Geekom XT13 Pro review: NUC mini-PC does without Meteor Lake and only gets an Intel Core i9-13900H
The Geekom XT13 Pro inherits the Geekom XT12 Pro and comes in the top configuration with an Intel Core i9-13900H equipped. There is also 32 GB DDR4 RAM and a 2 TB SSD, although this comes at a price. The price is 949 USD/949 GBP, so it's really no bargain. For 679 USD/649 GBP, the Geekom XT13 Pro is available with an Intel Core i7-13620H and a 1 TB SSD. Geekom has decided not to use the newer Meteor Lake processors and is sticking with the older Raptor Lake processors. This test will show whether this is the right way to stand up to the competition.
The question also arises as to whether this pricing is justified. We will also address this important point specifically after the performance analysis. In any case, the manufacturer itself sets the bar very high.
Possible competitors in comparison
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Memory | Weight | Height |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
72.4 % | v8 | 08/2024 | Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32768 MB | 555 g | 37 mm |
80.8 % | v8 | 06/2024 | Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 32768 MB | 653 g | 60 mm |
87.5 % | v7 (old) | 05/2024 | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | 32768 MB | 863 g | 48.6 mm |
83.4 % | v7 (old) | 04/2024 | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 32768 MB | 768 g | 57 mm |
84.1 % | v8 | 04/2024 | Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32768 MB | 545 g | 37 mm |
82.6 % | v7 (old) | 03/2024 | Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | 32768 MB | 417 g | 38 mm |
Note: We have updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7 available here.
Case - Perfect processing of metal and plastic
The housing of the Geekom XT13 Pro is familiar, it was used for the Geekom XT12 Pro. A similarity with the Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit cannot be denied either. Basically, there is nothing wrong with the look. Our test sample is once again perfectly finished and everything fits together wonderfully. Nevertheless, we would have liked to see a new casing to differentiate it slightly from the internal competition. The mini-PC only takes up 11.7 x 11.2 centimeters on the desk, making it one of the more compact devices. The Geekom XT13 Pro can also be attached directly to a monitor using the supplied VESA mount.
Equipment - Good selection and 2x USB4
In terms of external interfaces, the Geekom XT13 Pro has the same options as the Geekom XT12 Pro. Although the device is very compact, there are many different connections. The two USB-C sockets on the back are modern USB4 ports, greatly expanding the range of applications with the right accessories. A total of four screens can be operated simultaneously and there is also a LAN connection.
Communication
The Geekom XT13 Pro uses a well-known wireless module that Geekom installs in many of its devices. The MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 WLAN module can provide adequate performance in our test device. If possible, however, the 6 GHz frequency range should primarily be used. Alternatively, the cable connection can also be used. Data rates of up to 2.5 GBit/s are then even possible.
Accessories
The scope of delivery of the Geekom XT13 Pro offers the usual standard. In addition to the device itself, the box also contains the 120-watt power supply unit and a VESA bracket with mounting material. An HDMI cable and the obligatory thank you card from Geekom are also included.
Maintenance
The Geekom XT13 Pro is easy to open. Only four small screws need to be loosened on the underside, which secure the base plate to the rest of the case. There is an SSD cooler on the base plate itself, which is why you should be a little more careful at this point. The RAM and mass storage are then easily accessible. In our case, an additional SSD can be installed. However, the correct standard must be observed here, as only SATA SSDs with a length of 42 millimeters are compatible.
Sustainability
The Geekom XT13 Pro is delivered in a comparatively large box with a lot of "air". We have seen Geekom do things differently. Furthermore, the standard accessories supplied are packed in separate plastic bags, which could be improved in terms of sustainability. The device itself is mainly made of metal and plastic. However, we do not know whether recycled materials have been used in its manufacture. On a positive note, the manufacturer offers a 36-month warranty.
Performance - Intel Core i9-13900H with 14 cores and 20 threads
The Geekom XT13 Pro comes in the top configuration with the Intel Core i9-13900H in the top configuration. Alternatively, the NUC PC can also be equipped with a slightly weaker Intel Core i7-13620H which is also equipped with 6P cores and should only be at a slight disadvantage to the top model in terms of performance. 32 GB DDR4 RAM is always included, although the fast NVMe SSD provides a solid basic configuration. The Geekom XT13 Pro is also not an insurmountable task for performance-hungry applications. Nevertheless, the 3D performance of the iGPU is the biggest weak point, but this can be noticeably improved with an eGPU.
Test conditions
For all performance tests with the Geekom XT13 Pro, we use the "High performance" energy profile. There were only deviations from this in the power consumption and noise measurements according to our Test criteria. In accordance with the manufacturer's specifications, Geekom allows the SoC to operate at the lowest power consumption. In figures, this means a power limit of 35 watts under continuous load, although up to 64 watts are allowed for short periods.
Processor
The Intel Core i9-13900H is based on the Raptor Lake architecture and combines 6P and 8E cores. Technically, there are Intel Core i9-12900H as we can see from our benchmark results in the performance rating compared to the Geekom XT12 Pro. In detail, however, we do see a slight advantage in favor of the Intel Core i9-13900H, which can draw attention to itself with a slightly better multi-core performance. One AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS or Intel's newer models from the Meteor Lake series. However, the gap to the slightly faster models of the competitors is not very large. There is no question of a noticeable difference in performance in everyday use due to the small differences.
You can find more benchmarks for the processors here.
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Cinebench 2024 | |
CPU Multi Core | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
CPU Single Core | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
wPrime 2.10 | |
32m | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
1024m | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 |
WinRAR - Result | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro |
Geekbench 5.0 | |
5.0 Multi-Core | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
5.0 Single-Core | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A7 |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (561 - 51004, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (3604 - 214250, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (225 - 9399, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (8172 - 184747, n=120, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (408 - 29064, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Average of class Mini PC (1958 - 113499, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Average of class Mini PC (3691 - 325960, n=120, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (74.8 - 2039, n=120, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (308 - 26952, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (4408 - 49256, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
The Cinebench R15 continuous loop of our test sample runs almost parallel to that of the Geekom XT12 Pro. In the end, however, the newer XT13 Pro model is able to pull away with a clear lead. It can also be seen that the small cooling system does not manage to maintain the SoC's Turbo over a longer period of time. The maximum power limit of 64 watts is only reached for a short time because the power consumption has to be throttled due to the high temperatures.
System performance
In the system performance tests, the documented performance of the Geekom XT13 Pro is only good enough for a place at the bottom of the rankings. Subjectively, however, we can say that the Geekom XT13 Pro offers decent performance. We were unable to observe any noticeable latencies when working with the device during the test phase. When it comes to the choice of RAM, the slower DDR4 standard takes its revenge, as can be seen from the AIDA64 benchmarks. Technically, the Intel Core i9-13900H could be combined with DDR5 (5,200 MT/s).
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (6481 - 76248, n=120, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (6914 - 83287, n=120, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (6862 - 89318, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Average of class Mini PC (44.9 - 184.8, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latencies
We do not see extremely excessive DPC latencies with the Geekom XT13 Pro. This was the case with the Geekom XT12 Pro. Nevertheless, our test sample is far from outstanding results. We reached the maximum value even when simply surfing with the Edge browser.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 |
* ... smaller is better
Mass storage
The Geekom XT13 Pro is equipped with an SSD with 2 TB of storage space from Acer. The same model was already in the Geekom GT13 and delivered a great performance across all tests. The technical connection is optimal and the resulting transfer rates are very high. Under continuous load, the Acer N7000 has slight problems keeping the read performance stable. Fortunately, there is no extreme disadvantage. As can be seen from the graph, the Acer N7000 can still perform significantly better with reduced read performance than the Geekom XT12 Pro or the Acemagic F2A. The test of the Geekom XT12 Pro revealed a problem with the position of the thermal pad, which is not the case with the Geekom XT13 Pro. The thermal pads are in the correct position. As we already mentioned in the maintenance section, an additional SSD can be installed in the Geekom XT13 Pro. However, the second M.2 slot only supports SATA SSDs with a length of 42 millimeters (M.2-2242).
For further comparisons and benchmarks, please refer to our Comparison table.