Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 5600U vs Intel Core i5-10210U vs Intel Celeron 5305U

AMD Ryzen 5 5600U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 5600U

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600U, not to be confused with Intel's Core i7-5600U, is a fairly fast Cezanne family processor designed for use in thinner, lighter laptops. The R5 5600U integrates six of the eight cores based on the Zen 3 microarchitecture and is the third fastest U-series processor at launch. The cores are clocked at 2.3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.2 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT for a total of 12 threads. The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process.

The new Zen 3 microarchitecture offers a significantly higher IPC (instructions per clock) compared to Zen 2. For desktop processors AMD claims 19 percent on average and in applications reviews showed around 12% gains at the same clock speed.

In addition to the six CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 7 integrated graphics card with 7 CUs at up to 1800 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 16 MB level 3 cache (up from 8 MB at the 4800U) can be found on the chip.

Performance

This Ryzen 5 series chip is a solid mid-range CPU, as of early 2022. Its multi-thread benchmark scores nearly match those of the Intel Core i5-11400H (a much more power-hungry hexa-core chip designed for use in gaming laptops). While not nearly as fast as 12th generation Alder Lake-P processors, the 5600U should be good enough for the vast majority of users.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 30 W, the IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 is among the fastest laptops powered by the 5600U that we know of. It can be more than 30% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 has a default TDP of 15 W, a value that laptop makers are allowed to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. By going for the lowest value possible, it is possible to build a passively cooled system around this chip. Most laptop makers, however, will do the opposite to maximize performance.

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600U is built with TSMC's 7 nm manufacturing process for average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-10210U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10210U

The Intel Core i5-10210U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks based on the Comet Lake (CML-U) generation and was announced in August 2019. Compared to the similar Whiskey Lake processors (e.g. Core i5-8665U), the only difference is support for higher memory speeds (up to LPDDR4-2933 vs DDR4-2400) and two additional cores in the top model (not in this i5). The processor cores are clocked between 1.6 and 4.2 GHz (all 4 cores 3.9 GHz max). Thanks to Hyper-Threading 8 threads can be used. Compared to the faster i5-10510U, the level 3 cache was reduced from 8 to 6 MB. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The integrated graphics adapter however is still the same as in the previous generations. It's still called Intel UHD Graphics 620 and clocked from 300 - 1100 MHz in the i5. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a VP9 and H.265 de- and encoder.

Performance

The average 10210U in our database is just as fast as the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, the Intel Core i7-8565U and the Intel Core i5-1035G1 are, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. While the i5 is not a performance monster, it sails through basic day-to-day workloads with little effort.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term power limit of 30 W, the Frost Canyon NUC (NUC10i5FNK) is among the fastest systems powered by the 10210U that we know of. It can be more than twice as fast in CPU-bound workloads as the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i5 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W, a value that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. By going for the lowest value, it is possible to build a passively cooled system around the i5. Please note that Comet Lake-U processors can briefly consume as much as 80 W or even 90 W when under heavy loads.

The Core i5-10210U is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for very low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Celeron 5305U

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron 5305U

The Intel Celeron 5305U is a low-power dual-core SoC for laptops, based on the Comet Lake architecture, which was introduced in 2020. Compared to Kaby Lake and Whiskey Lake, there are apparently no differences with Comet Lake apart from the two additional cores in the Top model Core i7-10710U. The processor is still manufactured using the mature 14nm process (14nm++ like Whiskey Lake). The processor cores clock at a fixed 2.3 GHz (no Turbo) and also only offer 2 threads (no HyperThreading). Compared to the more powerful Core i3, i5 and i7 variants, the Celeron does not offer SSE (2) support.

You can find more information about the Comet Lake architecture and the available processors on our Comet Lake topic page.

According to Intel, the integrated graphics card is called Intel UHD Graphics, but is an old Intel UHD Graphics 610. It is clocked in the Celeron 5205U at 300 - 900 MHz and is only sufficient for very demanding games. The CPU also offers an integrated DDR4-2666 / LPDDR4x 2933 / LPDDR3-2133 dual-channel memory controller as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoder and encoder.

Performance

The performance of the Celeron 5305U is in the lowest entry-level class of notebook processors in 2020. Due to the lack of Turbo and only 2 cores, the CPU cannot score points in either single-core or multi-core tasks. The processor is therefore only suitable for undemanding tasks such as surfing with a few tabs and office tasks.

The power consumption and performance can be set from 15 to 12.5 watts by the notebook manufacturer via cTDP-down. However, the processor then only runs at 800 MHz and significantly reduced performance. Even at 15 watts, however, the processor is suitable for thin and light notebooks.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 5600UIntel Core i5-10210UIntel Celeron 5305U
CodenameCezanne-U (Zen 3)Comet Lake-UComet Lake-U
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)Intel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-U
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U1.9 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600U « 2.3 - 4.2 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5560U2.3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 5400U2.6 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10810U1.1 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10710U1.1 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10610U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10510U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310U1.7 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210U « 1.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110U2.1 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 5305U2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron 5205U1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i7-10810U1.1 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10710U1.1 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10610U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10510U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310U1.7 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210U1.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110U2.1 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 5305U « 2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron 5205U1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2300 - 4200 MHz1600 - 4200 MHz2300 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB256 KB
L2 Cache3 MB1 MB
L3 Cache16 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 124 / 82 / 2
TDP25 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Technology7 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFP6BGA1528BGA1528
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMELPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2666/LPDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXLPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1800 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 610 (300 - 900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 5600U
32.9 pt (55%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10210U
27.1 pt (45%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
82 Points (46%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
388 Points (7%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 6871     avg: 7929     median: 7792.5 (7%)     max: 9345 Points
min: 1794     avg: 3321     median: 3794 (4%)     max: 4376 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1345     avg: 1365     median: 1371 (58%)     max: 1376 Points
min: 797     avg: 974     median: 1062 (45%)     max: 1063 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 532     avg: 534     median: 534 (58%)     max: 536 Points
min: 322     avg: 406.8     median: 415 (45%)     max: 428 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2345     avg: 3036     median: 3067 (7%)     max: 3632 Points
min: 722     avg: 1279     median: 1242 (3%)     max: 1820 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1265     avg: 1347     median: 1321 (8%)     max: 1546 Points
min: 320     avg: 609     median: 616 (4%)     max: 790 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 220     avg: 222     median: 223 (62%)     max: 223 Points
min: 134     avg: 165.6     median: 166 (46%)     max: 174 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 14.5     avg: 15.1     median: 14.8 (19%)     max: 15.96 Points
min: 5.69     avg: 7.3     median: 7.5 (10%)     max: 8.66 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.61     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (62%)     max: 2.64 Points
min: 1.71     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (45%)     max: 1.91 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 58.49     avg: 2866     median: 2866.3 (17%)     max: 5674 Points
min: 6410     avg: 6478     median: 6412 (39%)     max: 6613 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 27130     avg: 28347     median: 28347 (21%)     max: 29564 Points
min: 15037     avg: 17758     median: 16072 (12%)     max: 22164 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 45363     avg: 47704     median: 46918 (30%)     max: 50831 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 11098     avg: 11124     median: 11132 (14%)     max: 11143 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 147.807     avg: 193.8     median: 156.3 (2%)     max: 277.4 s
217.8 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 4.848     avg: 6.3     median: 5.4 (1%)     max: 8.78 s
6.8 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
398 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
11.3 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6346     avg: 6694     median: 6858 (11%)     max: 6877 Points
4213 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 32052     avg: 37855     median: 37815.5 (22%)     max: 43071 MIPS
min: 10920     avg: 16808     median: 16742 (10%)     max: 21679 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5118     avg: 5198     median: 5204.5 (61%)     max: 5260 MIPS
min: 3504     avg: 4205     median: 4261 (50%)     max: 4467 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 76     avg: 78.5     median: 78.5 (26%)     max: 80.95 fps
min: 33.41     avg: 42.2     median: 43.9 (15%)     max: 49.35 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 234     avg: 235     median: 235 (54%)     max: 236 fps
min: 149.1     avg: 167.7     median: 169.5 (39%)     max: 184.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7.31     avg: 9.7     median: 9.8 (17%)     max: 11.8 fps
min: 2.36     avg: 4.3     median: 4.3 (8%)     max: 6.28 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.7     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (23%)     max: 0.796 GB/s
min: 0.48     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (14%)     max: 0.491 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (19%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
min: 0.79     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (14%)     max: 0.802 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 5.1     avg: 7     median: 7.7 (20%)     max: 8.3 GB/s
min: 4.6     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (12%)     max: 4.7 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 781     avg: 798     median: 798 (10%)     max: 815 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 328     avg: 412.8     median: 412.5 (3%)     max: 481 Seconds
min: 585     avg: 859     median: 829 (6%)     max: 1339 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.537     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.59 sec
min: 0.658     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.901 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 10261     avg: 10973     median: 11308 (24%)     max: 11349 Points
min: 6167     avg: 6403     median: 6363 (14%)     max: 6680 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.417     avg: 8.6     median: 8.7 (2%)     max: 8.767 s
min: 8.913     avg: 9     median: 9 (2%)     max: 9.008 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.25     avg: 18.8     median: 18.9 (1%)     max: 19.23 s
min: 20.35     avg: 20.6     median: 20.6 (1%)     max: 20.86 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 39.78     avg: 333.6     median: 454.6 (2%)     max: 506.532 s
min: 509     avg: 517     median: 516.5 (2%)     max: 524 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 39453     avg: 40516     median: 40516 (31%)     max: 41579 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7823     avg: 11018     median: 11465.5 (28%)     max: 13130 Points
min: 3843     avg: 6632     median: 6720 (17%)     max: 9364 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 70486     avg: 72645     median: 72645 (59%)     max: 74804 Points
min: 40123     avg: 48009     median: 49630 (40%)     max: 54173 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 70573     avg: 71966     median: 71965.5 (58%)     max: 73358 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 80047     avg: 81270     median: 81269.5 (67%)     max: 82492 Points
min: 47281     avg: 55148     median: 56586 (47%)     max: 60555 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 9144     avg: 10893     median: 10921 (28%)     max: 13033 Points
min: 4495     avg: 6154     median: 5973.5 (15%)     max: 8574 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 14756     avg: 17757     median: 17787.5 (32%)     max: 20872 Points
min: 381     avg: 8610     median: 8567 (15%)     max: 11875 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3820     avg: 4931     median: 4984 (21%)     max: 5685 Points
min: 1983     avg: 2749     median: 2734.5 (12%)     max: 3997 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 6943     avg: 7132     median: 7131.5 (67%)     max: 7320 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
6885 Points (79%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
1885 Points (47%)
495 Points (12%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
7232 Points (28%)
865 Points (3%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
1817 Points (58%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
6925 Points (28%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1334     avg: 1388     median: 1391 (54%)     max: 1430 Points
min: 949     avg: 1071     median: 1079 (42%)     max: 1133 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4506     avg: 5611     median: 5773 (10%)     max: 6523 Points
min: 2079     avg: 3570     median: 3689 (7%)     max: 4256 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1340     avg: 1365     median: 1371 (6%)     max: 1383 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5031     avg: 5876     median: 6117 (19%)     max: 6479 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5553     avg: 5775     median: 5854 (58%)     max: 5918 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 21830     avg: 24021     median: 24495 (24%)     max: 25738 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4892 Points (54%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
15199 Points (22%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11855     avg: 12114     median: 12114 (21%)     max: 12373 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3429     avg: 3457     median: 3457 (68%)     max: 3485 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
15805 Points (25%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4278 Points (64%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 646     avg: 656     median: 654.5 (1%)     max: 667 ms
min: 886     avg: 1014     median: 966 (1%)     max: 1267 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 239.4     avg: 245.5     median: 245.5 (3%)     max: 251.5 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 64294     avg: 65787     median: 65343 (49%)     max: 67723 Points
min: 30096     avg: 36050     median: 34153 (26%)     max: 44584 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 198.4     avg: 200.8     median: 200 (55%)     max: 204 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 243     avg: 254.5     median: 255.5 (46%)     max: 265 Points
min: 169     avg: 190.8     median: 191 (34%)     max: 203 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
4130 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 8069     avg: 8091     median: 8090.5 (43%)     max: 8112 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 26840     avg: 32009     median: 32009 (68%)     max: 37178 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 12155     avg: 12335     median: 12334.5 (81%)     max: 12514 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 17751     avg: 18155     median: 18155 (91%)     max: 18559 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1164     avg: 1255     median: 1241.5 (46%)     max: 1373 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 22.5     avg: 38     median: 34.5 (6%)     max: 64.9 Watt
min: 17.1     avg: 30.6     median: 27.9 (5%)     max: 58.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 27.6     avg: 40.9     median: 39.3 (7%)     max: 59.8 Watt
min: 17.7     avg: 27.3     median: 28.1 (5%)     max: 37.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.5     avg: 6.4     median: 6.4 (4%)     max: 9.27 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.2 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 25.9     avg: 34.8     median: 33.6 (25%)     max: 49 Points per Watt
min: 15.8     avg: 20.8     median: 17.3 (13%)     max: 35.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 5600U → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10210U → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 5305U → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 17. 01:02:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12983 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11459 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 19784 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752706950s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 16 Jul 2025 05:20:08 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12983 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 12983 +0.011s ... 0.024s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11459 +0.004s ... 0.027s

#11 got single benchmarks 11459 +0.045s ... 0.072s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 19784 +0.001s ... 0.073s

#13 got single benchmarks 19784 +0.003s ... 0.075s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.075s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.064s ... 0.139s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.139s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)