NVIDIA Quadro M2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro M2200 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built most likely on the GM206 chip with 1024 shader cores. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M (second generation) . The Quadro M2200M is built for the Intel Kaby Lake generation.
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
Performance
The maximum core clock of the Quadro M2200 is 1038 MHz. The performance is between the old Quadro M2000M and Quadro M3000M , but generally closer to the latter (sometimes even on par). It is not surprising that the gaming performance is comparable to the Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M (Ti) and it is just behind the new GeForce GTX 1050 (Pascal).
Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2 , the cores of the Quadro M2200 can be used for general calculations.
Power Consumption
The power consumption of the Quadro M2200 is rated at a TGP of 55 Watt (39.1 Watt TDP) – similar to the previous Quadro M2000M – and therefore best suited for 15-inch laptops and up.
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro M4000M is a high-end, DirectX 12 (FL_12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM204 chip with all 1280 of the 1536 shader cores activated and is manufactured in 28 nm at TSMC. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M . The Quadro M4000M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is a successor to the Quadro K4100M (Kepler-based). The M4000M usually comes with 4 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective, 160 GB/s opposed to 102.4 GB/s of the K4100M).
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
Performance
The clock speeds of the Quadro M4000M are very similar to the GTX 970M based on the same chip. The base clock is slightly higher with 975 versus 924 MHz but the Boost speed is lower at 1013 versus 1038 MHz. Therefore, with good cooling the GTX 970M should be slightly faster. Compared to the Quadro line-up, it is the second fastest Quadro card in 2015 and therefore clearly faster than the old Quadro K4100M.
Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.2) or OpenCL 1.2 , the cores of the Quadro M4000M can be used for general calculations.
Power Consumption
The power consumption of the Quadro M4000M is rated at the same TGP of 100 Watt as the M5000M and older K5100M/K4100M (including the board and memory components). Therefore, the card is suited for large notebooks with 17-inch displays or greater.
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro M5000M is a high-end, DirectX 12 (FL_12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM204 chip with all 1536 shader cores activated and is manufactured in 28 nm at TSMC. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M. The Quadro M5000M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is a successor to the Quadro K5100M (Kepler-based). The M5000M usually comes with 8 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective, 160 GB/s opposed to 115.2 GB/s of the K5100M).
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
Performance
As the exact clock speed of the M5000M is still not known, we can only speculate on the performance of the card. However, it is the top model of the mobile Quadro line in 2015 and based on the same chip as the GeForce GTX 980M. Therefore, it should be clearly faster than the old Quadro K5100M.
Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.2) or OpenCL 1.2 , the cores of the Quadro M5000M can be used for general calculations.
Power Consumption
The power consumption of the Quadro M5000M is rated at the same TGP of 100 Watt as the K5100M (including the board and memory components). Therefore, the card is suited for large notebooks with 17-inch displays or greater.
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 NVIDIA Quadro M4000M NVIDIA Quadro M5000M Quadro M Series Codename N17P-Q3 Architecture Maxwell Maxwell Maxwell Pipelines 1024 - unified 1280 - unified 1536 - unified Core Speed 694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz 975 - 1013 (Boost) MHz 962 - 1051 (Boost) MHz Memory Speed 5508 MHz 5012 MHz 5000 MHz Memory Bus Width 128 Bit 256 Bit 256 Bit Memory Type GDDR5 GDDR5 GDDR5 Max. Amount of Memory 4 GB 4 GB 8 GB Shared Memory no no no API DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 Power Consumption 55 Watt 100 Watt 100 Watt Transistors 4.9 Billion 5.2 Billion 5.2 Billion technology 28 nm 28 nm 28 nm Features Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus Notebook Size large large large Date of Announcement 13.01.2017 02.10.2015 02.10.2015 Link to Manufacturer Page www.nvidia.de www.nvidia.com www.nvidia.com
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M2200
2.7 pt (8%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M4000M
3.5 pt (11%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M5000M
4.2 pt (13%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1845 avg: 1889 median: 1903 (5%) max: 1920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1699 avg: 1724 median: 1724 (5%) max: 1750 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 280203 avg: 289176 median: 289176 (33%) max: 298148 Points
324161 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
176003 Points (23%)
251633 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 20388 avg: 21012 median: 20644 (22%) max: 22003 Points
min: 13452 avg: 17686 median: 17686 (19%) max: 21920 Points
min: 22786 avg: 23879 median: 23878.5 (26%) max: 24971 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 36877 avg: 37505 median: 37796 (10%) max: 37841 Points
49204 Points (13%)
min: 61789 avg: 63738 median: 63738 (17%) max: 65687 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5232 avg: 5253 median: 5252 (9%) max: 5275 Points
6937 Points (12%)
min: 7979 avg: 8095 median: 8094.5 (14%) max: 8210 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5786 avg: 5835 median: 5850 (7%) max: 5869 Points
7723 Points (9%)
min: 9087 avg: 9228 median: 9227.5 (10%) max: 9368 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 127867 avg: 195445 median: 195444 (23%) max: 263022 Points
218874 Points (26%)
min: 294222 avg: 309196 median: 309196 (37%) max: 324170 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7453 avg: 7581 median: 7581 (11%) max: 7709 Points
min: 9042 avg: 9296 median: 9295.5 (13%) max: 9549 Points
min: 10640 avg: 11029 median: 11110 (15%) max: 11336 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 7319 avg: 7372 median: 7372 (6%) max: 7425 Points
10259 Points (9%)
min: 11820 avg: 11893 median: 11845 (10%) max: 12015 Points
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
24622 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
24915 Points (14%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 26834 avg: 28150 median: 28149.5 (37%) max: 29465 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
min: 29317 avg: 30962 median: 30962 (40%) max: 32607 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 23.2 avg: 26.4 median: 27.9 (9%) max: 28.1 fps
min: 47.3 avg: 47.9 median: 47.9 (16%) max: 48.4 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
min: 108.6 avg: 112.3 median: 112.3 (37%) max: 116 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
min: 101.5 avg: 102.8 median: 102.8 (46%) max: 104 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 147.6 avg: 155.3 median: 155.3 (29%) max: 163 fps
SPECviewperf 11 specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 48.26 avg: 48.9 median: 48.9 (29%) max: 49.48 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
111.4 fps (66%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
min: 51 avg: 54.8 median: 51.7 (31%) max: 61.8 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 49.11 avg: 51 median: 51 (29%) max: 52.9 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
58.1 fps (33%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
min: 53.8 avg: 54.6 median: 54 (31%) max: 55.9 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 42.66 avg: 49.7 median: 49.7 (38%) max: 56.8 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
61.3 fps (47%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
min: 46.7 avg: 48.7 median: 49.3 (37%) max: 50 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 16.23 avg: 19.2 median: 19.2 (23%) max: 22.18 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
18.8 fps (22%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
min: 15 avg: 17.6 median: 17.9 (21%) max: 20 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 56.6 avg: 57.2 median: 57.2 (43%) max: 57.7 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
109.2 fps (82%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
min: 57.2 avg: 62.3 median: 58 (44%) max: 71.6 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 47.95 avg: 52.7 median: 52.7 (57%) max: 57.5 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
76.3 fps (82%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
min: 53 avg: 55.2 median: 53 (57%) max: 59.6 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 55.7 avg: 57.1 median: 57.1 (27%) max: 58.5 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
110.2 fps (53%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
min: 58.9 avg: 64 median: 59 (28%) max: 74 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 48.49 avg: 50.6 median: 50.6 (27%) max: 52.7 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
82.3 fps (43%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
min: 49.8 avg: 52.4 median: 52 (27%) max: 55.3 fps
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 85.3 avg: 90.3 median: 86.2 (21%) max: 99.5 fps
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 80 avg: 88.6 median: 88.6 (22%) max: 97.1 fps
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
min: 101 avg: 103 median: 103 (26%) max: 105 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 57.7 avg: 58.3 median: 58.1 (9%) max: 59 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 92 avg: 109.9 median: 109.9 (16%) max: 127.8 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
min: 86.9 avg: 87.5 median: 87.5 (13%) max: 88 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 31.14 avg: 32.2 median: 32.8 (7%) max: 32.8 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 40.33 avg: 44.5 median: 44.5 (10%) max: 48.6 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
min: 44 avg: 44.1 median: 44.1 (10%) max: 44.14 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 20.34 avg: 23.6 median: 24.6 (6%) max: 25.66 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 26.06 avg: 27.2 median: 27.2 (7%) max: 28.4 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
min: 31.35 avg: 32.2 median: 32.2 (8%) max: 33 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 46.93 avg: 47.4 median: 46.9 (13%) max: 48.34 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 47.6 avg: 55.8 median: 55.8 (15%) max: 64 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
min: 69.6 avg: 71.3 median: 71.3 (19%) max: 73 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 4.28 avg: 4.9 median: 5.2 (5%) max: 5.26 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 6.04 avg: 6.5 median: 6.5 (6%) max: 6.9 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
min: 6.86 avg: 7.1 median: 7.1 (6%) max: 7.4 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 68.2 avg: 69.3 median: 68.5 (27%) max: 71.2 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 58.3 avg: 68.4 median: 68.4 (27%) max: 78.4 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
min: 81.3 avg: 81.7 median: 81.7 (33%) max: 82 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 71.4 avg: 72.2 median: 72 (12%) max: 73.2 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 71 avg: 79.6 median: 79.6 (13%) max: 88.1 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
min: 94.4 avg: 96.7 median: 96.7 (16%) max: 99 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6833 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
min: 6826 avg: 7676 median: 7675.5 (5%) max: 8525 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
88.6 fps (31%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
89.3 fps (31%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
min: 95 avg: 105.5 median: 105.5 (37%) max: 116 fps
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 102.9 avg: 107.4 median: 103.9 (6%) max: 115.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
93.2 fps (5%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
min: 109.6 avg: 113.3 median: 113.3 (7%) max: 117 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
110.7 fps (12%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
163.7 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
219.1 fps (13%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
432 fps (3%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 1204 avg: 1276 median: 1306 (6%) max: 1318 Samples/s
min: 1324 avg: 1328 median: 1327.5 (6%) max: 1331 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 2086 avg: 2097 median: 2099 (4%) max: 2107 Samples/s
min: 2167 avg: 2173 median: 2173 (4%) max: 2179 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4332 Points (5%)
5686 Points (6%)
6291 Points (7%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
68.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
89.2 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
87.7 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.2 fps per Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (19%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
39.5 dB(A) (63%)
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 100% n=27 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M4000M → 130% n=27 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M5000M → 127% n=27
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
Quadro M2200:
83.4 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
37.1 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
33.7 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
17.6 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
14.6 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
139.4 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
105.3 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
47.1 fps
127%
Quadro M4000M:
90 fps
138%
Quadro M4000M:
55 fps
141%
Quadro M4000M:
48 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
13.7 fps
146%
Quadro M4000M:
20 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
214.2 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
131.2 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
70.4 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
52.4 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
148.8 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
119 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
56.4 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
48.2 fps
140%
Quadro M5000M:
155 fps
186%
Quadro M5000M:
123 fps
191%
Quadro M5000M:
67 fps
200%
Quadro M5000M:
38 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
12.7 fps
Quadro M5000M:
87.4 88 ~ 88 fps
Quadro M5000M:
63.6 68 ~ 66 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
108.8 fps
99%
Quadro M5000M:
97.6 118 ~ 108 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
88.6 fps
115%
Quadro M5000M:
92.3 111 ~ 102 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
74.8 fps
130%
Quadro M5000M:
89.4 104 ~ 97 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
39.6 fps
179%
Quadro M5000M:
61 80.5 ~ 71 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
171.5 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
148.3 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
115.9 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
47.8 fps
Quadro M5000M:
53.4 66 ~ 60 fps
Quadro M5000M:
52 66 ~ 59 fps
Quadro M5000M:
51.4 65 ~ 58 fps
Quadro M5000M:
34.4 35 ~ 35 fps
Quadro M5000M:
60.8 66 ~ 63 fps
116%
Quadro M5000M:
289 fps
111%
Quadro M4000M:
196 fps
130%
Quadro M5000M:
228 fps
119%
Quadro M4000M:
181 fps
139%
Quadro M5000M:
212 fps
147%
Quadro M4000M:
85 fps
159%
Quadro M5000M:
92 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
381.4 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
238.8 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
149.3 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
70.2 fps
130%
Quadro M5000M:
74.4 107 ~ 91 fps
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M4000M → 133% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 139%
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M5000M → 146% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 196%
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Ghost Recon Wildlands 83.4 37.1 33.7 17.6 For Honor 78 54 51 37 14.6 Battlefield 1 139.4 105.3 47.1 42 Rise of the Tomb Raider 126 71 40 34 13.7 Rainbow Six Siege 214.2 131.2 70.4 52.4 Star Wars Battlefront 148.8 119 56.4 48.2 The Witcher 3 111 66 35 19 12.7 Thief 108.8 88.6 74.8 39.6 Battlefield 4 171.5 148.3 115.9 47.8 BioShock Infinite 250 176 152 58 Tomb Raider 381.4 238.8 149.3 70.2 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 4 7 2 5 4 6 3 2 2 8 1 3
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Rise of the Tomb Raider 90 55 48 20 BioShock Infinite 196 181 85 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Anno 2205 193 179 82 34 The Witcher 3 155 123 67 38 Dirt Rally 386 160 126 73 F1 2014 121 121 122 120 Ryse: Son of Rome 135 116 65 65 Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor 192 150 88 66 GRID: Autosport 368 190 155 106 Thief 108 102 97 71 Total War: Rome II 373 299 235 57 Company of Heroes 2 60 59 58 35 GRID 2 176.3 145.6 134.5 102.7 Metro: Last Light 141 138 113 63 BioShock Infinite 289 228 212 92 Tomb Raider 472 336 234 91 Hitman: Absolution 83.5 75.9 67.2 50.3 Dirt 3 211 202.7 171.4 158.2 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 13 1 3 12 1 7 8 5 9 2
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 28. 17:05:42
#0 checking url part for id 7706 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 6506 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 6505 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 May 2024 05:35:22 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.119s ... 0.12s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.12s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.12s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7706 +0.047s ... 0.167s
#9 got single benchmarks 7706 +0.018s ... 0.185s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 6506 +0.015s ... 0.201s
#11 got single benchmarks 6506 +0.007s ... 0.208s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 6505 +0.013s ... 0.222s
#13 got single benchmarks 6505 +0.009s ... 0.23s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.23s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.334s ... 0.565s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.565s
#17 Got 159 rows for game benchmarks. +0.011s ... 0.575s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.575s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.013s ... 0.589s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.04s ... 0.629s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.629s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.631s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)