Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-12700K vs AMD Ryzen 9 7900 vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

Intel Core i7-12700K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12700K

The Intel Core i7-12700K is a high end CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 8 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 20 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 5 GHz (Turbo Boost Max 3.0), the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.9 GHz. All cores can use 25 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.5 GHz.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost. Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

Performance

The average 12700K in our database is way ahead of the Ryzen 7 5800X and the Ryzen 9 3900X, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which is a very, very impressive result, as of late 2022.

Power consumption

This Core i7 series chip has a Base power consumption of 125 W, with its highest Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sitting at 190 W. It might be a good idea to get an AIO cooling solution for a chip this power hungry.

The i7-12700K is manufactured on Intel's fourth-generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower-than-average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7900

The AMD Ryzen 9 79 00 is a high-end desktop processorfrom the Raphael series with 12 cores and hyperthreading (SMT), which means it can process up to 24 threads simultaneously. Launched in early 2023, the Ryzen 9 7900 is the fastest 12-core processor with 65 watts TDP.

The Ryzen 9 7900 clocks at 3.7 GHz base clock and reaches up to 5.4 GHz on one core in Turbo mode. This is also the difference to the higher clocked Ryzen 9 7900X.

At first glance, the internal structure of the processor has not changed fundamentally. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is still based on the chiplet design consisting of two CCD clusters, each containing a CCX with 8 cores. However, the manufacturing process has been scaled down to 5 nm, which ensures higher clock rates. There is also the IO die, which contains the memory controller and the iGPU, among other things. This is now manufactured in a 6 nm structure width.

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 can impress in games thanks to the significantly improved IPC.

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7950X

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is a fast high-end desktop processor of the Raphael series. It offers 16 cores based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (32 threads). The cores clock from 4.5 (base) up to 5.7 GHz (single core boost). The 7950X is the second fastest Ryzen at launch.

The Raphael series still uses a chiplet design with two CCD-clusters (each with 8 possible cores) in 5nm and an IO-die (including the memory controller and the Radeon Graphics iGPU) in 6nm.

Performance

The average 7950X in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-13900K, Ryzen 9 7945HX, Ryzen 9 7950X3D, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a super-fast chip, as of mid 2023.

The R9 7950X is rated at a TDP of 170 Watt and proved to be rather power-hungry in applications and games.

ModelIntel Core i7-12700KAMD Ryzen 9 7900AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-SAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)AMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)
CodenameAlder LakeRaphael (Zen4)Raphael (Zen 4)
Series: Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000) Raphael (Zen4)
Intel Core i9-12900K3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-129002.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K « 2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-127003.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 « 3.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 77003.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 76003.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock2700 - 5000 MHz3700 - 5400 MHz4500 - 5700 MHz
L2 Cache12 MB12 MB16 MB
L3 Cache25 MB64 MB64 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 2012 / 2416 / 32
16 x 5.7 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP125 Watt65 Watt170 Watt
10 nm5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475VCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm, 0.650 - 1.475 V
max. Temp.100 °C95 °C95 °C
SocketLGA1700AM5 (LGA 1718)AM5 (LGA1718)
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterp., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHAMMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2DDR5-5200 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1500 MHz)AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$409 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache768 KB1 MB
Transistors9.9 Million9900 Million
Die Size262 mm2CCD = 2x 70 sq. mm, I/O = 122 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12700K
46.7 pt (65%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7900
54.2 pt (75%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7950X
60.4 pt (84%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
min: 121     avg: 122     median: 122 (85%)     max: 123 Points
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
min: 1991     avg: 2027     median: 2027 (38%)     max: 2063 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 17003     avg: 19784     median: 19784 (18%)     max: 22565 Points
24776 Points (23%)
min: 29882     avg: 35794     median: 37353 (35%)     max: 38248 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1806     avg: 1851     median: 1850.5 (79%)     max: 1895 Points
1966 Points (84%)
min: 1982     avg: 2009     median: 2001 (85%)     max: 2045 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 731     avg: 736     median: 735.5 (82%)     max: 740 Points
762 Points (85%)
min: 771     avg: 781     median: 778 (86%)     max: 795 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6953     avg: 7801     median: 7800.5 (19%)     max: 8648 Points
9703 Points (24%)
min: 11727     avg: 13977     median: 14538 (35%)     max: 14891 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3325 Points (21%)
4020 Points (25%)
min: 4836     avg: 5835     median: 6095 (38%)     max: 6236 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
272 Points (82%)
315 Points (95%)
min: 314     avg: 318     median: 316 (95%)     max: 328 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
38.4 Points (50%)
45.3 Points (59%)
min: 68.58     avg: 68.8     median: 68.6 (89%)     max: 69.26 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (82%)
3.7 Points (92%)
min: 3.69     avg: 3.8     median: 3.7 (92%)     max: 3.86 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9305 Points (56%)
8339 Points (50%)
min: 8388     avg: 8516     median: 8508 (51%)     max: 8652 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
63484 Points (46%)
60934 Points (44%)
min: 71716     avg: 72279     median: 72480 (53%)     max: 72641 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
102539 Points (71%)
min: 130289     avg: 133916     median: 133916 (93%)     max: 137543 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15179 Points (18%)
min: 15848     avg: 16054     median: 16054 (20%)     max: 16260 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
171.2 s (2%)
46.8 s (1%)
min: 30.427     avg: 31.6     median: 30.8 (0%)     max: 33.613 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.7 s (1%)
3 s (1%)
min: 1.557     avg: 1.9     median: 1.7 (0%)     max: 2.423 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
10389 Points (16%)
10154 Points (16%)
min: 15449     avg: 15860     median: 15779 (25%)     max: 16351 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 65508     avg: 73439     median: 73438.5 (42%)     max: 81369 MIPS
112881 MIPS (65%)
min: 151967     avg: 157272     median: 157469 (90%)     max: 161724 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6117     avg: 6270     median: 6269.5 (75%)     max: 6422 MIPS
7936 MIPS (95%)
min: 7795     avg: 8093     median: 8167 (98%)     max: 8365 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
179 fps (62%)
207 fps (72%)
min: 266.5     avg: 271.8     median: 274 (96%)     max: 275 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
349.5 fps (81%)
355.5 fps (82%)
min: 379.5     avg: 383.3     median: 383 (88%)     max: 387.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 14.9     avg: 20.5     median: 20.5 (36%)     max: 26.1 fps
31.2 fps (55%)
min: 36.2     avg: 42.7     median: 43.6 (77%)     max: 44.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.6 GB/s (0%)
2 GB/s (0%)
min: 2.8     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (0%)     max: 2.9 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.8 GB/s (48%)
3.1 GB/s (53%)
min: 4.4     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (78%)     max: 4.6 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
15.7 GB/s (41%)
21.5 GB/s (56%)
min: 30.7     avg: 32     median: 32.5 (85%)     max: 32.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
199 Seconds (3%)
min: 128     avg: 135.3     median: 134 (2%)     max: 164 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 152.3     avg: 173.1     median: 173.1 (1%)     max: 193.9 Seconds
125 Seconds (1%)
min: 82     avg: 86.4     median: 86 (1%)     max: 103 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.412     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.423 sec
0.4 sec (8%)
min: 0.3682     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3836 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
16827 Points (36%)
19451 Points (41%)
min: 19782     avg: 20993     median: 21065 (45%)     max: 22169 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.3 s (2%)
6.7 s (1%)
min: 6.088     avg: 6.4     median: 6.3 (1%)     max: 6.834 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.6 s (1%)
13.9 s (1%)
min: 13.291     avg: 13.9     median: 13.6 (1%)     max: 14.826 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
387 s (2%)
329 s (1%)
min: 309.009     avg: 314.8     median: 312.5 (1%)     max: 322.796 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
93250 Points (82%)
min: 101697     avg: 105944     median: 105875 (93%)     max: 107186 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 23129     avg: 24947     median: 24947 (67%)     max: 26765 Points
26325 Points (71%)
min: 24576     avg: 34300     median: 35459.5 (96%)     max: 36767 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
109742 Points (89%)
min: 78811     avg: 90547     median: 90772 (74%)     max: 100969 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
112268 Points (91%)
min: 79100     avg: 90596     median: 90717 (74%)     max: 101249 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
109389 Points (92%)
min: 81936     avg: 92519     median: 92950.5 (78%)     max: 101189 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 21804     avg: 23017     median: 23017 (58%)     max: 24230 Points
min: 18195     avg: 26233     median: 26488 (67%)     max: 27047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 31240     avg: 34160     median: 34159.5 (61%)     max: 37079 Points
min: 37496     avg: 45495     median: 45937.5 (82%)     max: 47225 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 13915     avg: 15550     median: 15550 (66%)     max: 17185 Points
14817 Points (62%)
min: 14571     avg: 16673     median: 16978 (72%)     max: 17769 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2916     avg: 2983     median: 2975 (80%)     max: 3083 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 18846     avg: 19870     median: 19813 (78%)     max: 21166 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1890     avg: 1912     median: 1911.5 (81%)     max: 1933 Points
2203 Points (93%)
min: 1990     avg: 2148     median: 2227 (94%)     max: 2311 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12475     avg: 14016     median: 14016 (25%)     max: 15557 Points
17880 Points (32%)
min: 20496     avg: 23922     median: 23903 (43%)     max: 25159 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1835     avg: 1841     median: 1840.5 (8%)     max: 1846 Points
2096 Points (9%)
min: 1959     avg: 2794     median: 2131 (9%)     max: 22993 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12318     avg: 13879     median: 13879 (44%)     max: 15440 Points
17581 Points (55%)
min: 6501     avg: 23146     median: 23887 (75%)     max: 24554 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8133 Points (81%)
8861 Points (89%)
min: 7777     avg: 8575     median: 8864 (89%)     max: 9322 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
55786 Points (61%)
65241 Points (72%)
min: 79731     avg: 85148     median: 85341 (94%)     max: 89678 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 496     avg: 498     median: 498 (1%)     max: 500 ms
452 ms (1%)
min: 433     avg: 441.3     median: 444 (1%)     max: 446 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 R9 7900 +
302 Points (87%)
min: 301     avg: 303.9     median: 303 (87%)     max: 309 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 301     avg: 303.5     median: 303.5 (63%)     max: 306 Points
366 Points (76%)
min: 358     avg: 375.9     median: 377 (79%)     max: 396 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1999 Points (77%)
2322 Points (89%)
min: 2150     avg: 2345     median: 2345 (90%)     max: 2513 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 132.1     avg: 206.6     median: 206.6 (36%)     max: 281 Watt
101%
1 R9 7900 +
203 Watt (35%)
min: 186.8     avg: 274.2     median: 287.5 (50%)     max: 335 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
278.2 Watt (51%)
130%
1 R9 7900 +
196.9 Watt (36%)
min: 191.9     avg: 284.7     median: 291.5 (53%)     max: 364 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
106.9 Watt (71%)
min: 78     avg: 94.1     median: 93 (62%)     max: 123.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
12 Points per Watt (9%)
170%
1 R9 7900 +
20.4 Points per Watt (15%)
min: 17.1     avg: 21     median: 20.8 (15%)     max: 25.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12700K → 100% n=38

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7900 → 113% n=38

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7950X → 136% n=38

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 16. 19:29:08

#0 checking url part for id 14033 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15014 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14627 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14033 +0.017s ... 0.046s

#8 got single benchmarks 14033 +0.011s ... 0.057s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15014 +0.015s ... 0.073s

#10 got single benchmarks 15014 +0.008s ... 0.081s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14627 +0.013s ... 0.094s

#12 got single benchmarks 14627 +0.149s ... 0.243s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.243s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.49s ... 0.733s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.733s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)