Geekom XT13 Pro review: NUC mini-PC does without Meteor Lake and only gets an Intel Core i9-13900H
The Geekom XT13 Pro inherits the Geekom XT12 Pro and comes in the top configuration with an Intel Core i9-13900H equipped. There is also 32 GB DDR4 RAM and a 2 TB SSD, although this comes at a price. The price is 949 USD/949 GBP, so it's really no bargain. For 679 USD/649 GBP, the Geekom XT13 Pro is available with an Intel Core i7-13620H and a 1 TB SSD. Geekom has decided not to use the newer Meteor Lake processors and is sticking with the older Raptor Lake processors. This test will show whether this is the right way to stand up to the competition.
The question also arises as to whether this pricing is justified. We will also address this important point specifically after the performance analysis. In any case, the manufacturer itself sets the bar very high.
Possible competitors in comparison
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Memory | Weight | Height |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
72.4 % | v8 | 08 / 2024 | Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32768 MB | 555 g | 37 mm |
80.8 % | v8 | 06 / 2024 | Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 32768 MB | 653 g | 60 mm |
87.5 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | 32768 MB | 863 g | 48.6 mm |
83.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 32768 MB | 768 g | 57 mm |
84.1 % | v8 | 04 / 2024 | Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32768 MB | 545 g | 37 mm |
82.6 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | 32768 MB | 417 g | 38 mm |
Note: We have updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7 available here.
Case - Perfect processing of metal and plastic
The housing of the Geekom XT13 Pro is familiar, it was used for the Geekom XT12 Pro. A similarity with the Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit cannot be denied either. Basically, there is nothing wrong with the look. Our test sample is once again perfectly finished and everything fits together wonderfully. Nevertheless, we would have liked to see a new casing to differentiate it slightly from the internal competition. The mini-PC only takes up 11.7 x 11.2 centimeters on the desk, making it one of the more compact devices. The Geekom XT13 Pro can also be attached directly to a monitor using the supplied VESA mount.
Equipment - Good selection and 2x USB4
In terms of external interfaces, the Geekom XT13 Pro has the same options as the Geekom XT12 Pro. Although the device is very compact, there are many different connections. The two USB-C sockets on the back are modern USB4 ports, greatly expanding the range of applications with the right accessories. A total of four screens can be operated simultaneously and there is also a LAN connection.
Communication
The Geekom XT13 Pro uses a well-known wireless module that Geekom installs in many of its devices. The MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 WLAN module can provide adequate performance in our test device. If possible, however, the 6 GHz frequency range should primarily be used. Alternatively, the cable connection can also be used. Data rates of up to 2.5 GBit/s are then even possible.
Accessories
The scope of delivery of the Geekom XT13 Pro offers the usual standard. In addition to the device itself, the box also contains the 120-watt power supply unit and a VESA bracket with mounting material. An HDMI cable and the obligatory thank you card from Geekom are also included.
Maintenance
The Geekom XT13 Pro is easy to open. Only four small screws need to be loosened on the underside, which secure the base plate to the rest of the case. There is an SSD cooler on the base plate itself, which is why you should be a little more careful at this point. The RAM and mass storage are then easily accessible. In our case, an additional SSD can be installed. However, the correct standard must be observed here, as only SATA SSDs with a length of 42 millimeters are compatible.
Sustainability
The Geekom XT13 Pro is delivered in a comparatively large box with a lot of "air". We have seen Geekom do things differently. Furthermore, the standard accessories supplied are packed in separate plastic bags, which could be improved in terms of sustainability. The device itself is mainly made of metal and plastic. However, we do not know whether recycled materials have been used in its manufacture. On a positive note, the manufacturer offers a 36-month warranty.
Performance - Intel Core i9-13900H with 14 cores and 20 threads
The Geekom XT13 Pro comes in the top configuration with the Intel Core i9-13900H in the top configuration. Alternatively, the NUC PC can also be equipped with a slightly weaker Intel Core i7-13620H which is also equipped with 6P cores and should only be at a slight disadvantage to the top model in terms of performance. 32 GB DDR4 RAM is always included, although the fast NVMe SSD provides a solid basic configuration. The Geekom XT13 Pro is also not an insurmountable task for performance-hungry applications. Nevertheless, the 3D performance of the iGPU is the biggest weak point, but this can be noticeably improved with an eGPU.
Test conditions
For all performance tests with the Geekom XT13 Pro, we use the "High performance" energy profile. There were only deviations from this in the power consumption and noise measurements according to our Test criteria. In accordance with the manufacturer's specifications, Geekom allows the SoC to operate at the lowest power consumption. In figures, this means a power limit of 35 watts under continuous load, although up to 64 watts are allowed for short periods.
Processor
The Intel Core i9-13900H is based on the Raptor Lake architecture and combines 6P and 8E cores. Technically, there are Intel Core i9-12900H as we can see from our benchmark results in the performance rating compared to the Geekom XT12 Pro. In detail, however, we do see a slight advantage in favor of the Intel Core i9-13900H, which can draw attention to itself with a slightly better multi-core performance. One AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS or Intel's newer models from the Meteor Lake series. However, the gap to the slightly faster models of the competitors is not very large. There is no question of a noticeable difference in performance in everyday use due to the small differences.
You can find more benchmarks for the processors here.
Performance rating - Percent | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Cinebench 2024 | |
CPU Multi Core | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
CPU Single Core | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
wPrime 2.10 | |
32m | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
1024m | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 |
WinRAR - Result | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro |
Geekbench 5.0 | |
5.0 Multi-Core | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
5.0 Single-Core | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A7 |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance rating | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Average of class Mini PC (770 - 82725, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (4141 - 227429, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (290 - 9475, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Average of class Mini PC (8208 - 184747, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Average of class Mini PC (408 - 31931, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Average of class Mini PC (2089 - 121827, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (7948 - 325960, n=111, last 2 years) | |
Aoostar GEM12 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Average of class Mini PC (596 - 2431, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Average of class Mini PC (432 - 43587, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Average of class Mini PC (5333 - 94259, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
The Cinebench R15 continuous loop of our test sample runs almost parallel to that of the Geekom XT12 Pro. In the end, however, the newer XT13 Pro model is able to pull away with a clear lead. It can also be seen that the small cooling system does not manage to maintain the SoC's Turbo over a longer period of time. The maximum power limit of 64 watts is only reached for a short time because the power consumption has to be throttled due to the high temperatures.
System performance
In the system performance tests, the documented performance of the Geekom XT13 Pro is only good enough for a place at the bottom of the rankings. Subjectively, however, we can say that the Geekom XT13 Pro offers decent performance. We were unable to observe any noticeable latencies when working with the device during the test phase. When it comes to the choice of RAM, the slower DDR4 standard takes its revenge, as can be seen from the AIDA64 benchmarks. Technically, the Intel Core i9-13900H could be combined with DDR5 (5,200 MT/s).
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (8377 - 163031, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Average of class Mini PC (8974 - 123769, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom XT13 Pro |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Average of class Mini PC (8762 - 216693, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Average of class Mini PC (88.8 - 184.8, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latencies
We do not see extremely excessive DPC latencies with the Geekom XT13 Pro. This was the case with the Geekom XT12 Pro. Nevertheless, our test sample is far from outstanding results. We reached the maximum value even when simply surfing with the Edge browser.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 |
* ... smaller is better
Mass storage
The Geekom XT13 Pro is equipped with an SSD with 2 TB of storage space from Acer. The same model was already in the Geekom GT13 and delivered a great performance across all tests. The technical connection is optimal and the resulting transfer rates are very high. Under continuous load, the Acer N7000 has slight problems keeping the read performance stable. Fortunately, there is no extreme disadvantage. As can be seen from the graph, the Acer N7000 can still perform significantly better with reduced read performance than the Geekom XT12 Pro or the Acemagic F2A. The test of the Geekom XT12 Pro revealed a problem with the position of the thermal pad, which is not the case with the Geekom XT13 Pro. The thermal pads are in the correct position. As we already mentioned in the maintenance section, an additional SSD can be installed in the Geekom XT13 Pro. However, the second M.2 slot only supports SATA SSDs with a length of 42 millimeters (M.2-2242).
For further comparisons and benchmarks, please refer to our Comparison table.
Drive Performance rating - Percent | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Average of class Mini PC | |
Acemagic F2A |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics
The Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 handles the 3D calculations and is responsible for the image output. With 96 EUs, the Intel Core i9-13900H is the fastest model in the series. However, the outdated model has a hard time asserting itself against the modern representatives. If Geekom had already dared to take the step of installing a Meteor Lake SoC in the XT13 Pro, a clearly noticeable increase in 3D performance could have been expected. The performance of an Intel Arc 8-core iGPU can be seen perfectly in the comparison data. Meanwhile, you get even more 3D performance if an AMD Radeon 780M is installed in the system. Geekom itself now offers several devices with this iGPU, which means that the manufacturer is making life difficult for itself in this discipline. One example of this is the Geekom A7, the Geekom A8, or the Geekom AE7.
Further comparisons and benchmarks can be found in our GPU comparison table.
3DMark Performance rating - Percent | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Extreme Preset DX11 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A7 |
Unigine Superposition | |
1280x720 720p Low | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 1080p High | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
ComputeMark v2.1 | |
1024x600 Normal, Score | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit | |
Room GPUs-only | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Sala GPUs-only | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 |
Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 |
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-13900H | Aoostar GEM12, AMD Radeon 780M R7 8845HS | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 9 185H | Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 7 155H | Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-12900H | Geekom A7, AMD Radeon 780M R9 7940HS | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPECviewperf 2020 | 309% | 36% | 25% | -4% | 278% | 389% | |
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) (fps) | 3.63 | 11.2 209% | 4.23 17% | 5.05 39% | 3.49 -4% | 11.1 206% | 17.1 ? 371% |
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) (fps) | 3.15 | 19.9 532% | 6.03 91% | 4.61 46% | 3.05 -3% | 14.1 348% | 23.9 ? 659% |
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) (fps) | 16 | 33.4 109% | 18.5 16% | 17.9 12% | 14.8 -7% | 31.4 96% | 42 ? 163% |
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) (fps) | 7.9 | 23.2 194% | 11.1 41% | 10 27% | 7.78 -2% | 24.8 214% | 27.7 ? 251% |
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) (fps) | 10.3 | 20.4 98% | 14.9 45% | 12.9 25% | 9.69 -6% | 20.9 103% | 37 ? 259% |
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) (fps) | 6.13 | 64.1 946% | 6.24 2% | 5.7 -7% | 6.29 3% | 61.4 902% | 52.9 ? 763% |
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) (fps) | 26.8 | 47.7 78% | 37.7 41% | 35.4 32% | 23.9 -11% | 47 75% | 95 ? 254% |
3DMark 05 Standard | 29045 points | |
3DMark 06 Score 1366x768 | 30156 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 28599 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 8024 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 155640 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 28112 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5448 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 2570 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1920 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 183 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 1276 points | |
Help |
Gaming performance
The Intel Iris Xe iGPU is unable to cope with most games. The aged iGPU only achieves adequate frame rates, if at all, in low resolutions and a low or medium graphics preset. If you still want to use the Geekom XT13 Pro for gaming, you have to take the detour via an external graphics card. Various models can be used with the device via USB4.
Dota 2 Reborn | |
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
1920x1080 high (2/3) | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
GTA V | |
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Baldur's Gate 3 | |
1280x720 Low Preset AA:SM | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro |
F1 24 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro |
FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 123.5 | 105.9 | 22.1 | 9 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 117.2 | 82.9 | 72.5 | 66.5 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 46 | 25.7 | 18.2 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 19.9 | 15.4 | 13.5 | 13 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 18.6 | 15 | 13 | 11.4 |
F1 24 (2024) | 43.1 | 37.3 | 26.7 |
Geekom XT13 Pro performance check with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The Geekom XT13 Pro has two USB4 ports, which support the use of external graphics cards. Without influencing the overall result, we carried out some tests with the Razer Core X and an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Compared to the aged iGPU of the Intel Core i9-13900H, the 3D performance can be massively increased. The comparison with the other test devices shows an almost identical result in the synthetic tests. Gaming performance can also be significantly increased with this combination, as can be seen from the games tested. Sometimes even the most modern games can be enjoyed in full detail.
Performance rating - Percent | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Unigine Superposition | |
1280x720 720p Low | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1920x1080 1080p High | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
3840x2160 4k Optimized | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
7680x4320 8k Optimized | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Extreme Preset DX11 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
ComputeMark v2.1 | |
1024x600 Normal, Score | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Photoshop PugetBench - GPU Score | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) |
Premiere Pro PugetBench - GPU 0.9 | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | |
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro |
Baldur's Gate 3 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:SM | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro |
F1 24 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) |
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-13900H | Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), i9-13900H | Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), i9-13900H | Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), i9-12900H | Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), Ultra 5 125H | Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), R9 7940HS | Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), R9 8945HS | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPECviewperf 2020 | 391% | 387% | 321% | 182% | 395% | 516% | 389% | |
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) (fps) | 3.63 | 13 258% | 10.8 198% | 11.8 225% | 10.9 200% | 13 258% | 10.8 198% | 17.1 ? 371% |
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) (fps) | 3.15 | 20.9 563% | 21 567% | 18.9 500% | 17.8 465% | 20.9 563% | 50.3 1497% | 23.9 ? 659% |
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) (fps) | 16 | 74.2 364% | 76.4 378% | 62.7 292% | 26.6 66% | 76.8 380% | 76.6 379% | 42 ? 163% |
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) (fps) | 7.9 | 39.4 399% | 40.1 408% | 32.8 315% | 23.6 199% | 39.2 396% | 38.8 391% | 27.7 ? 251% |
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) (fps) | 10.3 | 47.2 358% | 47.3 359% | 40 288% | 28.7 179% | 46.5 351% | 45.9 346% | 37 ? 259% |
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) (fps) | 6.13 | 16.5 169% | 16.5 169% | 15.2 148% | 11.4 86% | 16.6 171% | 16.6 171% | 52.9 ? 763% |
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) (fps) | 26.8 | 194 624% | 196 631% | 155 478% | 47.5 77% | 199 643% | 195 628% | 95 ? 254% |
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 182.2 | 178.4 | 170.3 | 104.2 | 92.7 | 103.4 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 165.8 | 138.3 | 132 | 121.9 | 104.6 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 183.7 | 142.2 | 98.8 | 77.6 | 48.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 146.4 | 137.9 | 106.3 | 92.1 | ||
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 113 | 91.3 | 79 | 78.5 | 61.6 | 37.1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 88.2 | 81.4 | 71.7 | 64.4 | 44.5 | 22.2 |
F1 24 (2024) | 76.9 | 73.1 | 60.5 | 42.2 | 36.9 | 19.2 |
Emissions - Weak cooling and low power consumption
Noise emissions
Even the devices of the same design were not able to impress with top values in terms of noise emissions. This also applies to the Geekom XT13 Pro, at least under load. The mini-PC is very quiet when idle and is barely audible. However, the fan is always running, which means that semi-passive operation is not possible. Under load, the fan occasionally revs up considerably, and we were able to measure a peak sound pressure level of 49.5 dB(A). However, the maximum volume is not always present. During the stress test, the fan speed fluctuated again and again, so that the Geekom XT13 Pro only reached 38 dB(A) under load. We observed the same phenomenon under average load. Here, the measurable volume fluctuates between 38 and 42.2 dB(A).
Unfortunately, the Geekom XT12 Pro is not one of the quietest devices. The device only works almost silently when idling, only a quiet fan noise is audible. This changes under load, as the mini-PC is clearly audible at up to 44.2 dB(A). We were even able to measure up to 47.2 dB(A) during gaming. However, we were unable to detect a permanently high sound pressure level during gaming. Here, the result fluctuated between 39 and 47.2 dB(A).
Noise level
Idle |
| 27.6 / 27.8 / 27.9 dB(A) |
Load |
| 42.2 / 49.5 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 10% | 1% | 2% | 2% | -9% | |
off / environment * (dB) | 25 | 24.3 3% | 24.1 4% | 24.9 -0% | 25.4 -2% | 25.4 -2% |
Idle Minimum * (dB) | 27.6 | 27.5 -0% | 29.8 -8% | 25.4 8% | 28 -1% | 33.3 -21% |
Idle Average * (dB) | 27.8 | 27.6 1% | 29.9 -8% | 25.7 8% | 28.1 -1% | 33.6 -21% |
Idle Maximum * (dB) | 27.9 | 27.6 1% | 30 -8% | 25.7 8% | 28.5 -2% | 33.7 -21% |
Load Average * (dB) | 42.2 | 36 15% | 37.3 12% | 47.8 -13% | 39.6 6% | 43.3 -3% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 46.6 | 35.4 24% | ||||
Load Maximum * (dB) | 49.5 | 38.2 23% | 43.5 12% | 49 1% | 44.2 11% | 43.3 13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 35.4 | 40.2 | 45.23 | 47.2 | 43.2 |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
The casing heats up noticeably under load. However, we cannot find any critical values. The SoC looks a little different, as Geekom does not limit the maximum temperature, which quickly reaches 100 °C under load. Unlike the Cinebench R15 multi-loop, the Intel Core i9-13900H does not exceed the 64-watt limit in the stress test. The SoC heats up too quickly and the performance has to be reduced. Over a longer period of time, the temperature then stabilizes at around 90 °C, which is not a problem for the processor. The extremely compact design simply makes it impossible to install a more powerful cooling system.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.6 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.3 °C / 90 F.
Power consumption
The power consumption of the Geekom XT13 Pro compares very favorably with its competitors. We only measured low values even in idle mode. The low power limits (PL1 and PL2) of the Intel Core i9-13900H ensure a relatively low energy requirement under load. Under average load, the system manages with a little less than 50 watts. Under load, we only see the 94.5 watts for a short time when the system can still make use of the Turbo. We were able to observe a somewhat peculiar behavior. In the Cinebench R23 Sigle test, we documented a lot of spikes, which has never been seen in other test devices. We repeated the test several times - with the same result. It is reasonable to assume that the SoC is repeatedly working at a temperature limit in this case, which allows it to briefly absorb more power. The power supply is provided by a small power supply unit with 120 watts. The same power supply unit is included with many Geekom devices.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -38% | -34% | -35% | -21% | 11% | 1% | -45% | |
Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 6.3 | 8.2 -30% | 8.2 -30% | 9.1 -44% | 5.7 10% | 3.8 40% | 5.48 ? 13% | 9.51 ? -51% |
Idle Average * (Watt) | 7.1 | 10 -41% | 12.1 -70% | 10.3 -45% | 9.5 -34% | 4.8 32% | 8.65 ? -22% | 11.7 ? -65% |
Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 9 | 14.6 -62% | 14 -56% | 14.4 -60% | 16.5 -83% | 6.5 28% | 10.9 ? -21% | 15.1 ? -68% |
Load Average * (Watt) | 49.8 | 73.9 -48% | 53.1 -7% | 54.9 -10% | 53.3 -7% | 71.9 -44% | 45.6 ? 8% | 62.3 ? -25% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 54 | 79.9 -48% | ||||||
Load Maximum * (Watt) | 94.5 | 95.3 -1% | 100.4 -6% | 110.4 -17% | 87.8 7% | 94.7 -0% | 67.8 ? 28% | 107.5 ? -14% |
* ... smaller is better
Efficiency
Performance rating - Percent | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Power Consumption | |
Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Cinebench R15 Multi Efficiency (external Monitor) | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Power consumption with external monitor
Power consumption with external monitor
Pros
Cons
Verdict - Premium price without premium performance
The Geekom XT13 Pro is a powerful mini-PC. However, we were already able to attest to this with the Geekom XT12 Pro. If we only compare these two models with each other, you can opt for the older device without any noticeable loss of performance. The Intel Core i9-13900H of the Geekom XT13 Pro cannot provide a noticeable increase in performance. The technical differences compared to the Intel Core i9-12900H are too small. Geekom does not dare to take the bold step of a mini-PC based on the Meteor Lake series. This means that Geekom is left behind, as many other manufacturers have already equipped their model series with the latest processors from Intel. The biggest disadvantage of the Geekom XT13 Pro is the iGPU, which is inferior to the modern representatives in all tests. However, Geekom is not only inferior to its competitors here but also to itself. Geekom's own portfolio includes mini-PCs with the latest AMD SoCs, which are technically not much worse, but deliver an all-round better result. We haven't even looked at the price yet. Unfortunately, the Geekom XT13 Pro is completely out of line here. 999 euros is currently on the bill if it is to be the top model. Other mini-PCs cost a little less but offer more performance.
The Geekom XT13 Pro delivers adequate performance with the Intel Core i9-13900H and impresses with its versatile features. However, the price-performance ratio of the Geekom XT13 Pro does not match up at all.
The good connectivity, with which Geekom has repeatedly scored points in the past, should be emphasized positively. The numerous connections include two USB4 ports, which may influence the purchase decision in terms of future-proofing. The three-year manufacturer's warranty also speaks in favor of a device from Geekom. Of course, this is also available for other devices from the manufacturer. The efficiency could only be increased slightly compared to the Geekom XT12 Pro. In this discipline, the Intel Core i9-13900H is clearly inferior to the more modern Meteor Lake processors. For this reason, we cannot give the Geekom XT13 Pro a purchase recommendation, even in relation to the high purchase price. If the Geekom XT13 Pro is not to become a shelf warmer, Geekom urgently needs to revise its current pricing.
Price and availability
The Geekom XT13 Pro is available from Geekom (US or UK). Get now 140 GPB off with the discount code NOTE140OFF.
Note: We have recently updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. Further information can be found here.
Geekom XT13 Pro
- 07/30/2024 v8
Sebastian Bade
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.