Notebookcheck Logo

Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs Intel HD Graphics 500

Intel UHD Graphics 617

► remove from comparison Intel UHD Graphics 617

The Intel UHD Graphics 617 (GT2) is a low-end integrated graphics unit, which can be found in the Y-series of the Amber-Lake generation. This "GT2" version offers 24 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at up to 1050 MHz (depending on the CPU model). Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the UHD 617 has to access the main memory (2x 64bit DDR3L/LPDDR3). Compared to the old HD Graphics 615 in Kaby-Lake-Y CPUs, the UHD 617 is the same GPU with slightly different clock speeds (depending on the model) and slight power/performance improvements due to the improved 14nm++ process. Compared to the similar UHD Graphics 615 in other Amber Lake models, the 617 looks to be higher clocked (+50 MHz) and has more headroom due to the higher TDP of 7 versus 5 Watt.

Performance

The 3D performance of the UHD 617 depends on the CPU model and the cooling / TDP-setting of the laptop. Furthermore, the used main memory (single channel, DDR3(L), amount) is influencing performance. On average the UHD graphics 617 should be very similar to the Kaby-Lake HD Graphics 615 due to the same architecture and similar speeds. That means that only low demanding games like Farming Simulator 17 or Rocket League are playable in lowest detail settings.

Features

The revised video engine in the HD 615 and UHD 615 / 617 now supports H.265/HEVC Main10 profile in hardware with 10 bit colors. Furthermore, Googles VP9 codec can also be hardware decoded. The UHD 617 should support HDCP 2.2 and therefore Netflix 4K. HDMI 2.0 however is still only supported with an external converter chip (LSPCon).

Power Consumption

The UHD Graphics 617 can be found in Y processors with 7 W TDP  and is therefore suited for very thin, mostly passively cooled subnotebooks like the MacBook Air 2018.

Intel HD Graphics 500

► remove from comparison Intel HD Graphics 500

The Intel HD Graphics 500 is an integrated processor graphics unit from the Apollo Lake generation (e. g. Celeron N3450 and Celeron N3350), which was announced mid 2016. The GPU can convince with low consumption figures, but the performance is only in the low-end segment and is rarely sufficient for modern games. Being a partial configuration of the Apollo Lake GPU, the HD Graphics 505 is equipped with just 12 Execution Units (EUs) (HD Graphics 505: 18 EUs) running at up to 650-700 MHz depending on the model. The technical specifications of the GPU are based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which is also used for the more expensive Skylake series.

Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the HD 505 has to access the main memory via processor (2x 64bit DDR3L-/LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400).

Performance

The HD Graphics 505 should be slightly slower than the older Broadwell GPU HD Graphics (Broadwell), so modern games (as of 2016) will rarely run smoothly even at the lowest settings.

Features

The revised video engine now decodes H.265/HEVC completely in hardware and thereby much more efficiently than before. Up to three displays can be connected via DP/eDP or HDMI (4K probably only at 30 Hz via HDMI 1.4).

Power Consumption

The TDP of the whole Pentium N4200 chip is 6 Watts by default, so the GPU is primarily used for (often passively cooled) netbooks or thin notebooks. The TDP can also be reduced to 4 Watts, but this will obviously affect the performance.

Intel UHD Graphics 617Intel HD Graphics 500
Gen. 9 Series
Iris Plus Graphics 655 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 650 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 645 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics P630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics P630 compare 24 64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
HD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 617 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics P580 compare 72 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 580 compare 72 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 550 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 540 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 530 compare 24 @ 0.35 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 520 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 515 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 610 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 610 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 510 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 605 compare 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 505 compare 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 600 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 500 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
CodenameKaby-Lake GT2Apollo Lake
ArchitectureGen. 9 Amber LakeGen. 9 Apollo Lake
Pipelines24 - unified12 - unified
Core Speed300 - 1150 (Boost) MHz300 - 700 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3L/LPDDR3
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4
technology14 nm14 nm
FeaturesQuickSyncQuickSync
Date of Announcement30.10.2018 01.09.2016
CPU in UHD Graphics 617GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-10510Y4 x 1200 MHz, 7 W300 MHz1150 MHz
Intel Core i5-8210Y2 x 1600 MHz, 7 W300 MHz1050 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz1050 - 1150 MHz
CPU in HD Graphics 500GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Celeron J34554 x 1500 MHz, 10 W250 MHz750 MHz
Intel Celeron N34504 x 1100 MHz, 6 W200 MHz700 MHz
Intel Celeron J33552 x 2000 MHz, 10 W250 MHz700 MHz
Intel Celeron N33502 x 1100 MHz, 6 W200 MHz650 MHz
min. - max.200 - 300 MHz650 - 1150 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - HD Graphics 500
0.2 pt (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 322     avg: 338.3     median: 337 (1%)     max: 356 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 286     avg: 299     median: 300 (1%)     max: 311 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
77156 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 12299     avg: 15195     median: 15085 (2%)     max: 18200 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
4841 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
7231 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 845     avg: 890     median: 889.5 (2%)     max: 934 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 947     avg: 997     median: 997 (1%)     max: 1047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 20140     avg: 26074     median: 23761 (3%)     max: 34320 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
3711 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
4496 Points (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1632     avg: 1672     median: 1671.5 (2%)     max: 1711 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1509     avg: 1541     median: 1540.5 (1%)     max: 1572 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel UHD Graphics 617
3DMark 06
8662 Points (11%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics 500
min: 3393     avg: 3551     median: 3506 (5%)     max: 3753 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel HD Graphics 500
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 2791     avg: 2888     median: 2894 (2%)     max: 3031 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 7.05     avg: 8.2     median: 8.1 (3%)     max: 9.61 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 617
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 34.7     avg: 39.1     median: 39.1 (2%)     max: 43.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 617
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8     avg: 98.6     median: 98.6 (99%)     max: 99.3 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3.6 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
9.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
8.4 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
15 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
20 fps (1%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel HD Graphics 500
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
42 fps (0%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
16.3 fps (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
49 Samples/s (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
79 Samples/s (0%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 296     avg: 320     median: 324 (0%)     max: 336 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.9 Watt (1%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
450 MHz (18%)

Average Benchmarks Intel UHD Graphics 617 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel HD Graphics 500 → 42% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Valorant

Valorant

2020
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
9.1  fps
low 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
23.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
24  fps
high 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
11.2  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
28.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
20.2  fps
high 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
13.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
12.6  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
2  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
3  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
0 (!)  fps
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
12  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
5.5  fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
1  fps
QHD 2560x1440
HD Graphics 500:
1  fps
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
34.4 (!)  fps
med. 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
4.6 (!)  fps
low 1280x720
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
20.2  fps
30%
HD Graphics 500:
5.3 5.5 7.6 ~ 6 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
14.1  fps
28%
HD Graphics 500:
3.9 4.7 ~ 4 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
12.8  fps
31%
HD Graphics 500:
3.6 4.3 ~ 4 fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
10  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
18.2 21.2 ~ 20 fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
17.2  fps
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
10  fps
med. 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
5.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
61.2  fps
30%
HD Graphics 500:
18.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
26  fps
24%
HD Graphics 500:
6.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
18.3  fps
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
4.9  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
8.7  fps
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
15.9  fps
low 1024x768
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
16.1  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
15.5  fps
low 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
19.1  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
16.4  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
9.7  fps
low 1280x720
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
67.2  fps
33%
HD Graphics 500:
15.9 22.1 27.6 ~ 22 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
28.2  fps
53%
HD Graphics 500:
15.3 15.3 ~ 15 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
14.6  fps
38%
HD Graphics 500:
5.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
13.6  fps
38%
HD Graphics 500:
5.1  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
28.5  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
12.5  fps
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
22  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
16  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
17.7  fps
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
71.6  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
13.7  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
10  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
6.3  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
43.8  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
19.1  fps
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
29.3  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
14.4  fps
low 1280x720
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
47.6  fps
42%
HD Graphics 500:
16.2 18 18.7 21 21.2 22.5 24.3 ~ 20 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
27.9  fps
36%
HD Graphics 500:
8.8 9.6 9.8 11 13 ~ 10 fps
high 1366x768
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
25  fps
36%
HD Graphics 500:
7.9 8.9 9.7 ~ 9 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
UHD Graphics 617:
8.4  fps
32%
HD Graphics 500:
2.7  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
21.5  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
9.3  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
19.3  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
9.1  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
14 16.6 ~ 15 fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
14  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
12.7 22 ~ 17 fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
13.6  fps
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
27.8  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
12.2  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
11.2  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
7.6  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
22.9  fps
high 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
11.1  fps
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
HD Graphics 500:
40.1  fps
med. 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
14.7  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
54.5  fps
med. 1360x768
HD Graphics 500:
14.1  fps
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
HD Graphics 500:
119  fps
high 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
27.2  fps
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
HD Graphics 500:
46  fps

Average Gaming Intel UHD Graphics 617 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Intel HD Graphics 500 → 35%

Intel HD Graphics 500lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Valorant9.09
Hearthstone23.92411.2
League of Legends28.220.213.912.6
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider3
Strange Brigade
F1 201812
The Crew 25.5
Far Cry 511
World of Tanks enCore34.44.6
X-Plane 11.11644
Middle-earth: Shadow of War10
Team Fortress 22017.2
Dirt 4105.6
Rocket League18.16.2
Prey4.9
For Honor8.7
Overwatch15.9
Rainbow Six Siege15.5
World of Warships19.1
Metal Gear Solid V16.49.7
Dota 2 Reborn22155.65.1
Dirt Rally28.512.5
F1 20142216
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor17.7
Sims 471.613.7
Risen 3: Titan Lords106.3
GRID: Autosport43.819.1
GRID 229.314.4
BioShock Infinite201092.7
Tomb Raider21.59.3
Dead Space 319.39.1
Counter-Strike: GO1514
Diablo III1713.6
Anno 207027.812.2
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim11.27.6
Deus Ex Human Revolution22.911.1
Dirt 340.114.7
StarCraft 254.514.1
Trackmania Nations Forever11927.2
World of Warcraft46
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
33
5
2
24


7


3


1





Intel UHD Graphics 617lowmed.highultraQHD4K
X-Plane 11.1120.214.112.8
Rocket League61.22618.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider16.1
Dota 2 Reborn67.228.214.613.6
BioShock Infinite47.627.9258.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1
2
4


4


2








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 23. 19:38:36

#0 checking url part for id 9356 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7543 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 May 2024 05:38:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.135s ... 0.136s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.136s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.136s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9356 +0.036s ... 0.172s

#8 got single benchmarks 9356 +0.01s ... 0.182s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7543 +0.021s ... 0.203s

#10 got single benchmarks 7543 +0.1s ... 0.303s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.303s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.248s ... 0.551s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.551s

#14 Got 113 rows for game benchmarks. +0.015s ... 0.565s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.565s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.027s ... 0.592s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.087s ... 0.679s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.679s

#19 return log +0.041s ... 0.72s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)