Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-10850H vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800H vs Intel Core i9-10885H

Intel Core i7-10850H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-10850H

The Intel Core i7-10850H is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.7 and 5.1 GHz (with Thermal Velocity Boost and Turbo Boost 3.0). Using only Turbo Boost 3.0 (when the temperatures don't allow the the Thermal Velocity Boost) a single core can reach 4.9 GHz. All six cores can reach 4.4 GHz. The processor is still manufactured on the old 14nm (14nm++) process. 

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced on the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i7-10850H supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP.

Performance

The average 10850H in our database proves to be a somewhat disappointing CPU, only matching the Core i5-10500H and the Ryzen 5 5500U in multi-thread performance. While the Core i7 will have no issue running any app or any game you can install in 2021, there are better options out there both in terms of sheer power and in terms of power efficiency.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD 630 in the Core i7-9750H. As a low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power consumption

This Core i7 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 45 W, a value that laptop makers are free to reduce somewhat (with 35 W being the minimum Intel-recommended value) resulting in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, the CPU is way too power-hungry to be the heart of a passively cooled mini-PC, laptop, tablet.

The i7-10850H is manufactured on one of the old 14 nm Intel processes leading to subpar, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 5800H

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800H is a high-performance octa-core processor of the Cezanne product family. It was released in Q1 2021; it is designed for use in larger laptops, primarily gaming laptops and DTRs. The Ryzen features eight SMT-enabled Zen 3 cores running at 3.2 GHz (base clock speed) to 4.4 GHz (highest Boost frequency possible) along with the Vega 8 iGPU. The chip has 16 MB of L3 cache.

Architecture

The Ryzen 7 5800H is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process, just like the outgoing Ryzen 7 4800H was; both CPUs have 8 cores and 16 threads, too. The underlying microarchitecture is what makes the two vastly different as the newer Zen 3 microarchitecture brings a massive IPC improvement over Zen 2. To be specific, AMD promises an increase of up to 19%, with independent reviews pointing to a lower (but sizeable nonetheless) 12% increase.

Ryzen 5 5800H supports dual-channel DDR4-3200 and quad-channel LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Unlike the desktop-grade Ryzen 5000-series processors, Ryzen 5 5800H does not support PCI-Express 4.0, meaning NVMe SSDs will be limited to read/write rates of 3.9 GB/s.

The CPU gets soldered straight on to the motherboard (FP6 socket interface) and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

The Ryzen is a marvel of a processor. As far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned, the average 5800H in our database trades blows with the Intel Core i5-12500H, Core i7-11800H, Core i7-12650H, Core i9-11950H and also the AMD Ryzen 9 4900H. Needless to say, a system built around this CPU will have little difficulty chewing through pretty much any workload imaginable for years to come.

With the long-term CPU power limit of 75 W, the Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH is among the fastest 5800H-toting laptops that we have tested; it can be at least 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest laptops built around the 5800H in our database such as the HP Victus 16 or the Asus ZenBook 14X OLED.

Graphics

In addition to its eight CPU cores, the APU has the Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics adapter. Just like the name suggests, Vega 8 features 8 Compute Units (8 x 64 = 512 unified shaders); in the case of Ryzen 7 5800H, the Vega runs at up to 2,000 MHz.

On paper, this iGPU is inferior to the 96 EU Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7. However, as is usually the case, synthetic benchmarks do not tell the entire story, as AMD's drivers are superior to those of Intel. As a result, the Vega will let you play a lot of games released in 2020 and 2021 at reasonable resolutions (up to Full HD 1080p) and Low to Medium presets. Mass Effect Legendary Edition is playable at 1080p (High), to give you an example. As the iGPU has no VRAM of its own, it is paramount that fast system RAM is used.

The graphics adapter definitely supports 2160p UHD monitors at 60 Hz. AVC, HEVC, MPEG-2, VP9-encoded videos can be hardware-decoded with the Vega but there is no AV1 support here; such a video will be software-decoded for much lower energy efficiency.

Power consumption

This AMD APU has a default TDP (also known as the long-term Power Limit) of 45 W that can be changed to anything between 35 W and 54 W by laptop makers, with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. No matter the exact value, an active cooling solution is a must.

The Ryzen 7 5800H is built with TSMC's 7 nm process for very decent, as of early 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-10885H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10885H

The Intel Core i9-10885H is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 5.3 GHz and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i9-10855H supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP. 

Performance

The performance of the Core i9-10885H should be slightly above the older Core i9-9980HK top model, thanks to the potential higher single core turbo. Thanks to the 8 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run very good on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration. At the time of announcement, the i9-10885H is the second fastest Comet Lake-H CPU behind the Core i9-10980HK.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9880H. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

ModelIntel Core i7-10850HAMD Ryzen 7 5800HIntel Core i9-10885H
SeriesIntel Comet LakeAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)Intel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-HCezanne-H (Zen 3)Comet Lake-H
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H « 2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX3.3 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H « 3.2 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H3.3 - 4.2 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H « 2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2700 - 5100 MHz3200 - 4400 MHz2400 - 5300 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB4 MB2 MB
L3 Cache12 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 128 / 168 / 16
TDP45 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm7 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1440FP6FCBGA1440
FeaturesDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$395 U.S.$556 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10850H
34.2 pt (47%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 5800H
38.9 pt (54%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10885H
36.2 pt (50%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
86 Points (60%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
618 Points (12%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 8812     avg: 11822     median: 12091.5 (11%)     max: 13214 Points
min: 8802     avg: 9438     median: 9438 (9%)     max: 10074 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1294     avg: 1410     median: 1416 (60%)     max: 1441 Points
min: 1284     avg: 1290     median: 1289.5 (55%)     max: 1295 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
494 Points (55%)
min: 502     avg: 550     median: 554 (62%)     max: 560 Points
min: 460     avg: 487.3     median: 489 (54%)     max: 513 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2636 Points (6%)
min: 3430     avg: 4578     median: 4662 (11%)     max: 5020 Points
min: 2798     avg: 3400     median: 3639 (9%)     max: 3762 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1232 Points (8%)
min: 1487     avg: 1968     median: 2005 (13%)     max: 2119 Points
min: 1264     avg: 1502     median: 1517 (10%)     max: 1726 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
203 Points (61%)
min: 209     avg: 228.2     median: 229 (69%)     max: 234 Points
min: 197     avg: 206.7     median: 211 (64%)     max: 212 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
12.2 Points (16%)
min: 21.25     avg: 22.5     median: 22.5 (29%)     max: 23.68 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.3 Points (56%)
min: 2.69     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (68%)     max: 2.75 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7653 Points (46%)
min: 5981     avg: 6017     median: 6017 (36%)     max: 6053 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
34586 Points (25%)
min: 35208     avg: 36735     median: 36734.5 (27%)     max: 38261 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 62312     avg: 65382     median: 65382 (45%)     max: 68452 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 11378     avg: 11508     median: 11507.5 (14%)     max: 11637 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 111.714     avg: 188.4     median: 188.4 (2%)     max: 265 s
131.2 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.93     avg: 6.1     median: 6.1 (1%)     max: 8.3 s
3.9 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
265 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
8.2 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5519 Points (9%)
min: 6660     avg: 6851     median: 6851 (11%)     max: 7042 Points
6420 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
30988 MIPS (18%)
min: 45773     avg: 54229     median: 54052 (31%)     max: 59986 MIPS
min: 36740     avg: 40519     median: 41823 (24%)     max: 42993 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5241 MIPS (63%)
min: 5038     avg: 5478     median: 5499.5 (66%)     max: 5632 MIPS
min: 5397     avg: 5551     median: 5589 (67%)     max: 5668 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
104.7 fps (37%)
80.5 fps (28%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
244 fps (56%)
217.8 fps (50%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
8.4 fps (15%)
min: 11.6     avg: 14.6     median: 14.8 (26%)     max: 16.1 fps
min: 10.6     avg: 11.5     median: 11.3 (20%)     max: 12.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (0%)
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (0%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.3 GB/s (22%)
min: 1.6     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (28%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.8 GB/s (20%)
min: 8.5     avg: 10     median: 10 (26%)     max: 11.5 GB/s
9.9 GB/s (26%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 486     avg: 499.5     median: 499.5 (6%)     max: 513 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
425 Seconds (3%)
min: 237     avg: 259.8     median: 255.5 (2%)     max: 339.8 Seconds
min: 283     avg: 311     median: 302 (2%)     max: 348 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (13%)
min: 0.511     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.559 sec
min: 0.564     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.572 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9471 Points (20%)
min: 12300     avg: 12790     median: 12790 (27%)     max: 13280 Points
12101 Points (26%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.7 s (2%)
min: 7.2     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (2%)     max: 9.415 s
7.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.7     avg: 18     median: 18 (1%)     max: 20.257 s
16.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
431.6 s (2%)
min: 366     avg: 419.5     median: 419.5 (2%)     max: 472.992 s
433.9 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
60691 Points (53%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
10694 Points (29%)
min: 13192     avg: 15511     median: 15120 (41%)     max: 17779 Points
min: 12279     avg: 14604     median: 14291 (39%)     max: 17242 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 77323     avg: 79661     median: 80007.5 (65%)     max: 81129 Points
31296 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 77630     avg: 79055     median: 79316 (64%)     max: 79957 Points
30997 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 78495     avg: 82477     median: 82134 (69%)     max: 85865 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
7254 Points (18%)
min: 16269     avg: 17332     median: 17425 (44%)     max: 18539 Points
min: 11176     avg: 12814     median: 12814 (32%)     max: 14452 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
14601 Points (26%)
min: 22433     avg: 23961     median: 23886 (43%)     max: 25300 Points
min: 17249     avg: 19483     median: 20594 (37%)     max: 20606 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4313 Points (18%)
min: 7021     avg: 8827     median: 8891 (37%)     max: 9835 Points
min: 6510     avg: 7798     median: 8203 (35%)     max: 8682 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1991 Points (54%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
9411 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1305 Points (55%)
min: 1336     avg: 1452     median: 1462 (62%)     max: 1505 Points
min: 1216     avg: 1303     median: 1317 (56%)     max: 1376 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5753 Points (10%)
min: 6551     avg: 7801     median: 7641 (14%)     max: 9062 Points
min: 6529     avg: 7045     median: 6914 (12%)     max: 7693 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1416     avg: 1419     median: 1418.5 (6%)     max: 1421 Points
min: 1234     avg: 1281     median: 1280.5 (6%)     max: 1327 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7408     avg: 7988     median: 7988 (25%)     max: 8568 Points
min: 6598     avg: 7172     median: 7172 (23%)     max: 7746 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5970     avg: 6133     median: 6132.5 (61%)     max: 6295 Points
min: 5672     avg: 5676     median: 5675.5 (57%)     max: 5679 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 29073     avg: 31637     median: 31636.5 (35%)     max: 34200 Points
min: 26114     avg: 29009     median: 29009 (32%)     max: 31904 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
737 ms (1%)
min: 623     avg: 643     median: 637.5 (1%)     max: 765 ms
min: 730     avg: 738     median: 734 (1%)     max: 749 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
134.1 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 65332     avg: 67146     median: 67411 (61%)     max: 68649 Points
58398 Points (52%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
190.5 Points (55%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 202     avg: 262.7     median: 269 (56%)     max: 280 Points
min: 233     avg: 234.3     median: 234 (49%)     max: 236 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1302     avg: 1344     median: 1330.5 (51%)     max: 1429 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 49.1     avg: 84     median: 82.6 (14%)     max: 109 Watt
min: 78.1     avg: 103.7     median: 116.4 (20%)     max: 116.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 53.9     avg: 89.8     median: 89 (16%)     max: 123 Watt
min: 125.2     avg: 131.2     median: 126 (23%)     max: 142.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.79     avg: 6.3     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 7.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.92     avg: 11.6     median: 11.4 (13%)     max: 15.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 17     avg: 22.9     median: 22.2 (17%)     max: 36.6 Points per Watt
min: 10.1     avg: 11.5     median: 10.7 (8%)     max: 13.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10850H → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 5800H → 138% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10885H → 123% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 01. 18:00:58

#0 checking url part for id 11960 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13005 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11962 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.054s ... 0.055s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.056s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11960 +0.017s ... 0.073s

#8 got single benchmarks 11960 +0.012s ... 0.085s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13005 +0.017s ... 0.102s

#10 got single benchmarks 13005 +0.158s ... 0.26s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11962 +0.014s ... 0.274s

#12 got single benchmarks 11962 +0.021s ... 0.294s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.294s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.426s ... 0.721s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.721s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)