NVIDIA Quadro M2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro M2200 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built most likely on the GM206 chip with 1024 shader cores. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M (second generation) . The Quadro M2200M is built for the Intel Kaby Lake generation.
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
Performance
The maximum core clock of the Quadro M2200 is 1038 MHz. The performance is between the old Quadro M2000M and Quadro M3000M , but generally closer to the latter (sometimes even on par). It is not surprising that the gaming performance is comparable to the Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M (Ti) and it is just behind the new GeForce GTX 1050 (Pascal).
Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2 , the cores of the Quadro M2200 can be used for general calculations.
Power Consumption
The power consumption of the Quadro M2200 is rated at a TGP of 55 Watt (39.1 Watt TDP) – similar to the previous Quadro M2000M – and therefore best suited for 15-inch laptops and up.
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M ► remove from comparison
The 28nm NVIDIA Quadro M1000M is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a 1st generation Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM107 architecture with 512 of the 640 shader cores activated. Therefore, the GPU is not similar to any current consumer card. The Geforce GTX 950M , for example, uses the full 640 shader cores. The Quadro M1000M is built for the Intel Skylake generation as the successor to the Kepler-based Quadro K1100M . The M1000M typically comes with 2 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective at 80 GB/s compared to 44.8 GB/s on the K1100M).
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
Performance
As the exact clock speed of the M1000M is still not known, we can only speculate on the performance of the card. However, it is a lower mid-range model from the mobile Quadro line in 2015. It should be slower than the GTX 950M in 3D gaming due to the lower shader count, but should easily outperform the old Quadro K1100M.
Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2 , the cores of the Quadro M1000M can be used for general calculations.
Power Consumption
The power consumption of the Quadro M1000M is rated for a 40 Watt TGP including the board and memory components, which is 5 Watt lower than the K1100M. Therefore, the card is suited for 15-inch notebooks and greater.
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M ► remove from comparison
The NVIDIA Quadro 3000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (probably GF104 like the GeForce GTX 470M). Compared to the 5010M, the 3000M does not support ECC memory and DP floating point calculations.
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance for example should be significantly better than similar specified GeForce graphics cards.
The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.1 for graphic rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 3000M should offer a high performance in general purpose calculations .
Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 3000M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called: NVIDIA 3D Vision Pro.
To automatically switch between the processor graphics card and the Quadro, the 3000M supports Nvidia Optimus (if the laptop vendor chooses to integrate it).
As the GeForce GTX 470M, the Quadro 3000M is specified at 75 Watt TDP and therefore only suited for large laptops with 17 inch displays.
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 NVIDIA Quadro M1000M NVIDIA Quadro 3000M Quadro M Series Codename N17P-Q3 Fermi Architecture Maxwell Maxwell Fermi Pipelines 1024 - unified 512 - unified 240 - unified Core Speed 694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz 993 - 1072 (Boost) MHz 450 MHz Memory Speed 5508 MHz 5000 MHz 625 MHz Memory Bus Width 128 Bit 128 Bit 256 Bit Memory Type GDDR5 GDDR5 GDDR5 Max. Amount of Memory 4 GB 4 GB 2048 MB Shared Memory no no no API DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 Power Consumption 55 Watt 40 Watt 75 Watt Transistors 4.9 Billion 1.9 Billion technology 28 nm 28 nm 40 nm Features Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus OpenGl 4.1, FP32 Notebook Size large large large Date of Announcement 13.01.2017 02.10.2015 22.02.2011 Link to Manufacturer Page www.nvidia.de www.nvidia.com Shader Speed 900 MHz
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M2200
2.7 pt (8%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M1000M
1.6 pt (5%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1845 avg: 1889 median: 1903 (5%) max: 1920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1699 avg: 1724 median: 1724 (5%) max: 1750 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 280203 avg: 289176 median: 289176 (33%) max: 298148 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 20388 avg: 21012 median: 20644 (22%) max: 22003 Points
min: 15717 avg: 15949 median: 15948.5 (17%) max: 16180 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 36877 avg: 37505 median: 37796 (10%) max: 37841 Points
min: 23067 avg: 23422 median: 23422 (6%) max: 23777 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5232 avg: 5253 median: 5252 (9%) max: 5275 Points
min: 3302 avg: 3323 median: 3323 (6%) max: 3344 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5786 avg: 5835 median: 5850 (7%) max: 5869 Points
min: 3478 avg: 3498 median: 3497.5 (4%) max: 3517 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 127867 avg: 195445 median: 195444 (23%) max: 263022 Points
min: 41161 avg: 41908 median: 41907.5 (5%) max: 42654 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7453 avg: 7581 median: 7581 (11%) max: 7709 Points
min: 4648 avg: 4661 median: 4660.5 (6%) max: 4673 Points
1742 Points (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 7319 avg: 7372 median: 7372 (6%) max: 7425 Points
min: 4225 avg: 4230 median: 4229.5 (4%) max: 4234 Points
1539 Points (1%)
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
24622 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
7941 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
24915 Points (14%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
min: 6604 avg: 6661 median: 6660.5 (4%) max: 6717 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 26834 avg: 28150 median: 28149.5 (37%) max: 29465 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 24393 avg: 24483 median: 24483 (32%) max: 24573 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
min: 14054 avg: 14221 median: 14220.5 (19%) max: 14387 Points
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) 2630QM Quadro 3000M 2 GB 4 GB 14054 Dell Precision M6600 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) 2720QM Quadro 3000M 8 GB 14387
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 23.2 avg: 26.4 median: 27.9 (9%) max: 28.1 fps
min: 18.7 avg: 18.8 median: 18.8 (6%) max: 18.9 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
44.9 fps (15%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
min: 43.4 avg: 43.6 median: 43.6 (19%) max: 43.8 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 61.3 avg: 62.3 median: 62.3 (12%) max: 63.2 fps
SPECviewperf 11 specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 48.26 avg: 48.9 median: 48.9 (29%) max: 49.48 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 40.87 avg: 40.9 median: 40.9 (24%) max: 41 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
20.4 fps (12%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 49.11 avg: 51 median: 51 (29%) max: 52.9 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 40 avg: 41.7 median: 41.7 (24%) max: 43.34 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
22.9 fps (13%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 42.66 avg: 49.7 median: 49.7 (38%) max: 56.8 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 46.32 avg: 48.7 median: 48.7 (37%) max: 51 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
30.1 fps (23%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 16.23 avg: 19.2 median: 19.2 (23%) max: 22.18 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 20.22 avg: 20.6 median: 20.6 (24%) max: 21 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
7.6 fps (9%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 56.6 avg: 57.2 median: 57.2 (43%) max: 57.7 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 56 avg: 56.1 median: 56.1 (42%) max: 56.2 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
42.5 fps (32%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 47.95 avg: 52.7 median: 52.7 (57%) max: 57.5 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 50.9 avg: 52.5 median: 52.5 (56%) max: 54 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
34.7 fps (37%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 55.7 avg: 57.1 median: 57.1 (27%) max: 58.5 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 39 avg: 39.6 median: 39.6 (19%) max: 40.12 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
18.3 fps (9%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 48.49 avg: 50.6 median: 50.6 (27%) max: 52.7 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 53.1 avg: 53.6 median: 53.6 (28%) max: 54 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
24.6 fps (13%)
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 85.3 avg: 90.3 median: 86.2 (21%) max: 99.5 fps
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 56.7 avg: 59.4 median: 59.4 (15%) max: 62 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 57.7 avg: 58.3 median: 58.1 (9%) max: 59 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 31 avg: 31.1 median: 31.1 (5%) max: 31.13 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 31.14 avg: 32.2 median: 32.8 (7%) max: 32.8 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 20 avg: 20.4 median: 20.4 (4%) max: 20.72 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 20.34 avg: 23.6 median: 24.6 (6%) max: 25.66 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 12 avg: 12 median: 12 (3%) max: 12.06 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 46.93 avg: 47.4 median: 46.9 (13%) max: 48.34 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 30 avg: 30.6 median: 30.6 (8%) max: 31.27 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 4.28 avg: 4.9 median: 5.2 (5%) max: 5.26 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 0.69 avg: 1.7 median: 1.7 (2%) max: 2.72 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 68.2 avg: 69.3 median: 68.5 (27%) max: 71.2 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 33.8 avg: 33.9 median: 33.9 (14%) max: 34 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 71.4 avg: 72.2 median: 72 (12%) max: 73.2 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 37 avg: 37.5 median: 37.4 (6%) max: 37.89 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6833 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 6833 avg: 6839 median: 6839 (5%) max: 6845 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
6519 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
88.6 fps (31%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 81.5 avg: 83.7 median: 83.7 (29%) max: 85.9 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
min: 45.4 avg: 45.5 median: 45.5 (16%) max: 45.65 fps
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 102.9 avg: 107.4 median: 103.9 (6%) max: 115.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
min: 93.7 avg: 95.9 median: 95.9 (6%) max: 98.1 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
110.7 fps (12%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
163.7 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
219.1 fps (13%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
432 fps (3%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 1204 avg: 1276 median: 1306 (6%) max: 1318 Samples/s
min: 534 avg: 682 median: 682 (3%) max: 830 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 2086 avg: 2097 median: 2099 (4%) max: 2107 Samples/s
min: 889 avg: 1180 median: 1179.5 (2%) max: 1470 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4332 Points (5%)
2676 Points (3%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
68.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
89.2 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
87.7 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.2 fps per Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (19%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
39.5 dB(A) (63%)
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 100% n=13 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M1000M → 88% n=13 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 3000M → 50% n=13
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
Quadro M2200:
83.4 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
37.1 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
33.7 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
17.6 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
14.6 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
139.4 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
105.3 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
47.1 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
13.7 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
214.2 fps
64%
Quadro M1000M:
137.8 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
131.2 fps
61%
Quadro M1000M:
79.9 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
70.4 fps
62%
Quadro M1000M:
43.5 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
52.4 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
148.8 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
119 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
56.4 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
48.2 fps
51%
Quadro M1000M:
54 59.4 ~ 57 fps
56%
Quadro M1000M:
36.5 38 ~ 37 fps
54%
Quadro M1000M:
17 20.8 ~ 19 fps
58%
Quadro M1000M:
10.8 11 ~ 11 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
12.7 fps
55%
Quadro M1000M:
7 7.7 ~ 7 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
108.8 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
88.6 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
74.8 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
39.6 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
171.5 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
148.3 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
115.9 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
47.8 fps
64%
Quadro M1000M:
111 115 ~ 113 fps
66%
Quadro M1000M:
37 38 ~ 38 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
381.4 fps
73%
Quadro M1000M:
279 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
238.8 fps
60%
Quadro M1000M:
144 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
149.3 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
70.2 fps
Quadro 3000M:
206.2 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
127.3 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
53.8 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
11.5 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
66.7 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
39.6 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
30.4 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
104.8 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
70.9 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
43.3 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
113.5 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
71.4 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
40 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
187.6 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
52.4 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M1000M → 62% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 60%
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Ghost Recon Wildlands 83.4 37.1 33.7 17.6 For Honor 78 54 51 37 14.6 Battlefield 1 139.4 105.3 47.1 42 Rise of the Tomb Raider 126 71 40 34 13.7 Rainbow Six Siege 214.2 131.2 70.4 52.4 Star Wars Battlefront 148.8 119 56.4 48.2 The Witcher 3 111 66 35 19 12.7 Thief 108.8 88.6 74.8 39.6 Battlefield 4 171.5 148.3 115.9 47.8 BioShock Infinite 250 176 152 58 Tomb Raider 381.4 238.8 149.3 70.2 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 4 7 2 5 4 6 3 2 2 8 1 3
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Rainbow Six Siege 137.8 79.9 43.5 32 13.2 Anno 2205 121 65 30 14 12 The Witcher 3 57 37 19 11 7 Dirt Rally 261 115 62 29 20 F1 2014 133 128 123 84 Ryse: Son of Rome 76 52 23 21 Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor 169 131 34 26 GRID: Autosport 248 143 82 43 Thief 78 53 45 23 Total War: Rome II 166 126 107 20 Company of Heroes 2 54 48 34 12 GRID 2 195 153 136 43 Metro: Last Light 83 49 25 BioShock Infinite 186 113 100 38 Tomb Raider 279 144 98 43 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 2 10 4 5 6 2 6 5 2 9 5 1 4
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Fifa 11 206.2 127.3 Metro 2033 53.8 11.5 Risen 66.7 39.6 30.4 Need for Speed Shift 104.8 70.9 43.3 Colin McRae: DIRT 2 113.5 71.4 40 Anno 1404 187.6 52.4 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 4 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 28. 17:06:42
#0 checking url part for id 7706 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 6509 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 2433 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 May 2024 05:35:22 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.111s ... 0.112s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.112s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.112s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7706 +0.047s ... 0.159s
#9 got single benchmarks 7706 +0.018s ... 0.177s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 6509 +0.014s ... 0.191s
#11 got single benchmarks 6509 +0.013s ... 0.204s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 2433 +0.001s ... 0.205s
#13 got single benchmarks 2433 +0.006s ... 0.212s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.212s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.332s ... 0.543s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.543s
#17 Got 155 rows for game benchmarks. +0.013s ... 0.556s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.556s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.016s ... 0.572s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.058s ... 0.63s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.63s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.632s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)