Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 4800U vs Intel Core i7-1065G7

AMD Ryzen 7 4800U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 4800U

The AMD Ryzen 7 4800U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4800U integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 1.8 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.2 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in the modern 7 nm process at TSMC and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips. Compared to the similar named Ryzen 7 4800H, the 4800U offers a lower TDP (15 versus 45 Watt) and base clock (1.8 versus 2.9 GHz).

According to AMD, the Ryzen 7 4800U is 4% faster in Cinebench R20 single thread test and 90 % faster in the multithreaded test compared to the fast Intel Core i7-1065G7 (Ice Lake, 4 cores, 3.9 GHz). This means the CPU should be one of the fastest processors in the 15 Watt TDP range and well suited for demanding tasks. The sustained performance however ist strongly depending on the cooling system and the TDP settings of the laptop.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 integrated graphics card with 8 CUs and up to 1750 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 15 Watt (default) and can be configured from 10 to 25 Watt by the laptop vendor. That means the chip is intended for thin and light laptops (but with fans).

Intel Core i7-1065G7

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1065G7

The Intel Core i7-1065G7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC of the Ice Lake U product family designed for thin laptops and Ultrabooks. It was announced in May 2019 (Computex). The CPU has four Sunnycove processor cores (8 threads thanks to Hyper-Threading) clocked at 1.3 (base) - 3.9 (single core Turbo) GHz. 2 cores can reach 3.8 GHz and all four 3.5 GHz using Turbo Boost. According to Intel the Sunnycove cores achieve 18% more IPCs (Instructions per Clock).

Other improvements for Ice Lake are the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wi-Fi 6 in the chip. The integrated DDR4 memory controller supports modules with up to 3200 MHz (and LPDDDR4 3733).

The biggest improvement of Ice Lake is the integrated Gen 11 graphics adapter called Iris Plus Graphics. The Core i7-1065G7 integrates the biggest G7 variant with 64 EUs clocked at 300 - 1100 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 should be twice as fast as the predecessors and best the AMD Vega 10 GPU from current Ryzen APUs.

Performance

The average 1065G7 in our database is most comparable to the AMD Ryzen 7 2700U and the Intel Core i5-8259U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a so-so result and a direct consequence of Intel's inability to make the best of its brand-new 10 nm node. The Core i7-10710U, a 10th generation processor built with an older 14 nm process, will easily rip a 1065G7 to pieces. That said, the 1065G7 will surely beat a 10710U in terms of energy efficiency.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and sufficiently high CPU power limits, the Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 is among the fastest laptops powered by the 1065G7 that we know of. It can be around 40% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i7 has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W. Laptop makers are free to change that value to anything between 12 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, that's a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The quad-core Intel CPU is built with Intel's second-gen 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 4800UIntel Core i7-1065G7
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Intel Ice Lake
CodenameRenoir-U (Zen 2)Ice Lake-U
Series: Ice Lake Ice Lake-U
AMD Ryzen 7 4980U compare2 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U « 1.8 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U compare2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U compare2.2 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600U compare2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U compare2.3 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U compare2.7 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1038NG7 compare2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1065G7 « 1.3 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G7 compare1.2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G4 compare1.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G1 compare1 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1005G1 compare1.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock1800 - 4200 MHz1300 - 3900 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB192 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
L3 Cache8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 164 / 8
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology7 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketFP6BGA1526
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-3733 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (300 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 4800U
33.2 pt (46%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1065G7
29.8 pt (41%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7558     avg: 8565     median: 8376 (8%)     max: 9762 Points
min: 3127     avg: 3615     median: 3437 (3%)     max: 4281 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1231     avg: 1235     median: 1235 (53%)     max: 1240 Points
min: 1050     avg: 1131     median: 1131 (48%)     max: 1212 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 474     avg: 480.5     median: 480 (53%)     max: 488 Points
min: 358     avg: 438.1     median: 449 (50%)     max: 474 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2943     avg: 3178     median: 3230.5 (8%)     max: 3306 Points
min: 1081     avg: 1510     median: 1543 (4%)     max: 2024 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1281     avg: 1444     median: 1411 (9%)     max: 1639 Points
min: 288     avg: 648     median: 662.5 (4%)     max: 836 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 182     avg: 184     median: 183 (55%)     max: 187 Points
min: 141     avg: 174.2     median: 178.1 (54%)     max: 190 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
17.8 Points (23%)
min: 5.69     avg: 7.4     median: 7.2 (9%)     max: 9.37 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (53%)
min: 2.09     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (52%)     max: 2.17 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5690 Points (34%)
min: 7083     avg: 7254     median: 7270.5 (44%)     max: 7390 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
33649 Points (24%)
min: 16551     avg: 21959     median: 22401.5 (16%)     max: 26481 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
99.5 s (1%)
min: 232.9     avg: 281     median: 255.6 (3%)     max: 354.4 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
min: 6.969     avg: 8     median: 7.7 (2%)     max: 9.186 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3881 Points (6%)
min: 4908     avg: 4953     median: 4956 (8%)     max: 4995 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 38654     avg: 41192     median: 40117 (23%)     max: 44804 MIPS
min: 10406     avg: 17024     median: 17254.5 (10%)     max: 22898 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4420     avg: 4486     median: 4436 (53%)     max: 4603 MIPS
min: 3289     avg: 4284     median: 4393 (53%)     max: 4589 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
88.5 fps (31%)
min: 40.6     avg: 45.1     median: 45.1 (16%)     max: 49.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
196.1 fps (45%)
min: 175.5     avg: 184.9     median: 184.9 (43%)     max: 194.3 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.48     avg: 10.2     median: 10.4 (18%)     max: 10.77 fps
min: 2.2     avg: 4.6     median: 4.5 (8%)     max: 6.38 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.449     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.459 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.5 GB/s (26%)
min: 0.76     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (13%)     max: 0.79 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.2 GB/s (27%)
min: 4.9     avg: 5     median: 5 (13%)     max: 5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 322     avg: 345.3     median: 340 (2%)     max: 374 Seconds
min: 675     avg: 882     median: 836 (6%)     max: 1650 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.576     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.613 sec
min: 0.661     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.798 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10227 Points (22%)
min: 9122     avg: 9209     median: 9208.5 (20%)     max: 9295 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.7 s (2%)
min: 8.64     avg: 11.7     median: 11.7 (3%)     max: 14.72 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
22.9 s (1%)
min: 18.92     avg: 23.2     median: 23.2 (1%)     max: 27.42 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
585 s (3%)
min: 431     avg: 481     median: 481 (2%)     max: 531 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
50726 Points (44%)
26223 Points (23%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 11658     avg: 12133     median: 12201 (33%)     max: 12541 Points
min: 3401     avg: 8138     median: 8479.5 (23%)     max: 10494 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
58600 Points (48%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
58705 Points (48%)
min: 29190     avg: 46812     median: 48876 (40%)     max: 54424 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
67233 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 11486     avg: 13163     median: 13102 (33%)     max: 14901 Points
min: 5065     avg: 7011     median: 7365 (19%)     max: 8472 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 16762     avg: 18139     median: 17885 (32%)     max: 19769 Points
min: 2752     avg: 9928     median: 10445 (19%)     max: 12021 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6229     avg: 6498     median: 6514 (27%)     max: 6750 Points
min: 2273     avg: 3365     median: 3523 (15%)     max: 4435 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1150     avg: 1164     median: 1156.5 (49%)     max: 1192 Points
min: 948     avg: 1274     median: 1316 (56%)     max: 1348 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5798     avg: 6255     median: 6136.5 (11%)     max: 6950 Points
min: 2464     avg: 4215     median: 4406.5 (8%)     max: 4855 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1162 Points (5%)
min: 1184     avg: 1295     median: 1310 (6%)     max: 1334 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7298 Points (23%)
min: 3375     avg: 4436     median: 4648 (15%)     max: 4839 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4919     avg: 4963     median: 4963 (50%)     max: 5007 Points
min: 5239     avg: 5587     median: 5637.5 (56%)     max: 5771 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 27166     avg: 27287     median: 27286.5 (30%)     max: 27407 Points
min: 14557     avg: 17869     median: 18459.5 (21%)     max: 18849 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5752 Points (78%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
18772 Points (46%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
14396 Points (26%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3863 Points (75%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 793     avg: 810     median: 816 (1%)     max: 822 ms
min: 788     avg: 912     median: 861.5 (1%)     max: 1249 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
88.9 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
36619 Points (33%)
min: 25166     avg: 37201     median: 36670 (33%)     max: 53081 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 205     avg: 210.7     median: 208 (43%)     max: 219 Points
min: 130     avg: 199.4     median: 201.5 (42%)     max: 216 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1025 Points (39%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37     avg: 42.1     median: 38.6 (7%)     max: 50.8 Watt
min: 23.4     avg: 30.5     median: 26 (4%)     max: 48.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 33.7     avg: 39.3     median: 34.8 (6%)     max: 49.5 Watt
min: 24.1     avg: 34.8     median: 34.5 (6%)     max: 48.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.3 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 33.1     avg: 37.2     median: 38 (28%)     max: 40.5 Points per Watt
min: 15.5     avg: 19.1     median: 19.3 (14%)     max: 25.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 4800U → 100% n=44

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1065G7 → 80% n=44

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 06:54:37

#0 checking url part for id 11681 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11399 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.035s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.035s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11681 +0.02s ... 0.055s

#7 got single benchmarks 11681 +0.017s ... 0.072s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11399 +0.017s ... 0.089s

#9 got single benchmarks 11399 +0.139s ... 0.228s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.228s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.359s ... 0.587s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.613s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)