Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-10870H vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800H vs AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS

Intel Core i7-10870H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-10870H

The Intel Core i7-10870H is a higher-end, octa-core processor of the Comet Lake product family. The Hyper-Threading-enabled processor was unveiled in 2020. It is designed for use in large gaming laptops and DTRs; its CPU cores run at 2.2 GHz (base clock speed) to 5 GHz (max. Boost frequency). The all-core Boost frequency sits at 4.2 GHz.

Core i7-10870H is slightly inferior to Core i7-10875H in that the former has a 100 MHz lower base clock speed, 100 MHz lower Boost clock speed and no support for Intel's proprietary security features: vPro, TXT, SIPP.

Last but not the least, this H-class processor features the 24 EU UHD Graphics 630 iGPU.

Architecture

Comet Lake is a yet another revision of the dated Skylake architecture (much like the previous Coffee Lake, Whiskey Lake, Kaby Lake product families) for similar feature set and performance-per-MHz figures.

Still, 10th Generation Core processors have their advantages. The upgraded memory controller is one such advantage; it can officially host memory clocked at 2,933 MHz, an upgrade over the 2,666 MHz limitation of the outgoing Coffee Lake product family. Intel recommends using no more than 128 GB, for reference.

The 10870H is manufactured on Intel's third-gen 14 nm process. The octa-core CPU is compatible with Thunderbolt 3; it has sixteen PCI-Express 3.0 lanes for connecting discrete graphics cards, SSDs and other devices. Four PCI-Express 3.0 lanes allow for read/write rates of up to 3.9 GB/s provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

Please note this isn't a user-replaceable CPU. It gets soldered permanently on to the motherboard (BGA1440 socket interface) and is thus pretty much impossible to replace.

Performance

The average 10870H in our database is close to the Ryzen 5 5600H and the Core i9-9980HK, as far as multi-thread banchmark scores are concerned. The i7 thus is absolutely capable of handling any task that requires significant processing muscle, as of late 2021.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 95 W, the MSI GE76 Raider 10UH is among the fastest laptops featuring the 10870H that we know of. It can be about 30% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system built around the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is an old acquaintance of ours; this 24 EU iGPU was used in many H-class Intel Core processors of previous years, like a Core i7-9750H.

In the case of 10870H, the UHD Graphics runs at 350 MHz to 1,200 MHz. It will let you use up to 3 displays simultaneously. The highest resolution supported here is 4K (4096 by 2304 pixels). This graphics adapter will happily hardware-decode VP9, AVC, HEVC, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs; the latest AV1 codec did not make the list.

UHD Graphics 630 was not made for gaming; it is not fast enough to handle most triple-A titles of 2019 and 2020, even if you set the resolution to 1024 x 768 and select the lowest quality preset possible.

Power consumption

The i7-10870H has a 45 W TDP (also known as the long-term Power Limit). Laptop makers are allowed to reduce that value somewhat, the lower limit being 35 W, with clock speeds and performance taking a hit as a result. As far as short-term loads are concerned, the CPU will happily consume 70 or even 100 W when Boosting, making quality active cooling solution a must.

This 10th generation Intel chip is manufactured on one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for low, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 5800H

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800H is a high-performance octa-core processor of the Cezanne product family. It was released in Q1 2021; it is designed for use in larger laptops, primarily gaming laptops and DTRs. The Ryzen features eight SMT-enabled Zen 3 cores running at 3.2 GHz (base clock speed) to 4.4 GHz (highest Boost frequency possible) along with the Vega 8 iGPU. The chip has 16 MB of L3 cache.

Architecture

The Ryzen 7 5800H is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process, just like the outgoing Ryzen 7 4800H was; both CPUs have 8 cores and 16 threads, too. The underlying microarchitecture is what makes the two vastly different as the newer Zen 3 microarchitecture brings a massive IPC improvement over Zen 2. To be specific, AMD promises an increase of up to 19%, with independent reviews pointing to a lower (but sizeable nonetheless) 12% increase.

Ryzen 5 5800H supports dual-channel DDR4-3200 and quad-channel LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Unlike the desktop-grade Ryzen 5000-series processors, Ryzen 5 5800H does not support PCI-Express 4.0, meaning NVMe SSDs will be limited to read/write rates of 3.9 GB/s.

The CPU gets soldered straight on to the motherboard (FP6 socket interface) and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

The Ryzen is a marvel of a processor. As far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned, the average 5800H in our database trades blows with the Intel Core i5-12500H, Core i7-11800H, Core i7-12650H, Core i9-11950H and also the AMD Ryzen 9 4900H. Needless to say, a system built around this CPU will have little difficulty chewing through pretty much any workload imaginable for years to come.

With the long-term CPU power limit of 75 W, the Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH is among the fastest 5800H-toting laptops that we have tested; it can be at least 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest laptops built around the 5800H in our database such as the HP Victus 16 or the Asus ZenBook 14X OLED.

Graphics

In addition to its eight CPU cores, the APU has the Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics adapter. Just like the name suggests, Vega 8 features 8 Compute Units (8 x 64 = 512 unified shaders); in the case of Ryzen 7 5800H, the Vega runs at up to 2,000 MHz.

On paper, this iGPU is inferior to the 96 EU Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7. However, as is usually the case, synthetic benchmarks do not tell the entire story, as AMD's drivers are superior to those of Intel. As a result, the Vega will let you play a lot of games released in 2020 and 2021 at reasonable resolutions (up to Full HD 1080p) and Low to Medium presets. Mass Effect Legendary Edition is playable at 1080p (High), to give you an example. As the iGPU has no VRAM of its own, it is paramount that fast system RAM is used.

The graphics adapter definitely supports 2160p UHD monitors at 60 Hz. AVC, HEVC, MPEG-2, VP9-encoded videos can be hardware-decoded with the Vega but there is no AV1 support here; such a video will be software-decoded for much lower energy efficiency.

Power consumption

This AMD APU has a default TDP (also known as the long-term Power Limit) of 45 W that can be changed to anything between 35 W and 54 W by laptop makers, with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. No matter the exact value, an active cooling solution is a must.

The Ryzen 7 5800H is built with TSMC's 7 nm process for very decent, as of early 2022, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 5900HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS is a processor for big (gaming) laptops based on the Cezanne generation. The R9 5900HS integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3 GHz (guaranteed base clock) to 4.6 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process. Compared to the 5900HX (up to 54 W), the 5900HS is configured with a TDP of 35 W.

The new Zen 3 microarchitecture offers a significantly higher IPC (instructions per clock) compared to Zen 2. For desktop processors AMD claims 19 percent on average and in applications reviews showed around 12% gains at the same clock speed.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 iGPU with 8 CUs at up to 2100 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 16 MB of Level 3 cache can be found on the chip.

Performance

The average 5900HS in our database matches the Core i7-12650H, the Core i9-11900H and the Core i9-11980HK in multi-thread performance. Surprisingly enough, it manages to come unbelievably close to the more power-hungry Ryzen 9 5900HX. This is a great CPU in all respects, and laptop makers as well as mini-PC manufacturers are taking notice.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 80 W, the Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC is among the fastest laptops powered by the 5900HS that we know of. It can be at least 10% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 35 W that laptop makers aren't really required to stick to. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The Ryzen 9 5900HS is built with TSMC's 7 nm process for average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-10870HAMD Ryzen 7 5800HAMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
SeriesIntel Comet LakeAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
CodenameComet Lake-HCezanne-H (Zen 3)Cezanne-HS (Zen 3)
Series: Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) Cezanne-HS (Zen 3)
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H « 2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX3.3 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H « 3.2 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H3.3 - 4.2 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS « 3 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS2.8 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS3 - 4.2 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock2200 - 5000 MHz3200 - 4400 MHz3000 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB4 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 168 / 168 / 16
TDP45 Watt45 Watt35 Watt
Technology14 nm7 nm7 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1440FP6FP6
FeaturesDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10870H
35.5 pt (49%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 5800H
38.9 pt (54%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 5900HS
39.9 pt (55%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
86 Points (60%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
618 Points (12%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 8250     avg: 9594     median: 9892.5 (9%)     max: 10450 Points
min: 8812     avg: 11822     median: 12091.5 (11%)     max: 13214 Points
min: 11426     avg: 12533     median: 12745.5 (12%)     max: 13214 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1177     avg: 1223     median: 1226 (52%)     max: 1253 Points
min: 1294     avg: 1410     median: 1416 (60%)     max: 1441 Points
min: 1457     avg: 1474     median: 1475.5 (63%)     max: 1488 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 460     avg: 473.6     median: 473.5 (53%)     max: 484 Points
min: 502     avg: 550     median: 554 (62%)     max: 560 Points
min: 560     avg: 572     median: 571.5 (64%)     max: 584 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3027     avg: 3588     median: 3632 (9%)     max: 4020 Points
min: 3430     avg: 4578     median: 4662 (11%)     max: 5020 Points
min: 4414     avg: 4843     median: 4895.5 (12%)     max: 5167 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1336     avg: 1614     median: 1659 (10%)     max: 1740 Points
min: 1487     avg: 1968     median: 2005 (13%)     max: 2119 Points
min: 1927     avg: 2053     median: 2041 (13%)     max: 2180 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 196     avg: 199.8     median: 200 (60%)     max: 204 Points
min: 209     avg: 228.2     median: 229 (69%)     max: 234 Points
min: 211     avg: 231     median: 236.5 (71%)     max: 240 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 21.25     avg: 22.5     median: 22.5 (29%)     max: 23.68 Points
24.9 Points (32%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.69     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (68%)     max: 2.75 Points
2.8 Points (70%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5981     avg: 6017     median: 6017 (36%)     max: 6053 Points
6380 Points (39%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 35208     avg: 36735     median: 36734.5 (27%)     max: 38261 Points
41235 Points (30%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 62312     avg: 65382     median: 65382 (45%)     max: 68452 Points
71832 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 11378     avg: 11508     median: 11507.5 (14%)     max: 11637 Points
12016 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 111.714     avg: 188.4     median: 188.4 (2%)     max: 265 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.93     avg: 6.1     median: 6.1 (1%)     max: 8.3 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
265 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
8.2 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6660     avg: 6851     median: 6851 (11%)     max: 7042 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 39581     avg: 44452     median: 44975.5 (26%)     max: 46708 MIPS
min: 45773     avg: 54229     median: 54052 (31%)     max: 59986 MIPS
min: 47553     avg: 55451     median: 57286 (33%)     max: 59680 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5145     avg: 5293     median: 5295.5 (63%)     max: 5429 MIPS
min: 5038     avg: 5478     median: 5499.5 (66%)     max: 5632 MIPS
min: 5540     avg: 5663     median: 5653 (68%)     max: 5804 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
104.7 fps (37%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
244 fps (56%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 10.7     avg: 12.2     median: 12.5 (22%)     max: 13.5 fps
min: 11.6     avg: 14.6     median: 14.8 (26%)     max: 16.1 fps
min: 12.7     avg: 14.3     median: 14.6 (26%)     max: 15.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (0%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.6     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (28%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 8.5     avg: 10     median: 10 (26%)     max: 11.5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 486     avg: 499.5     median: 499.5 (6%)     max: 513 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 272     avg: 297.6     median: 292 (2%)     max: 333 Seconds
min: 237     avg: 259.8     median: 255.5 (2%)     max: 339.8 Seconds
min: 230.9     avg: 254.5     median: 241 (2%)     max: 305 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.573     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.614 sec
min: 0.511     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.559 sec
min: 0.51     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.538 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12300     avg: 12790     median: 12790 (27%)     max: 13280 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.2     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (2%)     max: 9.415 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.7     avg: 18     median: 18 (1%)     max: 20.257 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 366     avg: 419.5     median: 419.5 (2%)     max: 472.992 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
60691 Points (53%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 13753     avg: 15226     median: 15943 (43%)     max: 16331 Points
min: 13192     avg: 15511     median: 15120 (41%)     max: 17779 Points
min: 14968     avg: 15607     median: 15002 (41%)     max: 16852 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 77323     avg: 79661     median: 80007.5 (65%)     max: 81129 Points
76855 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 77630     avg: 79055     median: 79316 (64%)     max: 79957 Points
77245 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 63612     avg: 64430     median: 63696 (54%)     max: 65981 Points
min: 78495     avg: 82477     median: 82134 (69%)     max: 85865 Points
92395 Points (78%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12985     avg: 14960     median: 15506 (39%)     max: 15719 Points
min: 16269     avg: 17332     median: 17425 (44%)     max: 18539 Points
min: 16965     avg: 17453     median: 17509 (44%)     max: 17828 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 17337     avg: 19768     median: 20247 (36%)     max: 20886 Points
min: 22433     avg: 23961     median: 23886 (43%)     max: 25300 Points
min: 23339     avg: 24112     median: 24106 (43%)     max: 24896 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 7603     avg: 8624     median: 8636.5 (36%)     max: 9627 Points
min: 7021     avg: 8827     median: 8891 (37%)     max: 9835 Points
min: 8261     avg: 8843     median: 8988.5 (38%)     max: 9134 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1991 Points (60%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
9411 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1191     avg: 1273     median: 1282.5 (54%)     max: 1295 Points
min: 1336     avg: 1452     median: 1462 (62%)     max: 1505 Points
min: 1410     avg: 1485     median: 1497 (63%)     max: 1547 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6403     avg: 7482     median: 7735.5 (14%)     max: 7882 Points
min: 6551     avg: 7801     median: 7641 (14%)     max: 9062 Points
min: 7767     avg: 7848     median: 7867 (14%)     max: 7910 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1264     avg: 1272     median: 1276 (6%)     max: 1277 Points
min: 1416     avg: 1419     median: 1418.5 (6%)     max: 1421 Points
1502 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7678     avg: 7738     median: 7700 (24%)     max: 7837 Points
min: 7408     avg: 7988     median: 7988 (25%)     max: 8568 Points
7784 Points (25%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5311     avg: 5555     median: 5652 (56%)     max: 5703 Points
min: 5970     avg: 6133     median: 6132.5 (61%)     max: 6295 Points
min: 6311     avg: 6361     median: 6361 (64%)     max: 6411 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 30420     avg: 30536     median: 30578 (34%)     max: 30611 Points
min: 29073     avg: 31637     median: 31636.5 (35%)     max: 34200 Points
min: 31610     avg: 31805     median: 31805 (35%)     max: 32000 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 789     avg: 801     median: 796.5 (1%)     max: 861 ms
min: 623     avg: 643     median: 637.5 (1%)     max: 765 ms
min: 597     avg: 616     median: 607 (1%)     max: 654 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
134.1 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 53412     avg: 54494     median: 54493.5 (49%)     max: 55575 Points
min: 65332     avg: 67146     median: 67411 (61%)     max: 68649 Points
65400 Points (59%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
190.5 Points (55%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 220     avg: 226.4     median: 225 (47%)     max: 243 Points
min: 202     avg: 262.7     median: 269 (56%)     max: 280 Points
min: 255     avg: 272.8     median: 275.5 (57%)     max: 285 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1302     avg: 1344     median: 1330.5 (51%)     max: 1429 Points
1414 Points (54%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 98.4     avg: 98.9     median: 98.9 (17%)     max: 99.4 Watt
min: 49.1     avg: 84     median: 82.6 (14%)     max: 109 Watt
min: 46.3     avg: 66.5     median: 67 (12%)     max: 86.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 98.6     avg: 98.8     median: 98.8 (18%)     max: 98.9 Watt
min: 53.9     avg: 89.8     median: 89 (16%)     max: 123 Watt
min: 66.7     avg: 78.5     median: 69.5 (13%)     max: 99.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.79     avg: 6.3     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 7.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.92     avg: 11.6     median: 11.4 (13%)     max: 15.4 Watt
16.8 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 13.5     avg: 13.8     median: 13.8 (10%)     max: 14 Points per Watt
min: 17     avg: 22.9     median: 22.2 (17%)     max: 36.6 Points per Watt
min: 21.1     avg: 27.2     median: 27.7 (21%)     max: 32.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10870H → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 5800H → 112% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS → 115% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 03. 19:32:37

#0 checking url part for id 12757 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13005 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13015 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 May 2024 05:34:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.088s ... 0.089s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.089s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12757 +0.016s ... 0.105s

#8 got single benchmarks 12757 +0.071s ... 0.175s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13005 +0.016s ... 0.191s

#10 got single benchmarks 13005 +0.152s ... 0.344s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 13015 +0.015s ... 0.359s

#12 got single benchmarks 13015 +0.024s ... 0.383s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.383s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.418s ... 0.801s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.801s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)