NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro P5000 Max-Q (official Nvidia Quadro P5000 with Max-Q Design) is a mobile high-end workstation graphics card for notebooks. It is the power efficient variant of the normal Quadro P5000 for laptops and offers slightly reduced clock speeds (1101 - 1366 MHz versus 1164 - 1506 MHz) and a greatly reduced power consumption (80 versus 100 Watt TGP). Similar to the consumer GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (Laptop), it is based on a slimmed-down GP104 chip with 2048 shaders. The graphics card is designed for the Kaby Lake generation.
The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers , which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.
Performance
The theoretical performance should be slightly below the normal Quadro P4000 due to the reduced clock speeds.
Power Consumption
With an TGP of 80 Watt, the P5000 Max-Q is only slightly higher rated (5 Watt) as the much slower Quadro P3000 (75 Watt) and therefore similar sized laptops can use the P5000 Max-Q.
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia T500 Mobile (formerly known as Quadro T500) for laptops is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is based on the consumer GeForce MX450 and features the same 896 cores and a 64 Bit memory bus. Currently it is available with 2 or 4 GB graphics RAM (GDDR5 or GDDR6). The TDP ranges between 18 - 25 Watt depending on the variant. As the MX450, the T500 also supports PCIe 4.0. The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC.
The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal. In contrary to the faster Quadro RTX cards, the T500 does not feature raytracing and Tensor cores.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is a professional high-end graphics card for powerful laptops and mobile workstations. The Max-Q variants are lower clocked versions that are running more efficient and can be used in smaller chassis than the regular versions. It is based on the same TU104 chip as the consumer GeForce RTX 2080 (mobile) but offers fewer shaders (2,560) and is therefore positioned between the GeForce RTX 2080 (2,944) and 2070 (2,304). Currently we know of three different Max-Q variants with a power consumption (TGP) of 90, 85 and 80 Watt and different clock speeds.
Model Shader TGP (W) Base (MHz) Boost (MHz) Quadro RTX 4000 Desktop 2304 160 1005 1545 Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile 2560 110 1350 1770 Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 90 960 1485 Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 85 900 1440 Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 80 780 1380 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile 2304 115? 1215 1440
The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers , which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.
NVIDIA manufacturers the TU104 chip on a 12 nm FinFET process and includes features like Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) and Real-Time Ray Tracing (RTRT), which should combine to create more realistic lighting effects than older GPUs based on the company's Pascal architecture (if the games support it). The Quadro RTX 5000 is also DisplayPort 1.4 ready, while there is also support for HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) and H.265 video en/decoding (PlayReady 3.0).
Performance
For professional applications, the Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q should be only slightly above the mobile Quadro RTX 3000 (depending on the version). Compared to consumer cards, the mobile RTX 2070 will offer a similar performance (or slightly lower).
The still relatively high power consumption of the RTX4000 Max-Q makes the card most suited for big laptops although we should see thinner designs with the Max-Q variants.
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro Turing Series Codename N17E-Q5 Max-Q N19E-Q3 MAX-Q Architecture Pascal Turing Turing Pipelines 2048 - unified 896 - unified 2560 - unified Core Speed 1101 - 1366 (Boost) MHz 1365 - 1695 (Boost) MHz 780 - 960 - 1380 - 1485 (Boost) MHz Memory Speed 6006 MHz 10000 MHz 14000 MHz Memory Bus Width 256 Bit 64 Bit 256 Bit Memory Type GDDR5 GDDR5, GDDR6 GDDR6 Max. Amount of Memory 16 GB 4 GB 8 GB Shared Memory no no no API DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 Power Consumption 100 Watt 25 Watt 80 - 90 Watt technology 16 nm 12 nm 12 nm Features Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus DLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor Notebook Size large medium sized large Date of Announcement 11.01.2017 27.05.2019 27.05.2019 Link to Manufacturer Page www.nvidia.com Transistors 10.8 Billion
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - T500 Laptop GPU
1.9 pt (6%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
7.8 pt (23%)
...
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1627 avg: 1953 median: 1958 (6%) max: 2270 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 72% 92% 80%
6724 Points (19%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 34% 24% 31% 27% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1554 avg: 1814 median: 1787.5 (5%) max: 2127 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 73% 91% 77%
6764 Points (18%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 31% 23% 29% 24% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
23072 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 15562 avg: 15975 median: 15851 (17%) max: 16513 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 94% 96% 100%
23809 Points (25%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 65% 67% 69% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 22719 avg: 24657 median: 23453 (6%) max: 27800 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 84% 82%
35167 Points (9%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 79% 67% 65% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3406 avg: 4047 median: 3973.5 (7%) max: 4833 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 70% 90% 74%
15010 Points (26%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 32% 23% 29% 24% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3696 avg: 4322 median: 4224.5 (5%) max: 5141 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 72% 90% 74%
17049 Points (19%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 30% 22% 27% 22% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
80696 Points (10%)
35402 Points (4%)
GPU TDP 22 W TDP 80 W 100% 44%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 6293 avg: 7692 median: 8132 (11%) max: 8212 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 99% 77% 99% 100%
min: 19079 avg: 19888 median: 19888 (28%) max: 20697 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 76% 33% 42% 43% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 6767 avg: 7808 median: 7995.5 (7%) max: 8475 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 80% 95% 93%
min: 23464 avg: 23574 median: 23574 (20%) max: 23684 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 67% 29% 34% 33% 100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
31133 Points (41%)
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
116 fps (29%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
128 fps (19%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
96.6 fps (21%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
77.6 fps (21%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
131 fps (52%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
122 fps (20%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
175 fps (31%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 64.9 avg: 80.7 median: 82.1 (22%) max: 93.6 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 86% 90% 69%
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 112.1 avg: 121.1 median: 121.1 (32%) max: 130 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 100% 72% 75% 58% 100%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 71.2 avg: 79.2 median: 77.5 (9%) max: 90.8 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 78% 91% 80%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 225.4 avg: 245.2 median: 245.2 (27%) max: 265 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 79% 32% 37% 32% 100%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 16.01 avg: 18.9 median: 16.9 (4%) max: 23.87 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 100% 71% 67%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 89.3 avg: 93 median: 93 (20%) max: 96.6 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 80 W 67% 19% 18% 100%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 24.84 avg: 29.6 median: 28.7 (6%) max: 36.14 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 73% 86% 69%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
81.9 fps (17%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 44% 32% 38% 30% 100%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 48.47 avg: 53.5 median: 51.9 (6%) max: 62 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 81% 86% 78%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 162 avg: 185 median: 185 (21%) max: 208 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 83% 31% 33% 30% 100%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 8.57 avg: 9.6 median: 8.7 (3%) max: 12.41 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 69% 71% 69%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
35.3 fps (11%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 35% 24% 25% 24% 100%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 55.8 avg: 62.1 median: 59.2 (9%) max: 74.3 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 77% 83% 75%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 162.1 avg: 186.1 median: 186.1 (27%) max: 210 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 88% 35% 38% 34% 100%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 81.9 avg: 88.6 median: 88.3 (10%) max: 95.8 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 88% 97% 85%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 181.6 avg: 204.8 median: 204.8 (23%) max: 228 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 89% 46% 51% 45% 100%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 45.15 avg: 51 median: 50.4 (9%) max: 57.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 83% 91% 78%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 129.5 avg: 150.8 median: 150.8 (26%) max: 172 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 89% 37% 41% 35% 100%
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 37.82 avg: 40.2 median: 39.1 (8%) max: 43.59 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 90% 87%
specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
114.4 fps (22%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 38% 34% 33% 100%
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 66.2 avg: 76 median: 68.8 (11%) max: 93.1 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 74% 71%
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
181 fps (30%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 51% 38% 37% 100%
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 10.73 avg: 12.1 median: 11 (8%) max: 14.74 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 74% 73%
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
38.3 fps (27%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 38% 29% 28% 100%
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 59 avg: 65.5 median: 59.3 (9%) max: 78.1 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 76% 76%
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
159.9 fps (23%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 49% 37% 37% 100%
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 8.62 avg: 9.7 median: 8.7 (7%) max: 11.96 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 72% 72%
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
35.7 fps (29%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 33% 24% 24% 100%
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 29.28 avg: 34.7 median: 32.7 (16%) max: 41.95 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 70% 78%
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
88.3 fps (43%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 48% 33% 37% 100%
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 16.48 avg: 19.2 median: 18 (12%) max: 23.22 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 77% 71%
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
60.5 fps (39%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 38% 30% 27% 100%
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 19.56 avg: 23.3 median: 21.6 (10%) max: 28.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 75% 68%
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
64.1 fps (29%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 45% 34% 31% 100%
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
63.1 fps (19%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
111.4 fps (11%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
14.6 fps (14%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
75.8 fps (12%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
41.4 fps (9%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
58.7 fps (28%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
36 fps (24%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
45.3 fps (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
156.6 fps (54%)
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 134 avg: 168.8 median: 173 (10%) max: 195 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 69% 99% 78%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
min: 191 avg: 210.5 median: 210.5 (12%) max: 230 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 100% 63% 91% 72% 90%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
99.6 % (100%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 80 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
119 fps (13%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
183 fps (4%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
236 fps (14%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
503 fps (4%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
653 Samples/s (3%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
1976 Samples/s (3%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4734 Points (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.1 avg: 47.1 median: 47.1 (7%) max: 49 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W 100% 101%
149.2 Watt (21%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 80 W 118% 119% 100%
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.6 avg: 43.7 median: 43.7 (6%) max: 50.8 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W 100% 102%
152.8 Watt (21%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 80 W 118% 121% 100%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 37.1 avg: 49.9 median: 53 (12%) max: 59.6 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 102% 106% 100%
168.4 Watt (37%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 80 W 140% 146% 138% 100%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3674 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (38%) max: 0.4555 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 92% 100% 81%
0.4 fps per Watt (34%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 80 W 92% 100% 81% 82%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.439 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (37%) max: 0.4617 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W 95% 100%
0.4 fps per Watt (34%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 80 W 95% 100% 89%
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 36.1 avg: 38.1 median: 38.1 (61%) max: 40.1 dB(A)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 90% 100%
Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
48 dB(A) (77%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 80 W 75% 84% 100%
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU → 0% n= Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q → 0% n=
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
T500 Laptop GPU:
10.9 15 ~ 13 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
108 113 ~ 111 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
31 72 ~ 52 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
25 34 ~ 30 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
22 33 ~ 28 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
21 32 ~ 27 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
93.3 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
78.8 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
66.2 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
45.3 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
118 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
86.5 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
68.3 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
46.3 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
29.7 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
131 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
116 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
107 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
101 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
65 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
221 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
178 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
115 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
62.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
36 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
133 148 ~ 141 fps
T500 Laptop GPU:
19 23.2 ~ 21 fps
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU low med. high ultra QHD 4K Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 31 17 13 10.1 Immortals Fenyx Rising 65 35 29 24 Star Wars Squadrons 54.7 47.2 42.4 F1 2020 100 59.8 44 29.3 Strange Brigade 111 34 29 25 17.9 9.6 Far Cry 5 52 30 28 27 X-Plane 11.11 70 63 55 29.4 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 50 24 17 12.4 5.73 Dota 2 Reborn 128 118 90 79 27.7 The Witcher 3 96 52 29 20 GTA V 141 97 42 21 13.2 14 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 5 2 2 6 3 6 4 1 7 1 1 3 5
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q low med. high ultra QHD 4K X-Plane 11.11 93.3 78.8 66.2 45.3 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 118 86.5 68.3 46.3 29.7 Dota 2 Reborn 131 116 107 101 65 The Witcher 3 221 178 115 62.6 36 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 2 3 1 4 2 1 1 2 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.27
log 16. 16:52:45
#0 checking url part for id 8084 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10605 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9882 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:38:48 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.147s ... 0.148s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.148s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.148s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8084 +0.035s ... 0.183s
#9 got single benchmarks 8084 +0s ... 0.183s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10605 +0.017s ... 0.2s
#11 got single benchmarks 10605 +0.018s ... 0.218s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9882 +0.015s ... 0.234s
#13 got single benchmarks 9882 +0.008s ... 0.241s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.241s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.294s ... 0.535s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.535s
#17 Got 119 rows for game benchmarks. +0.019s ... 0.555s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.555s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 0.561s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.021s ... 0.582s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.582s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.584s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)