Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 4980U vs Intel Core i7-1065G7

AMD Ryzen 7 4980U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 4980U

The AMD Ryzen 7 4980U is a Renoir family processor designed for certain Microsoft Surface systems. 4980U has eight Zen 2 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz (base clock speed) to 4.4 GHz (Boost) with thread-doubling SMT tech enabled for a total of 16 threads. The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process and partly thanks to that AMD promises a 2x improvement in performance-per-Watt over Ryzen 3000 series mobile CPUs.

Architecture

The Zen 2 microarchitecture has brought a sizeable per-thread performance boost compared to the outgoing Zen+ parts. Renoir product family is also the first to introduce 8-core ULV processors to laptop market, keeping power consumption within reasonable limits. This AMD processor family is very impressive from most perspectives. One of the disatvantages to keep in mind is the lack of PCI-Express 4 support, meaning these blazing-fast NVMe SSDs will be limited to 3.9 GB/s tops.

Ryzen 7 4980U is designed to work with quad-channel LPDDR4 memory at up to 4,267 MHz. 8 MB of Level 3 are present in this chip. The Ryzen 7 gets soldered straight to the motherboard (FP6 socket) and is thus not user-replaceable. Please go to our Renoir hub page for more information on the product family.

Performance

The 4980U is the fastest U-class Ryzen 4000 series chip. As such, its clock speeds are 200 MHz higher (both the base one and Boost one) than what the Ryzen 7 4800U has.

It is thus hardly surprising that the average 4980U in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 7 5800U and also the Core i7-1260P, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Graphics

In addition to its eight CPU cores, the Ryzen 7 also features the Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics adapter with 8 CUs (= 512 shaders) at up to 1,950 MHz. This iGPU is compatible with FreeSync and DirectX 12 and is able to HW-decode AVC, HEVC, VP9-encoded videos (no AV1 support here). Vega 8 is capable of outputting UHD 2160p60 video signal to several monitors and, similar to Intel's Iris Xe (80 EUs), is good enough for a bit of light gaming on the go, provided one is content with sub-1080p resolutions and low/medium quailty presets.

Power consumption

The APU has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W; much like it is with other U-class Ryzen 4000 chips, AMD is fine with laptop makers (Microsoft, in this case) changing that value to anything between 10 W and 25 W.

The 7 nm TSMC process this Ryzen 7 is built with makes for above average, as of mid 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-1065G7

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1065G7

The Intel Core i7-1065G7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC of the Ice Lake U product family designed for thin laptops and Ultrabooks. It was announced in May 2019 (Computex). The CPU has four Sunnycove processor cores (8 threads thanks to Hyper-Threading) clocked at 1.3 (base) - 3.9 (single core Turbo) GHz. 2 cores can reach 3.8 GHz and all four 3.5 GHz using Turbo Boost. According to Intel the Sunnycove cores achieve 18% more IPCs (Instructions per Clock).

Other improvements for Ice Lake are the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wi-Fi 6 in the chip. The integrated DDR4 memory controller supports modules with up to 3200 MHz (and LPDDDR4 3733).

The biggest improvement of Ice Lake is the integrated Gen 11 graphics adapter called Iris Plus Graphics. The Core i7-1065G7 integrates the biggest G7 variant with 64 EUs clocked at 300 - 1100 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 should be twice as fast as the predecessors and best the AMD Vega 10 GPU from current Ryzen APUs.

Performance

The average 1065G7 in our database is most comparable to the AMD Ryzen 7 2700U and the Intel Core i5-8259U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a so-so result and a direct consequence of Intel's inability to make the best of its brand-new 10 nm node. The Core i7-10710U, a 10th generation processor built with an older 14 nm process, will easily rip a 1065G7 to pieces. That said, the 1065G7 will surely beat a 10710U in terms of energy efficiency.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and sufficiently high CPU power limits, the Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 is among the fastest laptops powered by the 1065G7 that we know of. It can be around 40% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i7 has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W. Laptop makers are free to change that value to anything between 12 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, that's a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The quad-core Intel CPU is built with Intel's second-gen 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 4980UIntel Core i7-1065G7
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Intel Ice Lake
CodenameRenoir-U (Zen 2)Ice Lake-U
Series: Ice Lake Ice Lake-U
AMD Ryzen 7 4980U « 2 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U compare1.8 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U compare2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U compare2.2 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600U compare2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U compare2.3 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U compare2.7 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1038NG7 compare2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1065G7 « 1.3 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G7 compare1.2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G4 compare1.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G1 compare1 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1005G1 compare1.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2000 - 4400 MHz1300 - 3900 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB192 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
L3 Cache8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 164 / 8
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology7 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketFP6BGA1526
FeaturesLPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4-3733 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1950 MHz)Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (300 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 4980U
33.6 pt (47%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1065G7
29.8 pt (41%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
9164 Points (9%)
min: 3127     avg: 3615     median: 3437 (3%)     max: 4281 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1260 Points (54%)
min: 1050     avg: 1131     median: 1131 (48%)     max: 1212 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
492 Points (55%)
min: 358     avg: 438.1     median: 449 (50%)     max: 474 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3453 Points (8%)
min: 1081     avg: 1510     median: 1543 (4%)     max: 2024 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1658 Points (10%)
min: 288     avg: 648     median: 662.5 (4%)     max: 836 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
182 Points (55%)
min: 141     avg: 174.2     median: 178.1 (54%)     max: 190 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
18.9 Points (25%)
min: 5.69     avg: 7.4     median: 7.2 (9%)     max: 9.37 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (53%)
min: 2.09     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (52%)     max: 2.17 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5715 Points (35%)
min: 7083     avg: 7254     median: 7270.5 (44%)     max: 7390 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
35106 Points (25%)
min: 16551     avg: 21959     median: 22401.5 (16%)     max: 26481 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 232.9     avg: 281     median: 255.6 (3%)     max: 354.4 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.969     avg: 8     median: 7.7 (2%)     max: 9.186 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
236.1 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
7.4 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4908     avg: 4953     median: 4956 (8%)     max: 4995 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
42368 MIPS (24%)
min: 10406     avg: 17024     median: 17254.5 (10%)     max: 22898 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4320 MIPS (52%)
min: 3289     avg: 4284     median: 4393 (53%)     max: 4589 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 40.6     avg: 45.1     median: 45.1 (16%)     max: 49.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 175.5     avg: 184.9     median: 184.9 (43%)     max: 194.3 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
9.8 fps (17%)
min: 2.2     avg: 4.6     median: 4.5 (8%)     max: 6.38 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.449     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.459 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.76     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (13%)     max: 0.79 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 4.9     avg: 5     median: 5 (13%)     max: 5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
342 Seconds (2%)
min: 675     avg: 882     median: 836 (6%)     max: 1650 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
min: 0.661     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.798 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9122     avg: 9209     median: 9208.5 (20%)     max: 9295 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.6 s (2%)
min: 8.64     avg: 11.7     median: 11.7 (3%)     max: 14.72 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.8 s (1%)
min: 18.92     avg: 23.2     median: 23.2 (1%)     max: 27.42 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
758 s (3%)
min: 431     avg: 481     median: 481 (2%)     max: 531 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
26223 Points (23%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
11759 Points (32%)
min: 3401     avg: 8138     median: 8479.5 (23%)     max: 10494 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 29124     avg: 49182     median: 52060.5 (42%)     max: 54876 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 29190     avg: 46812     median: 48876 (40%)     max: 54424 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 52974     avg: 57448     median: 57798 (49%)     max: 60169 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
10152 Points (26%)
min: 5065     avg: 7011     median: 7365 (19%)     max: 8472 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
18654 Points (33%)
min: 2752     avg: 9928     median: 10445 (19%)     max: 12021 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
5917 Points (25%)
min: 2273     avg: 3365     median: 3523 (15%)     max: 4435 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1133 Points (48%)
min: 948     avg: 1274     median: 1316 (56%)     max: 1348 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7156 Points (13%)
min: 2464     avg: 4215     median: 4406.5 (8%)     max: 4855 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1184     avg: 1295     median: 1310 (6%)     max: 1334 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3375     avg: 4436     median: 4648 (15%)     max: 4839 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5239     avg: 5587     median: 5637.5 (56%)     max: 5771 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14557     avg: 17869     median: 18459.5 (20%)     max: 18849 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5752 Points (78%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
18772 Points (46%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
14396 Points (26%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3863 Points (75%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
811 ms (1%)
min: 788     avg: 912     median: 861.5 (1%)     max: 1249 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
88.9 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 25166     avg: 37201     median: 36670 (33%)     max: 53081 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
210 Points (44%)
min: 130     avg: 199.4     median: 201.5 (42%)     max: 216 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1025 Points (39%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 23.4     avg: 30.5     median: 26 (4%)     max: 48.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 24.1     avg: 34.8     median: 34.5 (6%)     max: 48.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.3 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 15.5     avg: 19.1     median: 19.3 (14%)     max: 25.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 4980U → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1065G7 → 79% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 29. 10:58:28

#0 checking url part for id 13176 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11399 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 May 2024 05:33:54 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.041s ... 0.042s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.042s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13176 +0.021s ... 0.064s

#7 got single benchmarks 13176 +0.01s ... 0.073s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11399 +0.02s ... 0.094s

#9 got single benchmarks 11399 +0.156s ... 0.25s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.25s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.318s ... 0.568s

#12 return log +0.034s ... 0.601s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)