Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-8700K vs Intel Core i7-10875H

Intel Core i7-8700K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8700K

The Intel Core i7-8700K is a high-end desktop processor with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in September 2017. The processor clocks at between 3.7 and 4.7 GHz and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. The i7-8700K is comparatively easy to overclock thanks to the unlocked multiplier.

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to the Core i7-7700K when all cores are in use. Single-core performance has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a high-end model, the i7-8700K is suitable for the most demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The build is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 95 watts. Therefore, well-dimensioned cooling systems should easily manage to deal with the created heat. We expect increased efficiency due to the higher performance.

Intel Core i7-10875H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-10875H

The Intel Core i7-10875H is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.3 and 5.1 GHz (4.3 with all 8 cores, 4.9 without Thermal Velocity boost) and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessors, the Comet Lake-H series CPUs offer only increased clock rates.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i7-10875H supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP. 

Performance

The performance of the Core i7-10875H should be somewhere around the older Core i9-9880H. Thanks to the 8 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run very good on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9880H. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i7 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

ModelIntel Core i7-8700KIntel Core i7-10875H
CodenameCoffee Lake-SComet Lake-H
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Comet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i7-8086K compare3.7 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700K « 3.7 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700 compare3.2 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8600K compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500 compare3 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400 compare2.8 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500T compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H « 2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock3700 - 4700 MHz2300 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB2 MB
L3 Cache12 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 128 / 16
TDP95 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
SocketFCLGA1151FCBGA1440
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$359 U.S.$450 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.100 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10875H
32.1 pt (53%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 5135     avg: 8108     median: 8889.5 (8%)     max: 9809 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1100     avg: 1222     median: 1241.5 (52%)     max: 1270 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
430 Points (47%)
min: 430     avg: 485.9     median: 483.5 (53%)     max: 524 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3165 Points (8%)
min: 1986     avg: 3455     median: 3391.5 (8%)     max: 4176 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1323     avg: 1374     median: 1362 (9%)     max: 1422 Points
min: 1003     avg: 1554     median: 1594.5 (10%)     max: 1833 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 187     avg: 192.4     median: 192 (53%)     max: 199 Points
min: 190     avg: 203.6     median: 202 (56%)     max: 220 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 13.61     avg: 14.8     median: 15 (19%)     max: 15.64 Points
18.7 Points (24%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.11     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (52%)     max: 2.27 Points
2.4 Points (57%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7130     avg: 7302     median: 7328 (44%)     max: 7423 Points
7803 Points (47%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 36392     avg: 38552     median: 39096 (28%)     max: 39624 Points
44805 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
46535 Points (30%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9303 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 116.6     avg: 120.8     median: 118.9 (1%)     max: 129.1 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 4     avg: 4.5     median: 4.2 (1%)     max: 5.341 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7032     avg: 7196     median: 7120 (11%)     max: 7435 Points
7473 Points (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 29844     avg: 43117     median: 44947 (26%)     max: 49562 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5071     avg: 5360     median: 5319 (63%)     max: 5780 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 82.1     avg: 85.6     median: 87.2 (29%)     max: 87.4 fps
103 fps (34%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 230     avg: 231.7     median: 232 (54%)     max: 233 fps
242.4 fps (56%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
10.8 fps (19%)
min: 7.27     avg: 11.7     median: 12.1 (21%)     max: 14.1 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.668     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (23%)     max: 0.796 GB/s
1.1 GB/s (32%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1     avg: 1.3     median: 1.4 (24%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 4.9     avg: 7.3     median: 8 (21%)     max: 8 GB/s
10.3 GB/s (27%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 312     avg: 332.8     median: 332.8 (2%)     max: 353.5 Seconds
min: 258.6     avg: 327     median: 322.5 (2%)     max: 535 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.546     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.662 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 11599     avg: 11729     median: 11701 (25%)     max: 11886 Points
min: 12228     avg: 12945     median: 12944.5 (28%)     max: 13661 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.545     avg: 8     median: 8 (2%)     max: 8.329 s
7.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 16.73     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (1%)     max: 18.77 s
16.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 413.8     avg: 443.5     median: 442.8 (2%)     max: 465.1 s
431.7 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 55236     avg: 55318     median: 55317.5 (42%)     max: 55399 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 13293     avg: 14460     median: 14766 (36%)     max: 15013 Points
min: 11778     avg: 16439     median: 16622 (41%)     max: 18773 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 63878     avg: 64781     median: 64445 (52%)     max: 66020 Points
63367 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 63734     avg: 64731     median: 64316 (52%)     max: 66143 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 63328     avg: 65156     median: 65451.5 (53%)     max: 66393 Points
min: 60620     avg: 65215     median: 65828 (53%)     max: 67661 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12363     avg: 12530     median: 12521 (32%)     max: 12713 Points
min: 8202     avg: 14143     median: 15133 (38%)     max: 16966 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 18221     avg: 18728     median: 18574 (33%)     max: 19358 Points
min: 15535     avg: 20404     median: 21228 (38%)     max: 22530 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6578     avg: 7256     median: 7255.5 (31%)     max: 7933 Points
min: 5192     avg: 8699     median: 8946 (38%)     max: 10140 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1210 Points (47%)
min: 1233     avg: 1304     median: 1300 (51%)     max: 1371 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
6310 Points (11%)
min: 5715     avg: 7734     median: 7799 (14%)     max: 8620 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1188     avg: 1255     median: 1264 (5%)     max: 1306 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6700     avg: 7399     median: 7370 (23%)     max: 8130 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5760     avg: 5827     median: 5783 (58%)     max: 5937 Points
min: 5616     avg: 5830     median: 5803 (58%)     max: 6016 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 24546     avg: 24938     median: 25045 (25%)     max: 25223 Points
min: 28711     avg: 30765     median: 31346 (31%)     max: 31934 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5738     avg: 5754     median: 5754 (64%)     max: 5770 Points
6013 Points (66%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 23187     avg: 23209     median: 23208.5 (30%)     max: 23230 Points
30783 Points (40%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
25920 Points (41%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4914 Points (74%)
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 CPU Mark
min: 19061     avg: 19077     median: 19077 (100%)     max: 19093 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
753 ms (1%)
min: 746     avg: 765     median: 757 (1%)     max: 848 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 52.2     avg: 55.8     median: 55.8 (1%)     max: 59.3 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 45565     avg: 47064     median: 47063.5 (34%)     max: 48562 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 212     avg: 238.5     median: 239 (43%)     max: 262 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 142.7     avg: 149.4     median: 149.4 (26%)     max: 156 Watt
min: 69     avg: 98.9     median: 104.8 (18%)     max: 117 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 134.3     avg: 143.2     median: 143.2 (26%)     max: 152 Watt
min: 71     avg: 110.8     median: 117 (21%)     max: 138 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 9.36     avg: 9.6     median: 9.6 (7%)     max: 9.85 Points per Watt
min: 13.2     avg: 14     median: 13.6 (10%)     max: 15.6 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8700K → 100% n=33

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10875H → 113% n=33

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 18. 14:09:17

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9296 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11949 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755518957s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Aug 2025 05:18:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9296 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 9296 +0.006s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11949 +0.004s ... 0.016s

#10 got single benchmarks 11949 +0.029s ... 0.044s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.044s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.04s ... 0.084s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.087s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)