Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX vs Intel Core i9-12900H vs AMD Ryzen 7 6800H

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

► remove from comparison AMD R9 6900HX

The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX is a processor for big (gaming) laptops based on the Rembrandt generation. The R9 6900HX integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3.3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.9 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 6 nm TSMC process. The "X" in the name indicates the overclocking capabilities of the CPU.

The new Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip itself however, offers a lot of new features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2, and AV1 decode.

A big novelty is the integrated GPU Radeon 680M, that is now based on the RDNA2 architecture and offers 12 CUs at up to 2.4 GHz. It should be the fastest iGPU of all at the time of announcement.

Performance

The average 6900HX in our database edges out the Core i7-12800H just slightly while, a little disappointingly, not quite managing to leave the 6900HS behind in the dust. Don't get us wrong; this is still a brilliant CPU for your demanding apps and games, as of late 2022. It does lag behind some of the 12th generation Intel Core i9 options, though.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of nearly 90 W, the XMG Neo 15 2022 is among the fastest laptops built around the 6900HX that we know of. It can be at least 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 45 W with the letter "X" indicating that the user is officially allowed to overclock the thing - leading to an increase in power consumption levels. Either way, a high-performance cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The R9 6900HX is built with TSMC's 6 nm process making for very good, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-12900H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-12900H

The Intel Core i9-12900H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.5 to 5 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 3.8 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the 12900HK, the 12900H does not offer the open multiplicator (for overclocking) but the full "Enterprise" set of vPro features (for remote management).

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.45 GHz.

Performance

The average 12900H in our database proves to be an outrageously fast CPU, ripping the Ryzen 9 6900HX to pieces as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Perhaps surprisingly, the i9's multi-thread performance is not much higher than that of the Core i7-12700H, suggesting the latter might be a better bang for the buck.

With its decent cooling solution and a long-term Power Limit of 110 W, the Asus StudioBook 16 H7600ZW is one of the fastest laptops built around the i9-12900H that we know of. It can be more than 80% faster than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, depending on the circumstances.

Power consumption

The Core i9 has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 35 W, with 45 W being its Base power consumption. The CPU's maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sits at 115 W.

The i9-12900H is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower than average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 6800H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 6800H

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800H is a processor for big (gaming) laptops based on the Rembrandt generation. The R7 6800H integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3.2 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.7 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 6 nm TSMC process.

The new Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip itself however, offers a lot of new features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2, and AV1 decode.

A big novelty is the integrated GPU Radeon 680M that is now based on the RDNA2 architecture and offers 12 CUs at up to 2.2 GHz. It should be the fastest iGPU of all at the time of announcement.

Performance

The average 6800H in our database is in the same league as the Core i5-12500H and the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. The Ryzen 9 5900HX is found close nearby as well.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 90 W, the Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H is among the fastest systems built around the 6800H that we know of. It can be about 60% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 45 W. An active cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The R7 6800H is built with TSMC's 6 nm manufacturing process for above average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 6900HXIntel Core i9-12900HAMD Ryzen 7 6800H
SeriesAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)Intel Alder Lake-PAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
CodenameRembrandt-H (Zen 3+)Alder Lake-HRembrandt-H (Zen 3+)
Series: Rembrandt (Zen 3+) Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+)
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX3.3 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H3.3 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900HK1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H « 1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX3.3 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H « 3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H3.3 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3300 - 4900 MHz1800 - 5000 MHz3200 - 4700 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB1.2 MB512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB11.5 MB4 MB
L3 Cache16 MB24 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1614 / 208 / 16
TDP45 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology6 nm10 nm6 nm
max. Temp.95 °C100 °C95 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2BGA1744FP7/FP7r2
FeaturesDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 680M ( - 2400 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)AMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 6900HX
41.5 pt (58%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900H
44.1 pt (61%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 6800H
40.7 pt (56%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
min: 91     avg: 91.5     median: 91.5 (64%)     max: 92 Points
min: 96     avg: 103.7     median: 104.5 (73%)     max: 111 Points
88 Points (61%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
min: 666     avg: 695     median: 695 (13%)     max: 724 Points
min: 371     avg: 588     median: 571 (11%)     max: 734 Points
709 Points (13%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9709     avg: 13307     median: 13497 (13%)     max: 15100 Points
min: 7359     avg: 15091     median: 15906 (15%)     max: 19648 Points
min: 11481     avg: 12957     median: 13094 (12%)     max: 14660 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1516     avg: 1565     median: 1558 (66%)     max: 1616 Points
min: 1634     avg: 1825     median: 1863 (79%)     max: 1921 Points
min: 1500     avg: 1527     median: 1542 (66%)     max: 1552 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 595     avg: 610     median: 610 (68%)     max: 631 Points
min: 624     avg: 706     median: 715 (79%)     max: 738 Points
min: 580     avg: 596     median: 598 (66%)     max: 605 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3742     avg: 5162     median: 5306 (13%)     max: 5813 Points
min: 2681     avg: 5696     median: 6053 (15%)     max: 7471 Points
min: 4460     avg: 5101     median: 5083 (12%)     max: 5661 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1588     avg: 2163     median: 2231 (14%)     max: 2411 Points
min: 1395     avg: 2456     median: 2586 (16%)     max: 3077 Points
min: 1585     avg: 2090     median: 2136 (13%)     max: 2366 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 241     avg: 250.1     median: 249 (75%)     max: 261 Points
min: 235     avg: 261.9     median: 265 (80%)     max: 277 Points
min: 182.7     avg: 234     median: 242.5 (73%)     max: 250 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 19.01     avg: 23.9     median: 23.9 (31%)     max: 26.44 Points
min: 12.08     avg: 23.6     median: 25.3 (33%)     max: 32.77 Points
min: 23.02     avg: 24.4     median: 24.6 (32%)     max: 25.67 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.86     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (73%)     max: 3.07 Points
min: 2.83     avg: 3     median: 3 (74%)     max: 3.3 Points
min: 2.83     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (71%)     max: 2.9 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6405     avg: 7252     median: 6545.5 (40%)     max: 12330 Points
min: 7952     avg: 8475     median: 8235 (50%)     max: 9498 Points
min: 6382     avg: 6410     median: 6421 (39%)     max: 6428 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 32313     avg: 42271     median: 39524 (29%)     max: 67558 Points
min: 24313     avg: 43425     median: 47767 (35%)     max: 60567 Points
min: 36895     avg: 39397     median: 39319 (28%)     max: 41978 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 55915     avg: 69650     median: 70044 (49%)     max: 77450 Points
min: 48178     avg: 66910     median: 70976.5 (49%)     max: 77409 Points
min: 67316     avg: 69054     median: 69054 (48%)     max: 70792 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 11870     avg: 12332     median: 12239.5 (15%)     max: 12943 Points
min: 12846     avg: 13385     median: 13227.5 (16%)     max: 14567 Points
min: 12014     avg: 12078     median: 12078 (15%)     max: 12142 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 93.19     avg: 114.7     median: 104.8 (1%)     max: 149.369 s
min: 187.176     avg: 206.8     median: 197.8 (2%)     max: 265.116 s
min: 97.298     avg: 309     median: 260.2 (3%)     max: 569.631 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.461     avg: 4     median: 3.8 (1%)     max: 4.688 s
min: 3.421     avg: 4.1     median: 4 (1%)     max: 5.062 s
min: 3.55     avg: 8.8     median: 8.2 (2%)     max: 14.531 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6795     avg: 6875     median: 6875 (11%)     max: 6980 Points
min: 7620     avg: 8202     median: 7937 (13%)     max: 9328 Points
min: 5890     avg: 11558     median: 6065 (10%)     max: 22719 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 49526     avg: 60091     median: 61333 (35%)     max: 65336 MIPS
min: 34684     avg: 60674     median: 64899 (37%)     max: 76677 MIPS
min: 55067     avg: 59319     median: 58341 (33%)     max: 64817 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5090     avg: 5799     median: 5817 (70%)     max: 6070 MIPS
min: 5302     avg: 5845     median: 5881 (70%)     max: 6289 MIPS
min: 5521     avg: 5726     median: 5758 (69%)     max: 5803 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 93.25     avg: 115.2     median: 114.5 (40%)     max: 127.8 fps
min: 67.5     avg: 105.8     median: 111.4 (39%)     max: 126.7 fps
min: 122.2     avg: 125.9     median: 125.9 (44%)     max: 129.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 240.5     avg: 253.9     median: 255.5 (59%)     max: 262.5 fps
min: 225     avg: 266.6     median: 263.3 (61%)     max: 317 fps
min: 251.5     avg: 258.9     median: 258.9 (60%)     max: 266.3 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 12.6     avg: 16.7     median: 17 (30%)     max: 18.7 fps
min: 8.05     avg: 17     median: 17.7 (31%)     max: 22.5 fps
min: 14.9     avg: 16.3     median: 15.9 (28%)     max: 18.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.857     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (0%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
min: 0.864     avg: 1.1     median: 1 (0%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
min: 0.972     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (0%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.3     avg: 1.6     median: 1.7 (29%)     max: 1.8 GB/s
min: 1.5     avg: 1.8     median: 1.9 (33%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
min: 1.5     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (29%)     max: 1.8 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 9.3     avg: 11.8     median: 11.9 (31%)     max: 13.5 GB/s
min: 8.6     avg: 10.5     median: 10.3 (27%)     max: 12.8 GB/s
min: 7.7     avg: 10.9     median: 11.5 (30%)     max: 13.5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 360     avg: 416.7     median: 407 (5%)     max: 558 Seconds
min: 273     avg: 426     median: 377 (5%)     max: 850 Seconds
min: 355     avg: 397.8     median: 392 (5%)     max: 453 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 212     avg: 238.7     median: 231 (2%)     max: 357 Seconds
min: 160     avg: 232.6     median: 210 (1%)     max: 451 Seconds
min: 213     avg: 242.1     median: 244 (2%)     max: 268 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4627     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4974 sec
min: 0.4218     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.506 sec
min: 0.4783     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.515 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12154     avg: 13269     median: 13274 (28%)     max: 14115 Points
min: 10122     avg: 13153     median: 13453 (29%)     max: 14655 Points
min: 13527     avg: 13696     median: 13602 (29%)     max: 13958 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.328     avg: 7.8     median: 7.7 (2%)     max: 8.567 s
min: 7.3     avg: 7.7     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 8.329 s
min: 7.839     avg: 8.5     median: 8.5 (2%)     max: 9.131 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 16.373     avg: 18.8     median: 18.8 (1%)     max: 20.719 s
min: 16.373     avg: 17.3     median: 17.2 (1%)     max: 18.439 s
min: 19.101     avg: 20.4     median: 20.4 (1%)     max: 21.76 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 385.531     avg: 622     median: 656.5 (3%)     max: 692.859 s
min: 385.4     avg: 410.8     median: 398.6 (2%)     max: 474.148 s
min: 694.152     avg: 712     median: 711.6 (3%)     max: 729.001 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 38061     avg: 64608     median: 67158 (59%)     max: 72267 Points
min: 33640     avg: 52620     median: 53621 (47%)     max: 62706 Points
min: 63580     avg: 65107     median: 65106.5 (57%)     max: 66633 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 15855     avg: 18161     median: 17908 (48%)     max: 21036 Points
min: 10552     avg: 21220     median: 22093 (60%)     max: 26126 Points
min: 16034     avg: 17954     median: 17606.5 (48%)     max: 20194 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 71056     avg: 77629     median: 77862 (63%)     max: 83820 Points
min: 70655     avg: 87893     median: 91477 (74%)     max: 103016 Points
min: 72800     avg: 78445     median: 80390 (65%)     max: 82145 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 68580     avg: 77428     median: 77897 (63%)     max: 84038 Points
min: 71651     avg: 89380     median: 91745 (74%)     max: 103757 Points
min: 72252     avg: 78330     median: 80583 (65%)     max: 82155 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 76107     avg: 80997     median: 80616 (68%)     max: 84711 Points
min: 81857     avg: 89973     median: 89999 (76%)     max: 100472 Points
min: 79042     avg: 82896     median: 84041 (71%)     max: 85606 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13091     avg: 17827     median: 18435 (47%)     max: 19474 Points
min: 9262     avg: 17871     median: 19114 (48%)     max: 22123 Points
min: 16924     avg: 17994     median: 17412.5 (44%)     max: 19934 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 18389     avg: 24551     median: 25524 (46%)     max: 27338 Points
min: 9703     avg: 25476     median: 26686 (48%)     max: 31176 Points
min: 23542     avg: 24922     median: 24655 (44%)     max: 27288 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6621     avg: 9584     median: 9706 (41%)     max: 11039 Points
min: 5062     avg: 11513     median: 11941 (50%)     max: 14424 Points
min: 8128     avg: 9440     median: 9263 (39%)     max: 10908 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2148 Points (58%)
min: 1893     avg: 2340     median: 2368.5 (64%)     max: 2582 Points
min: 2049     avg: 2056     median: 2056 (55%)     max: 2063 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
10340 Points (41%)
min: 9258     avg: 10349     median: 10229.5 (40%)     max: 12044 Points
min: 9527     avg: 9585     median: 9584.5 (38%)     max: 9642 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1523     avg: 1589     median: 1589 (67%)     max: 1652 Points
min: 1631     avg: 1797     median: 1820 (77%)     max: 1892 Points
min: 1518     avg: 1550     median: 1550.5 (65%)     max: 1568 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8313     avg: 9642     median: 9647 (17%)     max: 10490 Points
min: 8519     avg: 11903     median: 12233.5 (22%)     max: 14376 Points
min: 8898     avg: 9458     median: 9331 (17%)     max: 10355 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1531     avg: 1561     median: 1557 (7%)     max: 1603 Points
min: 1553     avg: 1695     median: 1710 (7%)     max: 1838 Points
min: 1484     avg: 1505     median: 1509 (7%)     max: 1523 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9220     avg: 9880     median: 10144 (32%)     max: 10426 Points
min: 8374     avg: 10525     median: 9892 (31%)     max: 12717 Points
min: 8868     avg: 9294     median: 9228 (29%)     max: 10189 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6191     avg: 6642     median: 6698 (67%)     max: 6804 Points
min: 7191     avg: 7533     median: 7650 (76%)     max: 8015 Points
min: 6341     avg: 6427     median: 6428 (64%)     max: 6500 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 36780     avg: 39028     median: 39852 (44%)     max: 39852 Points
min: 30682     avg: 36787     median: 36900 (40%)     max: 41134 Points
min: 35810     avg: 36493     median: 36446 (40%)     max: 37393 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 564     avg: 588     median: 586.5 (1%)     max: 607 ms
min: 490     avg: 520     median: 507.5 (1%)     max: 608 ms
min: 584     avg: 590     median: 590.5 (1%)     max: 596 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
105.9 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 84027     avg: 87439     median: 86645 (78%)     max: 92438 Points
min: 73164     avg: 74897     median: 75542 (68%)     max: 75984 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 200     avg: 222.4     median: 227 (65%)     max: 233 Points
min: 239     avg: 261.4     median: 264 (76%)     max: 279 Points
min: 197.4     avg: 222.2     median: 225 (65%)     max: 229 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 248     avg: 280.3     median: 286 (60%)     max: 304 Points
min: 263     avg: 297.4     median: 296.5 (62%)     max: 332 Points
min: 252     avg: 280     median: 278 (58%)     max: 304 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1476     avg: 1621     median: 1610 (62%)     max: 1743 Points
min: 1515     avg: 1842     median: 1860 (71%)     max: 2108 Points
min: 1522     avg: 1603     median: 1590 (61%)     max: 1704 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 48.7     avg: 96.5     median: 95.8 (17%)     max: 135.7 Watt
min: 52     avg: 108.3     median: 101.2 (17%)     max: 180 Watt
min: 62.1     avg: 97     median: 85 (15%)     max: 157.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 44.6     avg: 92.1     median: 90.6 (17%)     max: 134 Watt
min: 74.6     avg: 126.6     median: 124 (23%)     max: 222 Watt
min: 61     avg: 98.5     median: 90.7 (17%)     max: 148.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 8.35     avg: 11.9     median: 10.9 (7%)     max: 19.4 Watt
min: 4.05     avg: 28.3     median: 26 (17%)     max: 96.8 Watt
min: 3.28     avg: 10     median: 8.8 (6%)     max: 20.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 10.1     avg: 13.5     median: 13.5 (15%)     max: 17 Watt
min: 7.99     avg: 18.1     median: 14.8 (16%)     max: 34.3 Watt
min: 4.77     avg: 10.1     median: 10.4 (12%)     max: 14.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 17.8     avg: 23.6     median: 22 (16%)     max: 34.6 Points per Watt
min: 13.6     avg: 19.8     median: 19.4 (14%)     max: 27.5 Points per Watt
min: 15.9     avg: 23.5     median: 23.1 (17%)     max: 31.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX → 100% n=52

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900H → 107% n=52

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 6800H → 98% n=52

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 04. 01:53:20

#0 checking url part for id 14084 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14043 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14082 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.047s ... 0.048s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14084 +0.021s ... 0.069s

#8 got single benchmarks 14084 +0.074s ... 0.143s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14043 +0.022s ... 0.165s

#10 got single benchmarks 14043 +0.126s ... 0.291s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14082 +0.018s ... 0.309s

#12 got single benchmarks 14082 +0.06s ... 0.369s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.369s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.754s ... 1.123s

#15 return log +0s ... 1.123s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)