GPD Win Max 2021 handheld gaming laptop review: Ryzen 7 slower than Core i7 ↺
The GPD Win Max launched late last year with 10th gen Intel Ice Lake options. For 2021, the manufacturer has refreshed the model with newer and faster 11th gen Tiger Lake CPUs and even Zen 2 options for AMD fans. The test unit we have here comes with the Ryzen 7 4800U and integrated Radeon RX Vega 8 GPU. Though AMD has since moved on to mobile Zen 3 CPUs like the Ryzen 7 5800U, the older Ryzen 7 4800U is still one of the fastest U-series CPUs available.
See the official Indiegogo page here to learn more about the Win Max and its features. The $1000 USD price tag is in the same ballpark as many traditional Ultrabooks since the Win Max is essentially a UMPC with modern Ultrabook performance and ports.
More GPD reviews:
potential competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79.3 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | GPD Win Max 2021 R7 4800U, Vega 8 | 850 g | 26 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
v (old) | 01 / 2021 | GPD Win 3 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 553 g | 27 mm | 5.50" | 1280x720 | |
| 84.4 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr R7 5800U, Vega 8 | 953 g | 17 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1200 | |
| 84.7 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2021 | Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.3 kg | 18.2 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2021 | Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88.9 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2021 | Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 13.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 |
Case
Visually, the chassis is compact with smooth gray metal surfaces and an excellent visual design. In hand, however, the system creaks very easily even from simple actions like opening the lid or gripping the sides of the base. The chassis doesn't carry a strong sense of luxuriousness as a result of all the creaking. For over a grand, the manufacturer could certainly do a lot better in this regard.
Connectivity
Port options are plentiful for such a small design. Unfortunately, DisplayPort-over-USB-C is not supported on our AMD unit meaning owners must use the HDMI port for connecting external monitors.
Opting for the Intel version of the Win Max will grant Thunderbolt 4 compatibility across the two USB-C ports.
The switch along the left edge toggles the controller inputs as detailed here on the Win 3.
SD Card Reader
Though the system integrates a MicroSD reader, it would not work at all on our pre-production unit. We tried inserting both UHS-I and UHS-II cards and none were recognized. We recommend users test out the MicroSD card slot immediately upon purchasing.
Communication
Disappointingly, the Win Max comes with an Intel 7265 instead of the newer and faster Intel AX200/201. This means that the system does not support Wi-Fi 6 speeds and it shows when comparing the Win Max to Intel-powered devices like the Win 3.
Maintenance
The bottom panel requires an extra-small Philips screwdriver to remove. Both RAM and WLAN are soldered meaning users can only upgrade the SSD or replace the battery if needed.
Accessories and Warranty
There are no extras in the box outside of the USB-C AC adapter. The standard one-year limited manufacturer warranty applies. Claiming warranty may be a long wait for buyers overseas.
Input Devices
Keyboard
We can't fault the backlit keyboard for being cramped as that is to be expected for its 8-inch form factor. It'll definitely take some time to get used to the odd layout and small keys if you plan on typing regularly on the Win Max.
The controller buttons are not very comfortable to use. The travel and feedback on the shoulder buttons in particular are too narrow and soft, respectively. Additionally, the joysticks have a very narrow range of motion that is even smaller than on the Nintendo Joy Cons. Precise movements are therefore difficult to pull off here especially for users with larger thumbs.
The Turbo fan mode can be toggled with the Fn+F key. However, there is no onscreen indicator to show if Turbo mode is active or not meaning it can sometimes be difficult to know the fan mode at any given moment.
Touchpad
The small Precision-enabled clickpad (5.8 x 3.3 cm) has excellent traction with a bit of sticking at slower speeds. Unfortunately, the cursor can be jumpy and unresponsive when gliding slowly which can make precision clicks annoyingly difficult.
Display
The 8-inch touchscreen is obviously larger than the 5.5-inch touchscreen of the Win 3, but that is where the advantages end. Everything else from response times, brightness, and colors are measurably slower, dimmer, and shallower, respectively, than the display on the Win 3. It's not a poor display by any means, but it's a step down from what we know the manufacturer is capable of based on what we've experienced on the Win 3. A switch to OLED would actually address the ghosting, color, and contrast concerns that we have with this particular IPS panel.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 374.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 832:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89, calibrated: 5.4
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
47.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
47.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
| GPD Win Max 2021 LT7911D, IPS, 8", 1280x800 | GPD Win 3 IPS, 5.5", 1280x720 | HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AU Optronics AUO6496, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1200 | Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AU Optronics B133HAN05.F, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T Samsung, SDC414A, OLED, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA Samsung SDC4155 (ATNA33XC09-0), OLED, 13.3", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 31% | 55% | 50% | 90% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 47.2 | 59.5 26% | 73.4 56% | 69.7 48% | 99.9 112% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 65.2 | 89.6 37% | 99.8 53% | 99.2 52% | 100 53% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 47.6 | 61.4 29% | 74.8 57% | 71.4 50% | 97.5 105% | |
| Response Times | 31% | 21% | 21% | 40% | 40% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 56.8 ? | 40 ? 30% | 42.4 ? 25% | 46.8 ? 18% | 2 ? 96% | 2 ? 96% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 37.6 ? | 25.6 ? 32% | 31.6 ? 16% | 28.8 ? 23% | 2 ? 95% | 2 ? 95% |
| PWM Frequency | 201.6 ? | 60 -70% | 60 ? -70% | |||
| Screen | -11% | 37% | 22% | 8% | 33% | |
| Brightness middle | 374.6 | 468.8 25% | 473.9 27% | 291.5 -22% | 353 -6% | 390 4% |
| Brightness | 361 | 460 27% | 458 27% | 294 -19% | 359 -1% | 368 2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 93 1% | 91 -1% | 93 1% | 95 3% | 66 -28% |
| Black Level * | 0.45 | 0.45 -0% | 0.36 20% | 0.19 58% | 0.1 78% | |
| Contrast | 832 | 1042 25% | 1316 58% | 1534 84% | 3530 324% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.21 | 9 -45% | 2.99 52% | 3.83 38% | 3.98 36% | 2.03 67% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.89 | 15.5 -57% | 4.35 56% | 8.43 15% | 53.07 -437% | 3.14 68% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5.4 | 1.91 65% | 1.1 80% | 1.07 80% | 3.1 43% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 10.9 -142% | 4 11% | 6.2 -38% | 1.41 69% | 1.28 72% |
| Gamma | 2.49 88% | 2.13 103% | 2.35 94% | 2.2 100% | 2.39 92% | 2.4 92% |
| CCT | 6726 97% | 10972 59% | 6269 104% | 6469 100% | 6346 102% | 6359 102% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56.6 | 87 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89.2 | 100 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 17% /
4% | 38% /
38% | 31% /
28% | 24% /
17% | 54% /
48% |
* ... smaller is better
Color space covers just 65 percent of sRGB compared to 89 percent on the Win 3. Thus, while the Win Max has the larger display than the Win 3, the latter has deeper and more accurate colors.
X-Rite colorimeter measurements reveal color temperature to be slightly on the cool side. Once properly calibrated, average grayscale and ColorChecker DeltaE values would improve from 4.5 to 2.3 and 6.2 to 5.4, respectively. Colors still become increasingly inaccurate at higher saturation levels due to the limited color space of the panel.
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 37.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 56.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 28.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 201.6 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 201.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 201.6 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8619 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Outdoor visibility is good only when under shade where glare is more controllable. We recommend disabling AMD Vari-Bright or else maximum brightness will automatically drop from 374 nits to 300 nits when running on battery power.
Performance
Processor
The AMD Ryzen 7 4800U was designed for larger Ultrabooks and so it's uncommon to see it here on a smaller 8-inch form factor. Raw multi-thread performance is excellent and essentially on neck-to-neck with the Ryzen 7 4700U or even Ryzen 7 5800U. On the other hand, single-thread performance is about 15 to 20 percent slower than the competing Core i7-1165G7.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (2943 - 3306, n=4) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| Honor MagicBook 15 4500U | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (474 - 488, n=4) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| Honor MagicBook 15 4500U | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (7558 - 9762, n=3) | |
| HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (1231 - 1240, n=3) | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (1281 - 1639, n=3) | |
| HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| Honor MagicBook 15 4500U | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (182 - 187, n=3) | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| Honor MagicBook 15 4500U | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Honor MagicBook 15 4500U | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (322 - 374, n=3) | |
| HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (4420 - 4603, n=3) | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| Honor MagicBook 15 4500U | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Honor MagicBook 15 4500U | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (1150 - 1192, n=4) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (5798 - 6950, n=4) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Honor MagicBook 15 4500U | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (9.48 - 10.8, n=3) | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| Honor MagicBook 15 4500U | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| Honor MagicBook 15 4500U | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (57.8 - 62.6, n=3) | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| Honor MagicBook 15 4500U | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (0.576 - 0.613, n=3) | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
* ... smaller is better
System Performance
PCMark 10 results are slightly higher than our GPD Win 3 largely due to the additional cores on the Ryzen 7 4800U when compared to the Core i5-1135G7.
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (5233 - 5383, n=3) | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T | |
| HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (9188 - 9637, n=3) | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (7631 - 8091, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (5123 - 5758, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5233 points | |
Help | ||
DPC Latency
LatencyMon shows DPC latency issues when opening multiple browser tabs on our homepage. Video playback at 4K 60 FPS is otherwise smooth with just 4 dropped frames during our minute-long video test.
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T | |
| GPD Win Max 2021 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
| HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
| GPD Win 3 | |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
The Win Max comes with a BIWIN NS200 PCIe 3 SSD much like what we found on the Win 3. Performance is faster than on the Intel SSD 660p especially in terms of sequential write rates, but the pricier Samsung PM981a is still on top.
| GPD Win Max 2021 BIWIN NS200 512GB CNF82GS1G00-512 | GPD Win 3 BIWIN NS200 1TB CNF82GS1G02-1TB | HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G | Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 4% | -44% | -69% | 15% | |
| Seq Read | 1892 | 1585 -16% | 1616 -15% | 1860 -2% | 2767 46% |
| Seq Write | 1707 | 1776 4% | 761 -55% | 500 -71% | 1368 -20% |
| 4K Read | 64.1 | 61.6 -4% | 46.87 -27% | 36.26 -43% | 46.86 -27% |
| 4K Write | 163.6 | 208.9 28% | 126.6 -23% | 118.6 -28% | 140.1 -14% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1142 | 1142 0% | 324.6 -72% | 419 -63% | 954 -16% |
| 4K-64 Write | 980 | 1103 13% | 815 -17% | 219 -78% | 1361 39% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.038 | 0.03 21% | 0.074 -95% | 0.102 -168% | 0.051 -34% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.076 | 0.074 3% | 0.135 -78% | 0.17 -124% | 0.022 71% |
| Score Read | 1395 | 1362 -2% | 533 -62% | 641 -54% | 1277 -8% |
| Score Write | 1315 | 1489 13% | 1018 -23% | 388 -70% | 1638 25% |
| Score Total | 3430 | 3573 4% | 1798 -48% | 1300 -62% | 3507 2% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1520 | 1741 15% | 906 -40% | 880 -42% | 2767 82% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 654 | 543 -17% | 614 -6% | 185.3 -72% | 1072 64% |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1325 | 1318 -1% | 539 -59% | 212.7 -84% | 1319 0% |
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 10% | -25% | -32% | 6% | |
| Write 4K | 183.6 | 223 21% | 128.3 -30% | 89.2 -51% | 143 -22% |
| Read 4K | 70.1 | 66.5 -5% | 50.9 -27% | 33.09 -53% | 50.2 -28% |
| Write Seq | 1815 | 1857 2% | 971 -47% | 988 -46% | 1963 8% |
| Read Seq | 1721 | 1737 1% | 1540 -11% | 1322 -23% | 1990 16% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 458.6 | 611 33% | 538 17% | 332.6 -27% | 375 -18% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 552 | 688 25% | 344.4 -38% | 389.3 -29% | 363.7 -34% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1865 | 1948 4% | 980 -47% | 984 -47% | 3086 65% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2106 | 1995 -5% | 1829 -13% | 2461 17% | 3382 61% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 405.6 | ||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 930 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
6% | -35% /
-37% | -51% /
-55% | 11% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU Performance
Graphics performance from our Radeon RX Vega 8 is about 30 to 40 percent faster than the Ryzen 5 4500U with the integrated RX Vega 6. However, it's still a step below both the Core i5 Iris Xe 80 EUs and Core i7 Iris Xe 96 EUs in most games as shown by our comparison charts below.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 5675 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20095 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3368 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1329 points | |
Help | ||