Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Intel Core i5-10300H vs Intel Xeon W-10885M

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 5900HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS is a processor for big (gaming) laptops based on the Cezanne generation. The R9 5900HS integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3 GHz (guaranteed base clock) to 4.6 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process. Compared to the 5900HX (up to 54 W), the 5900HS is configured with a TDP of 35 W.

The new Zen 3 microarchitecture offers a significantly higher IPC (instructions per clock) compared to Zen 2. For desktop processors AMD claims 19 percent on average and in applications reviews showed around 12% gains at the same clock speed.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 iGPU with 8 CUs at up to 2100 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 16 MB of Level 3 cache can be found on the chip.

Performance

The average 5900HS in our database matches the Core i7-12650H, the Core i9-11900H and the Core i9-11980HK in multi-thread performance. Surprisingly enough, it manages to come unbelievably close to the more power-hungry Ryzen 9 5900HX. This is a great CPU in all respects, and laptop makers as well as mini-PC manufacturers are taking notice.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 80 W, the Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC is among the fastest laptops powered by the 5900HS that we know of. It can be at least 10% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 35 W that laptop makers aren't really required to stick to. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The Ryzen 9 5900HS is built with TSMC's 7 nm process for average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-10300H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10300H

The Intel Core i5-10300H is a fast processor for laptops with four cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.5 and 4.5 GHz (up to 4.2 with 4 cores) and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i5-9300H from 2019, the 10300H is clocked slightly higher (+100 MHz Base, +400 MHz Boost) and supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i5-10300H supports no vPro, TXT or SIPP. These business features are available in the faster Core i5-10400H (2.6 - 4.6 GHz) that was released at a later date.

Performance

The average 10300H in our database matches the AMD Ryzen 5 3550H in multi-thread performance. While not a poor result per se, it is indicative of an entry-level H-class CPU that is unlikely to meet the needs of hardcore gamers, professional videographers and similar clientele.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i5-9300H. As a low-end solution it will probably only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power consumption

The Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop makers are free to reduce slightly, 35 W being the lowest Intel-recommended value. Doing so would result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, a proper cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The i5-10300H is manufactured on one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for lower-than-average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Xeon W-10885M

► remove from comparison Intel W-10885M

The Intel Xeon W-10885M is a high-end processor for workstation laptops with eight cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 5.3 GHz and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Intel Xeon W-10885M supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP and is the professional version of the Intel Core i9-10885H

Performance

The performance of the W-10885M should be slightly above the older Core i9-9980HK top model, thanks to the potential higher single core turbo. Thanks to the 8 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run very good on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration. At the time of announcement, the Intel Xeon W-10885M is the second fastest Comet Lake-H CPU behind the Core i9-10980HK.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics P630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9880H. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all. The P-variant uses professional drivers.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 5900HSIntel Core i5-10300HIntel Xeon W-10885M
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)Intel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameCezanne-HS (Zen 3)Comet Lake-HComet Lake-H
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS « 3 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS2.8 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS3 - 4.2 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H « 2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M « 2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock3000 - 4600 MHz2500 - 4500 MHz2400 - 5300 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB256 KB512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1 MB2 MB
L3 Cache16 MB8 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 164 / 88 / 16
TDP35 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology7 nm14 nm14 nm
SocketFP6BGA1440FCBGA1440
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s, MMX, BMI2, AES-NI, SSE4.1, ABM, VMX, EIST, RDRAND, SSE4.2, TM1, RDSEED, SSE, AVX, FMA, SMEP, TM2, SSE2, AVX2, ADX, SMAP, Hyper-Threading, SGX, SSE3, Turbo, SSSE3, MPX, SSTDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1050 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics P630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.100 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 5900HS
39.9 pt (55%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10300H
31.8 pt (44%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - W-10885M
36.5 pt (51%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
68.2 Points (47%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
331 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 11426     avg: 12533     median: 12745.5 (12%)     max: 13214 Points
min: 4621     avg: 5132     median: 5106 (5%)     max: 5668 Points
6893 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1457     avg: 1474     median: 1475.5 (63%)     max: 1488 Points
min: 1095     avg: 1126     median: 1136 (48%)     max: 1147 Points
1300 Points (55%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 560     avg: 572     median: 571.5 (64%)     max: 584 Points
min: 312     avg: 443.2     median: 454 (50%)     max: 470 Points
min: 488     avg: 495.3     median: 495.5 (55%)     max: 502 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4414     avg: 4843     median: 4895.5 (12%)     max: 5167 Points
min: 1397     avg: 2046     median: 2117 (5%)     max: 2240 Points
min: 2727     avg: 3639     median: 3882.5 (9%)     max: 4065 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1927     avg: 2053     median: 2041 (13%)     max: 2180 Points
min: 536     avg: 825     median: 892 (6%)     max: 921 Points
min: 1089     avg: 1509     median: 1640 (10%)     max: 1666 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 211     avg: 231     median: 236.5 (71%)     max: 240 Points
min: 108     avg: 174     median: 186 (56%)     max: 194 Points
min: 208     avg: 209.8     median: 210 (63%)     max: 211 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
24.9 Points (32%)
min: 9.87     avg: 10     median: 10.1 (13%)     max: 10.06 Points
18.3 Points (24%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.8 Points (70%)
min: 2.05     avg: 2.1     median: 2.2 (54%)     max: 2.17 Points
2.4 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6380 Points (39%)
min: 6867     avg: 7056     median: 7130 (43%)     max: 7170 Points
7865 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
41235 Points (30%)
min: 26994     avg: 27496     median: 27692 (20%)     max: 27801 Points
44583 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
71832 Points (50%)
min: 35899     avg: 36042     median: 36042 (25%)     max: 36185 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
12016 Points (15%)
min: 9326     avg: 9339     median: 9338.5 (11%)     max: 9351 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
215.2 s (3%)
105.8 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.1 s (1%)
3.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4825 Points (8%)
7180 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 47553     avg: 55451     median: 57286 (33%)     max: 59680 MIPS
min: 15146     avg: 23295     median: 24158 (14%)     max: 24841 MIPS
min: 36204     avg: 43315     median: 45696 (26%)     max: 48044 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5540     avg: 5663     median: 5653 (68%)     max: 5804 MIPS
min: 2945     avg: 4704     median: 4896 (59%)     max: 4956 MIPS
min: 5495     avg: 5568     median: 5507 (66%)     max: 5703 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
53.3 fps (19%)
100.1 fps (35%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
190.2 fps (44%)
236.9 fps (55%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 12.7     avg: 14.3     median: 14.6 (26%)     max: 15.4 fps
min: 6.13     avg: 7.1     median: 7.3 (13%)     max: 7.78 fps
min: 8.89     avg: 11.9     median: 13.1 (23%)     max: 13.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.4 GB/s (0%)
1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.7 GB/s (12%)
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3.1 GB/s (8%)
10.3 GB/s (27%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
962 Seconds (12%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 230.9     avg: 254.5     median: 241 (2%)     max: 305 Seconds
min: 478.9     avg: 515     median: 515.5 (4%)     max: 555 Seconds
min: 281     avg: 326.3     median: 286 (2%)     max: 412 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.51     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.538 sec
min: 0.625     avg: 0.7     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 1.088 sec
min: 0.551     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.57 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9731     avg: 9744     median: 9744 (21%)     max: 9757 Points
13490 Points (29%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.7 s (2%)
7.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.8 s (1%)
17.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
516 s (2%)
429.3 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 14968     avg: 15607     median: 15002 (41%)     max: 16852 Points
min: 8554     avg: 9719     median: 9884.5 (27%)     max: 10909 Points
min: 13072     avg: 16593     median: 18302 (49%)     max: 18404 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
76855 Points (62%)
min: 58736     avg: 60992     median: 61113 (50%)     max: 62933 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
77245 Points (63%)
min: 58462     avg: 61155     median: 61387 (50%)     max: 62548 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
92395 Points (78%)
min: 38284     avg: 60059     median: 63707 (54%)     max: 63995 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16965     avg: 17453     median: 17509 (44%)     max: 17828 Points
min: 8220     avg: 8936     median: 9017.5 (23%)     max: 9305 Points
min: 10772     avg: 13951     median: 14922 (38%)     max: 16159 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 23339     avg: 24112     median: 24106 (43%)     max: 24896 Points
min: 12298     avg: 12919     median: 13016 (23%)     max: 13267 Points
min: 15118     avg: 19215     median: 20247 (36%)     max: 22279 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8261     avg: 8843     median: 8988.5 (38%)     max: 9134 Points
min: 3772     avg: 4678     median: 4684 (20%)     max: 5600 Points
min: 6457     avg: 8161     median: 8812 (37%)     max: 9214 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1599 Points (43%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
5340 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1410     avg: 1485     median: 1497 (63%)     max: 1547 Points
min: 703     avg: 1166     median: 1203.5 (51%)     max: 1241 Points
min: 1331     avg: 1339     median: 1340 (57%)     max: 1347 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7767     avg: 7848     median: 7867 (14%)     max: 7910 Points
min: 2783     avg: 4351     median: 4478 (8%)     max: 4728 Points
min: 6948     avg: 7939     median: 8378 (15%)     max: 8491 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1502 Points (7%)
min: 1121     avg: 1175     median: 1172.5 (5%)     max: 1234 Points
min: 1310     avg: 1332     median: 1323 (6%)     max: 1362 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7784 Points (25%)
min: 3887     avg: 4333     median: 4365 (14%)     max: 4713 Points
min: 7542     avg: 8126     median: 8295 (26%)     max: 8541 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6311     avg: 6361     median: 6361 (64%)     max: 6411 Points
min: 4844     avg: 5198     median: 5199 (52%)     max: 5549 Points
min: 5880     avg: 5899     median: 5892 (59%)     max: 5924 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 31610     avg: 31805     median: 31805 (35%)     max: 32000 Points
min: 15448     avg: 17203     median: 17278 (19%)     max: 18807 Points
min: 30737     avg: 32163     median: 32814 (36%)     max: 32939 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 CPU Mark
12111 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 597     avg: 616     median: 607 (1%)     max: 654 ms
min: 812     avg: 872     median: 824 (1%)     max: 1366 ms
min: 728     avg: 736     median: 733 (1%)     max: 746 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
65400 Points (59%)
min: 36854     avg: 47282     median: 48896 (44%)     max: 51952 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 255     avg: 272.8     median: 275.5 (57%)     max: 285 Points
min: 134     avg: 206.2     median: 210.5 (44%)     max: 231 Points
min: 228     avg: 229.3     median: 229 (48%)     max: 231 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1414 Points (54%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.3     avg: 66.5     median: 67 (12%)     max: 86.3 Watt
min: 76.8     avg: 95.8     median: 95.3 (16%)     max: 112 Watt
150 Watt (26%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 66.7     avg: 78.5     median: 69.5 (13%)     max: 99.2 Watt
min: 75.3     avg: 85.7     median: 85.8 (16%)     max: 93 Watt
152.9 Watt (28%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
16.8 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 21.1     avg: 27.2     median: 27.7 (21%)     max: 32.7 Points per Watt
min: 9.51     avg: 10.4     median: 10.5 (8%)     max: 11.1 Points per Watt
10.8 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS → 100% n=27

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10300H → 68% n=27

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon W-10885M → 92% n=27

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 17. 01:57:46

#0 checking url part for id 13015 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11706 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12205 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.05s ... 0.051s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.051s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13015 +0.024s ... 0.074s

#8 got single benchmarks 13015 +0.037s ... 0.111s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11706 +0.022s ... 0.133s

#10 got single benchmarks 11706 +0.097s ... 0.23s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12205 +0.023s ... 0.252s

#12 got single benchmarks 12205 +0.02s ... 0.272s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.272s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.625s ... 0.897s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.897s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)