Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-9100F vs Intel Core i9-13900H vs Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i3-9100F

► remove from comparison Intel i3-9100F

The Intel Core i3-9100F is an entry level Quad-Core processor for desktop PCs based on the Coffee Lake architecture. It offers four cores clocked at 3.6 - 4.2 GHz without HyperThreading / SMT support (4 threads only). The CPU is still manufactured in 14nm++ and does not feature an integrated graphics card. 

Compared to the older Core i3-8100, the i3-9100F offers around 10 to 15 percent higher performance. Therefore, the CPU is well suited for simple office tasks but less for high end gaming or demanding applications.

Intel specifies the CPU with a TDP of 65 Watt. For desktops that means that the processor wont need big cooling solutions and can be used in small cases.

Intel Core i9-13900H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13900H

The Intel Core i9-13900H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Raptor Lake-H series (Alder Lake architecture). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.6 to 5.4 GHz (single core turbo, all-core 4.9 GHz) on the performance cluster and 1.9 to 4.1 GHz on the efficiency cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare with the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the similar Core i9-13900HK, the 13900H supports no open multiplicator for overclocking, but on the other hand the full set of vPro management features.

Performance

The average 13900H in our database is in the same league as the Core i5-13500HX, Core i7-13705H, Core i9-12900HK, Core i9-13905H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 115 W, the Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 is among the fastest laptops built around the 13900H that we know of. It can be about 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200 (up from 4800 MHz for the 12th gen). The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) .

The CPU is rated at 45 W base power (115 W PL2) but most laptops will use a PL1 of around 60 Watt. The SoC is manufactured in a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7 (improved over the 12th Gen).

Intel Core i5-9400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9400F

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a six-core desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture introduced in October 2018 along with the flagship Intel Core i9-9900K. The processor clocks at 2.9-4.1 GHz and can process up to 6 threads simultaneously. The Intel Core i5-9400F is manufactured in the improved 14-nm process (14nm++).

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-8400, the performance could only be increased slightly. Performance increases of up to 10 percent can be expected. Both processors (old and new) still do not offer hyperthreading. The performance increase therefore only adds up to small architecture improvements and a slightly higher basic and turbo clock rate. This CPU is suitable for everyday office use, which does not require large coolers due to the low waste heat. But games are also among the application areas, because in games the Intel Core i5-9400F clearly beats the Intel Core i3-9100F. Here the six cores are paying off in the meantime. 

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a processor without integrated graphics unit. If you value an iGPU, you should take a closer look at the Intel Core i5-9400, as it offers the entry level Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Power consumption

Intel puts the Thermal Design Power (TDP) at 65 watts. This means there is no need for large cooling systems, which also allows installation in very compact housings.

ModelIntel Core i3-9100FIntel Core i9-13900HIntel Core i5-9400F
CodenameCoffee Lake-RRaptor Lake-HCoffee Lake-R
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Raptor Lake-HIntel Coffee Lake
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F « 3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HK1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13905H1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900H « 1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13800H1.8 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13705H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13620H1.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600H2.1 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13505H1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500H1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13420H1.5 - 4.6 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F « 2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock3600 - 4200 MHz1900 - 5400 MHz2900 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB1.2 MB384 KB
L2 Cache1 MB11.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache6 MB24 MB9 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 414 / 20
6 x 5.4 GHz Intel Golden Cove P-Core
8 x 4.1 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
6 / 6
TDP65 Watt45 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm14 nm
Die Size126 mm2149 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1151-2BGA1744LGA 1151-2
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2400 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-5200/LPDDR5-6400/LPDDR5x-6400 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL B., GNA, vPro Ent., RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, Virtualization
Architecturex86x86x86
$122 U.S.$182 U.S.
Announced
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz)
Manufacturerark.intel.com
Voltage100 V

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-9100F
27.9 pt (46%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900H
40.9 pt (68%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-9400F
28.7 pt (48%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 101     avg: 106.7     median: 103.5 (58%)     max: 118.8 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 680     avg: 791     median: 760.5 (14%)     max: 962 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 11997     avg: 16813     median: 17471 (16%)     max: 20385 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1297     avg: 1887     median: 1964.5 (83%)     max: 2054 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
414 Points (45%)
min: 428     avg: 720     median: 753 (82%)     max: 792 Points
416 Points (45%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1175 Points (3%)
min: 4935     avg: 6533     median: 6808 (17%)     max: 7716 Points
2378 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
634 Points (4%)
min: 2061     avg: 2676     median: 2666.5 (17%)     max: 3100 Points
984 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
171 Points (47%)
min: 211     avg: 268.9     median: 279 (77%)     max: 297 Points
173 Points (48%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5.4 Points (7%)
min: 27.48     avg: 28.5     median: 28.5 (37%)     max: 29.65 Points
11.3 Points (15%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (46%)
min: 2.93     avg: 3     median: 3 (71%)     max: 3 Points
2 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6509 Points (39%)
min: 9326     avg: 9502     median: 9550 (58%)     max: 9630 Points
6490 Points (39%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
18118 Points (13%)
min: 53438     avg: 54582     median: 53904 (39%)     max: 56403 Points
31523 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
21908 Points (14%)
min: 76558     avg: 78476     median: 79014 (50%)     max: 79856 Points
40065 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8472 Points (10%)
min: 13515     avg: 13696     median: 13752 (17%)     max: 13820 Points
8182 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
345.9 s (4%)
min: 179.496     avg: 340.6     median: 412.8 (5%)     max: 429.446 s
198.7 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
11.8 s (2%)
min: 3.141     avg: 3.4     median: 3.5 (1%)     max: 3.521 s
6.8 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4052 Points (6%)
min: 6365     avg: 7489     median: 6800 (11%)     max: 9303 Points
5794 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
17150 MIPS (10%)
min: 45045     avg: 66435     median: 70166 (40%)     max: 79032 MIPS
25639 MIPS (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4682 MIPS (55%)
min: 3665     avg: 6054     median: 6276 (74%)     max: 6600 MIPS
4678 MIPS (55%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
44.4 fps (15%)
min: 110.15     avg: 120.9     median: 114 (38%)     max: 138.55 fps
64 fps (21%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
218 fps (50%)
min: 284     avg: 294     median: 297.5 (69%)     max: 300.5 fps
234 fps (54%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.1 fps (11%)
min: 14.1     avg: 18.5     median: 18.9 (33%)     max: 22.3 fps
9.1 fps (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (9%)
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (38%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.5 GB/s (9%)
min: 2.3     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (41%)     max: 2.5 GB/s
0.9 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3 GB/s (8%)
min: 13.2     avg: 13.8     median: 13.3 (35%)     max: 14.8 GB/s
5.2 GB/s (14%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 279     avg: 348.7     median: 336 (4%)     max: 467 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
687 Seconds (5%)
min: 166     avg: 205.4     median: 196 (1%)     max: 268 Seconds
468.5 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (14%)
min: 0.4052     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.723 sec
0.7 sec (14%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13869     avg: 14775     median: 14893 (32%)     max: 15501 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.3 s (2%)
min: 6.156     avg: 7     median: 7.4 (2%)     max: 7.512 s
9.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
21 s (1%)
min: 13.784     avg: 15.5     median: 16.2 (1%)     max: 16.436 s
20.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
495.5 s (2%)
min: 350.453     avg: 397.4     median: 417.1 (2%)     max: 424.723 s
499.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 55574     avg: 64502     median: 63194 (49%)     max: 75108 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
8742 Points (22%)
min: 15540     avg: 21781     median: 22343 (55%)     max: 25420 Points
11185 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
68492 Points (56%)
min: 83732     avg: 94385     median: 93901 (76%)     max: 103874 Points
70546 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
68473 Points (56%)
min: 85594     avg: 91529     median: 93285 (76%)     max: 95474 Points
70482 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
68727 Points (55%)
min: 89904     avg: 94148     median: 95253 (76%)     max: 98040 Points
72413 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
6295 Points (16%)
min: 12004     avg: 17867     median: 17844.5 (45%)     max: 22184 Points
8275 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
8958 Points (16%)
min: 17733     avg: 26658     median: 27039 (48%)     max: 32664 Points
12616 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4218 Points (18%)
min: 7863     avg: 11535     median: 11648 (49%)     max: 13726 Points
5777 Points (24%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2415     avg: 2650     median: 2653.5 (66%)     max: 2807 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 11118     avg: 12847     median: 12644 (49%)     max: 14404 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2494     avg: 2640     median: 2609.5 (83%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 11059     avg: 13474     median: 13148.5 (54%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1152 Points (45%)
min: 1140     avg: 1895     median: 1955 (76%)     max: 2043 Points
1139 Points (45%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
4074 Points (7%)
min: 9094     avg: 12649     median: 12890 (23%)     max: 15410 Points
5715 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1146 Points (5%)
min: 1654     avg: 1801     median: 1828.5 (8%)     max: 1958 Points
1132 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4060 Points (13%)
min: 11168     avg: 12381     median: 12212 (39%)     max: 14172 Points
5698 Points (18%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5301 Points (53%)
min: 7253     avg: 7955     median: 8190 (82%)     max: 8498 Points
5347 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
15937 Points (16%)
min: 41851     avg: 47143     median: 45193 (45%)     max: 54848 Points
21830 Points (22%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
866 ms (1%)
min: 456     avg: 507     median: 479 (1%)     max: 828 ms
867 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 85435     avg: 97010     median: 100627 (74%)     max: 102947 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 133.5     avg: 274     median: 283.5 (78%)     max: 348 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
204 Points (37%)
min: 171.4     avg: 301.6     median: 316 (57%)     max: 340 Points
211 Points (38%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1104     avg: 1871     median: 1912 (72%)     max: 2146 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
139 Watt (24%)
min: 38.1     avg: 100     median: 100.1 (17%)     max: 154 Watt
131.6 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
101.5 Watt (19%)
min: 66.1     avg: 123.7     median: 114.8 (21%)     max: 196.9 Watt
122.5 Watt (22%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 2.9     avg: 13.7     median: 14.5 (10%)     max: 28.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.85     avg: 13.3     median: 12.3 (14%)     max: 24 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
6.3 Points per Watt (5%)
min: 13.6     avg: 27.8     median: 22 (16%)     max: 97.6 Points per Watt
8 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-9100F → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900H → 251% n=41

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9400F → 131% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 25. 14:45:49

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12190 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14717 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 12197 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1756125948s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 25 Aug 2025 05:18:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12190 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 12190 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14717 +0.005s ... 0.021s

#11 got single benchmarks 14717 +0.036s ... 0.057s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12197 +0.004s ... 0.061s

#13 got single benchmarks 12197 +0.004s ... 0.066s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.066s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.095s ... 0.161s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.161s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)