Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS vs AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS

AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7735HS

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS is a processor for (gaming) laptops based of the Rembrandt Refresh generation. The R7 7735HS integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3.2 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.75 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in 6 nm at TSMC. The 7735HS is the refresh of the Ryzen 7 6800HS with 50 MHz higher boost speed and a potential higher TDP up to 54W.

The Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip offers modern features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4 and DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s.

Performance

The average 7735HS in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 5 7645HX, Ryzen 9 6900HS, Ryzen 9 6900HX, Core i5-12500H, Core i5-13500H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 75 W, the Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 is among the fastest laptops built around the 7735HS that we know of. It can be about 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

The integrated GPU Radeon 680M is still one of the fastest iGPUs (only bested by the new Radeon 780M). It is based on the RDNA2 architecture and offers 12 CUs at up to 2.2 GHz.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 CPU has a specified TDP of 35 W to 54 W (also known as the long-term power limit).

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is a powerful Phoenix family chip that saw the light of day in H1 2023. The processor features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at 3.8 GHz. The highest Boost clock speed achievable is 5.1 GHz.

Not only does this APU has full might of the Zen 4 architecture at its disposal, it also comes with the new Ryzen AI technology that's set to make generative AI more ubiquitous than ever before. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has. Ryzen AI is coming after Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies; time will tell if this move by AMD is a good idea.

Perhaps more importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is set to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

Elsewhere, the 7840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7840HS in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-12700H, Core i7-12850HX, Core i9-12900H, Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The 7840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS

► remove from comparison AMD R5 7640HS

The Ryzen 5 7640HS is an upper mid-range processor (APU) of the Phoenix product family. It was brought to life in H1 2023 and it has 6 SMT-enabled Zen 4 cores (12 threads) running at 4.3 GHz to 5.0 GHz. The laptop chip is one of the first to feature Ryzen AI, AMD's answer to Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies. The Radeon 760M iGPU is responsible for carrying out 3D calculations and similar duties.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has.

More importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (Zen 3-powered chips did not have that) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is set to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

Elsewhere, the 7640HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a super-fast DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 RAM controller. USB 4 (and thus Thunderbolt) is supported natively and so is PCIe 4. In fact, 20 PCIe 4 lanes are on offer; data transfer speeds of up to 7.8 GB/s will be possible provided a sufficiently fast NVMe SSD is used.

Systems powered by this Ryzen 5 series chip are expected to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that the APU is not overclockable and neither will you be able to replace it with a faster one as it gets soldered down permanently (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7640HS in our database is about as fast as the Ryzen 9 5900HX, Ryzen 7 6800H, Ryzen 7 7736U and also the Core i5-12500H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a good if not record-breaking result as of mid 2023. Such a CPU will handle pretty much any task you can throw at it, gaming included.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 760M has 8 CUs (512 shaders) running at up to 2,600 MHz. While this is not the best graphics adapter for gaming as it's only just fast enough for low quality settings and resolutions such as 1600 x 900, it will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it also HW-encodes and HW-decodes the most widely used video codecs such as AV1, HEVC and AVC.

Power consumption

The 7640HS has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between improving battery life and giving the system they are working on more oomph. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The APU is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 7735HSAMD Ryzen 7 7840HSAMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
CodenameRembrandt-HS RefreshPhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4)
Clock3200 - 4750 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz4300 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB384 KB
L2 Cache4 MB8 MB6 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 168 / 166 / 12
TDP35 Watt35 Watt45 Watt
Technology6 nm4 nm4 nm
Die Size210 mm2178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.95 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2FP7/FP7r2/FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUAMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Series: Phoenix (Zen 4) Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS « 4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7735HS
36.6 pt (61%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7840HS
40.3 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 7640HS
38.9 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 88.1     avg: 90.3     median: 90.5 (51%)     max: 92 Points
min: 101     avg: 104.6     median: 105 (59%)     max: 107 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 620     avg: 684     median: 666.5 (12%)     max: 781 Points
min: 880     avg: 912     median: 913 (17%)     max: 956 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10283     avg: 12760     median: 13240 (12%)     max: 14131 Points
min: 15515     avg: 16343     median: 16188 (15%)     max: 17214 Points
13029 Points (12%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1288     avg: 1527     median: 1546 (65%)     max: 1570 Points
min: 1718     avg: 1769     median: 1774 (75%)     max: 1812 Points
1715 Points (72%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 502     avg: 596     median: 602 (66%)     max: 613 Points
min: 668     avg: 687     median: 688 (75%)     max: 705 Points
667 Points (73%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3968     avg: 4946     median: 5151 (13%)     max: 5502 Points
min: 6061     avg: 6387     median: 6344 (15%)     max: 6744 Points
5044 Points (12%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1758     avg: 2121     median: 2163.6 (14%)     max: 2355 Points
min: 2473     avg: 2587     median: 2565 (16%)     max: 2729 Points
2079 Points (13%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 206     avg: 245.7     median: 248 (69%)     max: 255 Points
min: 270     avg: 277.2     median: 278 (77%)     max: 286 Points
271 Points (75%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 21.27     avg: 24.7     median: 25.5 (33%)     max: 26.63 Points
min: 29.59     avg: 29.9     median: 29.7 (38%)     max: 30.25 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.92     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (70%)     max: 2.98 Points
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (78%)     max: 3.33 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6340     avg: 6566     median: 6624.5 (40%)     max: 6676 Points
min: 7515     avg: 7599     median: 7574 (46%)     max: 7709 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 36073     avg: 40315     median: 40976.5 (30%)     max: 43232 Points
min: 45602     avg: 48003     median: 48144 (35%)     max: 50264 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 61781     avg: 69551     median: 71042 (45%)     max: 75830 Points
min: 83726     avg: 85254     median: 84973 (54%)     max: 87064 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12156     avg: 12431     median: 12494 (15%)     max: 12642 Points
min: 14015     avg: 14130     median: 14177 (17%)     max: 14197 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 92.763     avg: 98.4     median: 97.8 (1%)     max: 104.757 s
min: 71.922     avg: 73.4     median: 72.8 (1%)     max: 75.535 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.429     avg: 3.6     median: 3.5 (1%)     max: 3.934 s
min: 2.626     avg: 2.8     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 3.244 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6378     avg: 6627     median: 6477.5 (10%)     max: 7174 Points
min: 6428     avg: 7133     median: 7271 (12%)     max: 7699 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 43455     avg: 57351     median: 58787 (34%)     max: 63698 MIPS
min: 59538     avg: 69163     median: 70243 (40%)     max: 73035 MIPS
54954 MIPS (32%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4779     avg: 5663     median: 5788 (68%)     max: 5849 MIPS
min: 6049     avg: 6558     median: 6604 (78%)     max: 6754 MIPS
6465 MIPS (76%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 105.3     avg: 122.2     median: 125.1 (42%)     max: 133.25 fps
min: 142.85     avg: 145.4     median: 144.1 (48%)     max: 149.3 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 234.5     avg: 263     median: 270.2 (62%)     max: 277 fps
min: 280     avg: 286.5     median: 281.5 (65%)     max: 298 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 10.8     avg: 15.7     median: 16.2 (28%)     max: 17.9 fps
min: 11.7     avg: 19.9     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 21.8 fps
16.7 fps (29%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (35%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (38%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.5     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (30%)     max: 1.9 GB/s
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2.1 (36%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 10.3     avg: 12.3     median: 12.8 (33%)     max: 13.2 GB/s
min: 10.2     avg: 13.3     median: 14.7 (38%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 355     avg: 416.6     median: 389 (5%)     max: 601 Seconds
min: 298     avg: 324.6     median: 319 (4%)     max: 463 Seconds
393 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 214     avg: 249.9     median: 236 (2%)     max: 351 Seconds
min: 185     avg: 198.7     median: 196 (1%)     max: 229 Seconds
245 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4822     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.585 sec
min: 0.4184     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4739 sec
0.4 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12732     avg: 13443     median: 13372 (28%)     max: 14403 Points
min: 14213     avg: 15469     median: 15583 (33%)     max: 16073 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.776     avg: 8.3     median: 8.2 (2%)     max: 9.048 s
min: 7.112     avg: 7.7     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 8.774 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.935     avg: 19.7     median: 19.1 (1%)     max: 21.596 s
min: 17.676     avg: 18.9     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 21.271 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 657.983     avg: 679     median: 668.7 (3%)     max: 719.005 s
min: 655.388     avg: 690     median: 689.9 (3%)     max: 724.411 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 61919     avg: 68319     median: 68510.5 (53%)     max: 74562 Points
min: 72488     avg: 81330     median: 82000.5 (63%)     max: 85884 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 11868     avg: 17212     median: 17656 (43%)     max: 20709 Points
min: 17320     avg: 22264     median: 22611 (56%)     max: 25584 Points
17294 Points (43%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 74994     avg: 79858     median: 80354 (65%)     max: 84074 Points
min: 77280     avg: 88106     median: 89565 (73%)     max: 93910 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 75023     avg: 78536     median: 78020 (63%)     max: 83079 Points
min: 80023     avg: 88577     median: 88981 (72%)     max: 93208 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 78135     avg: 82249     median: 82390 (68%)     max: 86082 Points
min: 83382     avg: 90268     median: 91995 (76%)     max: 95508 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 10323     avg: 17657     median: 18460 (47%)     max: 19958 Points
min: 13602     avg: 19552     median: 20556.5 (52%)     max: 21602 Points
13652 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 20430     avg: 24352     median: 24955 (44%)     max: 27690 Points
min: 24338     avg: 27634     median: 27816 (50%)     max: 29343 Points
21442 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 7275     avg: 9282     median: 9182.5 (39%)     max: 11073 Points
min: 8903     avg: 10918     median: 11131 (47%)     max: 12218 Points
7659 Points (32%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2058     avg: 2102     median: 2106.5 (53%)     max: 2153 Points
min: 2585     avg: 2660     median: 2670 (67%)     max: 2721 Points
2620 Points (65%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 7854     avg: 9724     median: 10105.5 (39%)     max: 11035 Points
min: 12111     avg: 12998     median: 13088 (51%)     max: 13498 Points
10936 Points (42%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 1892     avg: 2009     median: 2009 (64%)     max: 2090 Points
min: 2488     avg: 2682     median: 2603 (83%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 7540     avg: 9312     median: 9522.5 (39%)     max: 10322 Points
min: 12439     avg: 14395     median: 12823.5 (53%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1327     avg: 1545     median: 1559.5 (61%)     max: 1615 Points
min: 1837     avg: 1962     median: 1957.5 (76%)     max: 2017 Points
1941 Points (76%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7368     avg: 9243     median: 9360 (17%)     max: 10258 Points
min: 8446     avg: 11688     median: 11859.5 (21%)     max: 12339 Points
9355 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1279     avg: 1485     median: 1528 (7%)     max: 1563 Points
min: 1834     avg: 1886     median: 1887 (8%)     max: 1936 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7319     avg: 9018     median: 9253 (29%)     max: 10300 Points
min: 8572     avg: 11542     median: 11888 (37%)     max: 12278 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6412     avg: 6583     median: 6618 (66%)     max: 6720 Points
min: 7879     avg: 8077     median: 8144.5 (81%)     max: 8166 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 29047     avg: 35544     median: 37422 (37%)     max: 40164 Points
min: 47599     avg: 48497     median: 48725.5 (49%)     max: 48906 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
6453 Points (71%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
38127 Points (55%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 576     avg: 599     median: 591 (1%)     max: 701 ms
min: 485     avg: 511     median: 516 (1%)     max: 544 ms
540 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 75867     avg: 76530     median: 76491 (58%)     max: 77270 Points
min: 91356     avg: 91588     median: 91577 (69%)     max: 91831 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 189.3     avg: 217.9     median: 224.5 (62%)     max: 231 Points
min: 232     avg: 263.8     median: 263 (72%)     max: 319 Points
257 Points (71%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 242     avg: 277.9     median: 279 (50%)     max: 307 Points
min: 288     avg: 316.9     median: 320 (57%)     max: 339 Points
316 Points (57%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1361     avg: 1566     median: 1535 (57%)     max: 1736 Points
min: 1566     avg: 1769     median: 1802 (67%)     max: 1891 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 8.13     avg: 71.9     median: 73.9 (13%)     max: 108.8 Watt
min: 64.7     avg: 92.2     median: 86.6 (15%)     max: 137.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.7     avg: 80.8     median: 77.3 (14%)     max: 110.4 Watt
min: 74.7     avg: 97.6     median: 88.7 (16%)     max: 135.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.94     avg: 11.3     median: 9.9 (7%)     max: 21.6 Watt
min: 4.73     avg: 13.6     median: 11.5 (8%)     max: 59.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.09     avg: 10.1     median: 9.5 (11%)     max: 17.6 Watt
min: 7.09     avg: 13.7     median: 12.6 (14%)     max: 35.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 21.1     avg: 28.1     median: 27.6 (21%)     max: 40.7 Points per Watt
min: 20.1     avg: 28.3     median: 30.3 (23%)     max: 33.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS → 119% n=23

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS → 103% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 09. 12:14:26

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14952 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14948 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14950 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752056066s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 07 Jul 2025 05:21:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.011s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14952 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#9 got single benchmarks 14952 +0.024s ... 0.04s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14948 +0.005s ... 0.045s

#11 got single benchmarks 14948 +0.031s ... 0.076s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14950 +0.004s ... 0.081s

#13 got single benchmarks 14950 +0.005s ... 0.086s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.086s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.106s ... 0.192s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.192s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)