NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

NVIDIA Quadro M600M

► remove NVIDIA Quadro M600M

The 28nm NVIDIA Quadro M600M is an entry-level DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a 1st generation Maxwell GPU that is most likely built on the GM107 architecture with 384 of the 640 shader cores activated. Compared to the older Quadro K620M and consumer GeForce 940M, the GPU offers a 128-Bit memory bus that separates it from the GM108-based K620M. The M600M typically comes with 2 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective at 80 GB/s instead of 16 GB/s on the K620M). 

In the Lenovo Thinkpad P70 the M600M is clocked at 837 - 876 MHz (Boost) for the shaders, and 1253 MHz (5012 MHz effektive) for the 2 GB GDDR5 from Samsung (thanks to our reader John for the GPU-Z screenshot).

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

The Quadro M600M is about 20% faster than the previous Quadro K620M thanks to the wider 128-bit memory interface and pretty much right between the siblings Quadro M500M & Quadro M1000M. The consumer GPU GeForce 940MX is beaten by ~10-15%, while the GeForce GTX 950M is another 20% faster.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M600M can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M600M is rated at the same 30 Watt TGP as the K620M including the board and memory components. Therefore, the card is also suited for thin and light notebooks.

NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

► remove NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

The NVIDIA Quadro 5010M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (GF100 chip). Therefore, the 5010M is closely related to the  consumer GeForce GTX 480M. The Quadro 5010M is the successor to the Quadro 5000M and also offers ECC RAM and double-precision floating point cores.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than GeForce graphics cards with similar specifications.

The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11 or OpenGL 4.1 for graphics rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi architecture, the 5010M should offer higher levels of performance in general purpose calculations compared to its predecessors.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 5010M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the integrated graphics card and the Quadro, the 5010M supports Nvidia Optimus. Note, however, that whether this feature is integrated or not depends on the notebook manufacturer.

Similar to the GeForce GTX 480M, the Quadro 5010M is specified at 100 Watt TDP. As a result, only very large laptops, such as the Clevo D901F, are able to house this high-end card.

At the time of arrival (Feb. 2011), the Quadro 5010M succeeds the older Quadrio FX 5000M as the fastest professional workstation graphic card for laptops.

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

► remove NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

The Nvidia Quadro M3000M is a high-end, DirectX 12 (FL_12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM204 chip with 1024 of the 1536 shader cores activated and is manufactured in 28 nm at TSMC. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M. The Quadro M3000M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is a successor to the Quadro K3100M (Kepler-based). The M3000M usually comes with 4 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective, 160 GB/s opposed to 102.4 GB/s of the K5100M). 

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

As the exact clock speed of the M3000M is still not known, we can only speculate on the performance of the card. However, it is the mid-range model of the mobile Quadro line in 2015 and based on the same chip as the GeForce GTX 965M. Therefore, it should be clearly faster than the old Quadro K3100M.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.2) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M3000M can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M3000M is rated at the same TGP of 75 Watt as the K3100M (including the board and memory components). Therefore, the card is suited for large notebooks with 17-inch displays or greater and 25 Watt less than the M4000M and M5000M.

NVIDIA Quadro M600MNVIDIA Quadro 5010MNVIDIA Quadro M3000M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1139 - 1140 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 962 - 1051 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 975 - 1013 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1050 MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1038 - 1197 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 993 - 1072 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1018 MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 475 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 756 - 1019 (Boost) MHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 837 - 876 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1029 - 1124 (Boost) MHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 405 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 700 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1139 - 1140 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 962 - 1051 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 975 - 1013 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1050 MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1038 - 1197 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 993 - 1072 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1018 MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 475 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 756 - 1019 (Boost) MHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 837 - 876 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1029 - 1124 (Boost) MHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 405 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 700 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1139 - 1140 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 962 - 1051 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 975 - 1013 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1050 MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1038 - 1197 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 993 - 1072 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1018 MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 475 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 756 - 1019 (Boost) MHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 837 - 876 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1029 - 1124 (Boost) MHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 405 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 700 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
ArchitectureMaxwellFermiMaxwell
384 - 384 - 1024 -
Core837 - 876 (Boost) MHz450 MHz1050 MHz
Memory5012 MHz1300 MHz5000 MHz
Bus128 Bit256 Bit256 Bit
MemoryGDDR5GDDR5 ECCGDDR5
Max. Memory2048 MB4096 MB4096 MB
nonono
DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 11_0), 5.0DirectX 11, 5.0DirectX 12_1, 5.0
Technology28 nm40 nm28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOpenGl 4.1, ECC Memory, FP64 IEEE 754Optimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Size
Introduced02.10.2015 22.02.2011 02.10.2015
Manufacturerhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-for-...http://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-mobi...http://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-for-...
CodenameN12E-Q5
Shader900 MHz
Transistors3000 Million5200 Million

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
9.4 pt (10%)
3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
719 Points (5%)
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
631 Points (4%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
66347 Points (9%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
13310 Points (20%)
min: 19732     avg: 21408     median: 21407.5 (32%)     max: 23083 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
18491 Points (10%)
min: 38539     avg: 44603     median: 44602.5 (23%)     max: 50666 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
2322 Points (8%)
min: 5835     avg: 5972     median: 5971.5 (21%)     max: 6108 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
2430 Points (6%)
min: 6415     avg: 6537     median: 6536.5 (16%)     max: 6658 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
73348 Points (10%)
min: 42957     avg: 84310     median: 84309.5 (11%)     max: 125662 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
3216 points (9%)
min: 3032     avg: 3066     median: 3066 (9%)     max: 3100 points
min: 8493     avg: 8540     median: 8539.5 (24%)     max: 8586 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
2911 points (6%)
2693 points (5%)
min: 8264     avg: 8289     median: 8288.5 (16%)     max: 8313 points
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
P Result 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
P Result 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
52873 Points (28%)
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
24769 Points (47%)
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Extreme HD DirectX 1920x1080
min: 37.8     avg: 38.2     median: 38.2 (23%)     max: 38.5 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - DX 11, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
min: 79.3     avg: 80     median: 80 (26%)     max: 80.6 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - OpenGL, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
min: 43.4     avg: 59.8     median: 59.8 (27%)     max: 76.2 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
41.7 fps (8%)
min: 112.7     avg: 114     median: 114.5 (22%)     max: 116.2 fps
SPECviewperf 11
Siemens NX 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Siemens NX 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Siemens NX 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Tcvis 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Tcvis 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Tcvis 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
SolidWorks 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SolidWorks 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SolidWorks 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Maya 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Maya 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Maya 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Lightwave 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Lightwave 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Lightwave 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Ensight 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Ensight 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Ensight 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Catia 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Catia 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Catia 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Windows 7 Experience Index - Gaming graphics
7.5 points (95%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Graphics
7.5 points (95%)
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Ref. Match 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Ref. Match 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
104 fps (17%)
250 fps (40%)
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
59.4 fps (16%)
42.6 fps (12%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
49.8 fps (11%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
45.9 fps (17%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
484 Samples/s (9%)
min: 1258     avg: 1273     median: 1273 (24%)     max: 1288 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
1016 Samples/s (9%)
min: 2234     avg: 2261     median: 2261 (21%)     max: 2288 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
1754 Points (6%)
4737 Points (17%)
Power Consumption - FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test - Power Consumption (external Monitor) 1280x720 *
59.5 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra 1920x1080 *
48.6 Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M600M → 100%

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 5010M → 100%

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M3000M → 202%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M600M:
36.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
24.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
23.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
16  fps
Quadro M600M:
»
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M600M:
73.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
42.7  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
18.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
16.3  fps
Quadro M600M:
»
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M600M:
29  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
21.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
11.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
5.8  fps
Quadro M600M:
»
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
46.2  fps
249%
Quadro M3000M:
114.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
28.6  fps
244%
Quadro M3000M:
69.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
15.3  fps
263%
Quadro M3000M:
40.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
12.7  fps
263%
Quadro M3000M:
33.4  fps
Quadro M600M:
»
Quadro M3000M:
»
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
146.8  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
76.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
54.5  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M3000M:
23.8  fps
Quadro M3000M:
»
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
85.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
50.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
43.7  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M3000M:
17.8  fps
Quadro M3000M:
»
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
83  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
47.9  fps
260%
Quadro M3000M:
124.5  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
21.4  fps
278%
Quadro M3000M:
59.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
18.5  fps
275%
Quadro M3000M:
50.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M3000M:
17.8  fps
Quadro M600M:
»
Quadro M3000M:
»
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
Quadro M3000M:
179  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
123  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
58  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
21  fps
Quadro M3000M:
»
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
43  fps
285%
Quadro M3000M:
122.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
26.2  fps
282%
Quadro M3000M:
73.1 74.6 ~ 74 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
14.2  fps
296%
Quadro M3000M:
40.9 42.4 ~ 42 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
7.6  fps
289%
Quadro M3000M:
22.1 22.5 ~ 22 fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M3000M:
14.1  fps
Quadro M600M:
»
Quadro M3000M:
»
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
108.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
89.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
53.6  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M3000M:
39.2  fps
Quadro M3000M:
»
GTA V

GTA V

2015
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
136.1  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
69.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
29.7  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M3000M:
35.3  fps
Quadro M3000M:
»
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
Quadro M3000M:
122  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
122  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
122  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
120  fps
Quadro M3000M:
»
low 1024x768
Quadro M3000M:
94  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
87  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
69  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
45  fps
Quadro M3000M:
»
low 1280x720
Quadro M3000M:
200  fps
med. 1344x756
Quadro M3000M:
125  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
68  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
54  fps
Quadro M3000M:
»
low 1024x768
Quadro M3000M:
380  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
186  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
151  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
81  fps
Quadro M3000M:
»
Thief

Thief

2014
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
88.6  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
77.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
43.1  fps
Quadro M3000M:
»
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
103.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
65.2  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
47.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
20.6  fps
Quadro M600M:
»
low 1024x768
Quadro M3000M:
349  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
271  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
217  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
40  fps
Quadro M3000M:
»
low 1024x768
Quadro M3000M:
66  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
66  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
57  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
25  fps
Quadro M3000M:
»
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
124.5  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
82.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
44.6  fps
Quadro M3000M:
»
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M600M:
127.6  fps
177%
Quadro M3000M:
226.3  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
80.2  fps
223%
Quadro M3000M:
176 182.7 ~ 179 fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M600M:
71.7  fps
230%
Quadro M3000M:
163.8 166.7 ~ 165 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M600M:
26.9  fps
260%
Quadro M3000M:
69.7 69.8 ~ 70 fps
Quadro M600M:
»
Quadro M3000M:
»
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
255.1  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
185  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
82.1  fps
Quadro M3000M:
»
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
high 1360x768
Quadro 5010M:
105.4 fps  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
35.3 fps  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»
Crysis 2

Crysis 2

2011
high 1366x768
Quadro 5010M:
81.6 fps  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
28.2 fps  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»
high 1360x768
Quadro 5010M:
105  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
72.8  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
high 1360x768
Quadro 5010M:
268.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
162.3  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
high 1360x768
Quadro 5010M:
86.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
51.9  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»
high 1360x768
Quadro 5010M:
98.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
52.7  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»
high 1600x900
Quadro 5010M:
37.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
14.6  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»
high 1366x768
Quadro 5010M:
88.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
45.3  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»
high 1366x768
Quadro 5010M:
93.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
62.5  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»
Risen

Risen

2009
high 1366x768
Quadro 5010M:
64.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
41.9  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
high 1360x768
Quadro 5010M:
120.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
73.3  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
high 1366x768
Quadro 5010M:
108.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
67  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M600M → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M3000M → 258%

v1.11
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)