Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 520 vs NVIDIA GeForce 825M

AMD Radeon 520

► remove from comparison

The Radeon 520 is a dedicated entry-level graphics card for laptops that was released in 2017. AMD reveals that the chip features five compute units based on the GCN architecture and 2 GB GDDR5 64-bit graphics memory. The new chip is not based on the Polaris architecture from 2016, but the old one that was introduced with the Radeon R5 M230 in 2014 and later used in the M330 and M430 / M440 / M445.

Due to the higher clock speed of up to 1030 MHz, the Radeon 520 should be slightly faster than the old Radeon R7 M445 (920 MHz, 320 shader units, GDDR5). However, the performance should be comparable, which means that demanding games like Dishonored 2, Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare or XCOM 2 should not run smoothly. Less demanding games like Overwatch, Fifa 17 (with a fast CPU) or Farming Simulator 17, would run well, but using low to medium detail settings. For detailed game benchmarks, visit the pages of the previous linked card. If only DDR3 is used, the performance should be on par with the Radeon R7 M440 (1021 MHz, 320 shader units, DDR3).

NVIDIA GeForce 825M

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce 825M  (sometimes also called GT 825M) is a middle class DirectX 12 graphics card. It is based on the 28 nm Kepler architecture and uses the same GK208 chip as the GeForce GT 730M and 740M.

Architecture

GK208 is based on the Kepler architecture and offers two shader blocks, called SMX, each with 192 shaders for a total of 384 shader cores. The shaders are clocked at the same speed as the rest of the chip. Furthermore, the GK208 chip has 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs on a 64-bit memory interface.

PCIe 3.0 is now supported by the mobile Kepler series and GPU Boost 2.0 mode can automatically overclock the card if the laptop cooling system allows it. This feature is available on any notebook with a graphics card from the 800M series.

Performance

According to our benchmarks, the performance of the GeForce 825M is somewhere between the GT 730M and GT 740M. Current games (as of 2013/2014) can thus be played in 1366 x 768 and medium settings. However, very demanding games such as Crysis 3 or Battlefield 4 will require lower resolutions and/or details.

Features

The feature set of the 825M corresponds to the GT 730M and 740M. This includes support for up to 4 active displays. Furthermore, high resolution monitors of up to 3840x2160 pixels can now be connected using DisplayPort 1.2 or HDMI 1.4a if available. HD-Audio codecs, such as Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD, can be transmitted via bitstream mode through the HDMI port. However, as most laptops will feature Optimus, the integrated GPU will likely have direct control over the display ports and may limit the feature set available by the Nvidia Kepler cards.

The 5th generation PureVideo HD video processor (VP5) offers hardware decoding of HD videos. Common codecs such as MPEG-1/2, MPEG-4 ASP, H.264 and VC1/WMV9 are fully supported up to 4K resolutions while VC1 and MPEG-4 are supported up to 1080p. Two streams can be decoded in parallel for features such as Picture-in-Picture. Another feature is the inclusion of a dedicated video encoding engine similar to Intel QuickSync that can be accessed via the NVENCI API.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the GeForce 825M should be similar to the GT 730M. As a result, the Nvidia GPU is best suited for multimedia notebooks 14-inches in size or greater. The 800M series also supports Optimus to automatically switch between an integrated graphics card and the Nvidia GPU.

AMD Radeon 520NVIDIA GeForce 825M
GeForce 800M Series
Radeon 530 compare 384 @ 1.02 GHz64 Bit @ 2250 MHz
Radeon 520 320 @ 1.03 GHz64 Bit @ 2250 MHz
GeForce 845M compare 384 @ 1.07 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit @ 2000 - 5000 MHz
GeForce 840M compare 384 @ 1.03 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
GeForce 830M compare 256 @ 1.03 - 1.15 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce 825M 384 @ 0.85 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce 820M compare 96 @ 0.78 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Kepler
Pipelines320 - unified384 - unified
Core Speed1030 MHz850 MHz
Memory Speed2250 MHz1800 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3, GDDR5DDR3
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB2048 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 12, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.3
technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesDirectX 12, Mantle, OpenGL, OpenCL 1.2, VulkanOptimus, PhysX, Verde Drivers, CUDA, 3D Vision, 3DTV Play
Date of Announcement21.03.2017 27.01.2014
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.com
Power Consumption33 Watt
Transistors1.3 Billion
Notebook Sizemedium sized

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Radeon 520
0.6 pt (2%)
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - GeForce 825M
0.5 pt (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 383     avg: 454.5     median: 454.5 (1%)     max: 526 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 335     avg: 397     median: 397 (1%)     max: 459 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
77543 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
34545 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 5509     avg: 7240     median: 7240 (8%)     max: 8971 Points
min: 5142     avg: 5421     median: 5421 (6%)     max: 5700 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 6156     avg: 8413     median: 8412.5 (2%)     max: 10669 Points
min: 7378     avg: 7416     median: 7416 (2%)     max: 7454 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 954     avg: 1233     median: 1232.5 (2%)     max: 1511 Points
min: 1043     avg: 1050     median: 1050 (2%)     max: 1057 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1022     avg: 1319     median: 1319 (1%)     max: 1616 Points
min: 1147     avg: 1150     median: 1150 (1%)     max: 1153 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
49247 Points (6%)
min: 73985     avg: 78894     median: 78893.5 (9%)     max: 83802 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 2055     avg: 2232     median: 2232 (3%)     max: 2409 Points
min: 1831     avg: 1860     median: 1859.5 (3%)     max: 1888 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1877     avg: 2017     median: 2016.5 (2%)     max: 2156 Points
min: 1738     avg: 1757     median: 1756.5 (2%)     max: 1775 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + AMD Radeon 520
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
5266 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce 825M
6000 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + AMD Radeon 520
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
4324 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce 825M
5243 Points (3%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
11294 Points (12%)
17043 Points (19%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + AMD Radeon 520
3DMark 06
6492 Points (8%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce 825M
9290 Points (12%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
4.1 fps (1%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
12 fps (4%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
9.2 fps (4%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
16.6 fps (3%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + AMD Radeon 520
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
9124 Points (6%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + AMD Radeon 520
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
24.5 fps (8%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce 825M
min: 30.87     avg: 31.6     median: 31.6 (11%)     max: 32.4 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + AMD Radeon 520
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 29.98     avg: 35.6     median: 35.6 (2%)     max: 41.13 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce 825M
49 fps (3%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + AMD Radeon 520
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce 825M
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
25.6 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
35.4 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
52.9 fps (3%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + AMD Radeon 520
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
114.1 fps (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
184 Samples/s (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
325 Samples/s (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
929 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Radeon 520 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce 825M → 112% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Destiny 2

Destiny 2

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon 520:
17.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
9.4  fps
ELEX

ELEX

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon 520:
17.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
8.1  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
6.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon 520:
22  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
10  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
7  fps
FIFA 18

FIFA 18

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon 520:
102.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
44  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
35.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
32.6  fps
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon 520:
34  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
15  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
13  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon 520:
95  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Radeon 520:
87.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
38.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
19.6  fps
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon 520:
46.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
16.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
9.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon 520:
57.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
22.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
14  fps
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon 520:
30.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
11.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
9.2  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon 520:
26.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
8.7  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon 520:
40.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
18.5  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
8.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon 520:
70.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Radeon 520:
47.1  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
18.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
7.6  fps
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon 520:
41.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Radeon 520:
33  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
14.6  fps
low 1280x768
100%
Radeon 520:
11.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
5.9  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon 520:
21  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
8  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Radeon 520:
21.6 36 ~ 29 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Radeon 520:
13.5 20.8 ~ 17 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
7.4 9.8 ~ 9 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
7.4  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Radeon 520:
52  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Radeon 520:
31.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
13.8  fps
low 1366x768
100%
Radeon 520:
53.3  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Radeon 520:
37.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
18.8  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon 520:
84.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Radeon 520:
45.8  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
19  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
17.9  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Radeon 520:
29.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Radeon 520:
18.7  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
10.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
5.8  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Radeon 520:
119.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Radeon 520:
35.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
17.6  fps
Titanfall

Titanfall

2014
med. 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
35.5  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
22.8  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
GeForce 825M:
26.2  fps
med. 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
15.5  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
12.4  fps
low 1024x768
GeForce 825M:
37.6  fps
med. 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
29.2  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
15.4  fps
low 1024x768
GeForce 825M:
43.1  fps
med. 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
25.4  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
11.3  fps
low 1024x768
GeForce 825M:
30  fps
med. 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
25.6  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
22.7  fps
low 1024x768
GeForce 825M:
60.4  fps
med. 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
42.5  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
18.7  fps
low 1024x768
GeForce 825M:
51.2  fps
med. 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
34.7  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
24.7  fps
low 1024x768
GeForce 825M:
80  fps
med. 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
48  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
22  fps
F1 2013

F1 2013

2013
med. 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
80  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
70  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce 825M:
28  fps
Fifa 14

Fifa 14

2013
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce 825M:
84.5  fps
low 1024x768
GeForce 825M:
61.9  fps
low 1280x720
GeForce 825M:
50.5  fps
med. 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
39.7  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
15  fps
low 1024x768
GeForce 825M:
39.4  fps
med. 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
34.2  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
22.7  fps
low 1024x768
GeForce 825M:
49.5  fps
med. 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
33.9  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
16.1  fps
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
med. 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
74.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce 825M:
26.9  fps
low 1024x768
GeForce 825M:
21.6  fps
med. 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
20.8  fps
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
med. 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
70.8  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
49.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce 825M:
13.4  fps
low 1024x768
GeForce 825M:
33.4  fps
med. 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
24.5  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
15  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon 520:
47.8 82.4 ~ 65 fps
106%
GeForce 825M:
69.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Radeon 520:
28.4 43.7 ~ 36 fps
104%
GeForce 825M:
37.5  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Radeon 520:
23.4 36.3 ~ 30 fps
104%
GeForce 825M:
31.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
7.5 11.7 ~ 10 fps
med. 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
79.7  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
41.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce 825M:
14.4  fps
SimCity

SimCity

2013
low 1024x768
GeForce 825M:
70.7  fps
med. 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
34.4  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
24.4  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Radeon 520:
62.3  fps
146%
GeForce 825M:
90 91.2 ~ 91 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Radeon 520:
31.8  fps
138%
GeForce 825M:
43.2 44 ~ 44 fps
high 1366x768
100%
Radeon 520:
24.2  fps
99%
GeForce 825M:
23.9 24.2 ~ 24 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
12.5  fps
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
GeForce 825M:
32.2  fps
med. 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
19.1  fps
med. 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
53.6  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
42.2  fps
low 1024x768
GeForce 825M:
44.9  fps
med. 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
28.5  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce 825M:
13.3  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Radeon 520:
65.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Radeon 520:
41.5  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Radeon 520:
33.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
21.6  fps
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
100%
Radeon 520:
77.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Radeon 520:
35.1  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Radeon 520:
22.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
11.1  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon 520:
44.8  fps
128%
GeForce 825M:
57.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Radeon 520:
29.4  fps
130%
GeForce 825M:
38.3  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Radeon 520:
19.8  fps
137%
GeForce 825M:
27.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 520:
10.6  fps
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
med. 1024x768
GeForce 825M:
96  fps
high 1280x1024
GeForce 825M:
31  fps

Average Gaming AMD Radeon 520 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce 825M → 121%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 118%

AMD Radeon 520lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Destiny 217.89.4
ELEX17.38.16.6
Middle-earth: Shadow of War22107
FIFA 18102.44435.732.6
F1 2017341513
Team Fortress 29587.338.319.6
Dirt 446.416.69.6
Rocket League57.122.214
Prey30.111.39.2
For Honor26.398.7
Resident Evil 740.218.58.2
Farming Simulator 1770.847.118.37.6
Overwatch41.93314.6
Ashes of the Singularity11.65.9
Far Cry Primal2198
Rise of the Tomb Raider291797.4
Rainbow Six Siege5231.913.8
World of Warships53.337.318.8
Dota 2 Reborn84.545.81917.9
The Witcher 329.718.710.25.8
Dirt Rally119.735.917.6
BioShock Infinite65363010
Tomb Raider62.331.824.212.5
Diablo III65.941.533.721.6
Anno 207077.435.122.111.1
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim44.829.419.810.6
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
8
9
9
14
11
1
20
4

10
1







NVIDIA GeForce 825Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Titanfall35.522.8
Thief26.215.512.4
Assassin´s Creed IV: Black Flag37.629.215.4
X-Plane 10.2543.125.411.3
Need for Speed: Rivals3025.622.7
Call of Duty: Ghosts60.442.518.7
Battlefield 451.234.724.7
Batman: Arkham Origins804822
F1 2013807028
Fifa 1484.5
Total War: Rome II61.9
Saints Row IV50.539.715
The Bureau: XCOM Declassified39.434.222.7
Splinter Cell: Blacklist49.533.916.1
Dota 274.826.9
Company of Heroes 221.620.8
GRID 270.849.513.4
Metro: Last Light33.424.515
BioShock Infinite69.237.531.1
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm79.741.814.4
SimCity70.734.424.4
Tomb Raider914424
Crysis 332.219.1
Dead Space 353.642.2
Hitman: Absolution44.928.513.3
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim57.238.327.1
World of Warcraft9631
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
11
6
8
12
5
16
5
1
4

1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 16. 12:53:36

#0 checking url part for id 7942 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5252 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:38:48 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.076s ... 0.077s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.078s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.078s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7942 +0.043s ... 0.12s

#8 got single benchmarks 7942 +0.016s ... 0.136s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 5252 +0.018s ... 0.154s

#10 got single benchmarks 5252 +0.008s ... 0.162s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.162s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.243s ... 0.404s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.404s

#14 Got 168 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.412s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.412s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.034s ... 0.446s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.114s ... 0.56s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.56s

#19 return log +0.066s ... 0.626s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)