Farming Simulator 22 Performance Analysis

Let the farming begin. After three years of absence the famed farming simulator finally returns to PC. We conducted our performance analysis to determine system requirements.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Stanislav Kokhanyuk), Published 12/03/2021 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...

Technology

Positives first: Giants Software has used the unusually long break to improve the visuals. For a 2021 game, Farming Simulator 22 does not look impressive, which is not surprising given that the title is developed by a small team. Nevertheless, the improved visuals are welcome, and there are plenty of improvements.

In addition to the texture quality, the draw distance has also been significantly improved. The effects have been reworked as well. The vegetation and vehicle models also look better. The developers paid a lot of attention to the way the agricultural machinery looks in the game.

The graphics settings menu is praise-worthy. For instance, it contains options which we did not expect to see in a farming simulator (DLSS & FidelityFX). In the advanced graphics menu, there are more than 20 settings. Some settings have a bigger impact on performance than others.

Those who do not want to tinker with individual settings can use presets to achieve the desired level of performance. In total, there are four presets, some of which have a bigger impact on the visuals than others. The game looks great only at the highest settings, though. The developers should definitely do more work on the engine. The loading times are quite long and there are also occasional micro-stutters.

Benchmark

In Farming Simulator 22 the frame rate is limited to 60 FPS by default (even with vertical synchronisation disabled). This was also the case with Farming Simulator 19. This issue can be resolved by editing the game.xml file which is located in the My Games folder, which is in itself located in the Documents folder. The command line under <developement> should be changed from “false” to “true”. After this procedure, the frame rate cap can be removed by pressing F3 when in the game. By pressing F2 you can enable the frame rate counter to confirm that the FPS limiter is disabled.

For our benchmark, we start the game at a low difficulty level and – as can be seen in the video below – take a run around the wheat field. We record the frame rates with the help of CapFrameX. In our opinion, 40 FPS is perfectly fine for such a title. However, the game starts to feel really smooth only at above 60 FPS.

Results

The benchmarks were conducted mainly using the laptops which our partners MSI and XMG (Schenker Technologies) lent us.

FHD (1920x1080)

Despite a jump in visual fidelity, the system requirements are still very moderate. With powerful GPUs, the performance is bottlenecked by the CPU as our 1080p chart clearly shows. Much-loved mid-range GPUs such as the GeForce GTX 1650 and the GTX 1650 Ti manage to achieve 60 FPS on average at 1080p and maximum settings.

Farming Simulator 22
1920x1080 Medium Preset 1920x1080 High Preset 1920x1080 Very High Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X	173 (7.01^min, 22^P0.1, 125^P1) fps ∼35% 156 (72.5^min, 102^P0.1, 129^P1) fps ∼37% 139 (18.7^min, 67.4^P0.1, 102^P1) fps ∼38%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio	166 (7.08^min, 21.9^P0.1, 125^P1) fps ∼33% 154 (17.8^min, 73.8^P0.1, 114^P1) fps ∼37% 138 (62^min, 75.6^P0.1, 92.3^P1) fps ∼38%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X	178 (23^min, 88.5^P0.1, 134^P1) fps ∼36% 153 (54.2^min, 79.9^P0.1, 114^P1) fps ∼36% 137 (56.6^min, 77^P0.1, 94.2^P1) fps ∼38%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP	188 (7.15^min, 23.7^P0.1, 136^P1) fps ∼38% 165 (19.3^min, 72.6^P0.1, 123^P1) fps ∼39% 142 (48.5^min, 77.5^P0.1, 99.7^P1) fps ∼39%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP	189 (7.29^min, 23.6^P0.1, 75.6^P1) fps ∼38% 163 (19^min, 70.9^P0.1, 123^P1) fps ∼39% 141 (19.8^min, 68.2^P0.1, 98.6^P1) fps ∼39%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP	174 (7.41^min, 21.5^P0.1, 123^P1) fps ∼35% 153 (19.4^min, 68.7^P0.1, 115^P1) fps ∼36% 128 (17.3^min, 69.1^P0.1, 88.4^P1) fps ∼35%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD	148 (5.86^min, 17.4^P0.1, 32.2^P1) fps ∼30% 121 (14^min, 24.6^P0.1, 59^P1) fps ∼29% 98.9 (18.3^min, 24.4^P0.1, 48.4^P1) fps ∼27%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H Dell G5 15 SE	134 (7.33^min, 22.4^P0.1, 33.7^P1) fps ∼27% 115 (17.2^min, 32.4^P0.1, 87.7^P1) fps ∼27% 95.6 (17.8^min, 49.2^P0.1, 73.6^P1) fps ∼26%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP	148 (7.3^min, 20.5^P0.1, 95.7^P1) fps ∼30% 116 (15.3^min, 50.1^P0.1, 78.5^P1) fps ∼28% 93.4 (12.2^min, 50.1^P0.1, 62.6^P1) fps ∼26%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GP75	115 (6.49^min, 19.4^P0.1, 24.3^P1) fps ∼23% 84.6 (15.3^min, 38.5^P0.1, 62.2^P1) fps ∼20% 67.6 (14.1^min, 40.9^P0.1, 52.4^P1) fps ∼19%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GL75	104 (6.48^min, 16.3^P0.1, 22.9^P1) fps ∼21% 77 (14.7^min, 32.2^P0.1, 57.6^P1) fps ∼18% 61.9 (11.8^min, 35.4^P0.1, 47.4^P1) fps ∼17%

QHD (2560x1440)

Mid-range GPUs are also able to achieve playable frame rates at 1440p. Here, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, the RTX 3050 Ti and the Radeon RX 5600M can handle the game at the highest settings.

Farming Simulator 22
2560x1440 Very High Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X	137 (20^min, 68.1^P0.1, 97^P1) fps ∼37%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio	136 (20.9^min, 70.2^P0.1, 101^P1) fps ∼37%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X	135 (57.2^min, 74.1^P0.1, 96.8^P1) fps ∼36%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP	134 (18.3^min, 63.7^P0.1, 97.2^P1) fps ∼36%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP	127 (12.2^min, 67.4^P0.1, 89.8^P1) fps ∼34%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP	107 (18.7^min, 58.2^P0.1, 79.5^P1) fps ∼29%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H Dell G5 15 SE	74.2 (12.9^min, 30.7^P0.1, 54.7^P1) fps ∼20%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD	72.6 (15.5^min, 18.2^P0.1, 39.4^P1) fps ∼20%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP	69.7 (11.8^min, 15.4^P0.1, 48.5^P1) fps ∼19%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GP75	49.3 (16.2^min, 23.2^P0.1, 38.7^P1) fps ∼13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GL75	45 (16.2^min, 23.7^P0.1, 35.7^P1) fps ∼12%

UHD (3840x2160)

However, at 4K the title requires a powerful GPU to hit playable frame rates at the highest setting. Here, you will need at least an RTX 3060.

Farming Simulator 22
3840x2160 Very High Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X	132 (17.1^min, 18.8^P0.1, 101^P1) fps ∼37%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio	128 (13.6^min, 17.7^P0.1, 105^P1) fps ∼36%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X	106 (42.7^min, 56.2^P0.1, 76.8^P1) fps ∼30%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP	88.5 (11.8^min, 15.4^P0.1, 23.6^P1) fps ∼25%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP	79.9 (10.1^min, 13^P0.1, 18.1^P1) fps ∼23%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP	65.9 (10.6^min, 15.2^P0.1, 20.1^P1) fps ∼19%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H Dell G5 15 SE	45.2 (9.07^min, 9.34^P0.1, 11^P1) fps ∼13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD	42.4 (9.05^min, 11.4^P0.1, 15.3^P1) fps ∼12%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP	41.9 (7.4^min, 11^P0.1, 13.6^P1) fps ∼12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GP75	28.6 (8.87^min, 9.57^P0.1, 13.6^P1) fps ∼8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GL75	26.1 (7.19^min, 7.87^P0.1, 12.1^P1) fps ∼7%

Note

Because benchmarking video games is very time consuming and is often constrained by installation/activation limits, at the time of publishing, we were able to provide only a part of our performance analysis of Farming Simulator 22. Other graphics cards will be added in the coming days and weeks.

Overview

Test Systems

Device	GPU	CPU	RAM	OS
XMG Neo 15	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 @165 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Neo 17	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Core 15	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 @130 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Focus 17	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti @75 W TGP (4 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GP65	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-9750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GP75	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (4 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-10750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GL75	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-10750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
Dell G5 15 SE	AMD Radeon RX 5600M (6 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI Prestige 14 Evo	Intel Iris Xe (96 CUs)	Intel Core i7-1185G7	1 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
Asus ROG Strix G15	AMD Radeon RX 6800M (12 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
Desktop PC I	MSI GeForce RTX 3090 (24 GB GDDR6X) MSI GeForce RTX 3080 (10 GB GDDR6X) MSI GeForce RTX 3070 (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-9900K	4 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
Desktop PC II	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 FE (24 GB GDDR6X) Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 (12 GB GDDR6X) Nvidia Titan RTX (24 GB GDDR6) Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super (8 GB GDDR6) Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super (8 GB GDDR6) KFA2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super (6 GB GDDR6) PNY GeForce GTX 1660 (6 GB GDDR5) KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super (4 GB GDDR6) KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR5) AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (12 GB DDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6600 (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5700 (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (6 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (8 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 9 5900X	2 x 32 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit

4K monitors	Nvidia drivers	AMD drivers
Asus PB287Q, Philips Brilliance 329P9H, Acer Predator XB321HK	ForceWare 496.76	Adrenalin 21.11.3

Loading Comments

Comment on this article

Editor of the original article: Florian Glaser - Managing Editor Gaming Laptops - 615 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2009

I discovered my interest in computers in my childhood, growing up with MS-DOS and Windows 3.1 in the early 1990s. I was especially fascinated with computer games, even from an early age. From Monkey Island through Lands of Lore to Doom, I tried every game I could get my hands on. I have been working for Notebookcheck since 2009 with my focus mostly being on high-performance gaming laptops.

Translator: Stanislav Kokhanyuk - Translator - 78 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2021

I am a big fan of technology, which is why I try to keep up with it. Among my other passions are literature and writing, and so it should not be surprising to anyone at all that I have a four-year bachelor's degree in philology. However, my interests are not limited just to the world of technology, or, for that matter, the world of literature. I am also interested in people and the stories they have to tell. And more recently, I took an interest in artificial intelligence.

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Farming Simulator 22 Performance Analysis

Florian Glaser, 2021-12- 3 (Update: 2021-12- 3)

Pos	Model	< Prev Next > Farming Simulator 22 (2021)
Pos	Model	low 1280x720 Low Preset	med. 1920x1080 Medium Preset	high 1920x1080 High Preset	ultra 1920x1080 Very High Preset	QHD 2560x1440 Very High Preset	4K 3840x2160 Very High Preset
3	AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX	460	397	311	301	296	269
11	AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT	290	237	201	195.6	189.5	181.8
14	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	270	196ⁿ²	173ⁿ²	153.5ⁿ²	153ⁿ²	138.5ⁿ²
15	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti	349	270	226	203	201	157
16	AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT	435	360	296	279	257	163.8
22	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU		263	217	194.4	191.6	145.2
24	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB	277	230	197	181.5	179.4	133.4
25	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080		166	154	138	136	128
30	AMD Radeon RX 6800	281	224	188	164	162	126
32	NVIDIA Titan RTX	279	221	186	164	163	122
34	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G	411	329	271	237	185.4	110.3
36	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		205	183	158	143	93.3
37	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		203	148.2	138.9	137	94.1
40	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070		178	153	137	135	106
41	AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT	294	225	204	186.3	177.5	113.1
43	AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT	292	225	189	170	157	99.2
44	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU		188	165	142	134	88.5
45	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	295	240	193.8	174.2	141.3	87.6
46	Intel Arc A770	362	246	185.9	168.6	143.3	92.3
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Farming Simulator 22
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
50	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		183.35ⁿ²	159.65ⁿ²	140.95ⁿ²	115.3ⁿ²	69.7
57	AMD Radeon RX 6800M	182	142	122	112
58	AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT	280	211	174.4	156.6	147.4	87
59	AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT	295	229	186	158	128	78.8
62	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	205	175.05ⁿ²	150.9ⁿ²	136.9ⁿ²	125.9ⁿ²	79.55ⁿ²
64	AMD Radeon RX 6800S		156	137	129	124	76.8
65*	AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT	429	232	196.8	167.1	130.1	82.3
66	Intel Arc A750	356	219	192.4	165.8	128.2	80.7
67	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060	269	199	151	125	97.7	61.5
76	NVIDIA Titan X Pascal	281	223	178	154	124	78.6
80	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)	284	228	191	158	132	80.6
84	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)	291	213	159	135	105	68.5
89	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		174	136.5ⁿ²	117ⁿ²	107	65.9
91	AMD Radeon RX 7600S		163.8	139.5	125.5	110.3	68.6
97	Intel Arc A580	398	241	180.3	151.3	120.9	73.9
98	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)	277	222	171	147	112	68.3
100	AMD Radeon RX 6600	284	218	172	146	107	63
104	AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)	293	188	141	119	92	60.1
106	AMD Radeon RX 6600M	170.1ⁿ³	134.5ⁿ³	119ⁿ³	112.8ⁿ³	110.9	65.4
107	AMD Radeon RX 6700S		155.9	134.2	119.8	104.5
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Farming Simulator 22
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
132	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050	271	159	95.4	95.5	73.3	44.5
134	AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop)	299	190	133	107	86	55.4
141	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)	292	176.1	129.9	111.3	84	50.2
142	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)	296	164	123	101	75.7	44.9
143	AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT	291	162	112	92.3	70.5	37.9
144	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)	241	109	82.3	65.9	50.4	36.2
148*	Intel Arc A730M		136.6	110.8	107.2	80.5
150	AMD Radeon RX 5600M		134	115	95.6	74.2	45.2
152	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		148	121	98.9	72.6	42.4
153	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU		139ⁿ²	110.4ⁿ²	92.85ⁿ²	69.7	41.9
158	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)	288	154	114	92	68.3	40.9
161	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)	294	136	102	79.4	58.6	34.8
167	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU		123.1	105.3	90.1
173	AMD Radeon RX 6500M			96.6	86
186	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	143	111	86.4	69.8
187	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	187	115	84.6	67.6	49.3	28.6
189	AMD Radeon RX 5500M	91.8	72.1	61.3	60.8
198	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	138.2	89.3	63.1	52.6
202	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	163	104	77	61.9	45	26.1
203	Intel Arc A380	261	108.7	78.9	64.5
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Farming Simulator 22
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
219*	NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU	171.9	96.6	70.1	61.2
224*	Intel Arc A350M	121	63	47	43
226*	NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU	175.4	87.5	63.5	53.9
241*	AMD Radeon 780M	133.4	94.3	73.8	60.4
246	NVIDIA GeForce MX550	169	80	60	42
247	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	118	62.7	46.4	28.3
249	AMD Radeon 680M	122ⁿ⁴	61.5ⁿ⁴	48.5ⁿ⁴	43.5ⁿ⁴
255*	NVIDIA GeForce MX450		79	55	24.2	19.2
270	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	121	60.6	43.9	32.5
283	AMD Radeon 660M	102	57.1	38.9
294	AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)		59.8	45.5	36.7
316	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	103ⁿ¹¹	45ⁿ¹⁰	33ⁿ⁹	29ⁿ⁸	25
317	NVIDIA GeForce MX350	114.1	45.7	32.4	20.5
332	NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)	35.5	25.7	11.4
334	NVIDIA GeForce MX250	87.4	33	23.4
336	NVIDIA GeForce MX150		31.6			7.79	1.86
337	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	51ⁿ⁵	30.4ⁿ⁴	23ⁿ³	22
339	NVIDIA GeForce GT 710	18	7.67
359*	AMD Radeon 540X	74.3	26.5	13.6
382*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 10	67.9	24.3	17.4	14.5
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Farming Simulator 22
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
418*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs	62.5	20.3	14.7
420*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	58.1ⁿ²	24.4ⁿ²	17.3
431*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	136ⁿ⁴	49.25ⁿ⁴	32.8ⁿ⁴	27.35ⁿ⁴	22.45ⁿ²	12.55ⁿ²
440	AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	107.45ⁿ²	42.9ⁿ²	31ⁿ²	24.45ⁿ²
457	NVIDIA GeForce MX130	59.1	24.7	10.5
461	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	56.9	27.6
464	NVIDIA GeForce 930MX	46.2	17.7
508	Intel Iris Graphics 550	44.5
511*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	69.6	25.3	18	14.4
582*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	37.5	18.4
583*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 5	69.6	25.2	17.8
584	Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)	38.4	15.3
585	Intel UHD Graphics 630	40.5
587*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	34.7	14
595	Intel UHD Graphics 620	33
668	AMD Radeon R5 M255		24.6
669*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 3	41.8	13.5
722*	Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)	20.5
774	Intel HD Graphics 610	19.3

Legend
5	Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
	May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
	May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?	Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.