Notebookcheck Logo

Geekom XT13 Pro review: NUC mini-PC does without Meteor Lake and only gets an Intel Core i9-13900H

Limited progress!

Geekom has presented the XT13 Pro as a powerful NUC mini-PC based on an Intel Core i9-13900H. This means that Intel's Meteor Lake processors are still left out. We have analyzed how well the high-end model of the Raptor Lake H series performs against the newer processors using numerous measurements and benchmarks.

The Geekom XT13 Pro inherits the Geekom XT12 Pro and comes in the top configuration with an Intel Core i9-13900H equipped. There is also 32 GB DDR4 RAM and a 2 TB SSD, although this comes at a price. The price is 949 USD/949 GBP, so it's really no bargain. For 679 USD/649 GBP, the Geekom XT13 Pro is available with an Intel Core i7-13620H and a 1 TB SSD. Geekom has decided not to use the newer Meteor Lake processors and is sticking with the older Raptor Lake processors. This test will show whether this is the right way to stand up to the competition.

The question also arises as to whether this pricing is justified. We will also address this important point specifically after the performance analysis. In any case, the manufacturer itself sets the bar very high.

Geekom XT13 Pro
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 - 5.4 GHz, Raptor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR4-3200, 2 von 2 belegt, max. 64 GB
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Acer N7000 2 TB, 2048 GB 
, 1760 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB4 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, 2 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5mm Klinke
Networking
Intel Ethernet Controller I226-V (10/2500MBit/s), MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 37 x 117 x 112 ( = 1.46 x 4.61 x 4.41 in)
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Additional features
120-Watt-Netzteil, VESA-Mount, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
555 g ( = 19.58 oz / 1.22 pounds), Power Supply: 260 g ( = 9.17 oz / 0.57 pounds)
Price
999 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Memory
Weight
Height
72.4 %v8
08 / 2024
Geekom XT13 Pro
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
32768 MB555 g37 mm
80.8 %v8
06 / 2024
Aoostar GEM12
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
32768 MB653 g60 mm
87.5 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
32768 MB863 g48.6 mm
83.4 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
04 / 2024
Acemagic F2A
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
32768 MB768 g57 mm
84.1 %v8
04 / 2024
Geekom XT12 Pro
i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
32768 MB545 g37 mm
82.6 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Geekom A7
R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
32768 MB417 g38 mm

Note: We have updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7 available here.

Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro with power supply unit (19 V; 6.32 A)
Power supply unit (19 V; 6.32 A)
Geekom XT13 Pro - DDR4-RAM

Case - Perfect processing of metal and plastic

The housing of the Geekom XT13 Pro is familiar, it was used for the Geekom XT12 Pro. A similarity with the Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit cannot be denied either. Basically, there is nothing wrong with the look. Our test sample is once again perfectly finished and everything fits together wonderfully. Nevertheless, we would have liked to see a new casing to differentiate it slightly from the internal competition. The mini-PC only takes up 11.7 x 11.2 centimeters on the desk, making it one of the more compact devices. The Geekom XT13 Pro can also be attached directly to a monitor using the supplied VESA mount.

Size comparison

146 mm / 5.75 in 146 mm / 5.75 in 57 mm / 2.24 in 768 g1.693 lbs145 mm / 5.71 in 145 mm / 5.71 in 48.6 mm / 1.913 in 863 g1.903 lbs130 mm / 5.12 in 130 mm / 5.12 in 60 mm / 2.36 in 653 g1.44 lbs117 mm / 4.61 in 112 mm / 4.41 in 37 mm / 1.457 in 555 g1.224 lbs117 mm / 4.61 in 112 mm / 4.41 in 37 mm / 1.457 in 545 g1.202 lbs112 mm / 4.41 in 112 mm / 4.41 in 38 mm / 1.496 in 417 g0.919 lbs210 mm / 8.27 in 148 mm / 5.83 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 2.9 g0.00639 lbs

Equipment - Good selection and 2x USB4

In terms of external interfaces, the Geekom XT13 Pro has the same options as the Geekom XT12 Pro. Although the device is very compact, there are many different connections. The two USB-C sockets on the back are modern USB4 ports, greatly expanding the range of applications with the right accessories. A total of four screens can be operated simultaneously and there is also a LAN connection.

The connection equipment on the Geekom XT13 Pro (Source: Geekom)
The connection equipment on the Geekom XT13 Pro (Source: Geekom)

Communication

WLAN module
WLAN module

The Geekom XT13 Pro uses a well-known wireless module that Geekom installs in many of its devices. The MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 WLAN module can provide adequate performance in our test device. If possible, however, the 6 GHz frequency range should primarily be used. Alternatively, the cable connection can also be used. Data rates of up to 2.5 GBit/s are then even possible.

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Acemagic F2A
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1770 (1584min - 1790max) MBit/s +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1761 (1734min - 1774max) MBit/s +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1716 (1560min - 1782max) MBit/s
Average of class Mini PC
  (684 - 1814, n=56, last 2 years)
1505 MBit/s -12%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (684 - 1771, n=51)
1463 MBit/s -15%
Geekom A7
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1375 (688min - 1438max) MBit/s -20%
Geekom XT12 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1152 (576min - 1273max) MBit/s -33%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Acemagic F2A
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1615 (767min - 1670max) MBit/s +12%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1562 (1198min - 1713max) MBit/s +8%
Average of class Mini PC
  (394 - 1887, n=57, last 2 years)
1444 MBit/s 0%
Geekom XT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1440 (1352min - 1553max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (394 - 1890, n=49)
1424 MBit/s -1%
Geekom A7
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1367 (1268min - 1443max) MBit/s -5%
Geekom XT12 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1315 (691min - 1352max) MBit/s -9%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1599 (802min - 1683max) MBit/s +65%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (644 - 1775, n=71)
1378 MBit/s +42%
Average of class Mini PC
  (267 - 1771, n=100, last 2 years)
1010 MBit/s +4%
Geekom XT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
969 (946min - 981max) MBit/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
892 (460min - 921max) MBit/s -8%
Geekom A7
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
858 (827min - 886max) MBit/s -11%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
838 (728min - 926max) MBit/s -14%
Aoostar GEM12
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
740 (676min - 758max) MBit/s -24%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1566 (904min - 1695max) MBit/s +94%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (358 - 1785, n=70)
1273 MBit/s +58%
Average of class Mini PC
  (251 - 1811, n=100, last 2 years)
935 MBit/s +16%
Geekom A7
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
831 (755min - 940max) MBit/s +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
806 (765min - 844max) MBit/s
Aoostar GEM12
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
736 (369min - 756max) MBit/s -9%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
709 (369min - 977max) MBit/s -12%
Geekom XT12 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
589 (295min - 624max) MBit/s -27%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1441 (1352-1553)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1562 (1198-1713)
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1715 (1560-1782)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1760 (1734-1774)
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø969 (946-981)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1572 (802-1683)
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø806 (765-844)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1566 (904-1695)

Accessories

The scope of delivery of the Geekom XT13 Pro offers the usual standard. In addition to the device itself, the box also contains the 120-watt power supply unit and a VESA bracket with mounting material. An HDMI cable and the obligatory thank you card from Geekom are also included.

Scope of delivery of the Geekom XT13 Pro
Scope of delivery of the Geekom XT13 Pro

Maintenance

The Geekom XT13 Pro is easy to open. Only four small screws need to be loosened on the underside, which secure the base plate to the rest of the case. There is an SSD cooler on the base plate itself, which is why you should be a little more careful at this point. The RAM and mass storage are then easily accessible. In our case, an additional SSD can be installed. However, the correct standard must be observed here, as only SATA SSDs with a length of 42 millimeters are compatible.

Geekom XT13 Pro open
Geekom XT13 Pro disassembled
Geekom XT13 Pro without RAM and SSD
Cooling unit on the Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro disassembled

Sustainability

The Geekom XT13 Pro is delivered in a comparatively large box with a lot of "air". We have seen Geekom do things differently. Furthermore, the standard accessories supplied are packed in separate plastic bags, which could be improved in terms of sustainability. The device itself is mainly made of metal and plastic. However, we do not know whether recycled materials have been used in its manufacture. On a positive note, the manufacturer offers a 36-month warranty.

Performance - Intel Core i9-13900H with 14 cores and 20 threads

The Geekom XT13 Pro comes in the top configuration with the Intel Core i9-13900H in the top configuration. Alternatively, the NUC PC can also be equipped with a slightly weaker Intel Core i7-13620H which is also equipped with 6P cores and should only be at a slight disadvantage to the top model in terms of performance. 32 GB DDR4 RAM is always included, although the fast NVMe SSD provides a solid basic configuration. The Geekom XT13 Pro is also not an insurmountable task for performance-hungry applications. Nevertheless, the 3D performance of the iGPU is the biggest weak point, but this can be noticeably improved with an eGPU.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO

Test conditions

For all performance tests with the Geekom XT13 Pro, we use the "High performance" energy profile. There were only deviations from this in the power consumption and noise measurements according to our Test criteria. In accordance with the manufacturer's specifications, Geekom allows the SoC to operate at the lowest power consumption. In figures, this means a power limit of 35 watts under continuous load, although up to 64 watts are allowed for short periods.

Processor

Intel Core i9-13900H (Source: Geekom)
Intel Core i9-13900H (Source: Geekom)

The Intel Core i9-13900H is based on the Raptor Lake architecture and combines 6P and 8E cores. Technically, there are Intel Core i9-12900H as we can see from our benchmark results in the performance rating compared to the Geekom XT12 Pro. In detail, however, we do see a slight advantage in favor of the Intel Core i9-13900H, which can draw attention to itself with a slightly better multi-core performance. One AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS or Intel's newer models from the Meteor Lake series. However, the gap to the slightly faster models of the competitors is not very large. There is no question of a noticeable difference in performance in everyday use due to the small differences.

You can find more benchmarks for the processors here.

Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R20
Cinebench R20
Cinebench R23
Cinebench R23
Cinebench 2024
Cinebench 2024
Performance rating - Percent
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
54.5 pt
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
54.2 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
53.8 pt
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
52.5 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
51 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
49.9 pt
Cinebench 2024
CPU Multi Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1067 Points +57%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1022 Points +50%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
933 Points +37%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
922 Points +36%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
680 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
578 Points -15%
CPU Single Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
110 Points +7%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
108 Points +5%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
108 Points +5%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
107 Points +4%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
106 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
103 Points
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
18497 Points +54%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
18016 Points +50%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
16130 Points +34%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
15556 Points +30%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
11997 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
11036 Points -8%
Single Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1851 Points +8%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
1824 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1783 Points +4%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1771 Points +3%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1747 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
1719 Points
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
279 Points +14%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
278 Points +13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
268 Points +9%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
258 Points +5%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
251 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
245 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2746 Points +12%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2738 Points +12%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2537 Points +4%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2470 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
2448 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
2121 Points -13%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
715 Points +10%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
701 Points +8%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
692 Points +7%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
691 Points +6%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
679 Points +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
649 Points
CPU (Multi Core)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7196 Points +46%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7188 Points +46%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6346 Points +29%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6277 Points +27%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
4935 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
4294 Points -13%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
3.34 Points +14%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
3.32 Points +13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3.27 Points +12%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3.13 Points +7%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
2.99 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
2.93 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
33.95 Points +19%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
33.49 Points +18%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
29.8 Points +5%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
29.76 Points +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
28.47 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
21.11 Points -26%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14374 Points +6%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
14300 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
14163 Points +5%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13938 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
13515 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
13378 Points -1%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
95005 Points +24%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
88902 Points +16%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
85872 Points +12%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
84721 Points +11%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
76558 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
69621 Points -9%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
296 Seconds * -13%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
261 Seconds *
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
202 Seconds * +23%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
197 Seconds * +25%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
178 Seconds * +32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
171 Seconds * +34%
wPrime 2.10
32m
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
4.111 s * -17%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3.523 s * -0%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
3.521 s *
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3.254 s * +8%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2.703 s * +23%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2.648 s * +25%
1024m
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
441.275 s * -3%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
429.446 s *
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
202.68 s * +53%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
139.617 s * +67%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
98.896 s * +77%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
98.222 s * +77%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 1
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
335.5 (329min - 340max) fps +13%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
325 (323min - 328max) fps +9%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
297.5 (283min - 313max) fps
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
292.5 (291min - 296max) fps -2%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
289 (286min - 292max) fps -3%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
262 (259min - 282max) fps -12%
Pass 2
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
158.2 (157.4min - 158.8max) fps +44%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
154.15 (153.8min - 154.3max) fps +40%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
143.7 (143min - 145.2max) fps +30%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
140.8 (138.2min - 144.7max) fps +28%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
110.15 (104.3min - 134.9max) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
92.2 (91min - 114.5max) fps -16%
WinRAR - Result
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
7945 KB/s +25%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7940 KB/s +25%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7723 KB/s +21%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
7490 KB/s +18%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
7327 KB/s +15%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
6365 KB/s
TrueCrypt
AES Mean 100MB
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
15.1 GB/s +14%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
14.4 GB/s +8%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
13.3 GB/s
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
11.3 GB/s -15%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
11.2 GB/s -16%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10.6 GB/s -20%
Twofish Mean 100MB
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
2.3 GB/s
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2.1 GB/s -9%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2 GB/s -13%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
1.9 GB/s -17%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1.8 GB/s -22%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1.7 GB/s -26%
Serpent Mean 100MB
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1.3 GB/s 0%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1.3 GB/s 0%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
1.3 GB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
1.1 GB/s -15%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1.1 GB/s -15%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1 GB/s -23%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
13392 Points +16%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12662 Points +10%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
12261 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12143 Points +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
11536 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
10028 Points -13%
Single-Core
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2008 Points +18%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1958 Points +15%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1856 Points +9%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
1790 Points +5%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1746 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
1708 Points
Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Multi-Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
13228 Points +15%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12438 Points +8%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
12127 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12086 Points +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
11464 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
9892 Points -14%
5.0 Single-Core
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1918 Points +14%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1900 Points +13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1821 Points +9%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
1710 Points +2%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1708 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
1678 Points
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
8253 Points +12%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
8034 Points +9%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
7635 Points +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7602 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
7389 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6927 Points -6%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
48723 Points +14%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
47960 Points +12%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
47777 Points +12%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
45250 Points +6%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
42713 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
37359 Points -13%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
22600 Points +25%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
21875 Points +21%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
21762 Points +20%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
20846 Points +15%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
18126 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
16634 Points -8%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
71934 MIPS +28%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
70733 MIPS +26%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
70707 MIPS +26%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
66438 MIPS +18%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
56068 MIPS
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
47146 MIPS -16%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6744 MIPS +16%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6644 MIPS +14%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
5881 MIPS +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
5828 MIPS
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
5560 MIPS -5%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5485 MIPS -6%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
20.9 fps +42%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
20.6 fps +40%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
20.5 fps +39%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
19.6 fps +33%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
14.7 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
12.3 fps -16%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4693 sec *
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4652 sec * +1%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4632 sec * +1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
0.4627 sec * +1%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
0.4392 sec * +6%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
0.4351 sec * +7%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
54.8 s * -17%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
49.5 s * -6%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
47.5 s * -1%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
46.8 s *
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
44.5 s * +5%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
39.6 s * +15%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
333 Points +23%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
300 Points +11%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
291 Points +7%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
276 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
271 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
264 Points -3%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
550 ms *
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
535 ms * +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
532 ms * +3%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
517 ms * +6%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
511 ms * +7%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
503 ms * +9%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
26194 Points +11%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
26038 Points +10%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
25816 Points +9%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
25043 Points +6%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
23640 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
22242 Points -6%
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
11481 Points +18%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
10824 Points +11%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
10397 Points +7%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10014 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
9741 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
7985 Points -18%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
7.512 s *
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
7.454 s * +1%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
7.442 s * +1%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
7.331 s * +2%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7.168 s * +5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
6.751 s * +10%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
18.402 s * -12%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
18.138 s * -10%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
16.436 s *
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
16.424 s * -0%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16.125 s * +2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14.879 s * +9%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
665.289 s * -57%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
529.929 s * -25%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
424.723 s *
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
396.475 s * +7%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
394.754 s * +7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
304.446 s * +28%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
9326
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
14274 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
76558 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
13515 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
13392
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
53904
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
2.59 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
23.48 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
91.64 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.93 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
28.47 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
90.43 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
245 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2448 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
104 fps
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
649 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4935 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11997 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1719 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
103 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
680 Points
Help
Performance rating
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
96.2 pt
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
92.2 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
82.4 pt
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
78.4 pt
Average of class Mini PC
 
72.1 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
58 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
52.2 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
25916 KRay/s +120%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
25359 KRay/s +115%
Average of class Mini PC
  (770 - 82725, n=112, last 2 years)
19085 KRay/s +62%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
17544 KRay/s +49%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
17312 KRay/s +47%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
11780 KRay/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
10476 KRay/s -11%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
109747 Points +84%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
107540 Points +80%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
91112 Points +52%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
88829 Points +49%
Average of class Mini PC
  (4141 - 227429, n=112, last 2 years)
81625 Points +37%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
59787 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
54166 Points -9%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
4753 MB/s +69%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
4695 MB/s +67%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
4343 MB/s +54%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
4246 MB/s +51%
Average of class Mini PC
  (290 - 9475, n=112, last 2 years)
3602 MB/s +28%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2813 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2504 MB/s -11%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
118174 Points +29%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
116083 Points +26%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
91925 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
89748 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
87291 Points -5%
Average of class Mini PC
  (8208 - 184747, n=112, last 2 years)
86834 Points -6%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
82291 Points -10%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
14876 Points +82%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
14663 Points +79%
Average of class Mini PC
  (408 - 31931, n=112, last 2 years)
10903 Points +33%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
10759 Points +32%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
10247 Points +25%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
8181 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
7317 Points -11%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
58597 Points +99%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
57402 Points +95%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
45718 Points +55%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
44874 Points +53%
Average of class Mini PC
  (2089 - 121827, n=112, last 2 years)
42490 Points +44%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
29407 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
26850 Points -9%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
164414 MB/s +55%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
154066 MB/s +46%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
144741 MB/s +37%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
105740 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
95500 MB/s -10%
Average of class Mini PC
  (7948 - 325960, n=111, last 2 years)
89844 MB/s -15%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
85572 MB/s -19%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
1233 MB/s +51%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1183 MB/s +44%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
1048 MB/s +28%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
1020 MB/s +25%
Average of class Mini PC
  (596 - 2431, n=112, last 2 years)
908 MB/s +11%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
819 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
745 MB/s -9%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
13875 KRay/s +122%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
13517 KRay/s +117%
Average of class Mini PC
  (432 - 43587, n=112, last 2 years)
10188 KRay/s +63%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
9284 KRay/s +49%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
9270 KRay/s +49%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
6242 KRay/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5777 KRay/s -7%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
45560 MPixel/s +61%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
40570 MPixel/s +43%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
40245 MPixel/s +42%
Average of class Mini PC
  (5333 - 94259, n=112, last 2 years)
34942 MPixel/s +23%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
33092 MPixel/s +17%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
28315 MPixel/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
24858 MPixel/s -12%

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

The Cinebench R15 continuous loop of our test sample runs almost parallel to that of the Geekom XT12 Pro. In the end, however, the newer XT13 Pro model is able to pull away with a clear lead. It can also be seen that the small cooling system does not manage to maintain the SoC's Turbo over a longer period of time. The maximum power limit of 64 watts is only reached for a short time because the power consumption has to be throttled due to the high temperatures.

CPU metrics during the Cinebench R15 loop
CPU metrics during the Cinebench R15 loop
01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø1851 (1675.95-2471.58)
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2530 (2503.13-2552.81)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2784 (2721.64-2831.86)
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2759 (2690.7-2800.92)
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø1545 (1395.97-2133.22)
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2410 (2285.58-2581.81)

System performance

In the system performance tests, the documented performance of the Geekom XT13 Pro is only good enough for a place at the bottom of the rankings. Subjectively, however, we can say that the Geekom XT13 Pro offers decent performance. We were unable to observe any noticeable latencies when working with the device during the test phase. When it comes to the choice of RAM, the slower DDR4 standard takes its revenge, as can be seen from the AIDA64 benchmarks. Technically, the Intel Core i9-13900H could be combined with DDR5 (5,200 MT/s).

PCMark 10 / Score
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
7510 Points +23%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000
7455 Points +22%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
7431 Points +22%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
7120 Points +17%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
6295 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000 2 TB
6102 Points
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
11273 Points +3%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
11125 Points +2%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000
11114 Points +2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
11030 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000 2 TB
10908 Points
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
10822 Points -1%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
10484 Points +40%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
10482 Points +40%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000
10291 Points +37%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
8901 Points +19%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
8114 Points +8%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000 2 TB
7490 Points
CrossMark / Overall
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1939 Points +6%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000
1861 Points +1%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
1860 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000 2 TB
1837 Points
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1802 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1675 Points -9%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000 2 TB
1931 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
1919 Points -1%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1849 Points -4%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1700 Points -12%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000
1540 Points -20%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1378 Points -29%
CrossMark / Creativity
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000
2072 Points +10%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
2040 Points +8%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1929 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000 2 TB
1889 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1883 Points 0%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
1870 Points -1%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1872 Points +7%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
1831 Points +4%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000
1781 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000 2 TB
1756 Points
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1717 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1589 Points -10%
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
71990 MB/s +54%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
67777 MB/s +45%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
67161 MB/s +44%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
62397 MB/s +34%
Average of class Mini PC
  (8377 - 163031, n=112, last 2 years)
58332 MB/s +25%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
46670 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
45792 MB/s -2%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
75449 MB/s +64%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
64323 MB/s +40%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
61542 MB/s +34%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
61006 MB/s +33%
Average of class Mini PC
  (8974 - 123769, n=112, last 2 years)
56934 MB/s +24%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
48963 MB/s +6%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
45998 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
86810 MB/s +84%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
86677 MB/s +83%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
70596 MB/s +49%
Average of class Mini PC
  (8762 - 216693, n=112, last 2 years)
66430 MB/s +41%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
65057 MB/s +38%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
47241 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
47201 MB/s 0%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
149 ns * -80%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
146.1 ns * -76%
Average of class Mini PC
  (88.8 - 184.8, n=112, last 2 years)
96.2 ns * -16%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
89 ns * -7%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
88.6 ns * -7%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
83 ns *
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
74.7 ns * +10%

* ... smaller is better

DPC latencies

We do not see extremely excessive DPC latencies with the Geekom XT13 Pro. This was the case with the Geekom XT12 Pro. Nevertheless, our test sample is far from outstanding results. We reached the maximum value even when simply surfing with the Edge browser.

Maximum latency when opening multiple browser tabs
Maximum latency when opening multiple browser tabs
Maximum latency when playing 4K video material
Maximum latency when playing 4K video material
Maximum latency after ten seconds of Prime95
Maximum latency after ten seconds of Prime95
Drivers ranked by longest execution time
Drivers ranked by longest execution time
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
2724 μs * -63%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
2151 μs * -29%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2069.2 μs * -24%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000 2 TB
1671.7 μs *
Geekom A7
Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Acer N5000
1616.1 μs * +3%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1001.9 μs * +40%

* ... smaller is better

Mass storage

Acer N7000 SSD (2 TB)
Acer N7000 SSD (2 TB)

The Geekom XT13 Pro is equipped with an SSD with 2 TB of storage space from Acer. The same model was already in the Geekom GT13 and delivered a great performance across all tests. The technical connection is optimal and the resulting transfer rates are very high. Under continuous load, the Acer N7000 has slight problems keeping the read performance stable. Fortunately, there is no extreme disadvantage. As can be seen from the graph, the Acer N7000 can still perform significantly better with reduced read performance than the Geekom XT12 Pro or the Acemagic F2A. The test of the Geekom XT12 Pro revealed a problem with the position of the thermal pad, which is not the case with the Geekom XT13 Pro. The thermal pads are in the correct position. As we already mentioned in the maintenance section, an additional SSD can be installed in the Geekom XT13 Pro. However, the second M.2 slot only supports SATA SSDs with a length of 42 millimeters (M.2-2242).

For further comparisons and benchmarks, please refer to our Comparison table.

AS SSD
AS SSD
CDM 3
CDM 3
CDM 5
CDM 5
CDM 6
CDM 6
CDI
CDI
Acer N7000 2 TB
Sequential Read: 3706 MB/s
Sequential Write: 4324 MB/s
512K Read: 2122 MB/s
512K Write: 3620 MB/s
4K Read: 73.35 MB/s
4K Write: 330.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 1038 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 770 MB/s
Drive Performance rating - Percent
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
88.9 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000 2 TB
82.1 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
65.8 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
58.2 pt
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
54.8 pt
Average of class Mini PC
 
51.8 pt
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
45.6 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
3755 (3733.85min - 3754.99max) MB/s +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000 2 TB
3690 (2901.41min - 3690.32max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3108 (3065.99min - 3107.56max) MB/s -16%
Average of class Mini PC
  (413 - 4960, n=112, last 2 years)
2458 MB/s -33%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2315 (2293.84min - 2315.26max) MB/s -37%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
2178 (2158.39min - 2177.68max) MB/s -41%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1674 (1242.56min - 1673.54max) MB/s -55%
seq write
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
4619 (4584.79min - 4619.39max) MB/s +10%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000 2 TB
4196 (3895.46min - 4196.19max) MB/s
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
3492 (3398.43min - 3491.76max) MB/s -17%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
3386 (3076.94min - 3385.64max) MB/s -19%
Average of class Mini PC
  (339 - 5595, n=112, last 2 years)
2818 MB/s -33%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
2341 (2252.02min - 2341.4max) MB/s -44%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1348 (1117.85min - 1347.87max) MB/s -68%
seq q8 t1 read
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000 2 TB
6932 (5986.51min - 6931.53max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
5213 (4500.71min - 5212.95max) MB/s -25%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
4861 (4468.61min - 4860.57max) MB/s -30%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
4769 (3791.02min - 4769.24max) MB/s -31%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
4676 (4310.07min - 4675.81max) MB/s -33%
Average of class Mini PC
  (397 - 8430, n=112, last 2 years)
4177 MB/s -40%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
3194 (2810.81min - 3194.17max) MB/s -54%
seq q8 t1 write
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000 2 TB
5793 (5555.78min - 5793.38max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
4754 (4738.27min - 4754.03max) MB/s -18%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
4695 (4470.16min - 4694.73max) MB/s -19%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
3729 (3700.15min - 3728.95max) MB/s -36%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
3255 (2485.13min - 3254.57max) MB/s -44%
Average of class Mini PC
  (346 - 6669, n=112, last 2 years)
3244 MB/s -44%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
2212 (1222.43min - 2212.27max) MB/s -62%
4k q1 t1 read
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
78.7 (78.09min - 78.69max) MB/s +12%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000 2 TB
70.3 (66.06min - 70.34max) MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
64.1 (56.32min - 64.06max) MB/s -9%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
63.5 (59.81min - 63.5max) MB/s -10%
Average of class Mini PC
  (6.85 - 87.3, n=112, last 2 years)
56.1 MB/s -20%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
52.3 (51.85min - 52.27max) MB/s -26%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
47.3 (47.07min - 47.31max) MB/s -33%
4k q1 t1 write
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000 2 TB
335 (332.49min - 335.43max) MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
279 (237.61min - 279.08max) MB/s -17%
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
274 (271.38min - 273.89max) MB/s -18%
Average of class Mini PC
  (29.6 - 435, n=112, last 2 years)
193.3 MB/s -42%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
187.2 (181.54min - 187.2max) MB/s -44%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
184.4 (177.6min - 184.36max) MB/s -45%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
165.9 (164.35min - 165.92max) MB/s -50%
4k q32 t16 read
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000 2 TB
4158 (4048.89min - 4158.05max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3197 (3174.44min - 3196.85max) MB/s -23%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1824 (1239.47min - 1824.09max) MB/s -56%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
1560 (1546.89min - 1559.94max) MB/s -62%
Average of class Mini PC
  (102.3 - 4158, n=112, last 2 years)
1506 MB/s -64%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
1452 (1402.67min - 1451.9max) MB/s -65%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1143 (1091.01min - 1142.98max) MB/s -73%
4k q32 t16 write
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3639 (3534.46min - 3639.09max) MB/s +16%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000 2 TB
3142 (2751.87min - 3141.57max) MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
1499 (1114.25min - 1499.4max) MB/s -52%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1434 (1410.26min - 1433.71max) MB/s -54%
Average of class Mini PC
  (70.3 - 4288, n=112, last 2 years)
1422 MB/s -55%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
595 (582.97min - 594.71max) MB/s -81%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
497 (467.49min - 497.28max) MB/s -84%
AS SSD
Score Total
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
10021 Points +50%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000 2 TB
6667 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
5975 Points -10%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
5177 Points -22%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
4987 Points -25%
Average of class Mini PC
  (507 - 10559, n=110, last 2 years)
4658 Points -30%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
4412 Points -34%
Score Read
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3741 Points +42%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000 2 TB
2635 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
2119 Points -20%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
1685 Points -36%
Average of class Mini PC
  (172 - 3834, n=110, last 2 years)
1659 Points -37%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1561 Points -41%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1482 Points -44%
Score Write
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
4371 Points +59%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2807 Points +2%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
2777 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000 2 TB
2741 Points
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
2676 Points -2%
Average of class Mini PC
  (210 - 4770, n=110, last 2 years)
2181 Points -20%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
2082 Points -24%
Seq Read
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000 2 TB
4882 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
4349.85 MB/s -11%
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
4317 MB/s -12%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
3779 MB/s -23%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
3650 MB/s -25%
Average of class Mini PC
  (483 - 6620, n=110, last 2 years)
3446 MB/s -29%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
3010 MB/s -38%
Seq Write
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
4188 MB/s +19%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
3936.64 MB/s +12%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000 2 TB
3506 MB/s
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
2611 MB/s -26%
Average of class Mini PC
  (326 - 5783, n=110, last 2 years)
2604 MB/s -26%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
2369 MB/s -32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2285 MB/s -35%
4K Read
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
89.3 MB/s +6%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000 2 TB
84.3 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
80.89 MB/s -4%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
63.3 MB/s -25%
Average of class Mini PC
  (18.2 - 104.3, n=110, last 2 years)
59.8 MB/s -29%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
49.7 MB/s -41%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
41.8 MB/s -50%
4K Write
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
316.33 MB/s +9%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000 2 TB
291 MB/s
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
238 MB/s -18%
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
221 MB/s -24%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
196.9 MB/s -32%
Average of class Mini PC
  (40.8 - 366, n=110, last 2 years)
177.3 MB/s -39%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
160 MB/s -45%
4K-64 Read
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3220 MB/s +56%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000 2 TB
2062 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
1602.91 MB/s -22%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
1270 MB/s -38%
Average of class Mini PC
  (94.3 - 3321, n=110, last 2 years)
1255 MB/s -39%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1218 MB/s -41%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1041 MB/s -50%
4K-64 Write
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3731 MB/s +78%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2340 MB/s +11%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
2255 MB/s +7%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000 2 TB
2100 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
2066.57 MB/s -2%
Average of class Mini PC
  (96.3 - 4103, n=110, last 2 years)
1743 MB/s -17%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1649 MB/s -21%
Access Time Read
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
0.138 ms * -100%
Average of class Mini PC
  (0.027 - 0.288, n=110, last 2 years)
0.0907 ms * -31%
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
0.076 ms * -10%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000 2 TB
0.069 ms *
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
0.067 ms * +3%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
0.049 ms * +29%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
0.046 ms * +33%
Access Time Write
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
0.126 ms * -125%
Average of class Mini PC
  (0.013 - 0.706, n=110, last 2 years)
0.1005 ms * -79%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
0.072 ms * -29%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
0.059 ms * -5%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000 2 TB
0.056 ms *
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
0.02 ms * +64%
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
0.017 ms * +70%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035070010501400175021002450280031503500385042004550490052505600595063006650Tooltip
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000 2 TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5637 (4899.21-6932.56)
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5121 (4152.57-5218.34)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4683 (3872.18-4767.25)
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø1320 (771.89-3141.95)
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø1764 (1425.22-4795.56)
Geekom A7 Acer N5000; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4848 (4561.2-4857.36)

Graphics

The Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 handles the 3D calculations and is responsible for the image output. With 96 EUs, the Intel Core i9-13900H is the fastest model in the series. However, the outdated model has a hard time asserting itself against the modern representatives. If Geekom had already dared to take the step of installing a Meteor Lake SoC in the XT13 Pro, a clearly noticeable increase in 3D performance could have been expected. The performance of an Intel Arc 8-core iGPU can be seen perfectly in the comparison data. Meanwhile, you get even more 3D performance if an AMD Radeon 780M is installed in the system. Geekom itself now offers several devices with this iGPU, which means that the manufacturer is making life difficult for itself in this discipline. One example of this is the Geekom A7, the Geekom A8, or the Geekom AE7.

Further comparisons and benchmarks can be found in our GPU comparison table.

3DMark Performance rating - Percent
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
97.5 pt
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
93.5 pt
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
92.9 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
91.4 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
58.5 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
54.7 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
13932 Points +88%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
13410 Points +81%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12085 Points +63%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
11691 Points +57%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
7428 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
6975 Points -6%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3205 Points +91%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3193 Points +90%
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2968 Points +76%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2846 Points +69%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
1682 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
1581 Points -6%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
8391 Points +44%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
8007 Points +37%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7710 Points +32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7599 Points +30%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
5845 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
5421 Points -7%
Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
34.6 fps +39%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
31.6 fps +27%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
29.7 fps +19%
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
26 fps +4%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
24.9 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
21.8 fps -12%
Extreme Preset DX11
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
36.3 fps +41%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
33.2 fps +29%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
32.7 fps +27%
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
32 fps +25%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
25.7 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
22.7 fps -12%
Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
24.5 fps +61%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
18.5 fps +22%
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
17.7 fps +16%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17.1 fps +13%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
15.2 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
13.3 fps -12%
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
32.4 fps +108%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
21 fps +35%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
18.3 fps +17%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
15.6 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
13.9 fps -11%
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
12.2 fps -22%
Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12174 Points +84%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10491 Points +59%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
10102 Points +53%
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
9725 Points +47%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
6603 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
5950 Points -10%
1920x1080 1080p High
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
3592 Points +59%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3391 Points +50%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3341 Points +48%
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
3129 Points +39%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
2254 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
2035 Points -10%
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1920 Points +70%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1812 Points +61%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1737 Points +54%
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1577 Points +40%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
1128 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
1042 Points -8%
ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
9796 Points +171%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
9494 Points +163%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7480 Points +107%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
6270 Points +73%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
3616 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
3390 Points -6%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
483 Points +67%
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
479 Points +65%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
469 Points +62%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
427 Points +47%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
290 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
231 Points -20%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
484 Points +69%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
481 Points +68%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
462 Points +62%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
422 Points +48%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
286 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
246 Points -14%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2574 Points +202%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2477 Points +191%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1961 Points +130%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1620 Points +90%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
860 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
851 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2608 Points +201%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2519 Points +191%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1594 Points +84%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1274 Points +47%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
872 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
866 Points
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
3650 Points +176%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
3535 Points +167%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3076 Points +133%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2444 Points +85%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
1323 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
1182 Points -11%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
817 Samples/s +30%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
801 Samples/s +28%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
640 Samples/s +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
627 Samples/s
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
549 Samples/s -12%
Sala GPUs-only
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2732 Samples/s +39%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2319 Samples/s +18%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
1970 Samples/s
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1522 Samples/s -23%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1496 Samples/s -24%
Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
5308 Points +23%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
4928 Points +14%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
4332 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
3830 Points -12%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1709 Points -61%
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1396 Points -68%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
i9-13900H
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Radeon 780M
R7 8845HS
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Ultra 9 185H
Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Ultra 7 155H
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
i9-12900H
Geekom A7, AMD Radeon 780M
R9 7940HS
Average of class Mini PC
 
SPECviewperf 2020
309%
36%
25%
-4%
278%
389%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) (fps)
3.63
11.2
209%
4.23
17%
5.05
39%
3.49
-4%
11.1
206%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) (fps)
3.15
19.9
532%
6.03
91%
4.61
46%
3.05
-3%
14.1
348%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) (fps)
16
33.4
109%
18.5
16%
17.9
12%
14.8
-7%
31.4
96%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) (fps)
7.9
23.2
194%
11.1
41%
10
27%
7.78
-2%
24.8
214%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) (fps)
10.3
20.4
98%
14.9
45%
12.9
25%
9.69
-6%
20.9
103%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) (fps)
6.13
64.1
946%
6.24
2%
5.7
-7%
6.29
3%
61.4
902%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) (fps)
26.8
47.7
78%
37.7
41%
35.4
32%
23.9
-11%
47
75%
3DMark 05 Standard
29045 points
3DMark 06 Score 1366x768
30156 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
28599 points
3DMark 11 Performance
8024 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
155640 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
28112 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5448 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
2570 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1920 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
183 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score
1276 points
Help

Gaming performance

The Intel Iris Xe iGPU is unable to cope with most games. The aged iGPU only achieves adequate frame rates, if at all, in low resolutions and a low or medium graphics preset. If you still want to use the Geekom XT13 Pro for gaming, you have to take the detour via an external graphics card. Various models can be used with the device via USB4.

Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Geekom A7
Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Acer N5000
155.8 (135.9min) fps +33%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
152.7 (134.2min) fps +30%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000 2 TB
117.2 (74.5min) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
106.5 (61min) fps -9%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
106.3 (81.7min) fps -9%
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
103.2 (59.8min) fps -12%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Geekom A7
Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Acer N5000
87.6 (75min) fps +21%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
86.6 (72.2min) fps +19%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
79 (48.2min) fps +9%
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
77.3 (52.5min) fps +7%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000 2 TB
72.5 (53min) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
61.3 (54.1min) fps -15%
GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Geekom A7
Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Acer N5000
167.5 (5.17min, 125P1) fps +36%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
165.1 (4.83min, 125P1) fps +34%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
163.6 (4.63min, 111.1P1) fps +32%
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
161 (4.76min, 100P1) fps +30%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000 2 TB
123.5 (30.5min, 66.7P1) fps
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Geekom A7
Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Acer N5000
66.6 (4.46min, 37P1) fps +201%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
65.3 (4.57min, 45.5P1) fps +195%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
41.2 (3.12min, 30.3P1) fps +86%
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
31.3 (2.94min, 22.7P1) fps +42%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000 2 TB
22.1 (7.08min, 16.4P1) fps
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
42.4 (35.7min) fps +128%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
34.3 (29.1min) fps +84%
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
29.5 (24.1min) fps +59%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000 2 TB
18.6 (15.4min) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
16.4 (13.6min) fps -12%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
26.3 (22.2min) fps +102%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
24 (20.6min) fps +85%
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
20.4 (13.8min) fps +57%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000 2 TB
13 (11min) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
11.5 (10min) fps -12%
Baldur's Gate 3
1280x720 Low Preset AA:SM
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
60.3 (21.3min, 36P0.1, 46.1P1) fps +114%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
50.5 (37.8min, 38.4P0.1, 42.2P1) fps +79%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000 2 TB
28.2 (13.8min, 15.1P0.1, 19.8P1) fps
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
24.7 (16.6min, 17.1P0.1, 19.4P1) fps +83%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
22.6 (19.8min, 19.9P0.1, 20.4P1) fps +67%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000 2 TB
13.5 (11.2min, 11.2P0.1, 11.6P1) fps
F1 24
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
77.5 (58min, 58P1) fps +80%
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
69.1 (57min, 55P1) fps +60%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000 2 TB
43.1 (36min, 26P1) fps
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
51.8 (42min, 42P1) fps +94%
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
48.4 (38min, 39P1) fps +81%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000 2 TB
26.7 (23min, 17P1) fps

FPS chart

05101520Tooltip
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø11.2 (9.21-12.9)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M: Ø21.7 (20.1-23.3)
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 123.5 105.9 22.1 9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 117.2 82.9 72.5 66.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 46 25.7 18.2
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 19.9 15.4 13.5 13
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 18.6 15 13 11.4
F1 24 (2024) 43.1 37.3 26.7

Geekom XT13 Pro performance check with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The Geekom XT13 Pro has two USB4 ports, which support the use of external graphics cards. Without influencing the overall result, we carried out some tests with the Razer Core X and an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Compared to the aged iGPU of the Intel Core i9-13900H, the 3D performance can be massively increased. The comparison with the other test devices shows an almost identical result in the synthetic tests. Gaming performance can also be significantly increased with this combination, as can be seen from the games tested. Sometimes even the most modern games can be enjoyed in full detail.

Performance rating - Percent
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
99 pt
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
99 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
98 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
96.2 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
95.2 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
94.8 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
34666 Points +367%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
34034 Points +358%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
33454 Points +350%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
33219 Points +347%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
32654 Points +340%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
32085 Points +332%

7428 Points
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
11182 Points +565%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
11156 Points +563%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
11118 Points +561%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
11085 Points +559%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
11062 Points +558%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
10935 Points +550%

1682 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
25842 Points +342%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
25468 Points +336%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
25462 Points +336%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
25415 Points +335%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
24809 Points +324%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
24796 Points +324%

5845 Points
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
7139 Points +468%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
7079 Points +464%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
7047 Points +461%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
7046 Points +461%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
7044 Points +461%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
6997 Points +457%

1256 Points
Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
34726 Points +426%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
34168 Points +417%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
33894 Points +413%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
31986 Points +384%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
31903 Points +383%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
25121 Points +280%

6603 Points
1920x1080 1080p High
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
15240 Points +576%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
15076 Points +569%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
15008 Points +566%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
14959 Points +564%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
14859 Points +559%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
14853 Points +559%

2254 Points
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
7193 Points +538%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
7098 Points +529%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
7089 Points +528%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
7064 Points +526%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
7055 Points +525%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
7029 Points +523%

1128 Points
3840x2160 4k Optimized
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
9419 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
9315 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
9240 Points
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
9205 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
9188 Points
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
9149 Points
7680x4320 8k Optimized
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
4079 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
4061 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
4042 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
4016 Points
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
4013 Points
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
4009 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
144.5 fps +851%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
143.9 fps +847%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
142.2 fps +836%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
141.6 fps +832%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
140.6 fps +825%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
135.9 fps +794%

15.2 fps
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
138.6 fps +788%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
138.2 fps +786%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
137.6 fps +782%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
137.5 fps +781%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
137 fps +778%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
133.5 fps +756%

15.6 fps
Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
174.9 fps +602%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
174.5 fps +601%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
173.6 fps +597%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
173.5 fps +597%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
172.3 fps +592%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
172.1 fps +591%

24.9 fps
Extreme Preset DX11
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
164.2 fps +539%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
163.6 fps +537%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
163.2 fps +535%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
162.5 fps +532%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
162 fps +530%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
158.8 fps +518%

25.7 fps
ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
28156 Points +679%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
28076 Points +676%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
27929 Points +672%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
27843 Points +670%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
27669 Points +665%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
25975 Points +618%

3616 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
2719 Points +838%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2715 Points +836%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
2708 Points +834%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
2687 Points +827%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
2681 Points +824%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
2527 Points +771%

290 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
2663 Points +831%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2657 Points +829%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
2641 Points +823%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
2622 Points +817%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
2614 Points +814%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
2463 Points +761%

286 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
5769 Points +578%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
5760 Points +577%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
5742 Points +575%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
5726 Points +573%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
5652 Points +564%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
5342 Points +528%

851 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
6335 Points +632%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6319 Points +630%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
6283 Points +626%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
6275 Points +625%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
6223 Points +619%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
5881 Points +579%

866 Points
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
10671 Points +707%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
10626 Points +703%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
10594 Points +701%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
10548 Points +697%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
10445 Points +689%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
9762 Points +638%

1323 Points
Photoshop PugetBench - GPU Score
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
100.6 Points +32%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
98.3 Points +28%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
93.7 Points +22%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
81.6 Points +7%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
81.2 Points +6%

76.5 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
66.3 Points -13%
Premiere Pro PugetBench - GPU 0.9
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
55.8 Points +598%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
55.8 Points +598%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
48 Points +500%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
47.9 Points +499%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
47.3 Points +491%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
45.6 Points +470%

8 Points
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 7940HS
106 (82.3min) fps +233%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 8945HS
101.4 (78.7min) fps +219%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
88.7 (68min) fps +179%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
84.9 (65.5min) fps +167%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-12900H
79.5 (59.3min) fps +150%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, Ultra 5 125H
70.2 (53.5min) fps +121%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000 2 TB
31.8 (24.6min) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 7940HS
81.5 (64.7min) fps +443%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
81.4 (65.1min) fps +443%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 8945HS
81.2 (65.1min) fps +441%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
80.4 (63.9min) fps +436%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-12900H
78.9 (63min) fps +426%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, Ultra 5 125H
72.2 (55.8min) fps +381%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000 2 TB
15 (12.4min) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 7940HS
64.5 (50.7min) fps +466%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
64.4 (49.9min) fps +465%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
63.9 (49.4min) fps +461%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 8945HS
63.5 (50.1min) fps +457%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-12900H
63.3 (47.6min) fps +455%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, Ultra 5 125H
60.8 (43.6min) fps +433%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000 2 TB
11.4 (9.68min) fps
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:SM
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
113.4 (62.4min, 69.4P0.1, 78.1P1) fps +470%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-12900H
113.3 (60min, 68.1P0.1, 78.5P1) fps +469%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
113 (47.4min, 65.4P0.1, 77.5P1) fps +468%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 7940HS
110.4 (37.6min, 67.1P0.1, 77.2P1) fps +455%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 8945HS
110.1 (57.6min, 68.5P0.1, 75.3P1) fps +453%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, Ultra 5 125H
109.5 (51.8min, 62.3P0.1, 74.4P1) fps +450%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000 2 TB
19.9 (15.5min, 15.6P0.1, 16.4P1) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
91.3 (51.4min, 53.4P0.1, 61.1P1) fps +493%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
90.8 (48.5min, 55.2P0.1, 61.7P1) fps +490%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 8945HS
90.4 (50.6min, 54.8P0.1, 59.8P1) fps +487%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-12900H
90.1 (50.2min, 55.2P0.1, 61.6P1) fps +485%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 7940HS
88.5 (53.2min, 55.5P0.1, 59.9P1) fps +475%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, Ultra 5 125H
87.3 (36.9min, 43.6P0.1, 57.2P1) fps +467%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000 2 TB
15.4 (11.8min, 11.9P0.1, 12.7P1) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
79 (45.4min, 46P0.1, 53.2P1) fps +508%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
78.5 (46.2min, 47P0.1, 53.1P1) fps +504%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 8945HS
78.3 (46.6min, 47.4P0.1, 51.3P1) fps +502%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-12900H
78.2 (40.1min, 46.3P0.1, 52.6P1) fps +502%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 7940HS
76.8 (44.1min, 46.7P0.1, 49.8P1) fps +491%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, Ultra 5 125H
76.3 (41.3min, 43.7P0.1, 50P1) fps +487%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000 2 TB
13 (10.1min, 10.1P0.1, 11P1) fps
F1 24
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 7940HS
88.2 (48min, 52P1) fps +105%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 8945HS
88.1 (48min, 49P1) fps +104%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
77.3 (42min, 43P1) fps +79%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
76.9 (42min, 44P1) fps +78%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-12900H
75 (42min, 43P1) fps +74%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, Ultra 5 125H
72.6 (41min, 43P1) fps +68%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000 2 TB
43.1 (36min, 26P1) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 8945HS
84.5 (47min, 49P1) fps +127%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 7940HS
82.2 (47min, 49P1) fps +120%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-12900H
74.1 (42min, 43P1) fps +99%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
73.1 (42min, 43P1) fps +96%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
72.8 (41min, 41P1) fps +95%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, Ultra 5 125H
70 (41min, 42P1) fps +88%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000 2 TB
37.3 (32min, 26P1) fps
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 7940HS
46.4 (27min, 26P1) fps
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 8945HS
46.1 (27min, 27P1) fps
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
42.2 (24min, 25P1) fps
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
42 (24min, 25P1) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-12900H
41.8 (24min, 24P1) fps
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, Ultra 5 125H
39.5 (22min, 23P1) fps
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
i9-13900H
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE),
i9-13900H
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE),
i9-13900H
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE),
i9-12900H
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE),
Ultra 5 125H
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE),
R9 7940HS
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE),
R9 8945HS
Average of class Mini PC
 
SPECviewperf 2020
391%
387%
321%
182%
395%
516%
389%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) (fps)
3.63
13
258%
10.8
198%
11.8
225%
10.9
200%
13
258%
10.8
198%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) (fps)
3.15
20.9
563%
21
567%
18.9
500%
17.8
465%
20.9
563%
50.3
1497%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) (fps)
16
74.2
364%
76.4
378%
62.7
292%
26.6
66%
76.8
380%
76.6
379%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) (fps)
7.9
39.4
399%
40.1
408%
32.8
315%
23.6
199%
39.2
396%
38.8
391%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) (fps)
10.3
47.2
358%
47.3
359%
40
288%
28.7
179%
46.5
351%
45.9
346%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) (fps)
6.13
16.5
169%
16.5
169%
15.2
148%
11.4
86%
16.6
171%
16.6
171%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) (fps)
26.8
194
624%
196
631%
155
478%
47.5
77%
199
643%
195
628%
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 182.2 178.4 170.3 104.2 92.7 103.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 165.8 138.3 132 121.9 104.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 183.7 142.2 98.8 77.6 48.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 146.4 137.9 106.3 92.1
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 113 91.3 79 78.5 61.6 37.1
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 88.2 81.4 71.7 64.4 44.5 22.2
F1 24 (2024) 76.9 73.1 60.5 42.2 36.9 19.2

Emissions - Weak cooling and low power consumption

Noise emissions

Even the devices of the same design were not able to impress with top values in terms of noise emissions. This also applies to the Geekom XT13 Pro, at least under load. The mini-PC is very quiet when idle and is barely audible. However, the fan is always running, which means that semi-passive operation is not possible. Under load, the fan occasionally revs up considerably, and we were able to measure a peak sound pressure level of 49.5 dB(A). However, the maximum volume is not always present. During the stress test, the fan speed fluctuated again and again, so that the Geekom XT13 Pro only reached 38 dB(A) under load. We observed the same phenomenon under average load. Here, the measurable volume fluctuates between 38 and 42.2 dB(A).

Unfortunately, the Geekom XT12 Pro is not one of the quietest devices. The device only works almost silently when idling, only a quiet fan noise is audible. This changes under load, as the mini-PC is clearly audible at up to 44.2 dB(A). We were even able to measure up to 47.2 dB(A) during gaming. However, we were unable to detect a permanently high sound pressure level during gaming. Here, the result fluctuated between 39 and 47.2 dB(A).

 

 

Noise level

Idle
27.6 / 27.8 / 27.9 dB(A)
Load
42.2 / 49.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.837.340.737.134.738.802542.342.638.836.335.140.403139.538.632.935.634.735.704029.127.5242424.229.305033.136.53230.831.428.206328.929.926.226.323.822.408024.922.221.820.220.214.9010027.721.620.318.318.516.8012524.72116.615.3159.1016025.922.215.915.816.110.1020026.228.915.615.115.213.3025027.623.715.115.214.18.6031528.923.614.915.715.28.304002925.121.820.119.18.7050030.625.714.915.114.68.106303329.314.114.314.78.8080036.232.414.414.814.59.70100041.233.215.415.415.710.80125038.831.914.714.91511.90160035.428.41313.112.911020004032.417.817.817.511.70250040.532.618.81918.712.6031503728.914.11414.113.10400040.433.314.814.714.414.50500036.526.714.614.514.414.60630030.820.414.714.814.614.90800027.817.71515.114.914.801000022.516.815.515.515.315.201250018.315.615.115.21515.30160001615.715.815.615.114.80SPL49.542.227.927.827.6250N6.43.710.90.90.60median 30.6median 25.7median 15.1median 15.2median 15median 11.9Delta5.54.61.31.20.62.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseGeekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Aoostar GEM12
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
Acemagic F2A
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
Geekom XT12 Pro
i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Geekom A7
R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
Noise
10%
1%
2%
2%
-9%
off / environment * (dB)
25
24.3
3%
24.1
4%
24.9
-0%
25.4
-2%
25.4
-2%
Idle Minimum * (dB)
27.6
27.5
-0%
29.8
-8%
25.4
8%
28
-1%
33.3
-21%
Idle Average * (dB)
27.8
27.6
1%
29.9
-8%
25.7
8%
28.1
-1%
33.6
-21%
Idle Maximum * (dB)
27.9
27.6
1%
30
-8%
25.7
8%
28.5
-2%
33.7
-21%
Load Average * (dB)
42.2
36
15%
37.3
12%
47.8
-13%
39.6
6%
43.3
-3%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB)
46.6
35.4
24%
Load Maximum * (dB)
49.5
38.2
23%
43.5
12%
49
1%
44.2
11%
43.3
13%
Witcher 3 ultra * (dB)
35.4
40.2
45.23
47.2
43.2

* ... smaller is better

Temperature

The casing heats up noticeably under load. However, we cannot find any critical values. The SoC looks a little different, as Geekom does not limit the maximum temperature, which quickly reaches 100 °C under load. Unlike the Cinebench R15 multi-loop, the Intel Core i9-13900H does not exceed the 64-watt limit in the stress test. The SoC heats up too quickly and the performance has to be reduced. Over a longer period of time, the temperature then stabilizes at around 90 °C, which is not a problem for the processor. The extremely compact design simply makes it impossible to install a more powerful cooling system.

Stress test Prime95, solo
Stress test Prime95, solo
FurMark stress test, solo
FurMark stress test, solo
Prime95 and FurMark stress test
Prime95 and FurMark stress test
Geekom XT13 Pro stress test (top)
Geekom XT13 Pro stress test (top)
Geekom XT13 Pro stress test (bottom)
Geekom XT13 Pro stress test (bottom)
Geekom XT13 Pro stress test (back)
Geekom XT13 Pro stress test (back)
Power supply unit during the stress test
Power supply unit during the stress test
Max. Load
 43.4 °C
110 F
45.7 °C
114 F
45.1 °C
113 F
 
 35.7 °C
96 F
42 °C
108 F
40.9 °C
106 F
 
 32 °C
90 F
37.3 °C
99 F
32.9 °C
91 F
 
Maximum: 45.7 °C = 114 F
Average: 39.4 °C = 103 F
40 °C
104 F
40.1 °C
104 F
40.3 °C
105 F
34.2 °C
94 F
37.8 °C
100 F
35.8 °C
96 F
34.7 °C
94 F
35.4 °C
96 F
32.1 °C
90 F
Maximum: 40.3 °C = 105 F
Average: 36.7 °C = 98 F
Power Supply (max.)  45.6 °C = 114 F | Room Temperature 21.8 °C = 71 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated)
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.3 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Mini PC.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.6 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.3 °C / 90 F.

Power consumption

The power consumption of the Geekom XT13 Pro compares very favorably with its competitors. We only measured low values even in idle mode. The low power limits (PL1 and PL2) of the Intel Core i9-13900H ensure a relatively low energy requirement under load. Under average load, the system manages with a little less than 50 watts. Under load, we only see the 94.5 watts for a short time when the system can still make use of the Turbo. We were able to observe a somewhat peculiar behavior. In the Cinebench R23 Sigle test, we documented a lot of spikes, which has never been seen in other test devices. We repeated the test several times - with the same result. It is reasonable to assume that the SoC is repeatedly working at a temperature limit in this case, which allows it to briefly absorb more power. The power supply is provided by a small power supply unit with 120 watts. The same power supply unit is included with many Geekom devices.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 1.6 / 2.8 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 6.3 / 7.1 / 9 Watt
Load midlight 49.8 / 94.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Geekom XT13 Pro
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Aoostar GEM12
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
Acemagic F2A
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
Geekom XT12 Pro
i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Geekom A7
R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
Average of class Mini PC
 
Power Consumption
-38%
-34%
-35%
-21%
11%
1%
-45%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
6.3
8.2
-30%
8.2
-30%
9.1
-44%
5.7
10%
3.8
40%
Idle Average * (Watt)
7.1
10
-41%
12.1
-70%
10.3
-45%
9.5
-34%
4.8
32%
8.65 ?(3.8 - 63, n=198)
-22%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
9
14.6
-62%
14
-56%
14.4
-60%
16.5
-83%
6.5
28%
10.9 ?(5.8 - 68.9, n=198)
-21%
Load Average * (Watt)
49.8
73.9
-48%
53.1
-7%
54.9
-10%
53.3
-7%
71.9
-44%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt)
54
79.9
-48%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
94.5
95.3
-1%
100.4
-6%
110.4
-17%
87.8
7%
94.7
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Efficiency

Performance rating - Percent
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M
100 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
86.3 pt
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
78.4 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
72.7 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
67.3 pt
Power Consumption
Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M
251 Points per Watt +31%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
205 Points per Watt +7%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
192.3 Points per Watt
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
183.7 Points per Watt -4%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
182.7 (48.6min, 48.7P1 - 81.3max) Points per Watt -5%
Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M
61.7 Points per Watt +55%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
55.6 Points per Watt +39%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
54.2 Points per Watt +36%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
39.9 Points per Watt
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
37.1 Points per Watt -7%
Cinebench R15 Multi Efficiency (external Monitor)
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M
35.8 Points per Watt +30%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
31.2 Points per Watt +13%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
27.5 Points per Watt
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
26.6 Points per Watt -3%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
24.7 Points per Watt -10%

Power consumption with external monitor

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.45 (6.3-9.04)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10 (9.28-14.3)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø12.2 (10.9-14.1)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10.4 (9.08-14.4)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø79.6 (76-85.2)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø43.8 (42.6-45.7)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø48.4 (45.6-52.4)
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø57.2 (53.8-88.4)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø84.4 (83.6-85.1)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø91.8 (87.6-95.4)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø92.2 (78.7-114)
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø54 (52.8-55.9)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø79.9 (75.5-83.5)
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø49.8 (46-53.2)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø73.9 (55.4-87)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø53.1 (49.6-57.6)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø54.9 (50.2-57)

Power consumption with external monitor

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø89 (87.1-94.5)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø83.6 (80.7-95.3)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø98.1 (94.2-100.4)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø99.6 (92-110.4)
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø89 (83.2-91.1)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø82.1 (74.2-89.2)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø88 (87.7-88.3)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103 (99.2-107)
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø43.1 (15.9-70.3)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø34 (31.1-57.1)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø33.3 (28.9-63)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø32.7 (19.4-55.3)
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø62.4 (49.8-87.7)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø75.3 (72.3-87.5)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø87.7 (87.3-88.3)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø100.7 (97.2-108.6)
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø52.1 (50.2-55.2)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø83.1 (79.2-88.5)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø50.3 (47.7-65.3)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø49.7 (47.3-60.6)

Pros

+ Sturdy and compact housing
+ modern design and high-quality metal surfaces
+ perfect workmanship
+ fast SoC with P and E cores
+ 2x USB4
+ easy to open
+ fast 2 TB SSD
+ 36 months warranty

Cons

- low iGPU performance
- clearly audible under load
- high purchase price

Verdict - Premium price without premium performance

Geekom XT13 Pro in test - provided by Geekom
Geekom XT13 Pro in test - provided by Geekom

The Geekom XT13 Pro is a powerful mini-PC. However, we were already able to attest to this with the Geekom XT12 Pro. If we only compare these two models with each other, you can opt for the older device without any noticeable loss of performance. The Intel Core i9-13900H of the Geekom XT13 Pro cannot provide a noticeable increase in performance. The technical differences compared to the Intel Core i9-12900H are too small. Geekom does not dare to take the bold step of a mini-PC based on the Meteor Lake series. This means that Geekom is left behind, as many other manufacturers have already equipped their model series with the latest processors from Intel. The biggest disadvantage of the Geekom XT13 Pro is the iGPU, which is inferior to the modern representatives in all tests. However, Geekom is not only inferior to its competitors here but also to itself. Geekom's own portfolio includes mini-PCs with the latest AMD SoCs, which are technically not much worse, but deliver an all-round better result. We haven't even looked at the price yet. Unfortunately, the Geekom XT13 Pro is completely out of line here. 999 euros is currently on the bill if it is to be the top model. Other mini-PCs cost a little less but offer more performance.

The Geekom XT13 Pro delivers adequate performance with the Intel Core i9-13900H and impresses with its versatile features. However, the price-performance ratio of the Geekom XT13 Pro does not match up at all.

The good connectivity, with which Geekom has repeatedly scored points in the past, should be emphasized positively. The numerous connections include two USB4 ports, which may influence the purchase decision in terms of future-proofing. The three-year manufacturer's warranty also speaks in favor of a device from Geekom. Of course, this is also available for other devices from the manufacturer. The efficiency could only be increased slightly compared to the Geekom XT12 Pro. In this discipline, the Intel Core i9-13900H is clearly inferior to the more modern Meteor Lake processors. For this reason, we cannot give the Geekom XT13 Pro a purchase recommendation, even in relation to the high purchase price. If the Geekom XT13 Pro is not to become a shelf warmer, Geekom urgently needs to revise its current pricing.

Price and availability

The Geekom XT13 Pro is available from Geekom (US or UK). Get now 140 GPB off with the discount code NOTE140OFF.

Note: We have recently updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. Further information can be found here.

Geekom XT13 Pro - 07/30/2024 v8
Sebastian Bade

Chassis
88 / 98 → 89%
Connectivity
65 / 81 → 80%
Weight
82%
Games Performance
29 / 80 → 36%
Application Performance
80 / 92 → 86%
Workstation
24%
AI Performance
75%
Temperature
90%
Noise
75%
Average
50%
72%
Mini PC - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
66.2%
Repairability
12.5%
Software Updates
39%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 28%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

static version load dynamic
Loading comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Geekom XT13 Pro review: NUC mini-PC does without Meteor Lake and only gets an Intel Core i9-13900H
Sebastian Bade, 2024-08- 4 (Update: 2024-08-13)