%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 34.5     avg: 39.9     median: 40.7 (72%)     max: 42.6 fps
min: 40.8     avg: 41.4     median: 41.1 (72%)     max: 42.8 fps
min: 36.2     avg: 36.8     median: 36.9 (65%)     max: 37.1 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 2.6     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (85%)     max: 3 GB/s
2.8 GB/s (82%)
1.5 GB/s (44%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 5.2     avg: 5.4     median: 5.4 (93%)     max: 5.4 GB/s
5.8 GB/s (100%)
2.8 GB/s (48%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 20.5     avg: 23.3     median: 22.9 (60%)     max: 27 GB/s
26.7 GB/s (70%)
14.8 GB/s (39%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 136     avg: 145.2     median: 140.5 (2%)     max: 174 Seconds
min: 135     avg: 143     median: 144.5 (2%)     max: 147 Seconds
min: 165     avg: 166.4     median: 166 (2%)     max: 168 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 80     avg: 85.7     median: 84 (1%)     max: 101 Seconds
min: 80     avg: 84.6     median: 85 (1%)     max: 87 Seconds
min: 105     avg: 106.2     median: 106 (1%)     max: 107 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3468     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3911 sec
min: 0.3425     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (7%)     max: 0.3504 sec
min: 0.3643     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3758 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 19989     avg: 20578     median: 20192 (43%)     max: 21934 Points
min: 20532     avg: 22354     median: 22657.5 (48%)     max: 22928 Points
min: 20439     avg: 21223     median: 21284 (45%)     max: 21659 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 5.655     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (1%)     max: 5.86 s
5.5 s (1%)
6.1 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 12.287     avg: 12.6     median: 12.5 (1%)     max: 13.193 s
12 s (1%)
13.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 289.628     avg: 296.6     median: 293.3 (1%)     max: 310.125 s
280.3 s (1%)
313.4 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 86915     avg: 97290     median: 96473 (74%)     max: 112434 Points
min: 11403     avg: 101267     median: 111512 (86%)     max: 114209 Points
min: 82063     avg: 100438     median: 102019 (78%)     max: 102765 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 29023     avg: 31289     median: 31187.5 (77%)     max: 33181 Points
min: 28497     avg: 31204     median: 31391 (77%)     max: 32853 Points
min: 26455     avg: 27800     median: 27731 (68%)     max: 28963 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 79257     avg: 97847     median: 97246.5 (79%)     max: 111988 Points
min: 89084     avg: 104553     median: 105332 (86%)     max: 111347 Points
min: 96003     avg: 102745     median: 103232 (84%)     max: 105350 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 80320     avg: 96904     median: 97919.5 (79%)     max: 102987 Points
min: 88682     avg: 104672     median: 105402 (86%)     max: 110989 Points
min: 97281     avg: 102964     median: 103220 (84%)     max: 106230 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 83056     avg: 98634     median: 97311 (78%)     max: 105981 Points
min: 90865     avg: 104818     median: 105098 (84%)     max: 110670 Points
min: 94657     avg: 102993     median: 101826 (82%)     max: 108551 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 26626     avg: 29034     median: 29044.5 (73%)     max: 30955 Points
min: 27678     avg: 28978     median: 29112 (74%)     max: 30462 Points
min: 25631     avg: 26260     median: 26310.5 (67%)     max: 26732 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 46013     avg: 51456     median: 51140 (91%)     max: 54226 Points
min: 48193     avg: 52070     median: 52354 (93%)     max: 56087 Points
min: 40436     avg: 42329     median: 42325 (75%)     max: 43200 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 16236     avg: 20507     median: 20037 (84%)     max: 22794 Points
min: 19418     avg: 22312     median: 22579 (95%)     max: 23721 Points
min: 13634     avg: 15940     median: 15959.5 (67%)     max: 16721 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
3070 Points (74%)
min: 3108     avg: 3214     median: 3243 (78%)     max: 3294 Points
2990 Points (72%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
20800 Points (81%)
min: 20435     avg: 21326     median: 21397 (83%)     max: 21790 Points
18300 Points (71%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2985     avg: 3078     median: 3104 (99%)     max: 3150 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 19463     avg: 20452     median: 20693 (85%)     max: 20754 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2106     avg: 2237     median: 2286 (87%)     max: 2290 Points
min: 2243     avg: 2347     median: 2369 (90%)     max: 2370 Points
min: 2274     avg: 2290     median: 2294 (87%)     max: 2297 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 22448     avg: 23743     median: 24033 (43%)     max: 24157 Points
min: 24552     avg: 25148     median: 25199 (45%)     max: 25867 Points
min: 19987     avg: 20553     median: 20667.5 (37%)     max: 20799 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2148     avg: 2191     median: 2197 (10%)     max: 2246 Points
min: 2177     avg: 2237     median: 2247 (10%)     max: 2280 Points
min: 2183     avg: 2195     median: 2196 (10%)     max: 2201 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 22024     avg: 23446     median: 23664 (75%)     max: 24021 Points
min: 23151     avg: 24582     median: 24467 (77%)     max: 25496 Points
min: 19975     avg: 20532     median: 20658 (65%)     max: 20765 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 9218     avg: 9542     median: 9598 (96%)     max: 9683 Points
min: 9620     avg: 9873     median: 9872.5 (99%)     max: 10009 Points
min: 9193     avg: 9260     median: 9275 (93%)     max: 9311 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 77347     avg: 84105     median: 85336 (84%)     max: 86695 Points
min: 82660     avg: 87853     median: 88108.5 (86%)     max: 91119 Points
min: 74731     avg: 76662     median: 77033 (76%)     max: 77769 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 423     avg: 430.6     median: 432 (1%)     max: 438 ms
min: 413     avg: 415     median: 414 (0%)     max: 418 ms
min: 431     avg: 438     median: 440 (1%)     max: 441 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 304     avg: 317.6     median: 316 (87%)     max: 335 Points
min: 332     avg: 334.7     median: 334 (92%)     max: 338 Points
min: 300     avg: 305.8     median: 304.5 (84%)     max: 314 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 338     avg: 364     median: 368 (66%)     max: 382 Points
min: 371     avg: 388.3     median: 386 (69%)     max: 410 Points
min: 371     avg: 383.8     median: 383 (69%)     max: 395 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2263     avg: 2497     median: 2580 (96%)     max: 2589 Points
min: 2490     avg: 2566     median: 2584 (97%)     max: 2611 Points
min: 2315     avg: 2370     median: 2370 (89%)     max: 2408 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 228     avg: 354.3     median: 359 (62%)     max: 471 Watt
537 Watt (93%)
319 Watt (55%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 349     avg: 392.5     median: 370.5 (68%)     max: 480 Watt
548 Watt (100%)
313 Watt (57%)
min: 64.1     avg: 83.6     median: 77.6 (51%)     max: 151.2 Watt
94.1 Watt (62%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 12.9     avg: 15     median: 15.2 (11%)     max: 16.8 Points per Watt
11.5 Points per Watt (9%)
15.5 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900K → 100% n=50

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-14900K → 104% n=50

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7900X → 93% n=50

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 10. 04:07:19

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14625 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15092 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14608 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760062038s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14625 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 14625 +0.021s ... 0.033s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 15092 +0.004s ... 0.037s

#11 got single benchmarks 15092 +0.049s ... 0.086s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14608 +0.004s ... 0.09s

#13 got single benchmarks 14608 +0.016s ... 0.106s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.106s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.108s ... 0.214s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.214s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)