Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-9980HK vs AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS vs Intel Core i5-8300H

Intel Core i9-9980HK

► remove from comparison Intel i9-9980HK

The Intel Core i9-9980HK is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.4 - 5 GHz and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5 GHz can only be reached using the "Thermal Velocity Boost" which allows one core to boost to 5 GHz (+100 MHz) as long as the CPU temperature is below 50°C. Multiple cores can be boosted +100 MHz? below 50°C (not verified). Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-8950HK, the 9980H is based on the same architecture but offers 2 more cores and higher clock speeds (boost).

According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. The i9-9980HK is the fastest model of the Coffee-Lake-H (refresh) series at the time of announcement and offers an unlocked multiplier for overclocking of the CPU.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now max. eight cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 33% compared to a similar clocked 6-core processor. According to first benchmarks, the mobile variant can reach the performance of the Core i9-9900K if the cooling is sufficient.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions.

AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is a powerful processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new laptop chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 7 7840U with a slightly higher wattage as well as higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The 8840HS has eight Zen 4 cores running at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz that are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads, while the great Radeon 780M is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs, making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more useful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and therefore with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving NVMe SSDs up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Systems built around this Ryzen 7 series APU are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since this is a 7840U in disguise that we are dealing with here, it is safe to expect the 8840HS to be about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to tune to their liking, with values between 20 W and 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 8840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-8300H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-8300H

The Intel Core i5-8300H is a fast processor for laptops with four cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced early 2018. The processor clocks at between 2.3 and 4 GHz (3.9 with 4 cores) and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

The Intel Core i5-8300H should perform similar as the older Core i7-7820HQ (2.9 - 4 GHz). The faster Coffee Lake CPUs, like the Core i7-8750H offers two additional cores and is therefore up to 50% faster in multithreaded benchmarks. Still, the performance of the i5-8300H should be sufficient for even demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz (rumored). The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i5 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

ModelIntel Core i9-9980HKAMD Ryzen 7 8840HSIntel Core i5-8300H
CodenameCoffee Lake-HHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Coffee Lake-H
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)Intel Coffee Lake
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
Intel Core i9-9980HK « 2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H « 2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Clock2400 - 5000 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz2300 - 4000 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB256 KB
L2 Cache2 MB8 MB1 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 168 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
4 / 8
TDP45 Watt28 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm4 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA1440FP7/FP7r2/FP8FCBGA1440
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1250 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Die Size178 mm2
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
$250 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9980HK
32.2 pt (53%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8840HS
38.6 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 99     avg: 100.7     median: 99.6 (56%)     max: 103.6 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 675     avg: 714     median: 677 (13%)     max: 790 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 12359     avg: 13222     median: 13082 (12%)     max: 14060 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1719     avg: 1736     median: 1737 (73%)     max: 1746 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 431     avg: 471.3     median: 478.5 (52%)     max: 505 Points
min: 649     avg: 669     median: 671 (73%)     max: 681 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2974     avg: 3530     median: 3475 (8%)     max: 4150 Points
min: 4788     avg: 5121     median: 4994 (12%)     max: 5556 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1327     avg: 1656     median: 1624 (10%)     max: 1930 Points
min: 1934     avg: 2070     median: 2045 (13%)     max: 2244 Points
min: 609     avg: 793     median: 812 (5%)     max: 850 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 181     avg: 198.8     median: 201 (56%)     max: 215 Points
min: 261     avg: 267.8     median: 270 (75%)     max: 270 Points
min: 151     avg: 168.6     median: 170 (47%)     max: 174 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 14.81     avg: 16.7     median: 17.2 (22%)     max: 18.04 Points
min: 6.2     avg: 7.9     median: 7.8 (10%)     max: 8.79 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.25     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (54%)     max: 2.4 Points
min: 1.72     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (45%)     max: 1.96 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7709     avg: 8346     median: 7969.5 (48%)     max: 9734 Points
min: 6115     avg: 6392     median: 6463.5 (39%)     max: 6524 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 39440     avg: 44697     median: 44455 (32%)     max: 50439 Points
min: 20061     avg: 22328     median: 22266.5 (16%)     max: 24718 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
55742 Points (36%)
min: 28616     avg: 30319     median: 30318.5 (19%)     max: 32021 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
10359 Points (13%)
min: 8277     avg: 8392     median: 8391.5 (10%)     max: 8506 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 110.4     avg: 115.3     median: 115.3 (1%)     max: 120.2 s
min: 205.9     avg: 255.6     median: 265.3 (3%)     max: 285.8 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.788     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (1%)     max: 4.941 s
min: 6.42     avg: 7.9     median: 7.7 (2%)     max: 9.762 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7266     avg: 7351     median: 7351 (12%)     max: 7436 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 39566     avg: 41756     median: 41688 (24%)     max: 44081 MIPS
min: 49930     avg: 57219     median: 59682 (34%)     max: 61047 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5283     avg: 5426     median: 5389.5 (64%)     max: 5642 MIPS
min: 5702     avg: 6151     median: 6205 (73%)     max: 6493 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 92.8     avg: 93.8     median: 93.8 (31%)     max: 94.8 fps
min: 39     avg: 43.7     median: 40.2 (13%)     max: 52 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 237.5     avg: 238.1     median: 238.1 (55%)     max: 238.7 fps
min: 163.2     avg: 173.4     median: 169 (39%)     max: 188 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 10.8     avg: 11.5     median: 11.4 (20%)     max: 12.35 fps
min: 13.1     avg: 15.6     median: 15.7 (28%)     max: 17.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (29%)
0.4 GB/s (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.7 GB/s (29%)
0.6 GB/s (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 10.1     avg: 10.2     median: 10.2 (27%)     max: 10.3 GB/s
3.9 GB/s (10%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 369     avg: 407.8     median: 404 (5%)     max: 486 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 317.4     avg: 397.6     median: 348.4 (2%)     max: 527 Seconds
min: 226     avg: 246     median: 232 (2%)     max: 297 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (12%)
min: 0.439     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4774 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 11256     avg: 12585     median: 13208 (28%)     max: 13290 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.639     avg: 7.7     median: 7.7 (2%)     max: 7.856 s
min: 9.264     avg: 9.4     median: 9.4 (2%)     max: 9.8 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 16.84     avg: 17.1     median: 17.1 (1%)     max: 17.26 s
min: 20.9     avg: 21.2     median: 21.1 (1%)     max: 21.74 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 424.4     avg: 432.3     median: 432.3 (2%)     max: 440.1 s
min: 546     avg: 551     median: 548.5 (2%)     max: 559 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
49107 Points (38%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 9056     avg: 15688     median: 16079.5 (40%)     max: 18260 Points
min: 17441     avg: 17857     median: 17623 (43%)     max: 18690 Points
min: 6234     avg: 8139     median: 8154 (20%)     max: 9415 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 64033     avg: 64733     median: 65047 (53%)     max: 65119 Points
min: 48575     avg: 52494     median: 53016 (43%)     max: 56026 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 64156     avg: 64682     median: 64841 (53%)     max: 65049 Points
min: 48063     avg: 51178     median: 51009 (41%)     max: 55273 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 60812     avg: 63911     median: 64615.5 (54%)     max: 65599 Points
min: 45639     avg: 53927     median: 56262.5 (47%)     max: 57543 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13173     avg: 15303     median: 15694.5 (40%)     max: 16935 Points
min: 16214     avg: 16905     median: 16660 (42%)     max: 17842 Points
min: 6260     avg: 7613     median: 7857 (20%)     max: 8471 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 11758     avg: 19893     median: 20357 (36%)     max: 22463 Points
min: 18812     avg: 21790     median: 22488 (40%)     max: 23382 Points
min: 9136     avg: 10979     median: 11196 (20%)     max: 11971 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5540     avg: 8487     median: 8884.5 (37%)     max: 10162 Points
min: 7391     avg: 8296     median: 8297 (35%)     max: 9011 Points
min: 3270     avg: 3571     median: 3571 (15%)     max: 3872 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
7968 Points (75%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2477     avg: 2550     median: 2552 (64%)     max: 2602 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 9922     avg: 11062     median: 11279 (44%)     max: 11700 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1314     avg: 1346     median: 1346 (53%)     max: 1378 Points
min: 1822     avg: 1906     median: 1928 (75%)     max: 1946 Points
990 Points (39%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6945     avg: 7405     median: 7568 (14%)     max: 7703 Points
min: 9229     avg: 9948     median: 9897 (18%)     max: 10884 Points
3270 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1171     avg: 1273     median: 1282 (6%)     max: 1355 Points
min: 1796     avg: 1825     median: 1817 (8%)     max: 1863 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7072     avg: 7421     median: 7403.5 (23%)     max: 7805 Points
min: 9436     avg: 10052     median: 9866 (31%)     max: 10854 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5617     avg: 5853     median: 5969 (60%)     max: 5972 Points
4770 Points (48%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 28625     avg: 29620     median: 29385 (29%)     max: 30849 Points
14790 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
6002 Points (66%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
30099 Points (43%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
31724 Points (56%)
15050 Points (27%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
4871 Points (95%)
3740 Points (73%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 705     avg: 878     median: 941 (1%)     max: 999 ms
min: 518     avg: 537     median: 538 (1%)     max: 563 ms
min: 1095     avg: 1146     median: 1133 (1%)     max: 1209 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
88.5 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 40364     avg: 42641     median: 42219.5 (32%)     max: 46473 Points
min: 89899     avg: 93041     median: 93040.5 (70%)     max: 96182 Points
min: 30806     avg: 32869     median: 33251 (25%)     max: 34659 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 246     avg: 249.6     median: 248 (68%)     max: 257 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
233 Points (42%)
min: 297     avg: 328.2     median: 299 (54%)     max: 440 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1643     avg: 1670     median: 1672 (63%)     max: 1698 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 97.2     avg: 103.3     median: 103.3 (18%)     max: 109.4 Watt
min: 37.9     avg: 44.7     median: 46.6 (8%)     max: 53 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 127.1     avg: 132.7     median: 132.7 (24%)     max: 138.2 Watt
min: 22.3     avg: 41.3     median: 42.6 (8%)     max: 53.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.62     avg: 5.4     median: 5.3 (4%)     max: 6.09 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.36     avg: 6     median: 5.8 (6%)     max: 7.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
13.2 Points per Watt (10%)
min: 42.3     avg: 46     median: 45.9 (34%)     max: 49.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9980HK → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS → 135% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8300H → 61% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 26. 16:55:53

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11341 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16413 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 9570 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1750949753s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Jun 2025 05:19:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11341 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 11341 +0.014s ... 0.025s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 16413 +0.002s ... 0.027s

#11 got single benchmarks 16413 +0.002s ... 0.029s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9570 +0.001s ... 0.03s

#13 got single benchmarks 9570 +0.021s ... 0.051s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.051s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.048s ... 0.099s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.099s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)