Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 4600H vs AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS vs AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS

AMD Ryzen 5 4600H

► remove from comparison AMD R5 4600H

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600H is a mobile SoC for big laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4600H integrates six of the eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (12 threads).

In addition to the six CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 6 integrated graphics adapter with 6 CUs and up to 1500 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

Performance

The average 4600H in our database matches the Intel Core i7-10875H and even the Core i9-10885H, both significantly more costly chips, in multi-thread performance, giving this Ryzen an outrageously high price-to-performance ratio.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

The Ryzen 5 chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 35 W and 54 W with clock speed and performance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, a high-performance cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The 7 nm TSMC process this APU is built with makes for better-than-average, as of early 2022, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is a powerful Phoenix family chip that saw the light of day in H1 2023. The processor features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at 3.8 GHz. The highest Boost clock speed achievable is 5.1 GHz.

Not only does this APU has full might of the Zen 4 architecture at its disposal, it also comes with the new Ryzen AI technology that's set to make generative AI more ubiquitous than ever before. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has. Ryzen AI is coming after Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies; time will tell if this move by AMD is a good idea.

Perhaps more importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is set to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

Elsewhere, the 7840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7840HS in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-12700H, Core i7-12850HX, Core i9-12900H, Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The 7840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 4900HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS is a mobile SoC for big laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4900HS integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.3 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in the modern 7 nm process at TSMC and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips

According to our information, the Ryzen 9 4900HS is only slightly faster than the Ryzen 7 4800HS. The CPU is clocked 100 MHz (base and boost) higher, but the gains greatly depend on the cooling and TDP settings. Compared to Intel chips, the i9-9980HK top model should be comparable. That means the Ryzen 9 4900HS should be able to handle all demanding tasks and gaming. Compared to the similar named 45W-version, the Ryzen 9 4900H, the 4900HS is differs in 100 MHz boost and 300 MHz base clock.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 7 integrated graphics card with most likely 7 CUs. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 35 Watt (default). That means the chip is intended for big and relatively heavy laptops. The Ryzen 7 4900HS is the 35 Watt version of the R9 4900H with a 10 Watt lower TDP.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 4600HAMD Ryzen 7 7840HSAMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
CodenameRenoir-H (Zen 2)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)Renoir (Zen 2)
Series: Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H3.3 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H2.9 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H « 3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3000 - 4000 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz3000 - 4300 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache3 MB8 MB4 MB
L3 Cache8 MB16 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 128 / 168 / 16
TDP45 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Technology7 nm4 nm7 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C105 °C
SocketFP6FP7/FP7r2/FP8FP6
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Die Size178 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 4600H
32.4 pt (45%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7840HS
45.7 pt (63%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 4900HS
35.2 pt (49%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
69 Points (48%)
min: 101     avg: 104.5     median: 105 (73%)     max: 107 Points
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
499 Points (9%)
min: 880     avg: 918     median: 918 (17%)     max: 956 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7713     avg: 8161     median: 8072 (7%)     max: 8786 Points
min: 15515     avg: 16432     median: 16282.5 (15%)     max: 17214 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1134     avg: 1145     median: 1142.5 (49%)     max: 1161 Points
min: 1737     avg: 1771     median: 1775 (75%)     max: 1812 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 428     avg: 445.3     median: 449.5 (50%)     max: 454 Points
min: 661     avg: 686     median: 689 (77%)     max: 705 Points
495 Points (55%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3055     avg: 3233     median: 3229.5 (8%)     max: 3393 Points
min: 6061     avg: 6418     median: 6361.5 (16%)     max: 6744 Points
4288 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1398     avg: 1428     median: 1425 (9%)     max: 1467 Points
min: 2473     avg: 2592     median: 2565 (16%)     max: 2729 Points
1863 Points (12%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 172.1     avg: 176.5     median: 176 (53%)     max: 179 Points
min: 270     avg: 277.9     median: 279 (84%)     max: 286 Points
193 Points (58%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
16.3 Points (21%)
min: 29.7     avg: 30     median: 30 (39%)     max: 30.25 Points
18.2 Points (24%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (51%)
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (82%)     max: 3.33 Points
2.2 Points (55%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5365 Points (32%)
min: 7574     avg: 7642     median: 7641.5 (46%)     max: 7709 Points
5866 Points (35%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
32756 Points (24%)
min: 45602     avg: 47933     median: 47933 (35%)     max: 50264 Points
37938 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 83726     avg: 85395     median: 85395 (59%)     max: 87064 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14015     avg: 14096     median: 14096 (17%)     max: 14177 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 71.922     avg: 72.4     median: 72.4 (1%)     max: 72.819 s
88.2 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.626     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (1%)     max: 2.658 s
3.3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4380 Points (7%)
min: 6428     avg: 7064     median: 7063.5 (11%)     max: 7699 Points
4548 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 36693     avg: 37768     median: 37642.5 (22%)     max: 38873 MIPS
min: 59538     avg: 69052     median: 70243 (40%)     max: 73035 MIPS
48577 MIPS (28%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4334     avg: 4395     median: 4397 (53%)     max: 4471 MIPS
min: 6049     avg: 6559     median: 6632 (79%)     max: 6754 MIPS
4634 MIPS (55%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
82.9 fps (29%)
min: 144.1     avg: 146.7     median: 146.7 (51%)     max: 149.3 fps
106 fps (37%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
197 fps (45%)
min: 281.5     avg: 289.8     median: 289.8 (67%)     max: 298 fps
223 fps (51%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.27     avg: 9.8     median: 9.8 (17%)     max: 10.4 fps
min: 11.7     avg: 19.8     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 21.8 fps
12.2 fps (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (0%)
1.3 GB/s (0%)
1.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.4 GB/s (24%)
2.1 GB/s (36%)
1.9 GB/s (33%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5 GB/s (13%)
min: 14.7     avg: 14.8     median: 14.8 (39%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
11.2 GB/s (29%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
631 Seconds (8%)
min: 298     avg: 324.8     median: 318 (4%)     max: 463 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 337.2     avg: 351.9     median: 352 (2%)     max: 369 Seconds
min: 185     avg: 198.7     median: 196 (1%)     max: 229 Seconds
297 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.607     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.627 sec
min: 0.4184     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4739 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15312     avg: 15685     median: 15663 (33%)     max: 16073 Points
12448 Points (26%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
10.5 s (2%)
min: 7.112     avg: 7.9     median: 7.9 (2%)     max: 8.774 s
9.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.1 s (1%)
min: 17.697     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (1%)     max: 21.271 s
21.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
607 s (3%)
min: 655.388     avg: 690     median: 689.9 (3%)     max: 724.411 s
547 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 76708     avg: 82457     median: 83358.5 (73%)     max: 85884 Points
57045 Points (50%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10904     avg: 11680     median: 11593.5 (31%)     max: 12640 Points
min: 17320     avg: 22184     median: 22615 (61%)     max: 25584 Points
15184 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 77280     avg: 89035     median: 91414 (74%)     max: 93910 Points
63010 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 84349     avg: 89853     median: 91645 (74%)     max: 93208 Points
62786 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 61439     avg: 63513     median: 63779 (54%)     max: 65322 Points
min: 84416     avg: 91454     median: 92596 (78%)     max: 95508 Points
67850 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 10548     avg: 11100     median: 11085.5 (28%)     max: 11681 Points
min: 13602     avg: 19711     median: 20681 (52%)     max: 21602 Points
15900 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 17769     avg: 18050     median: 18021.5 (32%)     max: 18378 Points
min: 24338     avg: 27680     median: 27921 (50%)     max: 29343 Points
21873 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5496     avg: 6170     median: 6251 (26%)     max: 6792 Points
min: 9433     avg: 11035     median: 11145 (47%)     max: 12218 Points
8966 Points (38%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1525 Points (41%)
min: 2585     avg: 2662     median: 2670 (72%)     max: 2721 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
6631 Points (26%)
min: 12111     avg: 12974     median: 13100 (52%)     max: 13498 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1099     avg: 1115     median: 1117 (47%)     max: 1124 Points
min: 1837     avg: 1968     median: 1967 (83%)     max: 2017 Points
1218 Points (51%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5260     avg: 6057     median: 6080 (11%)     max: 6574 Points
min: 8446     avg: 11651     median: 11872 (21%)     max: 12339 Points
7675 Points (14%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1834     avg: 1896     median: 1900 (8%)     max: 1936 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8572     avg: 11439     median: 11933 (38%)     max: 12278 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4964 Points (50%)
min: 7924     avg: 8100     median: 8148 (81%)     max: 8166 Points
5372 Points (54%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
25247 Points (28%)
min: 47599     avg: 48417     median: 48498 (53%)     max: 48906 Points
30230 Points (33%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4605 Points (63%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
20939 Points (51%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 844     avg: 849     median: 848.5 (1%)     max: 855 ms
min: 485     avg: 508     median: 508 (1%)     max: 544 ms
894 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 46066     avg: 47138     median: 47137.5 (42%)     max: 48209 Points
min: 91356     avg: 91588     median: 91577 (82%)     max: 91831 Points
38616 Points (35%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 220     avg: 261.3     median: 263 (76%)     max: 319 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 198     avg: 206     median: 207 (43%)     max: 212 Points
min: 288     avg: 316.9     median: 322 (67%)     max: 339 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1061 Points (41%)
min: 1566     avg: 1770     median: 1801 (69%)     max: 1993 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
66.4 Watt (11%)
min: 64.7     avg: 94.4     median: 89.6 (15%)     max: 137.9 Watt
104.2 Watt (18%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
66.4 Watt (12%)
min: 74.7     avg: 102.2     median: 93 (17%)     max: 135.7 Watt
104.5 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.73     avg: 14.6     median: 11.8 (8%)     max: 59.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.09     avg: 13.7     median: 12.6 (14%)     max: 35.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
21.1 Points per Watt (16%)
min: 20.1     avg: 27     median: 28.4 (21%)     max: 33.2 Points per Watt
17.8 Points per Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 4600H → 100% n=32

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS → 164% n=32

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS → 120% n=32

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 20. 13:47:05

#0 checking url part for id 11679 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14948 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11882 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.044s ... 0.045s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.045s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11679 +0.02s ... 0.064s

#8 got single benchmarks 11679 +0.056s ... 0.12s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14948 +0.02s ... 0.14s

#10 got single benchmarks 14948 +0.083s ... 0.223s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11882 +0.021s ... 0.244s

#12 got single benchmarks 11882 +0.017s ... 0.26s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.26s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.567s ... 0.828s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.828s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)