Notebookcheck Logo

Geekom XT13 Pro review: NUC mini-PC does without Meteor Lake and only gets an Intel Core i9-13900H

Limited progress! Geekom has presented the XT13 Pro as a powerful NUC mini-PC based on an Intel Core i9-13900H. This means that Intel's Meteor Lake processors are still left out. We have analyzed how well the high-end model of the Raptor Lake H series performs against the newer processors using numerous measurements and benchmarks.

The Geekom XT13 Pro inherits the Geekom XT12 Pro and comes in the top configuration with an Intel Core i9-13900H equipped. There is also 32 GB DDR4 RAM and a 2 TB SSD, although this comes at a price. The price is 949 USD/949 GBP, so it's really no bargain. For 679 USD/649 GBP, the Geekom XT13 Pro is available with an Intel Core i7-13620H and a 1 TB SSD. Geekom has decided not to use the newer Meteor Lake processors and is sticking with the older Raptor Lake processors. This test will show whether this is the right way to stand up to the competition.

The question also arises as to whether this pricing is justified. We will also address this important point specifically after the performance analysis. In any case, the manufacturer itself sets the bar very high.

Geekom XT13 Pro
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 - 5.4 GHz, Raptor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR4-3200, 2 von 2 belegt, max. 64 GB
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Acer N7000, 2048 GB 
, 1760 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, 2 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5mm Klinke
Networking
Intel Ethernet Controller I226-V (10/2500MBit/s), MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 37 x 117 x 112 ( = 1.46 x 4.61 x 4.41 in)
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Additional features
120-Watt-Netzteil, VESA-Mount, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
555 g ( = 19.58 oz / 1.22 pounds), Power Supply: 260 g ( = 9.17 oz / 0.57 pounds)
Price
999 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Memory
Weight
Height
72.4 %v8
08/2024
Geekom XT13 Pro
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
32768 MB555 g37 mm
80.8 %v8
06/2024
Aoostar GEM12
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
32768 MB653 g60 mm
87.5 %v7 (old)
05/2024
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
32768 MB863 g48.6 mm
83.4 %v7 (old)
04/2024
Acemagic F2A
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
32768 MB768 g57 mm
84.1 %v8
04/2024
Geekom XT12 Pro
i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
32768 MB545 g37 mm
82.6 %v7 (old)
03/2024
Geekom A7
R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
32768 MB417 g38 mm

Note: We have updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7 available here.

Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro with power supply unit (19 V; 6.32 A)
Power supply unit (19 V; 6.32 A)
Geekom XT13 Pro - DDR4-RAM

Case - Perfect processing of metal and plastic

The housing of the Geekom XT13 Pro is familiar, it was used for the Geekom XT12 Pro. A similarity with the Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit cannot be denied either. Basically, there is nothing wrong with the look. Our test sample is once again perfectly finished and everything fits together wonderfully. Nevertheless, we would have liked to see a new casing to differentiate it slightly from the internal competition. The mini-PC only takes up 11.7 x 11.2 centimeters on the desk, making it one of the more compact devices. The Geekom XT13 Pro can also be attached directly to a monitor using the supplied VESA mount.

Size comparison

146 mm / 5.75 in 146 mm / 5.75 in 57 mm / 2.24 in 768 g1.693 lbs145 mm / 5.71 in 145 mm / 5.71 in 48.6 mm / 1.913 in 863 g1.903 lbs130 mm / 5.12 in 130 mm / 5.12 in 60 mm / 2.36 in 653 g1.44 lbs117 mm / 4.61 in 112 mm / 4.41 in 37 mm / 1.457 in 555 g1.224 lbs117 mm / 4.61 in 112 mm / 4.41 in 37 mm / 1.457 in 545 g1.202 lbs112 mm / 4.41 in 112 mm / 4.41 in 38 mm / 1.496 in 417 g0.919 lbs210 mm / 8.27 in 148 mm / 5.83 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 2.9 g0.00639 lbs

Equipment - Good selection and 2x USB4

In terms of external interfaces, the Geekom XT13 Pro has the same options as the Geekom XT12 Pro. Although the device is very compact, there are many different connections. The two USB-C sockets on the back are modern USB4 ports, greatly expanding the range of applications with the right accessories. A total of four screens can be operated simultaneously and there is also a LAN connection.

The connection equipment on the Geekom XT13 Pro (Source: Geekom)
The connection equipment on the Geekom XT13 Pro (Source: Geekom)

Communication

WLAN module
WLAN module

The Geekom XT13 Pro uses a well-known wireless module that Geekom installs in many of its devices. The MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 WLAN module can provide adequate performance in our test device. If possible, however, the 6 GHz frequency range should primarily be used. Alternatively, the cable connection can also be used. Data rates of up to 2.5 GBit/s are then even possible.

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Acemagic F2A
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1770 (1584min - 1790max) MBit/s +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1761 (1734min - 1774max) MBit/s +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1716 (1560min - 1782max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (684 - 1771, n=37)
1440 MBit/s -16%
Geekom A7
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1375 (688min - 1438max) MBit/s -20%
Average of class Mini PC
  (684 - 1771, n=53, last 2 years)
1350 MBit/s -21%
Geekom XT12 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1152 (576min - 1273max) MBit/s -33%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Acemagic F2A
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1615 (767min - 1670max) MBit/s +12%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1562 (1198min - 1713max) MBit/s +8%
Geekom XT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1440 (1352min - 1553max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (394 - 1800, n=36)
1416 MBit/s -2%
Geekom A7
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1367 (1268min - 1443max) MBit/s -5%
Geekom XT12 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1315 (691min - 1352max) MBit/s -9%
Average of class Mini PC
  (394 - 1800, n=54, last 2 years)
1283 MBit/s -11%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1599 (802min - 1683max) MBit/s +65%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (707 - 1775, n=52)
1412 MBit/s +46%
Geekom XT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
969 (946min - 981max) MBit/s
Average of class Mini PC
  (192.9 - 1796, n=107, last 2 years)
934 MBit/s -4%
Geekom XT12 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
892 (460min - 921max) MBit/s -8%
Geekom A7
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
858 (827min - 886max) MBit/s -11%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
838 (728min - 926max) MBit/s -14%
Aoostar GEM12
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
740 (676min - 758max) MBit/s -24%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1566 (904min - 1695max) MBit/s +94%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (358 - 1785, n=52)
1287 MBit/s +60%
Average of class Mini PC
  (184.1 - 1776, n=107, last 2 years)
860 MBit/s +7%
Geekom A7
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
831 (755min - 940max) MBit/s +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
806 (765min - 844max) MBit/s
Aoostar GEM12
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
736 (369min - 756max) MBit/s -9%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
709 (369min - 977max) MBit/s -12%
Geekom XT12 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
589 (295min - 624max) MBit/s -27%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1441 (1352-1553)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1562 (1198-1713)
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1715 (1560-1782)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1760 (1734-1774)
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø969 (946-981)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1572 (802-1683)
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø806 (765-844)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1566 (904-1695)

Accessories

The scope of delivery of the Geekom XT13 Pro offers the usual standard. In addition to the device itself, the box also contains the 120-watt power supply unit and a VESA bracket with mounting material. An HDMI cable and the obligatory thank you card from Geekom are also included.

Scope of delivery of the Geekom XT13 Pro
Scope of delivery of the Geekom XT13 Pro

Maintenance

The Geekom XT13 Pro is easy to open. Only four small screws need to be loosened on the underside, which secure the base plate to the rest of the case. There is an SSD cooler on the base plate itself, which is why you should be a little more careful at this point. The RAM and mass storage are then easily accessible. In our case, an additional SSD can be installed. However, the correct standard must be observed here, as only SATA SSDs with a length of 42 millimeters are compatible.

Geekom XT13 Pro open
Geekom XT13 Pro disassembled
Geekom XT13 Pro without RAM and SSD
Cooling unit on the Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro disassembled

Sustainability

The Geekom XT13 Pro is delivered in a comparatively large box with a lot of "air". We have seen Geekom do things differently. Furthermore, the standard accessories supplied are packed in separate plastic bags, which could be improved in terms of sustainability. The device itself is mainly made of metal and plastic. However, we do not know whether recycled materials have been used in its manufacture. On a positive note, the manufacturer offers a 36-month warranty.

Performance - Intel Core i9-13900H with 14 cores and 20 threads

The Geekom XT13 Pro comes in the top configuration with the Intel Core i9-13900H in the top configuration. Alternatively, the NUC PC can also be equipped with a slightly weaker Intel Core i7-13620H which is also equipped with 6P cores and should only be at a slight disadvantage to the top model in terms of performance. 32 GB DDR4 RAM is always included, although the fast NVMe SSD provides a solid basic configuration. The Geekom XT13 Pro is also not an insurmountable task for performance-hungry applications. Nevertheless, the 3D performance of the iGPU is the biggest weak point, but this can be noticeably improved with an eGPU.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO

Test conditions

For all performance tests with the Geekom XT13 Pro, we use the "High performance" energy profile. There were only deviations from this in the power consumption and noise measurements according to our Test criteria. In accordance with the manufacturer's specifications, Geekom allows the SoC to operate at the lowest power consumption. In figures, this means a power limit of 35 watts under continuous load, although up to 64 watts are allowed for short periods.

Processor

Intel Core i9-13900H (Source: Geekom)
Intel Core i9-13900H (Source: Geekom)

The Intel Core i9-13900H is based on the Raptor Lake architecture and combines 6P and 8E cores. Technically, there are Intel Core i9-12900H as we can see from our benchmark results in the performance rating compared to the Geekom XT12 Pro. In detail, however, we do see a slight advantage in favor of the Intel Core i9-13900H, which can draw attention to itself with a slightly better multi-core performance. One AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS or Intel's newer models from the Meteor Lake series. However, the gap to the slightly faster models of the competitors is not very large. There is no question of a noticeable difference in performance in everyday use due to the small differences.

You can find more benchmarks for the processors here.

Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R20
Cinebench R20
Cinebench R23
Cinebench R23
Cinebench 2024
Cinebench 2024
Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
58.5 pt
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
58.2 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
58 pt
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
56.7 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
54.6 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
53.2 pt
Cinebench 2024
CPU Multi Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1067 Points +57%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1022 Points +50%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
933 Points +37%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
922 Points +36%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
680 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
578 Points -15%
CPU Single Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
110 Points +7%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
108 Points +5%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
108 Points +5%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
107 Points +4%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
106 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
103 Points
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
18497 Points +54%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
18016 Points +50%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
16130 Points +34%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
15556 Points +30%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
11997 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
11036 Points -8%
Single Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1851 Points +8%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
1824 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1783 Points +4%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1771 Points +3%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1747 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
1719 Points
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
279 Points +14%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
278 Points +13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
268 Points +9%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
258 Points +5%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
251 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
245 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2746 Points +12%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2738 Points +12%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2537 Points +4%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2470 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
2448 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
2121 Points -13%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
715 Points +10%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
701 Points +8%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
692 Points +7%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
691 Points +6%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
679 Points +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
649 Points
CPU (Multi Core)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7196 Points +46%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7188 Points +46%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6346 Points +29%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6277 Points +27%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
4935 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
4294 Points -13%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
3.34 Points +14%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
3.32 Points +13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3.27 Points +12%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3.13 Points +7%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
2.99 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
2.93 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
33.95 Points +19%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
33.49 Points +18%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
29.8 Points +5%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
29.76 Points +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
28.47 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
21.11 Points -26%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14374 Points +6%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
14300 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
14163 Points +5%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13938 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
13515 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
13378 Points -1%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
95005 Points +24%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
88902 Points +16%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
85872 Points +12%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
84721 Points +11%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
76558 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
69621 Points -9%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
296 Seconds * -13%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
261 Seconds *
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
202 Seconds * +23%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
197 Seconds * +25%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
178 Seconds * +32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
171 Seconds * +34%
wPrime 2.10
32m
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
4.111 s * -17%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3.523 s * -0%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
3.521 s *
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3.254 s * +8%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2.703 s * +23%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2.648 s * +25%
1024m
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
441.275 s * -3%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
429.446 s *
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
202.68 s * +53%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
139.617 s * +67%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
98.896 s * +77%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
98.222 s * +77%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 1
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
335.5 (329min - 340max) fps +13%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
325 (323min - 328max) fps +9%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
297.5 (283min - 313max) fps
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
292.5 (291min - 296max) fps -2%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
289 (286min - 292max) fps -3%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
262 (259min - 282max) fps -12%
Pass 2
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
158.2 (157.4min - 158.8max) fps +44%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
154.15 (153.8min - 154.3max) fps +40%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
143.7 (143min - 145.2max) fps +30%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
140.8 (138.2min - 144.7max) fps +28%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
110.15 (104.3min - 134.9max) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
92.2 (91min - 114.5max) fps -16%
WinRAR - Result
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
7945 KB/s +25%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7940 KB/s +25%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7723 KB/s +21%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
7490 KB/s +18%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
7327 KB/s +15%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
6365 KB/s
TrueCrypt
AES Mean 100MB
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
15.1 GB/s +14%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
14.4 GB/s +8%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
13.3 GB/s
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
11.3 GB/s -15%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
11.2 GB/s -16%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10.6 GB/s -20%
Twofish Mean 100MB
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
2.3 GB/s
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2.1 GB/s -9%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2 GB/s -13%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
1.9 GB/s -17%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1.8 GB/s -22%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1.7 GB/s -26%
Serpent Mean 100MB
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1.3 GB/s 0%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1.3 GB/s 0%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
1.3 GB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
1.1 GB/s -15%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1.1 GB/s -15%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1 GB/s -23%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
13392 Points +16%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12662 Points +10%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
12261 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12143 Points +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
11536 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
10028 Points -13%
Single-Core
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2008 Points +18%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1958 Points +15%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1856 Points +9%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
1790 Points +5%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1746 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
1708 Points
Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Multi-Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
13228 Points +15%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12438 Points +8%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
12127 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12086 Points +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
11464 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
9892 Points -14%
5.0 Single-Core
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1918 Points +14%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1900 Points +13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1821 Points +9%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
1710 Points +2%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1708 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
1678 Points
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
8253 Points +12%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
8034 Points +9%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
7635 Points +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7602 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
7389 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6927 Points -6%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
48723 Points +14%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
47960 Points +12%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
47777 Points +12%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
45250 Points +6%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
42713 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
37359 Points -13%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
22600 Points +25%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
21875 Points +21%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
21762 Points +20%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
20846 Points +15%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
18126 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
16634 Points -8%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
71934 MIPS +28%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
70733 MIPS +26%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
70707 MIPS +26%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
66438 MIPS +18%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
56068 MIPS
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
47146 MIPS -16%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6744 MIPS +16%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6644 MIPS +14%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
5881 MIPS +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
5828 MIPS
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
5560 MIPS -5%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5485 MIPS -6%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
20.9 fps +42%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
20.6 fps +40%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
20.5 fps +39%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
19.6 fps +33%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
14.7 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
12.3 fps -16%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4693 sec *
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4652 sec * +1%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4632 sec * +1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
0.4627 sec * +1%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
0.4392 sec * +6%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
0.4351 sec * +7%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
54.8 s * -17%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
49.5 s * -6%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
47.5 s * -1%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
46.8 s *
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
44.5 s * +5%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
39.6 s * +15%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
333 Points +23%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
300 Points +11%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
291 Points +7%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
276 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
271 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
264 Points -3%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
550 ms *
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
535 ms * +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
532 ms * +3%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
517 ms * +6%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
511 ms * +7%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
503 ms * +9%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
26194 Points +11%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
26038 Points +10%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
25816 Points +9%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
25043 Points +6%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
23640 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
22242 Points -6%
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
11481 Points +18%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
10824 Points +11%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
10397 Points +7%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10014 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
9741 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
7985 Points -18%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
7.512 s *
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
7.454 s * +1%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
7.442 s * +1%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
7.331 s * +2%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7.168 s * +5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
6.751 s * +10%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
18.402 s * -12%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
18.138 s * -10%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
16.436 s *
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
16.424 s * -0%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16.125 s * +2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14.879 s * +9%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
665.289 s * -57%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
529.929 s * -25%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
424.723 s *
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
396.475 s * +7%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
394.754 s * +7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
304.446 s * +28%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
9326
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
14274 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
76558 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
13515 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
13392
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
53904
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
23.48 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
91.64 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.93 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
28.47 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
90.43 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
2.59 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
245 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
104 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2448 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
96.2 pt
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
92.2 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
82.4 pt
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
78.4 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
58 pt
Average of class Mini PC
 
53.2 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
52.2 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
25916 KRay/s +120%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
25359 KRay/s +115%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
17544 KRay/s +49%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
17312 KRay/s +47%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
11780 KRay/s
Average of class Mini PC
  (561 - 51004, n=120, last 2 years)
11552 KRay/s -2%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
10476 KRay/s -11%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
109747 Points +84%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
107540 Points +80%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
91112 Points +52%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
88829 Points +49%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
59787 Points
Average of class Mini PC
  (3604 - 214250, n=120, last 2 years)
59252 Points -1%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
54166 Points -9%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
4753 MB/s +69%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
4695 MB/s +67%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
4343 MB/s +54%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
4246 MB/s +51%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2813 MB/s
Average of class Mini PC
  (225 - 9399, n=120, last 2 years)
2600 MB/s -8%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2504 MB/s -11%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
118174 Points +29%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
116083 Points +26%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
91925 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
89748 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
87291 Points -5%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
82291 Points -10%
Average of class Mini PC
  (8172 - 184747, n=120, last 2 years)
75427 Points -18%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
14876 Points +82%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
14663 Points +79%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
10759 Points +32%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
10247 Points +25%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
8181 Points
Average of class Mini PC
  (408 - 29064, n=120, last 2 years)
8084 Points -1%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
7317 Points -11%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
58597 Points +99%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
57402 Points +95%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
45718 Points +55%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
44874 Points +53%
Average of class Mini PC
  (1958 - 113499, n=120, last 2 years)
31066 Points +6%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
29407 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
26850 Points -9%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
164414 MB/s +55%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
154066 MB/s +46%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
144741 MB/s +37%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
105740 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
95500 MB/s -10%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
85572 MB/s -19%
Average of class Mini PC
  (3691 - 325960, n=120, last 2 years)
82911 MB/s -22%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
1233 MB/s +51%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1183 MB/s +44%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
1048 MB/s +28%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
1020 MB/s +25%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
819 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
745 MB/s -9%
Average of class Mini PC
  (74.8 - 2039, n=120, last 2 years)
667 MB/s -19%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
13875 KRay/s +122%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
13517 KRay/s +117%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
9284 KRay/s +49%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
9270 KRay/s +49%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
6242 KRay/s
Average of class Mini PC
  (308 - 26952, n=120, last 2 years)
6177 KRay/s -1%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5777 KRay/s -7%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
45560 MPixel/s +61%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
40570 MPixel/s +43%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
40245 MPixel/s +42%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
33092 MPixel/s +17%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
28315 MPixel/s
Average of class Mini PC
  (4408 - 49256, n=120, last 2 years)
26470 MPixel/s -7%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
24858 MPixel/s -12%

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

The Cinebench R15 continuous loop of our test sample runs almost parallel to that of the Geekom XT12 Pro. In the end, however, the newer XT13 Pro model is able to pull away with a clear lead. It can also be seen that the small cooling system does not manage to maintain the SoC's Turbo over a longer period of time. The maximum power limit of 64 watts is only reached for a short time because the power consumption has to be throttled due to the high temperatures.

CPU metrics during the Cinebench R15 loop
CPU metrics during the Cinebench R15 loop
01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø1851 (1675.95-2471.58)
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2530 (2503.13-2552.81)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2784 (2721.64-2831.86)
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2759 (2690.7-2800.92)
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø1545 (1395.97-2133.22)
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2410 (2285.58-2581.81)

System performance

In the system performance tests, the documented performance of the Geekom XT13 Pro is only good enough for a place at the bottom of the rankings. Subjectively, however, we can say that the Geekom XT13 Pro offers decent performance. We were unable to observe any noticeable latencies when working with the device during the test phase. When it comes to the choice of RAM, the slower DDR4 standard takes its revenge, as can be seen from the AIDA64 benchmarks. Technically, the Intel Core i9-13900H could be combined with DDR5 (5,200 MT/s).

PCMark 10 / Score
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
7510 Points +23%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000
7455 Points +22%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
7431 Points +22%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
7120 Points +17%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
6295 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
6102 Points
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
11273 Points +3%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
11125 Points +2%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000
11114 Points +2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
11030 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
10908 Points
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
10822 Points -1%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
10484 Points +40%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
10482 Points +40%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000
10291 Points +37%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
8901 Points +19%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
8114 Points +8%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
7490 Points
CrossMark / Overall
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1939 Points +6%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000
1861 Points +1%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
1860 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
1837 Points
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1802 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1675 Points -9%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
1931 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
1919 Points -1%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1849 Points -4%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1700 Points -12%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000
1540 Points -20%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1378 Points -29%
CrossMark / Creativity
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000
2072 Points +10%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
2040 Points +8%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1929 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
1889 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1883 Points 0%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
1870 Points -1%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1872 Points +7%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
1831 Points +4%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000
1781 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
1756 Points
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1717 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1589 Points -10%
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
71990 MB/s +54%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
67777 MB/s +45%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
67161 MB/s +44%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
62397 MB/s +34%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
46670 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
45792 MB/s -2%
Average of class Mini PC
  (6481 - 76248, n=120, last 2 years)
45562 MB/s -2%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
75449 MB/s +64%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
64323 MB/s +40%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
61542 MB/s +34%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
61006 MB/s +33%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
48963 MB/s +6%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
45998 MB/s
Average of class Mini PC
  (6914 - 83287, n=120, last 2 years)
45976 MB/s 0%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
86810 MB/s +84%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
86677 MB/s +83%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
70596 MB/s +49%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
65057 MB/s +38%
Average of class Mini PC
  (6862 - 89318, n=120, last 2 years)
49743 MB/s +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
47241 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
47201 MB/s 0%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
149 ns * -80%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
146.1 ns * -76%
Average of class Mini PC
  (44.9 - 184.8, n=120, last 2 years)
89.8 ns * -8%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
89 ns * -7%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
88.6 ns * -7%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
83 ns *
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
74.7 ns * +10%

* ... smaller is better

DPC latencies

We do not see extremely excessive DPC latencies with the Geekom XT13 Pro. This was the case with the Geekom XT12 Pro. Nevertheless, our test sample is far from outstanding results. We reached the maximum value even when simply surfing with the Edge browser.

Maximum latency when opening multiple browser tabs
Maximum latency when opening multiple browser tabs
Maximum latency when playing 4K video material
Maximum latency when playing 4K video material
Maximum latency after ten seconds of Prime95
Maximum latency after ten seconds of Prime95
Drivers ranked by longest execution time
Drivers ranked by longest execution time
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
2724 μs * -63%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
2151 μs * -29%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2069.2 μs * -24%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
1671.7 μs *
Geekom A7
Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Acer N5000
1616.1 μs * +3%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1001.9 μs * +40%

* ... smaller is better

Mass storage

Acer N7000 SSD (2 TB)
Acer N7000 SSD (2 TB)

The Geekom XT13 Pro is equipped with an SSD with 2 TB of storage space from Acer. The same model was already in the Geekom GT13 and delivered a great performance across all tests. The technical connection is optimal and the resulting transfer rates are very high. Under continuous load, the Acer N7000 has slight problems keeping the read performance stable. Fortunately, there is no extreme disadvantage. As can be seen from the graph, the Acer N7000 can still perform significantly better with reduced read performance than the Geekom XT12 Pro or the Acemagic F2A. The test of the Geekom XT12 Pro revealed a problem with the position of the thermal pad, which is not the case with the Geekom XT13 Pro. The thermal pads are in the correct position. As we already mentioned in the maintenance section, an additional SSD can be installed in the Geekom XT13 Pro. However, the second M.2 slot only supports SATA SSDs with a length of 42 millimeters (M.2-2242).

For further comparisons and benchmarks, please refer to our Comparison table.

AS SSD
AS SSD
CDM 3
CDM 3
CDM 5
CDM 5
CDM 6
CDM 6
CDI
CDI
Acer N7000
Sequential Read: 3706 MB/s
Sequential Write: 4324 MB/s
512K Read: 2122 MB/s
512K Write: 3620 MB/s
4K Read: 73.35 MB/s
4K Write: 330.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 1038 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 770 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
88.9 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000
82.1 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
65.8 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
58.2 pt
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
54.8 pt
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
45.6 pt
Average of class Mini PC
 
44.2 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
3755 (3733.85min - 3754.99max) MB/s +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000
3690 (2901.41min - 3690.32max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3108 (3065.99min - 3107.56max) MB/s -16%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2315 (2293.84min - 2315.26max) MB/s -37%
Average of class Mini PC
  (233 - 4357, n=119, last 2 years)