Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 155H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a high-end laptop processor of the Meteor Lake series that has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. This 1st Gen Core Ultra chip has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; its 16 cores are comprised of 6 HT-enabled Performance cores running at up to 4.8 GHz and 10 Efficient cores (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) running at up to 3.8 GHz.

The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.30 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 7 155H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 155H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official performance data published by Intel, then the 155H is about as fast as the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.30 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is almost as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 7 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. Its Base power consumption is supposed to be around 64 W, however, most laptop makers will probably go for a higher value to get higher clock speeds and thus better performance. Either way, a powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 155H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

The Ryzen AI 9 365 is a relatively powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in June 2024. The chip features 10 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.0 GHz, along with the 12 CU RDNA 3.5 Radeon 880M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other key features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM support.

Of the 10 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores with the other 6 being smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter probably run at somewhat lower clock speeds than the former. In the meantime, the more expensive Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has both more CPU cores and a faster 16 CU integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores found in two separate clusters, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with.

Either way, mobile Zen 5 implementation is reportedly (ChipsAndCheese) closer to desktop Zen 4 than to desktop Zen 5 due to differing cache sizes, vast differences in AVX-512 throughput and other factors.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen AI 9 chip supports DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, giving system designers a choice between lower latency and higher throughput respectively. The chip is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU, which is a lot more complex than first-gen XDNA was, delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

As is usual for laptop CPUs, the Ryzen is not user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good.

Performance

At 30 W, this Ryzen AI 9 series CPU is only just fast enough to compete with much older chips such as the Ryzen 9 4900H and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS in multi-threaded benchmarks, suggesting power efficiency is the focus here rather than sheer performance.

Graphics

The Radeon 880M is the direct successor to the 780M. It packs just a few differences under the hood, such as faster caches; its 12 RDNA 3.5 architecture CUs/WGPs (768 unified shaders) run at up to 2,900 MHz. With well over 30 fps in both Once Human and The First Descendant (1080p - Low), this iGPU is certainly fast enough for a fair bit of casual as well as competitive gaming.

Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors simultaneously. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs such as AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The 365 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The 4 nm TSMC process that these CPUs are built with makes for above average, as of late 2024, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 7 155HAMD Ryzen AI 9 365
CodenameMeteor Lake-HStrix Point (Zen 5)
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Series: Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300) Strix Point (Zen 5)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H compare3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H « 3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H compare3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H compare3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 « 2 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compare2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme compare2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Clock3800 - 4800 MHz2000 - 5000 MHz
L3 Cache24 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
10 / 20
4 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 5
6 x AMD Zen 5c
TDP28 Watt54 Watt
Technology7 nm4 nm
max. Temp.110 °C100 °C
SocketBGA2049FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)AMD Radeon 880M ( - 2900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 155H
37.5 pt (62%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 9 365
41.9 pt (70%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 96     avg: 102.7     median: 102.3 (57%)     max: 108 Points
min: 102.7     avg: 112.1     median: 113.5 (64%)     max: 116.3 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 323     avg: 776     median: 789 (15%)     max: 1024 Points
min: 590     avg: 907     median: 992.5 (18%)     max: 1112 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9769     avg: 14965     median: 15028 (14%)     max: 19007 Points
min: 11462     avg: 17784     median: 18698 (17%)     max: 20649 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1496     avg: 1726     median: 1743 (73%)     max: 1815 Points
min: 1942     avg: 1985     median: 1992 (84%)     max: 2001 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 601     avg: 665     median: 670.5 (73%)     max: 696 Points
min: 758     avg: 780     median: 782 (85%)     max: 787 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3798     avg: 5795     median: 5762.5 (14%)     max: 7409 Points
min: 5247     avg: 7126     median: 7303 (18%)     max: 8070 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1932     avg: 2449     median: 2450 (15%)     max: 2880 Points
min: 1950     avg: 2759     median: 2842 (18%)     max: 3075 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 99.6     avg: 249.5     median: 255 (71%)     max: 268 Points
min: 195.7     avg: 287.2     median: 303 (84%)     max: 306 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 27.11     avg: 30.5     median: 30.7 (40%)     max: 33.49 Points
min: 27.35     avg: 30.8     median: 30.8 (40%)     max: 34.29 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.77     avg: 3     median: 3 (72%)     max: 3.13 Points
min: 3.47     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (84%)     max: 3.62 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8808     avg: 9492     median: 9619.5 (58%)     max: 9919 Points
min: 8436     avg: 8446     median: 8446 (51%)     max: 8456 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 50589     avg: 56540     median: 57550 (42%)     max: 60472 Points
min: 42669     avg: 45453     median: 45452.5 (33%)     max: 48236 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 13726     avg: 67393     median: 80420 (51%)     max: 95005 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12270     avg: 30347     median: 13508.5 (16%)     max: 82102 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 92.544     avg: 146.2     median: 139.6 (2%)     max: 206.526 s
302.8 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.523     avg: 3.8     median: 3.7 (1%)     max: 4.041 s
6.7 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
482 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
3.4 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6137     avg: 6921     median: 6911.5 (11%)     max: 7723 Points
min: 4480     avg: 11937     median: 11936.5 (19%)     max: 19393 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 41739     avg: 59108     median: 60595 (35%)     max: 70254 MIPS
min: 47754     avg: 65201     median: 69773 (40%)     max: 71722 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4594     avg: 5330     median: 5398 (64%)     max: 5621 MIPS
min: 5790     avg: 5984     median: 6017 (71%)     max: 6062 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 120.65     avg: 136.4     median: 135.4 (45%)     max: 154.15 fps
96.8 fps (32%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 282.57     avg: 302.1     median: 300.5 (69%)     max: 325 fps
258.7 fps (60%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.93     avg: 16.5     median: 16.7 (29%)     max: 21.2 fps
min: 18.6     avg: 21.8     median: 22.4 (39%)     max: 24.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.944     avg: 1     median: 1 (29%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.6     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (29%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
min: 2.1     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (38%)     max: 2.3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 9.3     avg: 10.3     median: 10.4 (27%)     max: 10.9 GB/s
min: 11.8     avg: 12.6     median: 12.6 (33%)     max: 13.3 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 296     avg: 413.3     median: 380 (5%)     max: 692 Seconds
min: 243     avg: 300.9     median: 270 (3%)     max: 429 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 175     avg: 232.5     median: 220 (2%)     max: 381 Seconds
min: 160     avg: 192.3     median: 175 (1%)     max: 270 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4457     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.53 sec
min: 0.4091     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4272 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12066     avg: 12936     median: 12712.5 (27%)     max: 14729 Points
min: 13687     avg: 14361     median: 14360.5 (31%)     max: 15034 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.046     avg: 7.4     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 8.087 s
8.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.701     avg: 16.2     median: 15.9 (1%)     max: 17.277 s
min: 17.8     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (1%)     max: 17.9 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 394.754     avg: 413.2     median: 400.3 (2%)     max: 444.482 s
415.6 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 61131     avg: 65940     median: 63514 (49%)     max: 74620 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6531     avg: 18376     median: 19092.5 (47%)     max: 23779 Points
min: 17153     avg: 19025     median: 18698 (46%)     max: 20777 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 53255     avg: 77249     median: 77292.5 (63%)     max: 93608 Points
61739 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 66925     avg: 75901     median: 72861.5 (59%)     max: 90957 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 84880     avg: 88438     median: 88437.5 (71%)     max: 91995 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 7073     avg: 15332     median: 15194 (38%)     max: 19549 Points
min: 13210     avg: 17120     median: 18270.5 (46%)     max: 18728 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 5249     avg: 22618     median: 23177 (41%)     max: 28337 Points
min: 19564     avg: 27580     median: 28875 (51%)     max: 29894 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3922     avg: 9000     median: 9454.5 (40%)     max: 12145 Points
min: 7753     avg: 10008     median: 10247 (43%)     max: 10783 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 1901     avg: 2377     median: 2409 (60%)     max: 2473 Points
min: 2778     avg: 2832     median: 2815 (70%)     max: 2920 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 7732     avg: 12275     median: 12385 (48%)     max: 13656 Points
min: 12627     avg: 14265     median: 14262 (55%)     max: 15137 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2167     avg: 2588     median: 2313 (73%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 10787     avg: 15361     median: 12061 (50%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1462     avg: 1751     median: 1761.5 (69%)     max: 1824 Points
min: 2062     avg: 2080     median: 2070 (81%)     max: 2104 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10017     avg: 12016     median: 12183.5 (22%)     max: 13556 Points
min: 9599     avg: 12817     median: 13115 (23%)     max: 14182 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1556     avg: 1678     median: 1696 (7%)     max: 1745 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11112     avg: 11906     median: 12025 (38%)     max: 12530 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6559     avg: 6879     median: 6927 (69%)     max: 7141 Points
8159 Points (81%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 39509     avg: 43123     median: 43897 (44%)     max: 46412 Points
43651 Points (44%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 416.4     avg: 541     median: 535 (1%)     max: 642 ms
min: 430     avg: 440.5     median: 436.5 (1%)     max: 456 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 77142     avg: 88549     median: 89268 (65%)     max: 97162 Points
min: 106359     avg: 112650     median: 110756 (81%)     max: 120835 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 166.4     avg: 251.8     median: 255 (70%)     max: 309 Points
min: 255     avg: 271.9     median: 265 (73%)     max: 330 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 213     avg: 276.5     median: 278.5 (50%)     max: 299 Points
min: 289     avg: 317.2     median: 318.5 (57%)     max: 336 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1366     avg: 1663     median: 1685.5 (63%)     max: 1903 Points
min: 1658     avg: 1768     median: 1742 (65%)     max: 1964 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.1     avg: 74.8     median: 72.8 (13%)     max: 168 Watt
min: 38.9     avg: 77.8     median: 75.8 (13%)     max: 116.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.9     avg: 89.4     median: 87.9 (16%)     max: 160.1 Watt
min: 72.1     avg: 86.4     median: 83.2 (15%)     max: 113.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 2.42     avg: 7.2     median: 6.1 (4%)     max: 24.2 Watt
min: 3.47     avg: 7.2     median: 8.2 (5%)     max: 9.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 2.83     avg: 10.1     median: 7.8 (9%)     max: 90.3 Watt
min: 6.86     avg: 8.6     median: 8.5 (9%)     max: 11 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 17.7     avg: 30.9     median: 28.6 (21%)     max: 64.7 Points per Watt
min: 32.5     avg: 35.4     median: 34.3 (26%)     max: 39.4 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 155H → 100% n=46

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 → 110% n=46

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 09. 22:20:33

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16906 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17625 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754770833s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 08 Aug 2025 14:21:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16906 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#8 got single benchmarks 16906 +0.06s ... 0.071s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17625 +0.004s ... 0.075s

#10 got single benchmarks 17625 +0.012s ... 0.087s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.087s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.075s ... 0.163s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.165s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)