Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H vs Intel Core i5-10300H

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 3750H

The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 - 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1400 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 7 3700U, the 3750H offers a 20 Watt higher TDP and therefore a better performance under long periods of load. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements.

Performance

The average 3750H in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-10610U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a fairly good result, as of early 2022.

The ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU is among the fastest laptops built around the 3750H that we know of. It can be about 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 has a default TDP of 35 W (also known as the long-term power limit). Laptop manufacturers are free to change that value to anything between 12 W and 35 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly. These values are comparatively high, making an active cooling solution pretty much a necessity.

Last but not the least, this AMD APU is built with a rather old, as of late 2022, 12 nm process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-10300H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10300H

The Intel Core i5-10300H is a fast processor for laptops with four cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.5 and 4.5 GHz (up to 4.2 with 4 cores) and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i5-9300H from 2019, the 10300H is clocked slightly higher (+100 MHz Base, +400 MHz Boost) and supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i5-10300H supports no vPro, TXT or SIPP. These business features are available in the faster Core i5-10400H (2.6 - 4.6 GHz) that was released at a later date.

Performance

The average 10300H in our database matches the AMD Ryzen 5 3550H in multi-thread performance. While not a poor result per se, it is indicative of an entry-level H-class CPU that is unlikely to meet the needs of hardcore gamers, professional videographers and similar clientele.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i5-9300H. As a low-end solution it will probably only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power consumption

The Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop makers are free to reduce slightly, 35 W being the lowest Intel-recommended value. Doing so would result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, a proper cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The i5-10300H is manufactured on one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for lower-than-average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 3750HIntel Core i5-10300H
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)Intel Comet Lake
CodenamePicasso (Zen+)Comet Lake-H
Clock2300 - 4000 MHz2500 - 4500 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB256 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 8
TDP35 Watt45 Watt
Transistors4500 Million
Technology12 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketFP5BGA1440
FeaturesDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s, MMX, BMI2, AES-NI, SSE4.1, ABM, VMX, EIST, RDRAND, SSE4.2, TM1, RDSEED, SSE, AVX, FMA, SMEP, TM2, SSE2, AVX2, ADX, SMAP, Hyper-Threading, SGX, SSE3, Turbo, SSSE3, MPX, SST
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1400 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H « 2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 3750H
27 pt (37%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10300H
31.8 pt (44%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
68.2 Points (47%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
331 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3897 Points (4%)
min: 4621     avg: 5132     median: 5106 (5%)     max: 5668 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
971 Points (41%)
min: 1095     avg: 1126     median: 1136 (48%)     max: 1147 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 340     avg: 363.8     median: 364.5 (41%)     max: 386 Points
min: 312     avg: 443.2     median: 454 (50%)     max: 470 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1514     avg: 1691     median: 1713 (4%)     max: 1825 Points
min: 1397     avg: 2046     median: 2117 (5%)     max: 2240 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 672     avg: 743     median: 734 (5%)     max: 805 Points
min: 536     avg: 825     median: 892 (6%)     max: 921 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 135     avg: 143.9     median: 144 (43%)     max: 157 Points
min: 108     avg: 174     median: 186 (56%)     max: 194 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.2 Points (12%)
min: 9.87     avg: 10     median: 10.1 (13%)     max: 10.06 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.6 Points (41%)
min: 2.05     avg: 2.1     median: 2.2 (54%)     max: 2.17 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4527     avg: 4732     median: 4770 (29%)     max: 4898 Points
min: 6867     avg: 7056     median: 7130 (43%)     max: 7170 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 19290     avg: 20242     median: 20687 (15%)     max: 20750 Points
min: 26994     avg: 27496     median: 27692 (20%)     max: 27801 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 35899     avg: 36042     median: 36042 (25%)     max: 36185 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 9326     avg: 9339     median: 9338.5 (11%)     max: 9351 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
197.1 s (2%)
215.2 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.4 s (1%)
7.1 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2866 Points (5%)
4825 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 17077     avg: 18318     median: 18689 (11%)     max: 19187 MIPS
min: 15146     avg: 23295     median: 24158 (14%)     max: 24841 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3511     avg: 3641     median: 3659 (44%)     max: 3752 MIPS
min: 2945     avg: 4704     median: 4896 (59%)     max: 4956 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
48.6 fps (17%)
53.3 fps (19%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
139.4 fps (32%)
190.2 fps (44%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.14     avg: 4.3     median: 4.4 (8%)     max: 4.4 fps
min: 6.13     avg: 7.1     median: 7.3 (13%)     max: 7.78 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
0.4 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.7 GB/s (12%)
0.7 GB/s (12%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5 GB/s (13%)
3.1 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
962 Seconds (12%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 584     avg: 630     median: 633 (4%)     max: 672 Seconds
min: 478.9     avg: 515     median: 515.5 (4%)     max: 555 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.6902     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.723 sec
min: 0.625     avg: 0.7     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 1.088 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7187     avg: 7715     median: 7431 (16%)     max: 8812 Points
min: 9731     avg: 9744     median: 9744 (21%)     max: 9757 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11 s (2%)
8.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
25.7 s (1%)
19.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
650 s (3%)
516 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
25143 Points (22%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6360     avg: 7609     median: 7878 (21%)     max: 8648 Points
min: 8554     avg: 9719     median: 9884.5 (27%)     max: 10909 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 39182     avg: 48304     median: 48251 (39%)     max: 57479 Points
min: 58736     avg: 60992     median: 61113 (50%)     max: 62933 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 44524     avg: 50874     median: 51438 (42%)     max: 56661 Points
min: 58462     avg: 61155     median: 61387 (50%)     max: 62548 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 55479     avg: 58242     median: 55515 (47%)     max: 63731 Points
min: 38284     avg: 60059     median: 63707 (54%)     max: 63995 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5698     avg: 7447     median: 7716 (20%)     max: 8117 Points
min: 8220     avg: 8936     median: 9017.5 (23%)     max: 9305 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 10095     avg: 11205     median: 11316 (20%)     max: 11900 Points
min: 12298     avg: 12919     median: 13016 (23%)     max: 13267 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2861     avg: 3318     median: 3344 (14%)     max: 3574 Points
min: 3772     avg: 4678     median: 4684 (20%)     max: 5600 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1599 Points (44%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
5340 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
874 Points (37%)
min: 703     avg: 1166     median: 1203.5 (51%)     max: 1241 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3537 Points (6%)
min: 2783     avg: 4351     median: 4478 (8%)     max: 4728 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 853     avg: 895     median: 884 (4%)     max: 959 Points
min: 1121     avg: 1175     median: 1172.5 (5%)     max: 1234 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3007     avg: 3467     median: 3571.5 (11%)     max: 3718 Points
min: 3887     avg: 4333     median: 4365 (14%)     max: 4713 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3898     avg: 4104     median: 4166 (42%)     max: 4186 Points
min: 4844     avg: 5198     median: 5199 (52%)     max: 5549 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11396     avg: 12985     median: 13403.5 (15%)     max: 13738 Points
min: 15448     avg: 17203     median: 17278 (19%)     max: 18807 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14478     avg: 14749     median: 14748.5 (26%)     max: 15019 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3717     avg: 3768     median: 3768 (74%)     max: 3819 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 CPU Mark
12111 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1132     avg: 1170     median: 1160 (1%)     max: 1228 ms
min: 812     avg: 872     median: 824 (1%)     max: 1366 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 29949     avg: 30479     median: 30626 (28%)     max: 30714 Points
min: 36854     avg: 47282     median: 48896 (44%)     max: 51952 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
153 Points (32%)
min: 134     avg: 206.2     median: 210.5 (44%)     max: 231 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 43.3     avg: 106.8     median: 95 (16%)     max: 182 Watt
min: 76.8     avg: 95.8     median: 95.3 (16%)     max: 112 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 40.7     avg: 68.1     median: 66.4 (12%)     max: 97.1 Watt
min: 75.3     avg: 85.7     median: 85.8 (16%)     max: 93 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 8.29     avg: 12     median: 11 (8%)     max: 16.7 Points per Watt
min: 9.51     avg: 10.4     median: 10.5 (8%)     max: 11.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 3750H → 100% n=43

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10300H → 122% n=43

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 07:37:17

#0 checking url part for id 11131 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11706 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:21:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.032s ... 0.033s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.033s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11131 +0.024s ... 0.057s

#7 got single benchmarks 11131 +0.064s ... 0.121s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11706 +0.022s ... 0.143s

#9 got single benchmarks 11706 +0.104s ... 0.247s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.247s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.46s ... 0.707s

#12 return log +0.037s ... 0.745s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)