Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 185H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is the top-of-the-line Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 6, are SMT-enabled and run at up to 5.1 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) run at up to 3.8 GHz. The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.35 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, such as the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while the rest of the chip is turned off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes that this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 9 185H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 185H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official Intel performance data, then the 185H is not a whole lot faster than the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.35 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is about as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 9 series processor has a "base" power consumption of 45 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. A powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 185H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is a powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in June 2024. The APU comes with 12 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.1 GHz, the 16 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 890M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support.

Of the 12 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores and 8 are smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter run at significantly lower clock speeds than the former.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the HX 370 supports LPDDR5x-8000 and DDR5-5600 RAM, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

Given the IPC improvement, we expect 4 Zen 5 cores combined with 8 Zen 5c cores to perform about as well as 16 Zen 4 cores meaning there is a real chance of the HX 370 dethroning the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. We'll make sure to update this section once we get our hands on a laptop powered by the HX 370.

Graphics

The Radeon 890M is the most powerful iGPU that AMD has on offer right now. It features 16 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (1024 unified shaders) running at up to 2,900 MHz. We expect the graphics adapter to deliver gaming performance good enough for playing 2023 and 2024 games in 1080p (Low detail settings).

Naturally, the 890M is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The HX 370 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of mid 2024, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 9 185HAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
CodenameMeteor Lake-HStrix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Series: Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H compare3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H compare3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H compare3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H compare3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz2000 - 5100 MHz
L3 Cache24 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
12 / 24
4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
TDP45 Watt28 Watt
Technology7 nm4 nm
max. Temp.110 °C100 °C
SocketBGA2049FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)
NPU / AI11 TOPS INT850 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
L2 Cache12 MB
TDP Turbo PL254 Watt
Chip AI80 TOPS INT8

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 185H
39.2 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.2 pt (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 103     avg: 108.2     median: 108.1 (61%)     max: 112.2 Points
min: 113.6     avg: 116.9     median: 117 (66%)     max: 121 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 828     avg: 1003     median: 1021 (19%)     max: 1096 Points
min: 621     avg: 1078     median: 1152 (21%)     max: 1299 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 12688     avg: 18030     median: 18338 (17%)     max: 19851 Points
min: 10435     avg: 20548     median: 21761 (20%)     max: 23902 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1620     avg: 1818     median: 1812 (76%)     max: 1912 Points
min: 1921     avg: 2010     median: 2018 (85%)     max: 2049 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 622     avg: 701     median: 702 (76%)     max: 735 Points
min: 753     avg: 789     median: 792 (86%)     max: 804 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4843     avg: 6957     median: 7192 (18%)     max: 7651 Points
min: 6449     avg: 8347     median: 8711 (21%)     max: 9280 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1581.9     avg: 2762     median: 2853 (18%)     max: 3165 Points
min: 2498.13     avg: 3245     median: 3409.5 (22%)     max: 3551 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 238     avg: 267.1     median: 268 (74%)     max: 281 Points
min: 188.8     avg: 296     median: 307 (85%)     max: 315 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 33.95     avg: 34.7     median: 34.6 (45%)     max: 35.55 Points
min: 38.84     avg: 40.1     median: 40.1 (52%)     max: 41.17 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.11     avg: 3.2     median: 3.1 (75%)     max: 3.27 Points
min: 3.59     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (88%)     max: 3.7 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 9719     avg: 9994     median: 9977.5 (60%)     max: 10300 Points
min: 8437     avg: 8635     median: 8653.5 (52%)     max: 8797 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 59935     avg: 63422     median: 63273.5 (46%)     max: 67204 Points
min: 52505     avg: 54759     median: 54920 (40%)     max: 56689 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 88902     avg: 90904     median: 91265.5 (58%)     max: 92183 Points
min: 96857     avg: 99802     median: 99347 (63%)     max: 103657 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 13892     avg: 14147     median: 14161 (17%)     max: 14374 Points
min: 15381     avg: 15735     median: 15812.5 (19%)     max: 15935 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 87.408     avg: 215.6     median: 165.1 (2%)     max: 441.275 s
min: 50.536     avg: 73.5     median: 79.4 (1%)     max: 84.476 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.254     avg: 4.3     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 8.1 s
min: 2.701     avg: 3     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 3.743 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6724     avg: 9769     median: 7940 (13%)     max: 17856 Points
min: 4008     avg: 4416     median: 4424.5 (7%)     max: 4806 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 52522     avg: 70203     median: 71934 (41%)     max: 76331 MIPS
min: 66154     avg: 78457     median: 80572.5 (46%)     max: 84735 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4502     avg: 5480     median: 5560 (66%)     max: 5781 MIPS
min: 5859     avg: 6179     median: 6181 (73%)     max: 6497 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 153.6     avg: 159.7     median: 159.9 (4%)     max: 165.6 fps
min: 164.85     avg: 172.8     median: 170.6 (4%)     max: 185.1 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 300.5     avg: 322.4     median: 326.3 (8%)     max: 336.5 fps
min: 300     avg: 310.1     median: 305.3 (8%)     max: 330 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 14.1     avg: 20.1     median: 20.6 (36%)     max: 22.7 fps
min: 20.3     avg: 25.3     median: 26.2 (46%)     max: 28.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.96     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (32%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
min: 1.6     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (47%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.4     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (31%)     max: 2.3 GB/s
min: 2.5     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (46%)     max: 2.8 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 7.9     avg: 10.8     median: 11.3 (29%)     max: 12.1 GB/s
min: 15.3     avg: 15.6     median: 15.3 (40%)     max: 16.6 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 280     avg: 331.7     median: 309 (4%)     max: 538 Seconds
min: 208     avg: 238.1     median: 221 (3%)     max: 306 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 163     avg: 188.6     median: 177 (1%)     max: 285 Seconds
min: 139     avg: 155.6     median: 148 (1%)     max: 192 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4313     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.503 sec
min: 0.3892     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.603 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9854     avg: 13153     median: 13074 (28%)     max: 15529 Points
min: 13761     avg: 16238     median: 16563 (35%)     max: 17466 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.6     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 7.256 s
min: 8.224     avg: 8.4     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.482 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 14.786     avg: 14.9     median: 14.9 (1%)     max: 15.15 s
min: 17.504     avg: 17.7     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 17.914 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 304.446     avg: 358     median: 366.9 (2%)     max: 402.742 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 73186     avg: 76512     median: 75742.5 (58%)     max: 80494 Points
min: 66119     avg: 74245     median: 76054 (58%)     max: 77565 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12693     avg: 21337     median: 22169.5 (55%)     max: 24629 Points
min: 17129     avg: 20410     median: 20742 (51%)     max: 24599 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 74638     avg: 81658     median: 76996.5 (63%)     max: 100241 Points
min: 50952     avg: 60316     median: 61356.5 (50%)     max: 67655 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 73618     avg: 82055     median: 75494 (61%)     max: 100192 Points
min: 50955     avg: 61354     median: 63791.5 (52%)     max: 67802 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 78677     avg: 89559     median: 91059 (73%)     max: 102469 Points
min: 48351     avg: 58447     median: 59313.5 (48%)     max: 66810 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 14341     avg: 18938     median: 18896 (48%)     max: 21425 Points
min: 16960     avg: 19488     median: 19578 (50%)     max: 21349 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 21106     avg: 28071     median: 28964.5 (52%)     max: 30623 Points
min: 24918     avg: 30030     median: 30474.5 (54%)     max: 33844 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6307     avg: 10957     median: 11454.5 (48%)     max: 12209 Points
min: 8866     avg: 10467     median: 10581.5 (45%)     max: 12293 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2199     avg: 2483     median: 2495 (60%)     max: 2573 Points
min: 2780     avg: 2888     median: 2880.5 (70%)     max: 2965 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 12825     avg: 13823     median: 13974 (54%)     max: 14540 Points
min: 11973     avg: 14664     median: 15051 (58%)     max: 16311 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2385     avg: 2398     median: 2397.5 (76%)     max: 2410 Points
min: 2645     avg: 2748     median: 2766 (88%)     max: 2844 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12735     avg: 12928     median: 12928 (53%)     max: 13121 Points
min: 12289     avg: 13899     median: 14313 (59%)     max: 15017 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1700     avg: 1828     median: 1852 (70%)     max: 1902 Points
min: 1957     avg: 2089     median: 2098 (80%)     max: 2175 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10441     avg: 13368     median: 13566 (24%)     max: 14230 Points
min: 11394     avg: 14303     median: 14516 (26%)     max: 16322 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1695     avg: 1788     median: 1799 (8%)     max: 1830 Points
min: 1827     avg: 1936     median: 1942 (8%)     max: 2041 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13228     avg: 13612     median: 13736 (43%)     max: 13972 Points
min: 12962     avg: 14257     median: 14353 (45%)     max: 15009 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7040     avg: 7372     median: 7422 (74%)     max: 7602 Points
min: 7480     avg: 7996     median: 7804 (78%)     max: 8628 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47960     avg: 49362     median: 49781.5 (49%)     max: 49924 Points
min: 42842     avg: 52953     median: 54787 (54%)     max: 57060 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 494     avg: 524     median: 522 (1%)     max: 594 ms
min: 307.8     avg: 434.7     median: 434 (1%)     max: 503 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 90543     avg: 95362     median: 96090 (69%)     max: 98144 Points
min: 64079     avg: 111154     median: 122035 (88%)     max: 125813 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 237     avg: 258.7     median: 260 (69%)     max: 271 Points
min: 189.2     avg: 255.5     median: 259 (69%)     max: 345 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 237     avg: 279.4     median: 286 (51%)     max: 301 Points
min: 252     avg: 311.5     median: 319 (57%)     max: 363 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1589     avg: 1774     median: 1770 (66%)     max: 1971 Points
min: 1307     avg: 1769     median: 1778 (66%)     max: 2040 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 44.4     avg: 113.4     median: 123.8 (21%)     max: 176.1 Watt
min: 45.6     avg: 90.6     median: 93 (16%)     max: 133.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 88     avg: 129.5     median: 124.6 (23%)     max: 171.8 Watt
min: 46.3     avg: 95.3     median: 101.8 (19%)     max: 130.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.1     avg: 12.4     median: 11.7 (8%)     max: 21.4 Watt
min: 4.58     avg: 8.8     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 19.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.18     avg: 13.7     median: 11.9 (14%)     max: 28.8 Watt
min: 6.31     avg: 9.4     median: 9.2 (11%)     max: 12.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 17.8     avg: 27.4     median: 24.2 (18%)     max: 67 Points per Watt
min: 26.9     avg: 35.8     median: 32.4 (24%)     max: 54.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 185H → 100% n=54

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 → 110% n=54

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 22. 03:20:12

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16921 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17543 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761096012s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 21 Oct 2025 16:37:05 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16921 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 16921 +0.03s ... 0.04s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17543 +0.005s ... 0.045s

#10 got single benchmarks 17543 +0.033s ... 0.078s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.078s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.081s ... 0.159s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.162s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)