Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-9850H vs Intel Core i9-12900H vs Intel Core i9-9880H

Intel Core i7-9850H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-9850H

The Intel Core i7-9850H is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.6 and 4.6 GHz (4 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i7-8850H, the 9850H offers only improved clock rates.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to a similar clocked Kaby Lake processor like the Core i7-7920HQ (3.1 - 4.1 GHz). Single-core performance has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. Compared to the i7-8850H, the performance improved only slightly.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz (rumored). The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i7 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Intel Core i9-12900H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-12900H

The Intel Core i9-12900H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.5 to 5 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 3.8 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the 12900HK, the 12900H does not offer the open multiplicator (for overclocking) but the full "Enterprise" set of vPro features (for remote management).

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.45 GHz.

Performance

The average 12900H in our database proves to be an outrageously fast CPU, ripping the Ryzen 9 6900HX to pieces as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Perhaps surprisingly, the i9's multi-thread performance is not much higher than that of the Core i7-12700H, suggesting the latter might be a better bang for the buck.

With its decent cooling solution and a long-term Power Limit of 110 W, the Asus StudioBook 16 H7600ZW is one of the fastest laptops built around the i9-12900H that we know of. It can be more than 80% faster than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, depending on the circumstances.

Power consumption

The Core i9 has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 35 W, with 45 W being its Base power consumption. The CPU's maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sits at 115 W.

The i9-12900H is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower than average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-9880H

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i9-9880H is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.3 - 4.8 GHz (4.1 GHz with 8 cores) and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 4.8 GHz can only be reached using the "Thermal Velocity Boost" which allows one core to boost to 4.8 GHz (+200 MHz) as long as the CPU temperature is below 50°C. Multiple cores can be boosted +100 MHz below 50°C (not verified). Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-8950HK, the 9980H is based on the same architecture but offers 2 more cores.

According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. The i9-8950HK is the fastest model of the Coffee-Lake-H series at the time of announcement and offers an unlocked multiplier for overclocking of the CPU.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 33% compared to a similar clocked predecessor and even up to 100% compared to older Kaby-Lake quad-cores. Single thread performance however only improved slightly and the multi-core performance is heavily depending on the cooling.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions.

ModelIntel Core i7-9850HIntel Core i9-12900HIntel Core i9-9880H
CodenameCoffee Lake-HAlder Lake-HCoffee Lake-H
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Alder Lake-PIntel Coffee Lake
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H « 2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900HK1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H « 1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H « 2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Clock2600 - 4600 MHz1800 - 5000 MHz2300 - 4800 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB1.2 MB512 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB11.5 MB2 MB
L3 Cache12 MB24 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 1214 / 208 / 16
TDP45 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm14 nm
SocketFCBGA1440BGA1744FCBGA1440
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-9850H
30.3 pt (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900H
39.2 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9880H
30.9 pt (51%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 96     avg: 104.9     median: 106 (60%)     max: 112 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 371     avg: 636     median: 578 (11%)     max: 920 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7359     avg: 15133     median: 15946.5 (15%)     max: 19648 Points
min: 8504     avg: 8670     median: 8747 (8%)     max: 8758 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1634     avg: 1829     median: 1863.5 (78%)     max: 1930 Points
min: 1140     avg: 1174     median: 1174 (49%)     max: 1208 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 425     avg: 439.5     median: 439.5 (48%)     max: 454 Points
min: 624     avg: 706     median: 714.5 (78%)     max: 738 Points
min: 441     avg: 459     median: 465 (51%)     max: 474 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1800     avg: 2114     median: 2114 (5%)     max: 2428 Points
min: 2681     avg: 5717     median: 6056.5 (15%)     max: 7471 Points
min: 2953     avg: 3271     median: 3235 (8%)     max: 3712 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1114     avg: 1205     median: 1230 (8%)     max: 1272 Points
min: 1395     avg: 2454     median: 2576.5 (16%)     max: 3077 Points
min: 1317     avg: 1506     median: 1508 (10%)     max: 1721 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 192     avg: 193.8     median: 193 (53%)     max: 196.5 Points
min: 235     avg: 262.3     median: 266 (74%)     max: 277 Points
min: 181     avg: 190.1     median: 190 (53%)     max: 198 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
12.5 Points (16%)
min: 12.08     avg: 23.6     median: 25.3 (33%)     max: 32.77 Points
18.9 Points (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (51%)
min: 2.83     avg: 3     median: 3 (71%)     max: 3.3 Points
2.1 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7169 Points (43%)
min: 7952     avg: 8475     median: 8235 (50%)     max: 9498 Points
6967 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
31938 Points (23%)
min: 24313     avg: 43425     median: 47767 (35%)     max: 60567 Points
42456 Points (31%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
42090 Points (27%)
min: 48178     avg: 66910     median: 70976.5 (45%)     max: 77409 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9224 Points (11%)
min: 12846     avg: 13385     median: 13227.5 (16%)     max: 14567 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
278 s (3%)
min: 187.176     avg: 206.8     median: 197.8 (2%)     max: 265.116 s
118.7 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
8.3 s (2%)
min: 3.421     avg: 4.1     median: 4 (1%)     max: 5.062 s
5.4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5621 Points (9%)
min: 7620     avg: 8202     median: 7937 (13%)     max: 9328 Points
6683 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 25786     avg: 29714     median: 31087 (18%)     max: 32268 MIPS
min: 34684     avg: 60849     median: 64908.5 (37%)     max: 76677 MIPS
min: 39455     avg: 42728     median: 42138 (24%)     max: 46591 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5020     avg: 5066     median: 5086 (60%)     max: 5092 MIPS
min: 5302     avg: 5843     median: 5881 (69%)     max: 6289 MIPS
min: 4837     avg: 4943     median: 4924 (58%)     max: 5068 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
68.3 fps (2%)
min: 67.5     avg: 105.8     median: 111.4 (3%)     max: 126.7 fps
102.4 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
201.3 fps (5%)
min: 225     avg: 266.6     median: 263.3 (7%)     max: 317 fps
217 fps (6%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7     avg: 8.4     median: 9 (16%)     max: 9.1 fps
min: 8.05     avg: 17.1     median: 17.8 (31%)     max: 22.5 fps
min: 10.6     avg: 11.2     median: 11.1 (20%)     max: 11.86 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (22%)
min: 0.864     avg: 1.1     median: 1 (29%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
0.7 GB/s (20%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.2 GB/s (21%)
min: 1.5     avg: 1.8     median: 1.9 (33%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
1 GB/s (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.4 GB/s (19%)
min: 8.6     avg: 10.5     median: 10.3 (27%)     max: 12.8 GB/s
7.5 GB/s (20%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 273     avg: 420.7     median: 376 (5%)     max: 850 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 411     avg: 459.3     median: 415 (3%)     max: 552 Seconds
min: 160     avg: 231.3     median: 205.5 (1%)     max: 451 Seconds
min: 293     avg: 336.5     median: 334.5 (2%)     max: 384 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4218     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.506 sec
min: 0.621     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.6904 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9137     avg: 10056     median: 10056 (21%)     max: 10975 Points
min: 10122     avg: 13153     median: 13453 (29%)     max: 14655 Points
min: 11788     avg: 12226     median: 12225.5 (26%)     max: 12663 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.2 s (2%)
min: 7.3     avg: 7.7     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 8.329 s
8.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.1 s (1%)
min: 16.373     avg: 17.3     median: 17.2 (1%)     max: 18.439 s
18.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
467.6 s (2%)
min: 385.4     avg: 410.8     median: 398.6 (2%)     max: 474.148 s
476.5 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 26292     avg: 34763     median: 37665 (29%)     max: 40333 Points
min: 33640     avg: 52620     median: 53621 (41%)     max: 62706 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 9987     avg: 11361     median: 11512 (28%)     max: 12585 Points
min: 10552     avg: 21276     median: 22264 (55%)     max: 26126 Points
min: 12593     avg: 15310     median: 15556 (38%)     max: 17046 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 54664     avg: 57802     median: 56870 (46%)     max: 61872 Points
min: 70655     avg: 87893     median: 91477 (74%)     max: 103016 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 71651     avg: 89380     median: 91745 (74%)     max: 103757 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 81857     avg: 89973     median: 89999 (72%)     max: 100472 Points
40635 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 8390     avg: 9853     median: 9841 (25%)     max: 11328 Points
min: 9262     avg: 17875     median: 18691.5 (47%)     max: 22123 Points
min: 10705     avg: 12582     median: 12214 (31%)     max: 15206 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 14059     avg: 15802     median: 15330 (27%)     max: 18016 Points
min: 9703     avg: 25492     median: 26678.5 (48%)     max: 31176 Points
min: 14940     avg: 18040     median: 18580 (33%)     max: 20125 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4588     avg: 5605     median: 5953 (25%)     max: 6275 Points
min: 5062     avg: 11544     median: 12039 (51%)     max: 14424 Points
min: 6412     avg: 7482     median: 7221 (30%)     max: 9138 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 1893     avg: 2368     median: 2384 (58%)     max: 2652 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 9258     avg: 10829     median: 10337.5 (40%)     max: 12856 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2093     avg: 2248     median: 2203 (70%)     max: 2440 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 8918     avg: 10207     median: 9930 (41%)     max: 11663 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1150 Points (44%)
min: 1631     avg: 1800     median: 1820 (69%)     max: 1897 Points
min: 1115     avg: 1176     median: 1176 (45%)     max: 1237 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
5270 Points (9%)
min: 8519     avg: 11913     median: 12237 (22%)     max: 14376 Points
min: 7109     avg: 7231     median: 7231 (13%)     max: 7353 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1135     avg: 1169     median: 1169 (5%)     max: 1203 Points
min: 1553     avg: 1695     median: 1710 (7%)     max: 1838 Points
min: 1139     avg: 1188     median: 1186 (5%)     max: 1239 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5353     avg: 5620     median: 5619.5 (18%)     max: 5886 Points
min: 8374     avg: 10525     median: 9892 (31%)     max: 12717 Points
min: 6841     avg: 7034     median: 7100 (22%)     max: 7161 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5320     avg: 5509     median: 5594 (56%)     max: 5614 Points
min: 7191     avg: 7533     median: 7650 (76%)     max: 8015 Points
min: 5166     avg: 5409     median: 5457 (54%)     max: 5605 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 18098     avg: 22010     median: 23715 (23%)     max: 24218 Points
min: 30682     avg: 36787     median: 36900 (36%)     max: 41134 Points
min: 28192     avg: 29022     median: 29077 (28%)     max: 29798 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5376 Points (59%)
7309 Points (81%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
20077 Points (26%)
46641 Points (61%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1010     avg: 1018     median: 1015 (1%)     max: 1028 ms
min: 490     avg: 520     median: 508 (1%)     max: 608 ms
min: 715     avg: 919     median: 934 (1%)     max: 1044 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 38630     avg: 39090     median: 39091 (29%)     max: 39548 Points
min: 84027     avg: 87439     median: 86645 (63%)     max: 92438 Points
min: 38079     avg: 43238     median: 40443 (30%)     max: 50837 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 239     avg: 262     median: 264 (73%)     max: 279 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 263     avg: 297.3     median: 296 (53%)     max: 332 Points
184 Points (33%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1515     avg: 1846     median: 1872 (70%)     max: 2108 Points
940 Points (35%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 52     avg: 109.2     median: 101.2 (17%)     max: 180 Watt
85.2 Watt (15%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 74.6     avg: 126.3     median: 124 (23%)     max: 222 Watt
min: 99.9     avg: 131.6     median: 131.6 (24%)     max: 163.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.05     avg: 29.1     median: 27 (18%)     max: 96.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.99     avg: 18.1     median: 14.8 (18%)     max: 34.3 Watt
6.4 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 13.6     avg: 19.9     median: 19.1 (14%)     max: 27.5 Points per Watt
min: 10.5     avg: 12.5     median: 12.5 (9%)     max: 14.4 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-9850H → 100% n=36

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900H → 166% n=36

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9880H → 119% n=36

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 09. 07:09:40

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11350 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14043 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11348 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759986580s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11350 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 11350 +0.008s ... 0.019s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14043 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#11 got single benchmarks 14043 +0.04s ... 0.063s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11348 +0.004s ... 0.067s

#13 got single benchmarks 11348 +0.01s ... 0.078s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.078s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.095s ... 0.172s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.172s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)