Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N4500 vs Intel Core i5-8265U vs Intel Celeron N5095A

Intel Celeron N4500

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4500

The Intel Celeron N4500 is a dual-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The two Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 2.8 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading. The N4500 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could is up two 30% better on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the dual-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 16 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 750 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4(x) memory controller (up to 16 GB, up to 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N4500 in our database shapes up to be a fairly slow processor, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core i3-4010U. (The latter saw the light of day in 2013 as a lower mid-range, dual-core CPU designed for use in ultraportable laptops.) In other words, expect the Celeron to be painfully slow in all but the most basic activities.

You mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

Like most N-class Intel chips, the Celeron has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 6 W. This is not much at all and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

The Celeron N4500 is built with Intel's 2nd generation 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-8265U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-8265U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Whiskey Lake generation and will probably be announced in August 2018. Compared to the similar named Kaby Lake-R processors (e.g. Core i5-8250U), the Whiskey Lake CPUs are now produced in a further improved 14nm process (14nm++) and offer higher clock speeds. The architecture and features are the same. The i5-8265U offers e.g. high Turbo clock speeds of 3,9 GHz (versus 3,4 GHz of the i5-8250U) for a single core (3.8 for two cores, 3.7 GHz for all four cores). The integrated GPU is still named Intel UHD Graphics 620 and the dual-channel memory controller still supports the same RAM speeds as Kaby-Lake-R (DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133). Thermal Velocity Boost is not supported (only in the Core i7-8565U).

The Whiskey Lake SoCs are used with a new PCH produced in 14nm that supports USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) and CNVi WiFi/BT parts.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake and Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. That means Whiskey Lake is a Kaby Lake chip manufactured in the improved 14nm++ process.

Performance

The performance of the i5-8265U depends on the cooling solution of the laptop and the defined TDP limits for short and long term performance. We already saw big differences for Kaby Lake-R (e.g., i7-8550U benchmarks), especially for long term (sustained) performance. Therefore, it will be interesting to see how the additionalTurbo  clock speed can be made use of. For the Core i7, Intel estimates between 3-11% higher performance to the Kaby-Lake-R generation and that should be similar in the Core i5 (as long as the cooling is sufficient).

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Whiskey Lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in a further improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm++), the same as the 8th Gen Coffee Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

Warning: Above information is partly still based on rumors and leaks and may therefore change till release.

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

ModelIntel Celeron N4500Intel Core i5-8265UIntel Celeron N5095A
CodenameJasper LakeWhiskey Lake-UJasper Lake
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Core i5Intel Jasper Lake
Series: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8365U1.6 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8265U « 1.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock1100 - 2800 MHz1600 - 3900 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB1 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB6 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 84 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
TDP6 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA1338BGA1528BGA1338
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (350 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache256 KB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4500
16.6 pt (28%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8265U
26.4 pt (44%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
709 Points (1%)
3500 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
452 Points (19%)
1008 Points (42%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
188 Points (20%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
332 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
171 Points (1%)
min: 457     avg: 592     median: 601.5 (4%)     max: 750 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
82 Points (23%)
min: 111     avg: 155     median: 159 (44%)     max: 164 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.1 Points (3%)
min: 5.22     avg: 6     median: 5.7 (7%)     max: 7.22 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (25%)
min: 1.73     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (42%)     max: 1.88 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5841     avg: 6044     median: 6082 (37%)     max: 6209 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 16318     avg: 18952     median: 19418 (14%)     max: 22962 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
6954 Points (4%)
min: 18924     avg: 21959     median: 21775.5 (14%)     max: 25361 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
5266 Points (6%)
min: 7705     avg: 7880     median: 7919 (10%)     max: 7975 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1270 s (15%)
min: 371.4     avg: 402.4     median: 402.4 (5%)     max: 433.3 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
50.2 s (10%)
min: 9.635     avg: 11     median: 11 (2%)     max: 12.41 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1076 Points (2%)
min: 3215     avg: 4040     median: 3988 (6%)     max: 4916 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
5394 MIPS (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2853 MIPS (34%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12 fps (0%)
min: 31.9     avg: 37.2     median: 39.1 (1%)     max: 40.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
60.6 fps (2%)
min: 150.5     avg: 158.7     median: 156 (4%)     max: 169.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.7 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (3%)
min: 0.427     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (14%)     max: 0.464 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
min: 0.708     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (14%)     max: 0.789 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.1 GB/s (3%)
min: 4.1     avg: 4.3     median: 4.4 (11%)     max: 4.5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1565 Seconds (20%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4249 Seconds (30%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
2.1 sec (46%)
min: 0.72     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.754 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2053 Points (4%)
min: 5637     avg: 6330     median: 6316 (13%)     max: 7439 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22.8 s (5%)
min: 9.762     avg: 10     median: 9.8 (2%)     max: 10.32 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
51.4 s (2%)
min: 22.12     avg: 22.3     median: 22.2 (1%)     max: 22.43 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1132 s (5%)
min: 543     avg: 562     median: 552 (2%)     max: 590 s
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1507 Points (4%)
min: 4154     avg: 6319     median: 6222 (15%)     max: 8443 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 21036     avg: 38716     median: 38144 (31%)     max: 50513 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 21037     avg: 37535     median: 36912 (30%)     max: 48588 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 23095     avg: 49269     median: 52630 (42%)     max: 56737 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1521 Points (4%)
min: 3393     avg: 5794     median: 5651 (14%)     max: 8298 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2017 Points (4%)
min: 4640     avg: 7934     median: 8001 (14%)     max: 11278 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
504 Points (2%)
min: 1837     avg: 2540     median: 2657 (11%)     max: 2931 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 457     avg: 459.5     median: 459.5 (11%)     max: 462 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 662     avg: 710     median: 709.5 (3%)     max: 757 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 401     avg: 531     median: 594 (23%)     max: 598 Points
min: 1024     avg: 1039     median: 1041.5 (40%)     max: 1047 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 707     avg: 929     median: 1018 (2%)     max: 1063 Points
min: 3442     avg: 3669     median: 3624.5 (6%)     max: 3986 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 986     avg: 1015     median: 1017 (4%)     max: 1041 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2973     avg: 3446     median: 3365 (11%)     max: 3962 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2106     avg: 4387     median: 4514 (45%)     max: 4830 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7144     avg: 13600     median: 13295 (13%)     max: 16249 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4229     avg: 4422     median: 4433 (49%)     max: 4605 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13168     avg: 13975     median: 14368 (19%)     max: 14390 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12198     avg: 13659     median: 14002 (25%)     max: 14499 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3470     avg: 3669     median: 3678.5 (48%)     max: 3842 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12221     avg: 13021     median: 13021 (20%)     max: 13821 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3805     avg: 3906     median: 3906 (58%)     max: 4007 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 10592     avg: 10596     median: 10595.5 (56%)     max: 10599 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 8582     avg: 8660     median: 8660 (60%)     max: 8738 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 11914     avg: 12181     median: 12181 (24%)     max: 12448 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 12671     avg: 13099     median: 13099 (26%)     max: 13527 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 11598     avg: 11639     median: 11639 (30%)     max: 11680 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1665.2     avg: 2413     median: 2412.6 (3%)     max: 3160 ms
min: 851     avg: 1141     median: 1194 (1%)     max: 1245 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
197.1 ms (2%)
min: 83     avg: 93.5     median: 95.6 (1%)     max: 99.8 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
24838 Points (18%)
min: 12842     avg: 31246     median: 32120 (24%)     max: 35563 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 91.2     avg: 99.6     median: 99.6 (27%)     max: 108 Points
145.3 Points (40%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 48.2     avg: 94.8     median: 94.8 (17%)     max: 141.3 Points
min: 186     avg: 187     median: 187 (34%)     max: 188 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
2.3 MB/s (2%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
128.8 MB/s (4%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
91 MB/s (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
2205 MB/s (55%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 6206     avg: 6520     median: 6519.5 (3%)     max: 6833 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 7404     avg: 7641     median: 7641 (28%)     max: 7878 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
381 Points (14%)
1006 Points (38%)
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
81 Points (45%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.7 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
9.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
10.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.06     avg: 4.8     median: 4.8 (6%)     max: 5.49 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4500 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8265U → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 08. 21:40:20

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13079 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10116 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759952419s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13079 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 13079 +0.009s ... 0.021s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10116 +0.005s ... 0.026s

#11 got single benchmarks 10116 +0.048s ... 0.074s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0.001s ... 0.075s

#13 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.075s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.075s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.06s ... 0.134s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.134s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)