Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 165H

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 155H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a high-end laptop processor of the Meteor Lake series that has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. This 1st Gen Core Ultra chip has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; its 16 cores are comprised of 6 HT-enabled Performance cores running at up to 4.8 GHz and 10 Efficient cores (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) running at up to 3.8 GHz.

The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.30 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 7 155H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 155H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official performance data published by Intel, then the 155H is about as fast as the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.30 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is almost as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 7 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. Its Base power consumption is supposed to be around 64 W, however, most laptop makers will probably go for a higher value to get higher clock speeds and thus better performance. Either way, a powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 155H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X Elite X1E-78-100

The Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 is a pretty fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops. The X1E-78-100 is the least powerful member of the Snapdragon X Elite processor series, as of May 2024; as such, it has 12 Oryon CPU cores (3 clusters of equally powerful cores; 12 threads) running at no more than 3.4 GHz. Other key features include the 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 iGPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller.

The top dog, known as the Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, is thought to be based on the same die with the same NPU but with higher GPU clock speeds, higher CPU clock speeds and possibly higher power targets as well.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if the X Elite is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The SoC is said to have 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

Our first benchmarks (featuring a 35 W X Elite X1E-78-100) revealed very decent CPU performance figures that see the X Elite going head-to-head with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U. It's also not much faster or slower than the Apple M3 chip with 10 GPU cores. While not groundbreaking, this should be good enough for the user to be able to run any applications in 2024 and 2025.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The integrated 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it supposedly delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that's good for up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is rather underwhelming according to our in-house testing results. While slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno fails to outgun the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1E-78-100 is set to be slightly less power-hungry than its more powerful brothers. Expect to see anything between 20 W and 45 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and on the performance profile chosen. That's exactly what Ryzen HS chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

Intel Core Ultra 7 165H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 165H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H is a high-end laptop processor of the Meteor Lake series. This 1st Gen Core Ultra chip has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. The 16 cores are comprised of 6 HT-enabled Performance cores running at up to 5.0 GHz and 10 Efficient cores (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) running at up to 3.8 GHz. Two of the 10 E-cores are located in the Low Power Island.

The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.30 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 7 165H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 165H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official Intel performance data, then the 165H is about as fast as the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.30 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is almost as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 7 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. A powerful cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 165H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 7 155HQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
CodenameMeteor Lake-HOryonMeteor Lake-H
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HQualcomm Snapdragon XIntel Meteor Lake-H
Series: Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H « 3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-1003.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 « - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H « 3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Clock3800 - 4800 MHz <=3400 MHz3800 - 5000 MHz
L3 Cache24 MB6 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
12 / 12
8 x 3.4 GHz
4 x 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
16 / 22
6 x 5.0 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP28 Watt35 Watt28 Watt
Technology7 nm4 nm7 nm
max. Temp.110 °C110 °C
SocketBGA2049BGA2049
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPSIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2300 MHz)
Architecturex86ARMx86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.qualcomm.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache2.3 MB
L2 Cache12 MB
TDP Turbo PL245 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 155H
37.5 pt (62%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X Elite X1E-78-100
31.2 pt (52%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 165H
37.6 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 96     avg: 102.7     median: 102.3 (57%)     max: 108 Points
min: 102.8     avg: 107.1     median: 108 (61%)     max: 108 Points
103.3 Points (58%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 323     avg: 776     median: 789 (15%)     max: 1024 Points
min: 746     avg: 893     median: 840 (16%)     max: 1132 Points
min: 616     avg: 690     median: 690 (13%)     max: 764 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9769     avg: 14965     median: 15028 (14%)     max: 19007 Points
min: 8353     avg: 9854     median: 10115 (9%)     max: 10960 Points
min: 14055     avg: 14783     median: 14551 (14%)     max: 15743 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1496     avg: 1726     median: 1743 (73%)     max: 1815 Points
min: 1111     avg: 1124     median: 1127 (47%)     max: 1130 Points
min: 1668     avg: 1731     median: 1759 (74%)     max: 1766 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 601     avg: 665     median: 670.5 (73%)     max: 696 Points
min: 408     avg: 419.5     median: 421 (46%)     max: 426 Points
min: 674     avg: 681     median: 683 (74%)     max: 687 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3798     avg: 5795     median: 5762.5 (14%)     max: 7409 Points
min: 3168     avg: 3712     median: 3790.5 (9%)     max: 4193 Points
min: 5471     avg: 5640     median: 5545 (14%)     max: 5904 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1932     avg: 2449     median: 2450 (15%)     max: 2880 Points
min: 1984     avg: 2162     median: 2187 (14%)     max: 2351 Points
min: 2467     avg: 2583     median: 2641 (17%)     max: 2642 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 99.6     avg: 249.5     median: 255 (71%)     max: 268 Points
min: 208     avg: 211.7     median: 211 (58%)     max: 216 Points
min: 257     avg: 258     median: 257 (71%)     max: 260 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 27.11     avg: 30.5     median: 30.7 (40%)     max: 33.49 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.77     avg: 3     median: 3 (72%)     max: 3.13 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8808     avg: 9492     median: 9619.5 (58%)     max: 9919 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 50589     avg: 56540     median: 57550 (42%)     max: 60472 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 13726     avg: 67393     median: 80420 (51%)     max: 95005 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12270     avg: 30347     median: 13508.5 (16%)     max: 82102 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 92.544     avg: 146.2     median: 139.6 (2%)     max: 206.526 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.523     avg: 3.8     median: 3.7 (1%)     max: 4.041 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
482 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
3.4 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6137     avg: 6921     median: 6911.5 (11%)     max: 7723 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 41739     avg: 59108     median: 60595 (35%)     max: 70254 MIPS
min: 38047     avg: 44942     median: 45771.5 (26%)     max: 49172 MIPS
min: 54741     avg: 58029     median: 56997 (33%)     max: 62349 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4594     avg: 5330     median: 5398 (64%)     max: 5621 MIPS
min: 4341     avg: 4582     median: 4618.5 (54%)     max: 4703 MIPS
min: 4939     avg: 5200     median: 5273 (62%)     max: 5387 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 120.65     avg: 136.4     median: 135.4 (45%)     max: 154.15 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 282.57     avg: 302.1     median: 300.5 (69%)     max: 325 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.93     avg: 16.5     median: 16.7 (29%)     max: 21.2 fps
min: 6.39     avg: 6.9     median: 6.7 (12%)     max: 7.57 fps
min: 14.4     avg: 15.2     median: 15.2 (27%)     max: 16 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.944     avg: 1     median: 1 (29%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.6     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (29%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 9.3     avg: 10.3     median: 10.4 (27%)     max: 10.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 296     avg: 413.3     median: 380 (5%)     max: 692 Seconds
min: 545     avg: 635     median: 652 (8%)     max: 702 Seconds
min: 406     avg: 435     median: 435 (6%)     max: 464 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 175     avg: 232.5     median: 220 (2%)     max: 381 Seconds
min: 313     avg: 365     median: 369.5 (3%)     max: 428 Seconds
min: 231     avg: 246     median: 246 (2%)     max: 261 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4457     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.53 sec
min: 0.724     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.77 sec
min: 0.4565     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4686 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12066     avg: 12936     median: 12712.5 (27%)     max: 14729 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.046     avg: 7.4     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 8.087 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.701     avg: 16.2     median: 15.9 (1%)     max: 17.277 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 394.754     avg: 413.2     median: 400.3 (2%)     max: 444.482 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 61131     avg: 65940     median: 63514 (49%)     max: 74620 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6531     avg: 18376     median: 19092.5 (47%)     max: 23779 Points
min: 10083     avg: 13706     median: 14374 (35%)     max: 14969 Points
min: 18101     avg: 20276     median: 20275.5 (50%)     max: 22450 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 53255     avg: 77249     median: 77292.5 (63%)     max: 93608 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 66925     avg: 75901     median: 72861.5 (59%)     max: 90957 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 84880     avg: 88438     median: 88437.5 (71%)     max: 91995 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 7073     avg: 15332     median: 15194 (38%)     max: 19549 Points
8244 Points (21%)
min: 13733     avg: 14430     median: 14429.5 (37%)     max: 15126 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 5249     avg: 22618     median: 23177 (41%)     max: 28337 Points
min: 11353     avg: 17429     median: 18516 (33%)     max: 18972 Points
min: 23240     avg: 23582     median: 23582 (42%)     max: 23924 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3922     avg: 9000     median: 9454.5 (40%)     max: 12145 Points
min: 2722     avg: 4725     median: 5121 (22%)     max: 5352 Points
min: 7617     avg: 8260     median: 8259.5 (35%)     max: 8902 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 1901     avg: 2377     median: 2409 (60%)     max: 2473 Points
min: 2354     avg: 2441     median: 2455 (61%)     max: 2464 Points
min: 2358     avg: 2429     median: 2421.5 (60%)     max: 2513 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 7732     avg: 12275     median: 12385 (48%)     max: 13656 Points
min: 12971     avg: 14041     median: 14256 (55%)     max: 14767 Points
min: 11616     avg: 12341     median: 12230.5 (47%)     max: 13288 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2167     avg: 2588     median: 2313 (73%)     max: 3105 Points
2175 Points (69%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 10787     avg: 15361     median: 12061 (50%)     max: 21003 Points
12046 Points (49%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1462     avg: 1751     median: 1761.5 (69%)     max: 1824 Points
min: 1576     avg: 1679     median: 1666.5 (65%)     max: 1805 Points
min: 1688     avg: 1782     median: 1793.5 (70%)     max: 1853 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10017     avg: 12016     median: 12183.5 (22%)     max: 13556 Points
min: 6244     avg: 9624     median: 9104.5 (16%)     max: 14043 Points
min: 11733     avg: 12010     median: 12051.5 (22%)     max: 12204 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1556     avg: 1678     median: 1696 (7%)     max: 1745 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11112     avg: 11906     median: 12025 (38%)     max: 12530 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6559     avg: 6879     median: 6927 (69%)     max: 7141 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 39509     avg: 43123     median: 43897 (44%)     max: 46412 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 416.4     avg: 541     median: 535 (1%)     max: 642 ms
min: 450.7     avg: 459.1     median: 454.2 (1%)     max: 482.4 ms
min: 514     avg: 518     median: 517.5 (1%)     max: 521 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 77142     avg: 88549     median: 89268 (65%)     max: 97162 Points
min: 79579     avg: 80168     median: 80003 (59%)     max: 81088 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 166.4     avg: 251.8     median: 255 (70%)     max: 309 Points
min: 271     avg: 284.8     median: 285.5 (78%)     max: 297 Points
min: 259     avg: 263     median: 263 (72%)     max: 267 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 213     avg: 276.5     median: 278.5 (50%)     max: 299 Points
min: 395     avg: 413.4     median: 419 (75%)     max: 423 Points
min: 291     avg: 293     median: 293 (53%)     max: 295 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1366     avg: 1663     median: 1685.5 (63%)     max: 1903 Points
min: 978     avg: 1193     median: 1248 (47%)     max: 1401 Points
min: 1690     avg: 1751     median: 1692 (63%)     max: 1872 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.1     avg: 74.8     median: 72.8 (13%)     max: 168 Watt
min: 34     avg: 44.4     median: 45.4 (8%)     max: 52.6 Watt
min: 55.7     avg: 58.2     median: 58.2 (10%)     max: 60.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.9     avg: 89.4     median: 87.9 (16%)     max: 160.1 Watt
min: 63     avg: 64.2     median: 64.2 (12%)     max: 65.3 Watt
min: 64.8     avg: 79.7     median: 79.7 (15%)     max: 94.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 2.42     avg: 7.2     median: 6.1 (4%)     max: 24.2 Watt
min: 2.89     avg: 5.5     median: 5.4 (4%)     max: 9.3 Watt
min: 2.51     avg: 4.6     median: 4.6 (3%)     max: 6.73 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 2.83     avg: 10.1     median: 7.8 (9%)     max: 90.3 Watt
min: 4.36     avg: 5.9     median: 5.5 (6%)     max: 9.2 Watt
min: 3.01     avg: 5.3     median: 5.3 (6%)     max: 7.51 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 17.7     avg: 30.9     median: 28.6 (21%)     max: 64.7 Points per Watt
34.9 Points per Watt (26%)
min: 27.9     avg: 33     median: 33 (25%)     max: 38.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 155H → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 → 82% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 165H → 98% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 18. 15:52:27

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16906 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17587 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 16905 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755525147s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Aug 2025 05:18:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.017s ... 0.017s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 16906 +0.006s ... 0.023s

#9 got single benchmarks 16906 +0.082s ... 0.105s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 17587 +0.005s ... 0.111s

#11 got single benchmarks 17587 +0.011s ... 0.122s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 16905 +0.004s ... 0.126s

#13 got single benchmarks 16905 +0.008s ... 0.133s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.133s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.08s ... 0.213s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.213s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)