Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-12900H vs Intel Core i9-10980HK

Intel Core i9-12900H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-12900H

The Intel Core i9-12900H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.5 to 5 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 3.8 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the 12900HK, the 12900H does not offer the open multiplicator (for overclocking) but the full "Enterprise" set of vPro features (for remote management).

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.45 GHz.

Performance

The average 12900H in our database proves to be an outrageously fast CPU, ripping the Ryzen 9 6900HX to pieces as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Perhaps surprisingly, the i9's multi-thread performance is not much higher than that of the Core i7-12700H, suggesting the latter might be a better bang for the buck.

With its decent cooling solution and a long-term Power Limit of 110 W, the Asus StudioBook 16 H7600ZW is one of the fastest laptops built around the i9-12900H that we know of. It can be more than 80% faster than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, depending on the circumstances.

Power consumption

The Core i9 has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 35 W, with 45 W being its Base power consumption. The CPU's maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sits at 115 W.

The i9-12900H is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower than average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-10980HK

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10980HK

The Intel Core i9-10980HK is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 5.3 GHz (all 8 cores up to 4.4 GHz) and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.3 GHz can be only achieved below 65°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost), between 65 and 85°C, 5.2 GHz are the maximum and above that 5.1 with restrictions (Turbo Boost 3.0).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-9980HK, the 10980HK probably offers only increased base clock rates (and maybe multi core turbo clocks). Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i7-10750H supports no vPro, TXT or SIPP. These business features are available in the similar (and later released) Core i9-10885H (2.4 - 5.3 GHz).

Performance

The performance of the Core i9-10980HK should be higher than the old Core i9-9980HK (2.4 - 5 GHz) thanks to the increased turbo clock speeds. Thanks to the 8 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run very good on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration. At the time of announcement, the i9-10980HK is the fastest Comet Lake-H CPU and fastest laptop CPU on the market. 

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9980HK. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Beware, the CPU was not yet released at the time of writing and the information is based on leaks and early information.

ModelIntel Core i9-12900HIntel Core i9-10980HK
CodenameAlder Lake-HComet Lake-H
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-PIntel Comet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-12900HK compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H « 1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H compare1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H compare1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H compare2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H compare1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H compare1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK « 2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock1800 - 5000 MHz2400 - 5300 MHz
L1 Cache1.2 MB512 KB
L2 Cache11.5 MB2 MB
L3 Cache24 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 208 / 16
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1744FCBGA1440
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
$583 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900H
39.2 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10980HK
32.7 pt (54%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 96     avg: 104.9     median: 106 (60%)     max: 112 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 371     avg: 636     median: 578 (11%)     max: 920 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7359     avg: 15133     median: 15946.5 (15%)     max: 19648 Points
min: 9597     avg: 10605     median: 10590.5 (10%)     max: 11641 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1634     avg: 1829     median: 1863.5 (78%)     max: 1930 Points
min: 1228     avg: 1277     median: 1287 (54%)     max: 1305 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 624     avg: 706     median: 714.5 (78%)     max: 738 Points
min: 465     avg: 488.2     median: 489 (53%)     max: 507 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2681     avg: 5717     median: 6056.5 (15%)     max: 7471 Points
min: 3526     avg: 3933     median: 3883 (9%)     max: 4487 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1395     avg: 2454     median: 2576.5 (16%)     max: 3077 Points
min: 1606     avg: 1739     median: 1737 (11%)     max: 1862 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 235     avg: 262.3     median: 266 (74%)     max: 277 Points
min: 198     avg: 206.7     median: 206 (57%)     max: 219 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 12.08     avg: 23.6     median: 25.3 (33%)     max: 32.77 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.83     avg: 3     median: 3 (71%)     max: 3.3 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7952     avg: 8475     median: 8235 (50%)     max: 9498 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 24313     avg: 43425     median: 47767 (35%)     max: 60567 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 48178     avg: 66910     median: 70976.5 (45%)     max: 77409 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12846     avg: 13385     median: 13227.5 (16%)     max: 14567 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 187.176     avg: 206.8     median: 197.8 (2%)     max: 265.116 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.421     avg: 4.1     median: 4 (1%)     max: 5.062 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7620     avg: 8202     median: 7937 (13%)     max: 9328 Points
6869 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 34684     avg: 60849     median: 64908.5 (37%)     max: 76677 MIPS
min: 43786     avg: 47126     median: 47455 (27%)     max: 49275 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5302     avg: 5843     median: 5881 (69%)     max: 6289 MIPS
min: 5081     avg: 5386     median: 5437 (64%)     max: 5542 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 67.5     avg: 105.8     median: 111.4 (3%)     max: 126.7 fps
98.2 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 225     avg: 266.6     median: 263.3 (7%)     max: 317 fps
238.5 fps (6%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 8.05     avg: 17.1     median: 17.8 (31%)     max: 22.5 fps
min: 12     avg: 13     median: 13 (23%)     max: 14.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.864     avg: 1.1     median: 1 (29%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
1.1 GB/s (32%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.5     avg: 1.8     median: 1.9 (33%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 8.6     avg: 10.5     median: 10.3 (27%)     max: 12.8 GB/s
10.1 GB/s (26%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 273     avg: 420.7     median: 376 (5%)     max: 850 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 160     avg: 231.3     median: 205.5 (1%)     max: 451 Seconds
min: 239     avg: 277.4     median: 279 (2%)     max: 299 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4218     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.506 sec
min: 0.561     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.596 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 10122     avg: 13153     median: 13453 (29%)     max: 14655 Points
min: 13573     avg: 13765     median: 13765 (29%)     max: 13957 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.3     avg: 7.7     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 8.329 s
7.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 16.373     avg: 17.3     median: 17.2 (1%)     max: 18.439 s
17.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 385.4     avg: 410.8     median: 398.6 (2%)     max: 474.148 s
449 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 33640     avg: 52620     median: 53621 (41%)     max: 62706 Points
min: 54332     avg: 56780     median: 56779.5 (44%)     max: 59227 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10552     avg: 21276     median: 22264 (55%)     max: 26126 Points
min: 13629     avg: 16455     median: 16268 (40%)     max: 19000 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 70655     avg: 87893     median: 91477 (74%)     max: 103016 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 71651     avg: 89380     median: 91745 (74%)     max: 103757 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 81857     avg: 89973     median: 89999 (72%)     max: 100472 Points
67714 Points (54%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 9262     avg: 17875     median: 18691.5 (47%)     max: 22123 Points
min: 14150     avg: 15807     median: 16163 (41%)     max: 17016 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 9703     avg: 25492     median: 26678.5 (48%)     max: 31176 Points
min: 19789     avg: 21270     median: 21190.5 (38%)     max: 22476 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5062     avg: 11544     median: 12039 (51%)     max: 14424 Points
min: 8448     avg: 9352     median: 9439 (40%)     max: 10020 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 1893     avg: 2368     median: 2384 (60%)     max: 2652 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 9258     avg: 10829     median: 10337.5 (40%)     max: 12856 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2093     avg: 2248     median: 2203 (70%)     max: 2440 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 8918     avg: 10207     median: 9930 (41%)     max: 11663 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1631     avg: 1800     median: 1820 (71%)     max: 1897 Points
min: 1283     avg: 1339     median: 1347.5 (53%)     max: 1401 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8519     avg: 11913     median: 12237 (22%)     max: 14376 Points
min: 7634     avg: 8175     median: 8155.5 (15%)     max: 8666 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1553     avg: 1695     median: 1710 (7%)     max: 1838 Points
min: 1222     avg: 1317     median: 1349 (6%)     max: 1380 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8374     avg: 10525     median: 9892 (31%)     max: 12717 Points
min: 7597     avg: 7969     median: 8010 (25%)     max: 8300 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7191     avg: 7533     median: 7650 (76%)     max: 8015 Points
min: 5615     avg: 5935     median: 5971 (60%)     max: 6218 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 30682     avg: 36787     median: 36900 (37%)     max: 41134 Points
min: 29927     avg: 31196     median: 30973 (31%)     max: 32688 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
7309 Points (81%)
5687 Points (63%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
46641 Points (61%)
30205 Points (40%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 490     avg: 520     median: 508 (1%)     max: 608 ms
min: 722     avg: 748     median: 745 (1%)     max: 764 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 84027     avg: 87439     median: 86645 (63%)     max: 92438 Points
57793 Points (42%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 239     avg: 262     median: 264 (73%)     max: 279 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 263     avg: 297.3     median: 296 (53%)     max: 332 Points
min: 232     avg: 242.9     median: 243 (44%)     max: 252 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1515     avg: 1846     median: 1872 (70%)     max: 2108 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 52     avg: 109.2     median: 101.2 (17%)     max: 180 Watt
min: 139     avg: 149.5     median: 149.5 (26%)     max: 160 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 74.6     avg: 126.3     median: 124 (23%)     max: 222 Watt
min: 147     avg: 170.5     median: 170.5 (31%)     max: 194 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.05     avg: 29.1     median: 27 (18%)     max: 96.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.99     avg: 18.1     median: 14.8 (16%)     max: 34.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 13.6     avg: 19.9     median: 19.1 (14%)     max: 27.5 Points per Watt
min: 9.05     avg: 10.2     median: 10.2 (8%)     max: 11.4 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900H → 100% n=38

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10980HK → 81% n=38

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 13. 01:38:25

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14043 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11873 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1757720305s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:38:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14043 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#8 got single benchmarks 14043 +0.041s ... 0.053s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11873 +0.004s ... 0.057s

#10 got single benchmarks 11873 +0.018s ... 0.074s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.074s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.07s ... 0.144s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.144s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)