Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS vs AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX vs AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is a powerful Phoenix family chip that saw the light of day in H1 2023. The processor features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at 3.8 GHz. The highest Boost clock speed achievable is 5.1 GHz.

Not only does this APU has full might of the Zen 4 architecture at its disposal, it also comes with the new Ryzen AI technology that's set to make generative AI more ubiquitous than ever before. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has. Ryzen AI is coming after Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies; time will tell if this move by AMD is a good idea.

Perhaps more importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is set to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

Elsewhere, the 7840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7840HS in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-12700H, Core i7-12850HX, Core i9-12900H, Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The 7840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

► remove from comparison Dragon Rage AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Dragon Range series. It offers 16 cores based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (32 threads). The cores clock from 2.5 (base) up to 5.4 GHz (single core boost). The 7945HX is the fastest mobile Ryzen CPU at launch and derived from the desktop Ryzen 9 7950X.

The Dragon Range series still uses a chiplet design with two CCD-clusters (each with 8 possible cores) in 5nm and an IO-die (including the memory controller and the Radeon 610M iGPU) in 6nm. The chip integrates 4x USB 3.2 Gen2 (10 Gbps) ports (no USB4), 28 PCIe 5.0 lanes (for GPU and SSDs) and a dual-channel DDR5-5200 memory controller.

Performance

The Ryzen 9 7945HX is among the fastest processors in our database, as of August 2023. It is in the same league as the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D and noticeably ahead of the Core i9-13980HX, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. It is outrageously, unbelievably fast, and those fortunate enough to purchase a laptop built around this CPU will have no performance issues for at least three years.

Thanks to its powerful cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 128 W, the ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 is one of the fastest laptops built around the 7945HX that we know of.

The R9 7945HX is rated at a TDP of 55 Watt and can be configured up to 75 Watt (cTDP).

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 PRO 7940HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (16 threads). The cores clock from 4 (base) up to 5.2 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

Compared to the consumer Ryzen 9 7940HS, the PRO models offer additional security, manageability, and reliability features designed for professional users and workstation environments.

The performance of the R9 PRO 7940HS should be slightly higher than the old top model Ryzen 9 6980HX (8 Zen 3 cores with up to 4.9 GHz) at 54W TDP and Ryzen 9 6980HS at 35W TDP. Compared to the higher end Dragon Range series, the 7940HS should be similar to the Ryzen 7 7745HX (also 8 Zen 4 cores, max 5.1 GHz, 55W tDP, 32 MB L3).

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.8 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 35 and 45 Watt.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 7840HSAMD Ryzen 9 7945HXAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
CodenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4)AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4)
Series: Phoenix (Zen 4) Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D2.3 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX « 2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX2.4 - 5.2 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX3 - 5.2 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX2.9 - 5.1 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz2500 - 5400 MHz4000 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB1 MB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB16 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB64 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1616 / 32
16 x 5.4 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP35 Watt55 Watt35 Watt
Technology4 nmCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FL1FP7/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Transistors9900 Million

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7840HS
40.3 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7945HX
46.8 pt (78%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 PRO 7940HS
39.4 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 101     avg: 104.6     median: 105 (59%)     max: 107 Points
min: 109.6     avg: 113     median: 113.6 (64%)     max: 116 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 880     avg: 912     median: 913 (17%)     max: 956 Points
min: 1677     avg: 1739     median: 1716 (32%)     max: 1828 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15515     avg: 16343     median: 16188 (15%)     max: 17214 Points
min: 30783     avg: 33078     median: 33459 (31%)     max: 34613 Points
min: 14919     avg: 15603     median: 14953 (14%)     max: 16938 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1718     avg: 1769     median: 1774 (75%)     max: 1812 Points
min: 1861     avg: 1919     median: 1940 (82%)     max: 1957 Points
min: 1568     avg: 1708     median: 1762 (74%)     max: 1794 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 668     avg: 687     median: 688 (75%)     max: 705 Points
min: 712     avg: 742     median: 753 (82%)     max: 760 Points
min: 611     avg: 665     median: 689 (75%)     max: 695 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6061     avg: 6387     median: 6344 (15%)     max: 6744 Points
min: 10025     avg: 12651     median: 13057 (32%)     max: 13769 Points
min: 5790     avg: 6068     median: 5812 (14%)     max: 6601 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2473     avg: 2587     median: 2565 (16%)     max: 2729 Points
min: 4998     avg: 5363     median: 5289 (33%)     max: 5663 Points
min: 2356     avg: 2478     median: 2360 (15%)     max: 2718 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 270     avg: 277.2     median: 278 (77%)     max: 286 Points
min: 290     avg: 304.3     median: 308 (85%)     max: 311 Points
min: 247     avg: 267.3     median: 275 (76%)     max: 280 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.59     avg: 29.9     median: 29.7 (38%)     max: 30.25 Points
min: 59.93     avg: 61.6     median: 61 (79%)     max: 64.29 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (78%)     max: 3.33 Points
min: 3.65     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (87%)     max: 3.67 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7515     avg: 7599     median: 7574 (46%)     max: 7709 Points
min: 8262     avg: 8390     median: 8408.5 (51%)     max: 8481 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 45602     avg: 48003     median: 48144 (35%)     max: 50264 Points
min: 68510     avg: 70846     median: 71596.5 (52%)     max: 71681 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 83726     avg: 85254     median: 84973 (54%)     max: 87064 Points
min: 127197     avg: 128938     median: 128360 (82%)     max: 131256 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14015     avg: 14130     median: 14177 (17%)     max: 14197 Points
min: 15601     avg: 15764     median: 15801 (19%)     max: 15889 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 71.922     avg: 73.4     median: 72.8 (1%)     max: 75.535 s
min: 34.561     avg: 66.2     median: 35.8 (0%)     max: 158.7 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.626     avg: 2.8     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 3.244 s
min: 1.917     avg: 2.7     median: 2.1 (0%)     max: 4.9 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6428     avg: 7133     median: 7271 (12%)     max: 7699 Points
min: 10253     avg: 13106     median: 13822 (22%)     max: 15242 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 59538     avg: 69163     median: 70243 (40%)     max: 73035 MIPS
min: 123364     avg: 135923     median: 139757 (80%)     max: 140932 MIPS
min: 61111     avg: 63409     median: 61303 (35%)     max: 67813 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6049     avg: 6558     median: 6604 (78%)     max: 6754 MIPS
min: 7319     avg: 7468     median: 7381 (87%)     max: 7711 MIPS
min: 5844     avg: 6185     median: 6215 (73%)     max: 6497 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 142.85     avg: 145.4     median: 144.1 (48%)     max: 149.3 fps
min: 228     avg: 236.7     median: 239 (80%)     max: 243 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 280     avg: 286.5     median: 281.5 (65%)     max: 298 fps
min: 360.5     avg: 366.5     median: 362 (84%)     max: 377 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 11.7     avg: 19.9     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 21.8 fps
min: 33.8     avg: 35.8     median: 35.4 (62%)     max: 37.6 fps
min: 17     avg: 18.2     median: 17.3 (30%)     max: 20.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (38%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
min: 2.6     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (78%)     max: 2.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2.1 (36%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
min: 4     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (71%)     max: 4.2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 10.2     avg: 13.3     median: 14.7 (38%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
min: 25.3     avg: 27.7     median: 27.7 (72%)     max: 29.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 298     avg: 324.6     median: 319 (4%)     max: 463 Seconds
min: 138     avg: 151.4     median: 152 (2%)     max: 160 Seconds
min: 305     avg: 331     median: 343 (4%)     max: 345 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 185     avg: 198.7     median: 196 (1%)     max: 229 Seconds
min: 87     avg: 95     median: 95 (1%)     max: 100 Seconds
min: 191     avg: 206.7     median: 214 (2%)     max: 215 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4184     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4739 sec
min: 0.3884     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4159 sec
min: 0.4462     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4835 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14213     avg: 15469     median: 15583 (33%)     max: 16073 Points
min: 19481     avg: 19804     median: 19820 (42%)     max: 20110 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.112     avg: 7.7     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 8.774 s
min: 6.4     avg: 6.8     median: 6.6 (1%)     max: 7.49 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.676     avg: 18.9     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 21.271 s
min: 13.9     avg: 14.6     median: 14.2 (1%)     max: 15.978 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 655.388     avg: 690     median: 689.9 (3%)     max: 724.411 s
min: 336.106     avg: 339.6     median: 337 (1%)     max: 345.75 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 72488     avg: 81330     median: 82000.5 (63%)     max: 85884 Points
min: 97328     avg: 100508     median: 100877 (77%)     max: 102949 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17320     avg: 22264     median: 22611 (56%)     max: 25584 Points
min: 24017     avg: 26697     median: 26667 (66%)     max: 30404 Points
min: 17734     avg: 19358     median: 18994.5 (47%)     max: 21708 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 77280     avg: 88106     median: 89565 (73%)     max: 93910 Points
min: 79423     avg: 82378     median: 82128.5 (67%)     max: 86375 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 80023     avg: 88577     median: 88981 (72%)     max: 93208 Points
min: 79397     avg: 82262     median: 81750 (66%)     max: 86844 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 83382     avg: 90268     median: 91995 (74%)     max: 95508 Points
min: 81621     avg: 84162     median: 83710 (67%)     max: 89010 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13602     avg: 19552     median: 20556.5 (52%)     max: 21602 Points
min: 22457     avg: 23233     median: 23020 (58%)     max: 24017 Points
min: 18622     avg: 18646     median: 18646 (47%)     max: 18670 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24338     avg: 27634     median: 27816 (50%)     max: 29343 Points
min: 29626     avg: 38324     median: 39095 (70%)     max: 42342 Points
min: 24750     avg: 25817     median: 25765.5 (46%)     max: 26986 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8903     avg: 10918     median: 11131 (47%)     max: 12218 Points
min: 6283     avg: 12174     median: 12954.5 (55%)     max: 13694 Points
min: 8500     avg: 9183     median: 9056.5 (38%)     max: 10117 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2585     avg: 2660     median: 2670 (67%)     max: 2721 Points
min: 2797     avg: 2870     median: 2876 (72%)     max: 2940 Points
min: 2339     avg: 2519     median: 2605 (65%)     max: 2614 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 12111     avg: 12998     median: 13088 (51%)     max: 13498 Points
min: 16223     avg: 16828     median: 16765 (65%)     max: 17892 Points
min: 10095     avg: 11157     median: 10348 (40%)     max: 13028 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2488     avg: 2682     median: 2603 (83%)     max: 3105 Points
min: 2800     avg: 3003     median: 3105 (99%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12439     avg: 14395     median: 12823.5 (53%)     max: 21003 Points
min: 16132     avg: 19379     median: 21003 (86%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1837     avg: 1962     median: 1957.5 (76%)     max: 2017 Points
min: 1960     avg: 2088     median: 2103 (82%)     max: 2158 Points
min: 1758     avg: 1894     median: 1956 (76%)     max: 1969 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8446     avg: 11688     median: 11859.5 (21%)     max: 12339 Points
min: 18372     avg: 19614     median: 19745 (35%)     max: 20394 Points
min: 9897     avg: 10631     median: 9959 (18%)     max: 12038 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1834     avg: 1886     median: 1887 (8%)     max: 1936 Points
min: 1882     avg: 2002     median: 2014.5 (9%)     max: 2095 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8572     avg: 11542     median: 11888 (37%)     max: 12278 Points
min: 19315     avg: 19802     median: 19649.5 (62%)     max: 20593 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7879     avg: 8077     median: 8144.5 (81%)     max: 8166 Points
min: 7646     avg: 8264     median: 8534 (85%)     max: 8613 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47599     avg: 48497     median: 48725.5 (49%)     max: 48906 Points
min: 75652     avg: 77236     median: 76265 (76%)     max: 79791 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 485     avg: 511     median: 516 (1%)     max: 544 ms
min: 446     avg: 460.3     median: 457.5 (1%)     max: 479 ms
min: 532     avg: 547     median: 546 (1%)     max: 564 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 91356     avg: 91588     median: 91577 (67%)     max: 91831 Points
min: 92275     avg: 96361     median: 97339 (71%)     max: 99470 Points
77466 Points (57%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 232     avg: 263.8     median: 263 (72%)     max: 319 Points
min: 259     avg: 285.9     median: 289 (79%)     max: 295 Points
min: 229     avg: 247     median: 252 (69%)     max: 255 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 288     avg: 316.9     median: 320 (57%)     max: 339 Points
min: 311     avg: 347.1     median: 351 (63%)     max: 387 Points
min: 279     avg: 296.7     median: 296 (53%)     max: 315 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1566     avg: 1769     median: 1802 (67%)     max: 1891 Points
min: 1929     avg: 2067     median: 2061 (77%)     max: 2240 Points
min: 1423     avg: 1538     median: 1555 (58%)     max: 1635 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 64.7     avg: 92.2     median: 86.6 (15%)     max: 137.9 Watt
min: 134.4     avg: 163     median: 145 (25%)     max: 225 Watt
min: 59     avg: 78.4     median: 61.3 (11%)     max: 114.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 74.7     avg: 97.6     median: 88.7 (16%)     max: 135.7 Watt
min: 139.1     avg: 173.2     median: 166.1 (30%)     max: 221 Watt
min: 62     avg: 79.3     median: 63 (12%)     max: 113 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.73     avg: 13.6     median: 11.5 (8%)     max: 59.2 Watt
min: 13.9     avg: 38.7     median: 31.2 (21%)     max: 71.2 Watt
min: 4.3     avg: 6.2     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 7.86 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.09     avg: 13.7     median: 12.6 (14%)     max: 35.5 Watt
min: 17.1     avg: 27     median: 24.1 (27%)     max: 37 Watt
min: 6.65     avg: 7.4     median: 7.1 (8%)     max: 8.33 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20.1     avg: 28.3     median: 30.3 (23%)     max: 33.2 Points per Watt
min: 25.1     avg: 31.3     median: 30.2 (23%)     max: 38 Points per Watt
min: 37.4     avg: 37.8     median: 37.8 (28%)     max: 38.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX → 140% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS → 91% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 21. 08:45:02

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14948 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14936 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 15052 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755758701s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Aug 2025 05:19:27 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14948 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 14948 +0.032s ... 0.044s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14936 +0.004s ... 0.048s

#11 got single benchmarks 14936 +0.002s ... 0.05s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 15052 +0.004s ... 0.055s

#13 got single benchmarks 15052 +0.007s ... 0.062s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.062s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.083s ... 0.145s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.145s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)