NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro P620
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro P5000 Max-Q (official Nvidia Quadro P5000 with Max-Q Design) is a mobile high-end workstation graphics card for notebooks. It is the power efficient variant of the normal Quadro P5000 for laptops and offers slightly reduced clock speeds (1101 - 1366 MHz versus 1164 - 1506 MHz) and a greatly reduced power consumption (80 versus 100 Watt TGP). Similar to the consumer GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (Laptop), it is based on a slimmed-down GP104 chip with 2048 shaders. The graphics card is designed for the Kaby Lake generation.
The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers , which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.
Performance
The theoretical performance should be slightly below the normal Quadro P4000 due to the reduced clock speeds.
Power Consumption
With an TGP of 80 Watt, the P5000 Max-Q is only slightly higher rated (5 Watt) as the much slower Quadro P3000 (75 Watt) and therefore similar sized laptops can use the P5000 Max-Q.
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia T500 Mobile (formerly known as Quadro T500) for laptops is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is based on the consumer GeForce MX450 and features the same 896 cores and a 64 Bit memory bus. Currently it is available with 2 or 4 GB graphics RAM (GDDR5 or GDDR6). The TDP ranges between 18 - 25 Watt depending on the variant. As the MX450, the T500 also supports PCIe 4.0. The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC.
The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal. In contrary to the faster Quadro RTX cards, the T500 does not feature raytracing and Tensor cores.
NVIDIA Quadro P620 ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro P620 is an entry-level mobile workstation graphics card for laptops. It uses a GP107 Pascal chip with a 128 Bit memory bus and therefore similar to the old Quadro P1000 with reduced clock speeds. Compared to consumer cards, there is no similar specified card currently and therefore the P620 slots in between the GeForce MX250 and GTX 1050 . With a theoretical peak of 1.5 TFLOPS, the performance is clearly ahead of the old P600 with 1.2 TFLOPS.
The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers , which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU NVIDIA Quadro P620 Quadro P Series Codename N17E-Q5 Max-Q Architecture Pascal Turing Pascal Pipelines 2048 - unified 896 - unified 512 - unified Core Speed 1101 - 1366 (Boost) MHz 1365 - 1695 (Boost) MHz 1177 - 1442 (Boost) MHz Memory Speed 6006 MHz 10000 MHz 6000 MHz Memory Bus Width 256 Bit 64 Bit 128 Bit Memory Type GDDR5 GDDR5, GDDR6 GDDR5 Max. Amount of Memory 16 GB 4 GB 4 GB Shared Memory no no no API DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5 Power Consumption 100 Watt 25 Watt 25 Watt technology 16 nm 12 nm 14 nm Features Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus Vulkan, Multi Monitor Notebook Size large medium sized large Date of Announcement 11.01.2017 27.05.2019 27.05.2019 Link to Manufacturer Page www.nvidia.com
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - T500 Laptop GPU
1.9 pt (6%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro P620
2.1 pt (6%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1627 avg: 1953 median: 1958 (6%) max: 2270 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 72% 92% 80%
min: 1572 avg: 1583 median: 1582.5 (5%) max: 1593 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 86% 78% 100% 87%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1554 avg: 1814 median: 1787.5 (5%) max: 2127 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 73% 91% 77%
min: 1383 avg: 1388 median: 1388 (4%) max: 1393 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 84% 80% 100% 84%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
310112 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
119547 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 15562 avg: 15975 median: 15851 (17%) max: 16513 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 94% 96% 100%
min: 22501 avg: 23292 median: 23291.5 (25%) max: 24082 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 77% 80%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 22719 avg: 24657 median: 23453 (6%) max: 27800 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 84% 82%
min: 29746 avg: 30410 median: 30409.5 (8%) max: 31073 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 79% 77%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3406 avg: 4047 median: 3973.5 (7%) max: 4833 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 70% 90% 74%
min: 4402 avg: 4448 median: 4447.5 (8%) max: 4493 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 74% 95% 79%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3696 avg: 4322 median: 4224.5 (5%) max: 5141 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 72% 90% 74%
min: 4600 avg: 4673 median: 4672.5 (5%) max: 4745 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 77% 96% 79%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
80696 Points (10%)
124567 Points (15%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 65%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 6293 avg: 7692 median: 8132 (11%) max: 8212 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 99% 77% 99% 100%
min: 6492 avg: 6552 median: 6519 (9%) max: 6645 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 85% 77% 99% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 6767 avg: 7808 median: 7995.5 (7%) max: 8475 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 80% 95% 93%
min: 5850 avg: 5939 median: 5909 (5%) max: 6059 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 81% 84% 100% 98%
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro P620 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
25105 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro P620 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
21759 Points (12%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
31133 Points (41%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro P620
min: 34862 avg: 35092 median: 35092 (46%) max: 35322 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 89%
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro P620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 77.7 avg: 83.4 median: 78.7 (20%) max: 93.9 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 49.5 avg: 50.1 median: 50.3 (7%) max: 50.6 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 25.23 avg: 26 median: 25.8 (6%) max: 26.84 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 14.32 avg: 14.5 median: 14.5 (4%) max: 14.65 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro P620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 40.7 avg: 40.9 median: 40.9 (11%) max: 41.03 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 3.86 avg: 3.9 median: 3.9 (3%) max: 3.93 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 59 avg: 59.5 median: 59.3 (24%) max: 60.3 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro P620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 53.2 avg: 54.2 median: 54.2 (9%) max: 55.1 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro P620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
57.5 fps (10%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 64.9 avg: 80.7 median: 82.1 (22%) max: 93.6 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 86% 90% 69%
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro P620
min: 78.5 avg: 81.7 median: 79.8 (21%) max: 86.7 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 95% 99% 77%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 71.2 avg: 79.2 median: 77.5 (9%) max: 90.8 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 78% 91% 80%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro P620
min: 89 avg: 90.4 median: 90.4 (10%) max: 91.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 79% 91% 80%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 16.01 avg: 18.9 median: 16.9 (4%) max: 23.87 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 100% 71% 67%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P620
min: 25.23 avg: 26 median: 25.3 (6%) max: 27.4 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 100% 66% 63%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 24.84 avg: 29.6 median: 28.7 (6%) max: 36.14 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 73% 86% 69%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P620
min: 13.05 avg: 19.1 median: 19.1 (4%) max: 25.1 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 80% 85% 100% 80%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 48.47 avg: 53.5 median: 51.9 (6%) max: 62 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 81% 86% 78%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro P620
min: 68.3 avg: 68.8 median: 68.8 (8%) max: 69.2 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 75% 80% 72%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 8.57 avg: 9.6 median: 8.7 (3%) max: 12.41 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 69% 71% 69%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P620
min: 7.29 avg: 7.7 median: 7.7 (2%) max: 8.07 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 93% 95% 93%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 55.8 avg: 62.1 median: 59.2 (9%) max: 74.3 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 77% 83% 75%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P620
min: 66.2 avg: 67.3 median: 67.7 (10%) max: 68 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 83% 89% 81%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 81.9 avg: 88.6 median: 88.3 (10%) max: 95.8 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 88% 97% 85%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro P620
min: 76.6 avg: 77.4 median: 77.1 (9%) max: 78.4 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 88% 91% 100% 88%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 45.15 avg: 51 median: 50.4 (9%) max: 57.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 83% 91% 78%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro P620
min: 55.2 avg: 56.4 median: 56.7 (10%) max: 57.2 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 85% 93% 80%
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 37.82 avg: 40.2 median: 39.1 (8%) max: 43.59 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 90% 87%
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 66.2 avg: 76 median: 68.8 (11%) max: 93.1 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 74% 71%
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 10.73 avg: 12.1 median: 11 (8%) max: 14.74 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 74% 73%
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 59 avg: 65.5 median: 59.3 (9%) max: 78.1 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 76% 76%
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 8.62 avg: 9.7 median: 8.7 (7%) max: 11.96 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 72% 72%
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 29.28 avg: 34.7 median: 32.7 (16%) max: 41.95 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 70% 78%
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 16.48 avg: 19.2 median: 18 (12%) max: 23.22 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 77% 71%
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 19.56 avg: 23.3 median: 21.6 (10%) max: 28.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 75% 68%
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro P620 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6822 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
156.6 fps (54%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro P620
126.4 fps (44%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 81% 100%
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 134 avg: 168.8 median: 173 (10%) max: 195 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 69% 99% 78%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro P620
min: 143 avg: 159.4 median: 166.3 (10%) max: 169 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 87% 69% 100% 79%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro P620
99.6 % (100%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
119 fps (13%)
92.4 fps (10%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 78% 100%
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
183 fps (4%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
236 fps (14%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
503 fps (4%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
653 Samples/s (3%)
1107 Samples/s (5%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 59%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
1976 Samples/s (3%)
2058 Samples/s (4%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 96%
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4734 Points (5%)
3516 Points (4%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 74% 100%
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.1 avg: 47.1 median: 47.1 (7%) max: 49 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W 100% 101%
66.6 Watt (9%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W 100% 102%
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.6 avg: 43.7 median: 43.7 (6%) max: 50.8 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W 100% 102%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 37.1 avg: 49.9 median: 53 (12%) max: 59.6 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 102% 106% 100%
min: 56 avg: 59.8 median: 59.8 (13%) max: 63.5 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 101% 106% 100%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3674 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (38%) max: 0.4555 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 92% 100% 81%
min: 0.285 avg: 0.3 median: 0.3 (26%) max: 0.2946 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 73% 100% 81%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.439 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (37%) max: 0.4617 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W 95% 100%
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 36.1 avg: 38.1 median: 38.1 (61%) max: 40.1 dB(A)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 90% 100%
Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro P620
min: 38.7 avg: 40.7 median: 40.7 (65%) max: 42.7 dB(A)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 98% 100%
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU → 0% n= Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro P620 → 0% n=
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
T500 Laptop GPU:
10.9 15 ~ 13 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
108 113 ~ 111 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
31 72 ~ 52 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
25 34 ~ 30 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
22 33 ~ 28 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
21 32 ~ 27 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
133 148 ~ 141 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
19 23.2 ~ 21 fps
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU low med. high ultra QHD 4K Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 31 17 13 10.1 Immortals Fenyx Rising 65 35 29 24 Star Wars Squadrons 54.7 47.2 42.4 F1 2020 100 59.8 44 29.3 Strange Brigade 111 34 29 25 17.9 9.6 Far Cry 5 52 30 28 27 X-Plane 11.11 70 63 55 29.4 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 50 24 17 12.4 5.73 Dota 2 Reborn 128 118 90 79 27.7 The Witcher 3 96 52 29 20 GTA V 141 97 42 21 13.2 14 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 5 2 2 6 3 6 4 1 7 1 1 3 5
NVIDIA Quadro P620 low med. high ultra QHD 4K FIFA 20 166 117.8 112 92.4 Borderlands 3 75.8 29.7 19.3 14.5 F1 2019 102 46 39 26 Metro Exodus 46.6 21.4 15.5 12.9 Apex Legends 88.4 35.2 29.1 26 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70 16 14 12 F1 2018 106 55 42 25 X-Plane 11.11 104 71.3 63.9 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 52 26 18 Fortnite 183.6 113.2 41.9 29.3 Destiny 2 100.5 48.6 37.6 30.1 Middle-earth: Shadow of War 96 37 27 20 Rocket League 248.9 153.5 96.5 Prey 144.7 74.8 56.7 Overwatch 261.8 169 77 Doom 96.7 76.3 44.1 Ashes of the Singularity 50.6 29.2 25.4 Rise of the Tomb Raider 101.9 62.9 33.7 26.4 Dota 2 Reborn 156 139 90.2 82.8 The Witcher 3 96 55 32 17 BioShock Infinite 301.7 160.9 140 52.8 StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm 542 258.9 156.8 82.4 Guild Wars 2 149.9 73.1 28.4 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 11 9 5 6 6 5 7 8 6 2 11 2 3
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.27
log 16. 16:35:52
#0 checking url part for id 8084 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10605 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9864 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:38:48 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.139s ... 0.14s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.14s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.14s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8084 +0.037s ... 0.177s
#9 got single benchmarks 8084 +0s ... 0.177s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10605 +0.019s ... 0.196s
#11 got single benchmarks 10605 +0.02s ... 0.216s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9864 +0.013s ... 0.229s
#13 got single benchmarks 9864 +0.011s ... 0.24s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.24s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.325s ... 0.565s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.565s
#17 Got 191 rows for game benchmarks. +0.028s ... 0.593s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.593s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.021s ... 0.614s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.067s ... 0.681s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.681s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.683s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)