Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Intel Core i9-14900K

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7800X3D

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a high-end desktop processor from the Raphael series with 8 Zen 4 cores and SMT (Simultaneous Multithreading), allowing it to handle up to 16 threads simultaneously. After its announcement in January 2023 at CES in Las Vegas, it was launched in April 2023. Following the launch of the two top models, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, the third model was introduced, which offers significantly more gaming performance with the 3D V-Cache.

The CPU cores have a base clock of 4.2 GHz and can be boosted up to 5 GHz (single-core turbo). The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D features a CCD with 8 cores, which includes the fast 3D V-Cache. This differs significantly from the two Ryzen 9 models, as they have two CCDs, but only one of them can utilize the 3D V-Cache.

The performance of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is consistently good, although its multi-threaded performance suffers a bit due to the eight native compute cores. However, the real strength of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D lies in gaming performance, where it excels. In tests, we see consistently high gaming performance, even surpassing that of an Intel Core i9-13900K.

In terms of power consumption, the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D aligns with the other two models featuring 3D V-Cache, making the 8-core processor extremely power-efficient. In numbers, this means that the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is specified with a TDP of up to 120 watts. The PPT (Package Power Tracking) is also rated up to 162 watts. For comparison, an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is specified with 170 watts (TDP) or 230 watts (PPT).

Intel Core i9-14900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-14900K

The Intel Core i9-14900K is a high-end processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, similar to the Intel Core i9-13900K last year. The base clock is 3.2 GHz and can reach up to 6 GHz under optimal conditions. The total of 32 threads are still divided into 8 P and 16 E cores. The 8 performance cores (P-cores) also offer hyperthreading, which means that a total of 32 threads can be processed simultaneously in conjunction with the 16 energy-efficient E-cores. As before, the K models continue to offer a freely selectable multiplier, which simplifies overclocking. The Intel Core i9-14900K uses the same CPU socket (LGA 1700) as the Intel Core i9-13900K. This means you don't necessarily need a new motherboard, as the 600 series chipsets support the new processors after a BIOS update. There is also still the option of using DDR4 for the RAM.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i9-13900K, the Core i9-14900K still offers 8 P-cores, which are relieved by 16 additional E-cores for demanding applications and thus ensure very high multi-thread performance. In comparison, however, the Intel Core i9-14900K can only gain a slight lead. The e-cores primarily take care of background applications. The hybrid architecture relies on the Intel Thread Director, which is responsible for the correct allocation of tasks. Meanwhile, the IPC could only be increased slightly. As an innovation with the Intel Core i9-14900K, the manufacturer is increasingly relying on AI, which is also used for overclocking. With one click in the Intel Extreme Utility, the tool checks the entire system and makes the necessary settings.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i9-13900K, the Intel Core i9-14900K offers an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, nothing has changed with the Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power consumption

The Intel Core i9-14900K is specified with a TDP of 125 watts, which corresponds to the PL1 value. In Boost mode, the processor's performance can increase to up to 253 watts (PL2). However, this requires very good cooling. Compared to the Intel Core i9-13900K, the specified power consumption does not increase if the limits are adhered to. The situation is different if the limits are deactivated. As this value depends on the overall system, we cannot make an exact statement on this.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 7800X3DIntel Core i9-14900K
CodenameRaphael (Zen4)Raptor Lake
SeriesAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)Intel Raptor Lake-R
Series: Raptor Lake-R Raptor Lake
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D compare4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X compare4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 compare3.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X compare4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 compare3.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D « 4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X compare4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900K « 3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K compare2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900 compare2 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700 compare1.5 - 5.4 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14600K compare3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500 compare2.6 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500T compare1.7 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock4200 - 5000 MHz3200 - 6000 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB32 MB
L3 Cache96 MB36 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1624 / 32
8 x 6.0 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP120 Watt125 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2162 Watt
Transistors6570 Million
Technology5 nm10 nm
Voltage1.1 - 1.2 V
Die Size193 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.89 °C100 °C
SocketAM5 (LGA 1718)LGA 1700
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2Intel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
iGPUAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$449 U.S.$589 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7800X3D
42.3 pt (70%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-14900K
51.1 pt (85%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 134     avg: 136.5     median: 137 (69%)     max: 138 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 2112     avg: 2189     median: 2146.5 (40%)     max: 2352 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16688     avg: 17197     median: 16817 (16%)     max: 18086 Points
min: 37606     avg: 39400     median: 39399.5 (37%)     max: 41193 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1646     avg: 1726     median: 1713 (70%)     max: 1820 Points
min: 2174     avg: 2263     median: 2262.5 (92%)     max: 2351 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 663     avg: 686     median: 686 (75%)     max: 709 Points
900 Points (98%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6488     avg: 6805     median: 6804.5 (17%)     max: 7121 Points
15466 Points (38%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2783     avg: 2879     median: 2878.5 (18%)     max: 2974 Points
min: 5924     avg: 6103     median: 6103 (39%)     max: 6282 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 272     avg: 281.5     median: 281.5 (78%)     max: 291 Points
min: 317     avg: 324.5     median: 324.5 (90%)     max: 332 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
33.5 Points (43%)
72.2 Points (93%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.4 Points (81%)
min: 4.02     avg: 4     median: 4 (95%)     max: 4.21 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8026 Points (48%)
12643 Points (76%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
51950 Points (38%)
94801 Points (69%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
94035 Points (60%)
144156 Points (92%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14485 Points (18%)
18511 Points (23%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
62.7 s (1%)
74.5 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.4 s (0%)
2.1 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
16585 Points (26%)
16108 Points (26%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 75558     avg: 80313     median: 80312.5 (46%)     max: 85067 MIPS
min: 145144     avg: 146282     median: 145207 (83%)     max: 149570 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7412     avg: 7824     median: 7823.5 (92%)     max: 8235 MIPS
min: 7772     avg: 7893     median: 7932 (93%)     max: 7934 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
169.3 fps (4%)
min: 75.9     avg: 181.2     median: 181.2 (5%)     max: 286.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
344 fps (9%)
min: 257.5     avg: 345.5     median: 345.5 (9%)     max: 433.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 22.1     avg: 23.3     median: 23.3 (41%)     max: 24.4 fps
min: 40.8     avg: 41.4     median: 41.1 (72%)     max: 42.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
2.8 GB/s (82%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.1 GB/s (36%)
5.8 GB/s (100%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
15.3 GB/s (40%)
26.7 GB/s (70%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 266     avg: 282.5     median: 282.5 (4%)     max: 299 Seconds
min: 135     avg: 143     median: 144.5 (2%)     max: 147 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 169     avg: 178     median: 178 (1%)     max: 187 Seconds
min: 80     avg: 84.6     median: 85 (1%)     max: 87 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4152     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4479 sec
min: 0.3425     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (7%)     max: 0.3504 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
16892 Points (36%)
min: 20532     avg: 22354     median: 22657.5 (48%)     max: 22928 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.1 s (2%)
5.5 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.3 s (1%)
12 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
337.6 s (1%)
280.3 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
97391 Points (75%)
min: 11403     avg: 101267     median: 111512 (86%)     max: 114209 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 30767     avg: 32947     median: 32947 (81%)     max: 35127 Points
min: 28497     avg: 31204     median: 31391 (77%)     max: 32853 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
89617 Points (73%)
min: 89084     avg: 104553     median: 105332 (86%)     max: 111347 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
89287 Points (72%)
min: 88682     avg: 104672     median: 105402 (86%)     max: 110989 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
91846 Points (74%)
min: 90865     avg: 104818     median: 105098 (84%)     max: 110670 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
25510 Points (65%)
min: 27678     avg: 28978     median: 29112 (74%)     max: 30462 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 30333     avg: 31455     median: 30687 (55%)     max: 33345 Points
min: 48193     avg: 52035     median: 52265 (93%)     max: 56087 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 10908     avg: 12327     median: 11975 (50%)     max: 14098 Points
min: 19418     avg: 22322     median: 22607.5 (95%)     max: 23721 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2634 Points (61%)
min: 3108     avg: 3214     median: 3243 (75%)     max: 3294 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
14288 Points (55%)
min: 20435     avg: 21326     median: 21397 (83%)     max: 21790 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2175 Points (69%)
min: 2985     avg: 3078     median: 3104 (99%)     max: 3150 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
12046 Points (49%)
min: 19463     avg: 20452     median: 20693 (85%)     max: 20754 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1856     avg: 1934     median: 1920 (65%)     max: 2027 Points
min: 2243     avg: 2347     median: 2369 (80%)     max: 2370 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12073     avg: 13013     median: 12715 (23%)     max: 14252 Points
min: 24552     avg: 25148     median: 25199 (45%)     max: 25867 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1938 Points (8%)
min: 2177     avg: 2237     median: 2247 (10%)     max: 2280 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
13888 Points (44%)
min: 23151     avg: 24582     median: 24467 (77%)     max: 25496 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
9097 Points (91%)
min: 9620     avg: 9873     median: 9872.5 (99%)     max: 10009 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
54840 Points (54%)
min: 82660     avg: 87853     median: 88108.5 (86%)     max: 91119 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 487     avg: 504     median: 503.5 (1%)     max: 520 ms
min: 413     avg: 415     median: 414 (0%)     max: 418 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
282 Points (73%)
min: 332     avg: 334.7     median: 334 (87%)     max: 338 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
353 Points (63%)
min: 371     avg: 388.3     median: 386 (69%)     max: 410 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2216 Points (83%)
min: 2490     avg: 2566     median: 2584 (97%)     max: 2611 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
218 Watt (38%)
537 Watt (93%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
207 Watt (38%)
548 Watt (100%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
121.6 Watt (80%)
min: 64.1     avg: 83.6     median: 77.6 (51%)     max: 151.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
14.4 Points per Watt (11%)
11.5 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D → 100% n=52

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-14900K → 147% n=52

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 17. 22:30:46

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15064 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15092 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1766007046s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Dec 2025 05:18:30 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15064 +0.005s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 15064 +0.007s ... 0.017s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15092 +0.005s ... 0.022s

#10 got single benchmarks 15092 +0.051s ... 0.072s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.072s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.068s ... 0.141s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.142s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)