Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G610 MP4

ARM Mali-G610 MP4

The ARM Mali-G610 MP4 or MC4 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for smartphones with 4 cores. It is based on the second generation of the Valhall architecture and supports OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and Vulkan 1.2. It was first integrated in the 2023 smartphone SoC, the MediaTek Dimensity 7200-Ultra.

Mali-G610 Series

Mali-G610 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G610 MP4 6
Mali-G610 MP3 compare 3
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureValhall
Pipelines6 - unified
Shared Memoryyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
technology4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement25.05.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
CPU in Mali-G610 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G8 x 2000 MHz? MHz1300 MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 72008 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? - 1300 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 7035     avg: 7158     median: 7158 (31%)     max: 7281 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 9011     avg: 9380     median: 9379.5 (21%)     max: 9748 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 1752     avg: 4594     median: 5966 (25%)     max: 6065 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 6935     avg: 8032     median: 7275 (18%)     max: 9887 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 6787     avg: 6849     median: 6849 (61%)     max: 6911 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 8784     avg: 9118     median: 9117.5 (55%)     max: 9451 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
5880 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
6979 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 4259     avg: 4514     median: 4483 (2%)     max: 4801 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1156     avg: 1243     median: 1202 (1%)     max: 1372 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 9.4     avg: 10     median: 9.5 (4%)     max: 11 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 21     avg: 22.3     median: 22 (4%)     max: 24 fps
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 53     avg: 54.3     median: 54 (4%)     max: 56 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 40     avg: 42.7     median: 44 (4%)     max: 44 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 67     avg: 72.7     median: 73 (2%)     max: 78 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 98     avg: 105     median: 106 (4%)     max: 111 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 159     avg: 172     median: 166 (1%)     max: 191 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 187031     avg: 202428     median: 202428 (20%)     max: 217824 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 178549     avg: 189958     median: 183489 (15%)     max: 207835 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 70.95     avg: 71.5     median: 71.5 (2%)     max: 72 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 3292     avg: 3540     median: 3321 (1%)     max: 4008 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 3207     avg: 3290     median: 3289.5 (1%)     max: 3372 points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.26     avg: 4.9     median: 4.6 (2%)     max: 5.99 Watt
01234567Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
46 47.9 53 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
34 34.6 44 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
59.3 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
39.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
39.4 40 60 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
99  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
57.3 60 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact4938
PUBG Mobile6039.746
Dead Trigger 299
Asphalt 9: Legends59
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1

1


2
1

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 15. 16:44:17

#0 ran 1s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Aug 2025 05:41:51 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.035s ... 0.036s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.036s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.036s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12462 +0.017s ... 0.053s

#8 got single benchmarks 12462 +0.019s ... 0.072s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.072s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.612s ... 0.684s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.684s

#12 Got 15 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.69s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.69s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.693s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.032s ... 0.725s

#16 return log +0.005s ... 0.73s

Notebook reviews with ARM Mali-G610 MP4 graphics card

Nothing Phone 2a Plus smartphone review

Nothing Phone (2a) Plus review - The stylish smartphone with an exclusive processor that doesn't cost a lot

The Phone 2a Plus uses the basis of Nothing's most popular smartphone and, according to the manufacturer, has been improved in three key areas. Read our review ...
MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G | ARM Mali-G610 MP4 | 6.70" | 190 g
Nothing Phone (2a)

Nothing Phone (2a) Review - The first affordable Nothing smartphone

Up until now, Nothing's smartphones have been far from cheap. The Nothing Phone (2a) sets the record straight. The 6.7-inch device has a starting price of £320 ...
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | ARM Mali-G610 MP4 | 6.70" | 190 g
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G review – A new mid-range top dog?

A bright, curved display, a powerful 200-MP camera, great performance and 120-watt fast charging: With features like these, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G aim...
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | ARM Mali-G610 MP4 | 6.67" | 204.5 g

Huawei Nova 14: unknown, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 14

Nothing Phone (2a) Plus: MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nothing Phone (2a) Plus

Vivo T3 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 7200, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo T3 5G

Vivo iQOO Z9: unknown, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Z9

Vivo S18e: MediaTek Dimensity 7200, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo S18e

Nothing Phone (2a): MediaTek Dimensity 7200, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nothing Phone (2a)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 7200, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+

Nothing Phone (2a): MediaTek Dimensity 7200, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Nothing reveals why the Phone (3) took 2 years to arrive and it isn't what we expected

   » Nothing Phone (3): Nothing's first 'flagship' phone disappoints and is too costly

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 7200, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » 200 MP camera of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G also performs well at DxOMark, but shows weaknesses in detail

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-03-17)